RESUMO
Aminoboration of simple alkenes with nitrogen nucleophiles remains an unsolved problem in synthetic chemistry; this transformation can be catalyzed by palladium via aminopalladation followed by transmetalation with a diboron reagent. However, this catalytic process faces inherent challenges with instability of the alkylpalladium(II) intermediate toward ß-hydride elimination. Herein, we report a palladium/iron cocatalyzed aminoboration, which enables this transformation. We demonstrate these conditions on a variety of alkenes and norbornenes with an array of common nitrogen nucleophiles. In the developed strategy, the iron cocatalyst is crucial to achieving the desired reactivity by serving as a halophilic Lewis acid to release the transmetalation-active cationic alkylpalladium intermediate. Furthermore, it serves as a redox shuttle in the regeneration of the Pd(II) catalyst by reactivation of nanoparticulate palladium.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Despite increased awareness, osteoporosis screening rates remain low. The objective of this survey study was to identify physician-reported barriers to osteoporosis screening. METHODS: We conducted a survey of 600 physician members of the Endocrine Society, American Academy of Family Practice, and American Geriatrics Society. The respondents were asked to rate barriers to osteoporosis screening in their patients. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses to determine correlates with the most commonly reported barriers. RESULTS: Of 566 response-eligible physicians, 359 completed the survey (response rate, 63%). The most commonly reported barriers to osteoporosis screening included patient nonadherence (63%), physician concern about cost (56%), clinic visit time constraints (51%), low on the priority list (45%), and patient concern about cost (43%). Patient nonadherence as a barrier was correlated with physicians in academic tertiary centers (odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-5.13), whereas clinic visit time constraints were correlated with physicians in both community-based academic affiliates and academic tertiary care ([OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.10-3.50] and [OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.22-5.07], respectively). Geriatricians (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.21-0.76) and physicians with >10 years in practice were less likely to report clinic visit time constraints as a barrier (11-20 years: OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20-0.85; >20 years: OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.65). Physicians with more patient-facing time (3-5 compared with 0.5-2 d/wk) were more likely to place screening low on the priority list (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.34-5.29). CONCLUSION: Understanding barriers to osteoporosis screening is vital in developing strategies to improve osteoporosis care.
Assuntos
Osteoporose , Médicos , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Padrões de Prática MédicaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Thyroid hormone use is widespread, and prior studies have shown that over- and undertreatment with thyroid hormone are common. Our objective was to understand physician worry regarding risks associated with thyroid hormone therapy, specifically overtreatment or undertreatment. METHODS: A nationwide survey was administered to physician members of the Endocrine Society, the American Academy of Family Practice, and the American Geriatrics Society. Participants were asked how often they were worried about various risks that may be associated with thyroid hormone over- or undertreatment, that is, cardiovascular complications, bone complications, and poor quality of life due to overtreatment or undertreatment with thyroid hormone. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to determine physician characteristics associated with each worry. RESULTS: The response rate was 63% (359 of 566); of those who responded, 128 (36%) were primary care physicians, 114 (32%) were endocrinologists, and 113 (32%) were geriatricians. Overall, 74 (21%) physicians reported that they frequently or always worried about cardiovascular complications, 74 (21%) about bone complications, 111 (31%) about the poor quality of life due to symptoms from undertreatment with thyroid hormone, and 87 (24%) about the poor quality of life due to symptoms from overtreatment with thyroid hormone. Endocrinologists were more likely to frequently or always worry about the patients' poor quality of life due to symptoms from overtreatment (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.93) compared with primary care physicians. CONCLUSION: Up to one third of the physicians frequently or always worried about risks resulting from the thyroid hormone overtreatment or undertreatment. More research is needed across specialties to understand physician perceptions of how thyroid hormone therapy impacts the patients' quality of life.
Assuntos
Endocrinologistas , Médicos de Família , Geriatras , Humanos , Sobretratamento , Qualidade de Vida , Hormônios Tireóideos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To understand osteoporosis screening practices, particularly in men, by a diverse cohort of physicians, including primary care physicians, endocrinologists, and geriatricians. METHODS: We surveyed randomly selected members of the American Academy of Family Practice, Endocrine Society, and American Geriatrics Society. Respondents were asked to rate how often they would screen for osteoporosis in four different clinical scenarios by ordering a bone density scan. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine factors associated with offering osteoporosis screening in men in each clinical scenario. Physicians were also asked to note factors that would lead to osteoporosis screening in men. RESULTS: Response rate was 63% (359/566). While 90% respondents reported that they would always or frequently screen for osteoporosis in a 65-year-old post-menopausal woman, only 22% reported they would screen a 74-year-old man with no significant past medical history. Endocrinologists were more likely to screen a 74-year-old man compared to primary care physicians (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 4.88). In addition to chronic steroid use (94%), history of nontraumatic fractures (88%), and androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer (82%), more than half the physicians reported suppressive doses of thyroid hormone (64%) and history of falls (52%) as factors leading to screening for osteoporosis in men. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey results highlight heterogeneity in osteoporosis screening in men, with underscreening in some scenarios compared to women, and identify factors that lead to screening in men. These findings can help design interventions to improve osteoporosis screening in men.
Assuntos
Osteoporose , Neoplasias da Próstata , Idoso , Antagonistas de Androgênios , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Evidence exists that thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) increases with age and lowering the TSH goal in older patients on thyroid hormone may cause over-treatment. Risks of overtreatment include cardiac and skeletal events. We assessed practice patterns regarding TSH goals and explored factors influencing physicians' decision making when managing hypothyroidism. METHODS: Members of the American College of Physicians, the American Academy of Family Practice, and the Endocrine Society were surveyed to determine goal TSH when treating hypothyroidism. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of physicians reported factoring patient age into their decision making when managing hypothyroidism. Patient age was prioritized third (53%), following patient symptoms (69.2%) and cardiac arrhythmias (65.7%). In multivariable analysis, endocrinologists (P = .002), internists (P = .049), physicians in academic settings (P = .003), and high-volume physicians (P = .021) were more likely to consider patient age when determining goal TSH. When presented with scenarios differing in patient gender and age, 90% of physicians targeted a TSH ≤3.0 mIU/L in 30-year-old patients. Fifty-three percent of respondents targeted a TSH ≤3.0 mIU/L in octogenarians, but 90% targeted a TSH >1.5 mIU/L in this group. Regardless of gender, physician-reported TSH goal ranges (0.1 to 0.5, 0.6 to 1.5, 1.6 to 3.0, and 3.1 to 5.0 mIU/L) increased in a direct relationship to patient age (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Just over half of physicians consider patient age when determining TSH goal. When presented with scenarios differing in patient age and gender, physicians targeted a higher TSH goal in octogenarians. This may indicate an attempt to avoid overtreatment in this group. Consensus is needed among physicians regarding the role of patient age in hypothyroidism management. ABBREVIATIONS: TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone.
RESUMO
Three-component carboamination of alkenes is of significant interest due to the ease by which functionalized amines can be produced from readily available chemical building blocks. Previously, a variety of carbon-centered radical precursors have been studied as the carbon components for this reaction, however, the use of general alkyl sources has remained as an unsolved challenge. Herein we present our efforts to develop an oxidative carboamination protocol that utilizes alkylboronic acids as carbon-centered radical precursors. The presented work demonstrates 34 examples, ranging from 17 to 88% yields, with a broad scope in vinylarenes, amines, and alkylboronic acids. Preliminary mechanistic studies suggest that a single-electron oxidation of the alkylboronic acid generates a carbon-centered radical intermediate that adds across the olefin followed by C-N bond formation via Cu-mediated inner-sphere or carbocation-mediated pathways.
RESUMO
Background: Little is known about cancer-related worry in thyroid cancer survivors with favorable prognosis. Methods: A diverse cohort of patients diagnosed with differentiated thyroid cancer in 2014-2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registries of Georgia and Los Angeles County were surveyed two to four years after diagnosis. Main outcomes were any versus no worry about harms from treatments, quality of life, family at risk for thyroid cancer, recurrence, and death. After excluding patients with recurrent, persistent, and distant disease, multivariable logistic regression was used to identify correlates of worry in 2215 disease-free survivors. Results: Overall, 41.0% reported worry about death, 43.5% worry about harms from treatments, 54.7% worry about impaired quality of life, 58.0% worry about family at risk, and 63.2% worry about recurrence. After controlling for disease severity, in multivariable analyses with separate models for each outcome, there was more worry in patients with lower education (e.g., worry about recurrence, high school diploma and below: odds ratio [OR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI 1.36-2.33] compared with college degree and above). Older age and male sex were associated with less worry (e.g., worry about recurrence, age ≥65 years: OR 0.28 [CI 0.21-0.39] compared with age ≤44 years). Worry was associated with being Hispanic or Asian (e.g., worry about death, Hispanic: OR 1.41 [CI 1.09-1.83]; Asian: OR 1.57 [CI 1.13-2.17] compared with whites). Conclusions: Physicians should be aware that worry is a major issue for thyroid cancer survivors with favorable prognosis. Efforts should be undertaken to alleviate worry, especially among vulnerable groups, including female patients, younger patients, those with lower education, and racial/ethnic minorities.