Artificial intelligence in radiology: trainees want more.

AIM: To understand the attitudes of UK radiology trainees towards artificial intelligence (AI) in Radiology, in particular, assessing the demand for AI education. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey, which ran over a period of 2 months, was created using the Google Forms platform and distributed via email to all UK training programmes. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 149 trainee radiologists with at least one response from all UK training programmes. Of the responses, 83.7% were interested in AI use in radiology but 71.4% had no experience of working with AI and 79.9% would like to be involved in AI-based projects. Almost all (98.7%) felt that AI should be taught during their training, yet only one respondent stated that their training programme had implemented AI teaching. Respondents indicated that basic understanding, implementation, and critical appraisal of AI software should be prioritized in teaching. Of the trainees, 74.2% agreed that AI would enhance the job of diagnostic radiologists over the next 20 years. The main concerns raised were information technology/implementation and ethical/regulatory issues. CONCLUSION: Despite the current limited availability of AI-based activities and teaching within UK training programmes, UK trainees' attitudes towards AI are mostly positive with many showing interest in being involved with AI-based projects, activities, and teaching.

Precision pain management in interventional radiology.

Pain is a common manifestation of several benign and malignant conditions. Inadequate response to conservative therapies is often succeeded by incremental use of analgesics and opioids; however, such an approach is often ineffective, not well tolerated by patients, and carries the risk of addiction leading to the opioid crisis. Implementing minimally invasive percutaneous procedures, performed by interventional radiologists has proven to be successful in providing safe, effective, and patient-specific therapies across a wide range of painful conditions. In the present narrative review, we will review the repertoire of minimally invasive imaging guided interventions, which have been successfully used to treat common painful benign and malignant conditions. We briefly describe each technique, common indications, and expected results.

Survey of research participation amongst UK radiology trainees: aspirations, barriers, solutions and the Radiology Academic Network for Trainees (RADIANT).

AIM: To inform the activity of the newly formed Radiology Academic Network for Trainees (RADIANT) regarding the current level of interest, engagement, and barriers experienced by UK radiology trainees to undertake research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based survey containing nine questions was sent to the UK radiology training programme directors for distribution to trainees. The survey was also distributed to all trainee members of the RADIANT network. This led to 224 responses over a period of 2 months. RESULTS: A large proportion of respondents indicated a desire to participate in research in the next 12 months 72.3% (n=162). The most frequently reported barriers to research were lack of time (60.7%, n=136), lack of awareness of local/departmental opportunities (53.6%, n=120), and limited experience in research statistics (46%, n=103). The most favoured factor that would improve access to research was structured research training opportunities, qualified as a project with clear goals and timeline (71%, n=159), protected time for research (68.8%, n=154), and local or national trainee research networks (40.2%, n=90 and 37.1%, n=83, respectively). CONCLUSION: Many radiology trainees would like to participate in research, but multiple barriers exist. The formation of RADIANT is seen as a key part of a multifaceted approach to improving access to quality research activity alongside support from local and regional training bodies.

Pain relief and local tumour control following percutaneous image-guided cryoablation for spine metastasis: a 12-year single-centre experience.

AIM: To assess pain relief and local tumour control retrospectively in spinal metastases undergoing cryoablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2008 and September 2020, 46 metastases in 41 consecutive patients (mean age 59.7±4.4 [SD] years; range 27-84) were treated with cryoablation in 42 interventional sessions. Patient demographics, procedural data, complications, pain, and local tumour control were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (36 spine metastases; 32 sessions) were treated for pain relief and 10 (10 metastases; 10 sessions) for local tumour control. Clinical success was reached in 30/32 (93.8%) interventional palliative sessions. Mean pre-procedural numerical pain rate scale was 6.2±1.7 (SD), and dropped significantly to 3.5±1.8 (SD), 1.9±1.7 (SD), and 1.9±1.8 (SD) at 24-h, 1-month and at the last available follow-up (median 16.5±23.2 [SD] months), respectively. For patients requiring local tumour control, primary clinical success was reached in 6/10 (60%) spinal metastases at median 25-months follow-up. The overall complication rate was 8%, with no secondary fractures or iatrogenic thermal-mediated nerve injuries reported. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of spinal metastases is safe and effective in achieving pain relief and local tumour control.

Percutaneous image-guided double oblique anterior approach to the acetabulum for cementoplasty.

AIM: To report the technique of percutaneous double oblique anterior access to the acetabulum and evaluate its feasibility and safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pelvic computed tomography (CT) examinations of 60 patients (30 men and 30 women; mean age 62.6±13.2 years) were retrieved randomly from the picture archiving and communication system (PACS). A virtual intraosseous trajectory was defined on both sides on the axial CT images with the entry point marked 1 cm above the anterosuperior iliac spine and the endpoint defined just above the level of the ischial spine at the midpoint of the posterior acetabulum. Patient age, sagittal oblique angulation, axial oblique angulation, length of intraosseous trajectory, distance from the hip joint, thickness of the iliac bone cortex, and intervening structure(s) between the skin and the bone entry points were recorded. RESULTS: The mean sagittal and axial oblique angulations were 34.2±4.5° and 31.5±6.7°, respectively, and mean length of the intraosseous trajectory was 11.8±0.9 cm. The axial oblique angle and length of the intraosseous trajectory were significantly lower in the female than the male population (p<0.05). None of the virtual trajectories traversed the hip joint. In 112/120 trajectories (93.3%), there were no cortical breaches in the iliac bones. In eight trajectories in four patients, the virtual trajectory crossed either the medial iliac cortex (4/120; 3.3%) or the medial iliac cortex and the iliacus muscle (4/120; 3.3%). CONCLUSION: The anterosuperior iliac and ischial spines can be used safely and reliably as landmarks to perform the double oblique anterior approach.

Osteoid osteoma in older adults: clinical success rate of percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation.

AIM: To assess the clinical success rate of percutaneous radiofrequency and laser ablation of osteoid osteomas in older adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Percutaneous radiofrequency or laser ablation was performed in 43 patients (35 years and older) with osteoid osteoma to achieve definitive cure in this retrospective study. The clinical success rate was defined as complete pain relief determined by numeric rating scale (NRS) scores (pre-procedural and post-procedural at 1-week, 6-week, and 2-year intervals). Tumour characteristics, technical success, procedural details, biopsy results, and complications were documented. RESULTS: Forty-four osteoid osteomas were ablated in 43 patients, and all procedures were technically successful. The clinical success rates were 95.2% (41/43), 93% (40/43), and 93.2% (41/44) at 1-week, 6-week, and 2-year post-procedural intervals. The acute complication rate was 2.3% (1/44; meningeal perforation following epidural anaesthesia). No delayed complication was documented. CONCLUSION: Osteoid osteomas are not unique to the paediatric and young population, and safe and effective definitive treatment of these benign tumours in older adults can be achieved by percutaneous radiofrequency and laser ablation with excellent patient outcomes.

[Percutaneous MR-guided prostate cancer cryoablation: Predictive factors and oncologic outcomes]. / Cryothérapie totale de la prostate sous IRM par voie périnéale : résultats carcinologiques et facteurs prédictifs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pejorative predictive factors on oncologic outcomes of percutaneous MR-guided whole gland prostate cancer cryoablation (CA). METHODS: Medical records of patients treated from 2009 to 2012, to assess medium-term oncologic outcomes, were reviewed. Prostate biopsies were performed in local recurrence suspicion (biochemical failure, MR follow-up failure). RESULTS: Among 18 patients, mean age of 72.6 (61-78), 2 (11 %) and 7 (38.9 %) biological and reported biopsy-proven local recurrence respectively with our initial technic of CA. Mean follow-up and recurrence were 56.3 (±21.7) and 20.7 (±13.9) months respectively. A previous treatment of prostate cancer (P=0.5), pre-treatment PSA (P=0.2), pre-treatment Gleason/ISUP score (P=0.4), nadir PSA post-CA (P=0.22) were not associated with recurrence. Bilateral positive cores appears as a pejorative predictive factor (P=0.04). However mean pre-treatment positive cores percentage, 25 (±16.5) in responding patients versus 40.7 (±25.2) in case of recurrence, and maximum percentage of cancer extent in each positive core, 10.6 (±9.3) in responding patients versus 18.7 (±16.5) in case of recurrence, seemed associated with local recurrence after prostate CA but our analysis wasn't able to find a difference (P=0.09 and P=0.3 respectively) due to a lack of power. CONCLUSION: Bilateral positive cores appears as a pejorative predictive factor. In our experience, important tumor volume seem to be a pejorative predictive factor for oncologic outcomes after PCA whereas treatment, PSA, Gleason/ISUP score, nadir PSA are not. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Ablative therapy in kidney cancer: Oncological, functional, perioperative outcomes and cost]. / Thérapies ablatives dans le cancer du rein : résultats oncologiques, périopératoires, fonctionnels et médico-économiques.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of kidney cancer has increased significantly over the past few decades presumably due to the increased use of imaging. The aim of this article is to describe contemporary outcomes of ablative therapy and to compare them to other therapeutic options in terms of oncological, functional, perioperative outcomes and cost. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE®, Embase®, using (MeSH) words; from January 2005 through May 2017, and we looked for all the studies. Investigators graded the strength of evidence in terms of methodology, language and relevance. RESULTS: Ninety-one articles were analyzed. We described the outcomes of ablative therapy in relation to the energy used and the approach, and compared these outcomes to the other therapeutic options in terms of oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes. We analyzed these studies in order to search for predictive factors influencing the results of ablative therapy. We also analyzed the economic burden of small renal tumor management. CONCLUSION: The strength of evidence is based almost entirely on retrospective studies and is susceptible to the inherent limitations of this study design. Although, the evidence was low among studies, our revue showed that, in elderly patients treated with ablative therapy for cT1a tumors, the cancer-specific survival was comparable to partial nephrectomy with differences in overall survival that are explained by competing risks of death in the old population. Considering the functional results, the renal function preservation seems to be comparable between the 2 groups while the perioperative morbidity is higher in the partial nephrectomy group. The evidence base medicine at this time cannot support the extension of the indications of ablative therapy beyond the actual implementations.

[Ablative therapy in urology: Good practice and perspective]. / Traitement ablatif en urologie : recommandations actuelles et perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: To expose the main point of discussion from present ablative therapies' guidelines and propose global perspectives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the scientific literature was performed in Medline database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Embase (http://www.embase.com/) using different associations of keywords "ablative therapy" ; "prostate cancer"; "kidney cancer"; "guidelines"; "hybrid operating room". Publications obtained were selected based on methodology, language and relevance. RESULTS: Present guidelines on ablative therapies in urology are, considering authors and organs, either particularly prudent (EAU guidelines for prostate and kidney) or relatively optimistic (CIRSE guidelines). This discrepancy is related to a low level of proof. So, a new approach is mandatory: more homogeneous in methodology, and especially more open to a new organization sparing economic efficiency. The objective will be to get multifunctional and multidisciplinaries platforms, in facts and in minds. It will induce, in the future, a deep reflection about training and boundaries' specialties. CONCLUSION: Ablative therapies represent a crucial stake for urology and a clear example of medicosurgical evolution in future, based on new technologies (energy, robotic, imaging). A serious and deep reflection is necessary to prepare it and be deeply involved in.

[Image-guided tumor ablation]. / Techniques d'ablation tumorale.

INTRODUCTION: Ablatives techniques for destroying in situ a tumoral process aim tissular necrosis by the application of several physical principles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE®, Embase®, using (MeSH) words; from January 2005 through May 2017, and we looked for all the studies. Investigators graded the strength of evidence in terms of methodology, language and relevance. RESULTS: Forty-seven articles were analyzed. We described ablative techniques and sorted them in thermal and non-thermal therapies according to the used physical principle and their frequency of use in the urological pathology. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous ablative therapies are mini-invasive techniques, which have an important role in tumors focal treatment. This article is a review of the ablative therapies and describes their physical principles, their equipment and their recent technological modifications, which have been developed to improve the clinical success of these techniques.

[Percutaneous renal ablation: Pre-, per-, post-interventional evaluation modalities and adapted management]. / Traitement ablatif pour cancer du rein : modalités d'évaluation pré-, per-, post-intervention et prise en charge adaptée.

OBJECTIVES: Ablative treatment (AT) rise is foreseen, validation of steps to insure good proceedings is needed. By looking over the process of the patient, this study evaluates the requirements and choices needed in every step of the management. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE®, Embase®, using (MeSH) words and we looked for all the studies. Investigators graded the strength of evidence in terms of methodology, language and relevance. RESULTS: Explanations of AT proposal rather than partial nephrectomy or surveillance have to be discussed in a consultation shared by urologist and interventional radiologist. Per-procedure choices depend on predictable ballistic difficulties. High volume, proximity of the hilum or of a risky organ are in favor of general anesthesia, cryotherapy and computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI). Percutaneous approach should be privileged, as it seems as effective as the laparoscopic approach. Early and delayed complications have to be treated both by urologist and radiologist. Surveillance by CT/MRI insure of the lack of contrast-enhanced in the treated area. Patients and tumors criteria, in case of incomplete treatment or recurrence, are the key of the appropriate treatment: surgery, second session of AT, surveillance. CONCLUSION: AT treatments require patient's comprehension, excellent coordination of the partnership between urologist and radiologist and relevant choices during intervention.

[Ablative therapy in kidney cancer: Indications]. / Thérapies ablatives dans le cancer du rein : indications.

BACKGROUND: Ablative therapies (AT) in kidney cancer are rising. It's important to evaluate the situation of this therapy. The aim of this study is to identify the best indications for AT treatment for kidney cancer. METHODS: Review of literature using Medline and Embase databases. Study were selected based on scientific relevance. Clinical keys centered on the best requirements to indicate ablative therapies. RESULTS: AT is indicated according to specific tumor and patients criteria. A good initial evaluation is essential (imaging, pathology, renal function and general condition of the patient). AT gets the best results when applied to the following tumor criteria: solid tumor, length<3cm, exophytic localization, RENAL score<8. In few cases, AT could be discussed as an alternative to the reference treatment, sparing surgery: life expectancy evaluated between 3 and 7 years, chronic renal failure or single kidney, transplanted kidney, familial tumors. AT can be used in first line, post-surgery after local recurrence or for distant metastasis. Like every other innovative technic, indications of AT would be adjust with learning curve and cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: AT have to be included as a valid treatment for kidney cancer<4cm. The respect of actual indications and collection of results of AT compared to surveillance and surgery, would determinate the evolution of AT indications in the future.

[Evaluation and results of ablative therapies in prostate cancer]. / Modalités d'évaluation et résultats des traitements ablatifs dans le cancer de la prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a state of the art about methods of evaluation and present results in ablative therapies for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: A review of the scientific literature was performed in Medline database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Embase (http://www.embase.com) using different associations of keywords. Publications obtained were selected based on methodology, language and relevance. After selection, 102 articles were analysed. RESULTS: Analyse the results of ablative therapies is presently difficult considering the heterogeneity of indications, techniques and follow-up. However, results from the most recent and homogeneous studies are encouraging. Oncologically, postoperative biopsies (the most important criteria) are negative (without any tumor cells in the treated area) in 75 to 95%. Functionally, urinary and sexual pre-operative status is spared (or recovered early) in more than 90% of the patients treated. More and more studies underline also the correlation between the results and the technique used considering the volume of the gland and, moreover, the "index lesion" localization. CONCLUSION: The post-treatment pathological evaluation by biopsies (targeted with MRI or, perhaps in a near future, with innovative ultrasonography) is the corner stone of oncological evaluation of ablative therapies. Ongoing trials will allow to standardize the follow-up and determine the best indication and the best techniques in order to optimize oncological and functional results for each patient treated.

[Indications and limits of ablative therapies in prostate cancer]. / Indications et limites actuelles des traitements ablatifs dans le cancer de la prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a state of the art about indications and limits of ablative therapies for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: A review of the scientific literature was performed in Medline database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Embase (http://www.embase.com) using different associations of keywords. Publications obtained were selected based on methodology, language and relevance. After selection, 107 articles were analysed. RESULTS: The objective to combine reduction of side effects and oncological control has induced recent development of several ablative therapies. Beyond this heterogeneity, some preferential indications appear: unilateral cancer of low risk (but with significant volume, excluding active surveillance) or intermediate risk (excluding majority of grade 4); treatment targeted the index lesion, by quarter or hemi-ablation, based on biopsy and mpMRI. In addition, indications must considered specific limits of each energy, such as gland volume and tumor localization. CONCLUSION: Based on new imaging and biopsy, ablative therapies will probably increased its role in the future in management of localize prostate cancer. The multiple ongoing trials will certainly be helpful to better define their indications and limits.

[Management of ablative therapies in prostate cancer]. / Traitements ablatifs pour cancer de prostate : modalités de prise en charge.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the specific modalities of ablative therapies management in prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the scientific literature was performed in Medline database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Embase (http://www.embase.com) using different associations of keywords. Publications obtained were selected based on methodology, language and relevance. After selection, 61 articles were analysed. RESULTS: Development of innovations such as ablative therapies in prostate cancer induces specific modalities in their management, during pre-, per- and post-procedure. More than for classical and well-known treatments, the decision to propose an ablative therapy requires analysis and consensus of medical staff and patient's agreement. Patient's specificities and economical aspects must also be considered. Procedures and follow-up must be realized by referents actors. CONCLUSION: Indication, procedure and follow-up of ablative therapies in prostate cancer require specific modalities. They must be respected in order to optimize the results and to obtain a precise and objective evaluation for defining future indications.

Impact of Consensus Guidelines by the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society for Radiation Oncology on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery in Stages 1 and 2 Invasive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the impact that the release of consensus guidelines for margins in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) had on re-excision rates. METHODS: A retrospective review examined a prospectively maintained database of patients who had operable invasive breast cancer treated with BCS at the authors' institution. The patients were divided into two groups: (1) those with a diagnosis determined from 1 July 2011 to 31 July 2013 (before release of the guidelines) and (2) those with a diagnosis determined from 1 February 2014 to 31 July 2014 (after release of the guidelines). The groups were evaluated with respect to patient and tumor characteristics, re-excision rates, and reasons for re-excision. RESULTS: A total of 846 cases of BCS were managed: 597 in group 1 and 249 in group 2. Re-excision rates were significantly reduced after release of the consensus guidelines (p = 0.03). Re-excisions were performed for 115 (19 %) of 597 patients in group 1 and 32 (13 %) of 249 patients in group 2. After release of the guidelines, re-excisions were performed for positive margins, as defined by the consensus statement, in 25 (78 %) of 32 cases. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, tumor size, grade, nodal status, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. Group 1 had more tumors of mixed ductal and lobular histology than group 2, and group 2 had more lobular tumors than group 1 (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The consensus guidelines on margins for BCS were applied for 78 % of the patients who underwent re-excision and resulted in a significant reduction in re-excision rates.

Evaluation of percutaneous biopsies of renal masses under MRI-guidance: a retrospective study about 26 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether MRI allows safe and accurate guidance for biopsies of renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2010 and September 2013, 26 patients (15 men and 11 women) with 26 renal masses underwent MRI-guided percutaneous biopsy. For each patient, we retrospectively collected the epidemiological, procedural and histopathological data. RESULTS: Mean size of tumour was 3.6 cm (range 0.6 - 9 cm). Mean procedure time was 48 minutes (range 37 - 70 min). Malignancy was found in the percutaneous samples in 81 % (21/26) of the masses. All these cases were considered as true positive biopsies. Benignity was found in the percutaneous samples in 5/26 (19 %) of the masses but was confirmed only in 3 cases. The other 2 cases included one false negative case and one undetermined biopsy, as patient was lost to follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of this study were 95.4 %, 100 %, 100 %, 75 % and 96 %, respectively CONCLUSION: MRI-guidance is safe and accurate to target renal masses.