Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dig Dis Sci ; 2024 Jun 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38850507

RESUMO

BACKGROUNDS: Frequent hospitalization and the costs of hospitalization are the main burdens in China for patients with acute pancreatitis. Most admitted patients have mild disease conditions that do not require hospitalization. AIMS: Here, we compare some health and economic aspects of patients with mild acute pancreatitis who received nurse-led care at home visits against those who were hospitalized on follow-up. METHODS: Patients discharged from the hospital after treatment for mild acute pancreatitis received (NC cohort, n = 104) or did not receive (HN cohort, n = 141) regular home visits by nurses for treatment and care. Patients were rehospitalized by caregivers with or without help of nurse. RESULTS: Hospital readmission events occurred in both cohorts at a follow-up care time of 2 months. Compared with the time of discharge from the hospital, unwanted effects were higher in follow-up care in all patients (p < 0.001 for all). Patients in the NC cohort had less time to resolution of pain, less time to resumption of oral solid food intake, smaller number of patients with hospital readmissions, less average time of hospitalization, lower cost of care, and lower occurrence of unwanted effects than those of patients in the HN cohort during 2 months of follow-up care (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mild acute pancreatitis who undergo treatment require nurse-led nontreatment intervention(s) for rehabilitation in follow-up. Nurse-led follow-up care at-home visits increase recovery, are beneficial and cost-effective, and decrease unwanted adverse effects in patients receiving treatment for mild acute pancreatitis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

2.
Brain Inj ; : 1-7, 2024 Jun 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845346

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This research aimed to evaluate the impact of grading and zoning nursing management on traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients' emergency treatment outcomes. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included 200 TBI patients. They were treated with a conventional care (control group, n = 100) and a novel grading and zoning approach (study group, n = 100), respectively. This innovative model organized care into levels based on urgency and complexity, facilitating targeted medical response and resource allocation. Key metrics compared included demographic profiles, consultation efficiency (time metrics and emergency treatment rates), physiological parameters (HR, RR, MAP, SpO2, RBS), and patient outcomes (hospital and ICU stays, complication rates, and emergency outcomes). RESULTS: The study group demonstrated significantly improved consultation efficiency, with reduced times for physician visits, examinations, emergency stays, and specialist referrals (all p < 0.001), alongside a higher emergency treatment rate (93% vs. 79%, p = 0.004), notably better physiological stability, improved HR, RR, MAP, SpO2 and RBS (p < 0.001), shorter hospital and ICU stays, fewer complications, and superior emergency outcomes. CONCLUSION: Grading and zoning nursing management substantially enhances TBI patients' emergency care efficiency and clinical outcomes, suggesting a viable model for improving emergency treatment protocols.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA