Biallelic deletions in INK4 in cutaneous melanoma are common and associated with decreased survival.

PURPOSE: Both the retinoblastoma and p53 pathways are often genetically altered in human cancers and their complex regulation is in part mediated by the three gene products p16, p14(ARF), and p15 of the INK4 locus on chromosome 9p21. Partial or complete biallelic deletions of the INK4 locus have been recognized in a variety of malignant tumors, including malignant melanoma. We have in the present study measured the frequency of INK4 deletions in a large number of melanoma metastases and determined their association with clinicopathologic variables and survival data. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Quantitative real-time PCR, as well as fluorescence-based fragment analysis, has been used to perform measurements of the relative allelic concentrations of the INK4 genes in 112 human melanoma tumor samples from 86 patients. RESULTS: Thirty-eight of 86 melanoma patients (44%) had metastases with biallelic losses in INK4. Ten of 20 patients with multiple metastases showed similar deletion patterns in all analyzed tumors. There was no significant association between any of the clinicopathologic variables and loss of INK4. However, loss of INK4 had an adverse effect on median survival from time of diagnosis. Patients with tumors with diploid INK4 had a median survival of 142 months, whereas those with monoallelic or biallelic loss in INK4 had a median survival of only 47 months (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Our results point to homozygous deletions in the INK4 region as being one of the most common genetic alterations in malignant cutaneous melanoma. INK4 deletions are associated with an adverse prognosis.

Association of MITF and other melanosome-related proteins with chemoresistance in melanoma tumors and cell lines.

Previous studies in cell lines have suggested a role for melanosomes and related protein trafficking pathways in melanoma drug response. We have investigated the expression of six proteins related to melanosomes and melanogenesis (MITF, GPR143, gp100/PMEL, MLANA, TYRP1, and RAB27A) in pretreatment metastases from melanoma patients (n = 52) with different response to dacarbazine/temozolomide. Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) and G-protein coupled receptor 143 (GPR143) showed significantly higher expression in nonresponders compared with responders. The premelanosome protein (gp100/PMEL) has been indicated previously in resistance to cisplatin in melanoma cells, but the expression levels of gp100/PMEL showed no association with response to dacarbazine/temozolomide in our clinical material. We also investigated the effects on chemosensitivity of siRNA inhibition of gp100/PMEL in the MNT-1 melanoma cell line. As expected from the study of the tumor material, no effect was detected with respect to response to temozolomide. However, knockdown of gp100/PMEL sensitized the cells to both paclitaxel and cisplatin. Overall, our results suggest that MITF, and several MITF-regulated factors, are associated with resistance to chemotherapy in melanoma and that different MITF targets can be of importance for different drugs.

KIT pathway alterations in mucosal melanomas of the vulva and other sites.

PURPOSE: A significant proportion of mucosal melanomas contain alterations in KIT. The aim of this study was to characterize the pattern of KIT, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in mucosal melanomas at specific sites and to assess activation of the KIT downstream RAF/MEK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathways in mucosal melanoma specimens. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Seventy-one primary mucosal melanomas from various sites were studied. Mutation analysis was done by DNA sequencing. Expression of KIT, phosphorylated (p)-ERK, and p-AKT was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: KIT mutations were detected in 35% (8 of 23) of vulvar, 9% (2 of 22) of anorectal, 7% (1 of 14) of nasal cavity, and 20% (1 of 5) of penile melanomas. No KIT mutations were found in 7 vaginal melanomas. The difference in KIT mutation frequency between vulvar and nonvulvar cases was statistically significant (P = 0.014). The overall frequencies of NRAS and BRAF mutations were 10% and 6%, respectively. Notably, vaginal melanomas showed a NRAS mutation rate of 43%. KIT gene amplification (≥4 copies), as assessed by quantitative real-time PCR, was observed in 19% of cases. KIT expression was associated with KIT mutation status (P < 0.001) and was more common in vulvar than nonvulvar tumors (P = 0.016). Expression of p-ERK and p-AKT was observed in 42% and 59% of tumors, respectively, and occurred irrespective of KIT/NRAS/BRAF mutation status. NRAS mutation was associated with worse overall survival in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that KIT mutations are more common in vulvar melanomas than other types of mucosal melanomas and that both the RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways are activated in mucosal melanoma specimens.

High frequency of p16(INK4A) promoter methylation in NRAS-mutated cutaneous melanoma.

The p16(INK4A) tumor suppressor is often deleted, or otherwise inactivated, in malignant melanoma. To investigate the loss of p16(INK4A) in greater detail, we analyzed 77 cutaneous melanoma metastases. Of these 56 retained at least one p16(INK4A) allele, and 21 had biallelic deletions. Using methylation-specific PCR, direct sequencing, and immunohistochemical methods, we analyzed p16(INK4A) promoter methylation, mutations, and protein expression, respectively. In addition, 14 corresponding primary tumors were analyzed for protein expression. Results were compared to clinicopathological parameters and previously obtained data regarding mutations in proto-oncogenes NRAS and BRAF. Results revealed that p16(INK4A) promoter methylation was present in 15 of 59 (25%) metastases; nonsynonymous mutations in 9 of 56 (16%) metastases; and protein expression in 12 of 67 (18%) metastases. Protein expression was lost during progression from primary to metastatic tumors, 71% (10 of 14) and 43% (6 of 14) being positive, respectively. However, the genetic and epigenetic alterations of p16(INK4A) observed could not explain the lack of p16(INK4A) protein in 27 metastases, indicating the presence of additional inactivating mechanisms for p16(INK4A). Interestingly, p16(INK4A) promoter methylation was significantly overrepresented in NRAS-mutated samples compared to NRAS wild-type samples (P=0.0004), indicating an association between these two events.