Levosimendan, a new therapeutic approach to prevent delayed cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage?

BACKGROUND: Under physiological cerebral conditions, levosimendan, a calcium-channel sensitizer, has a dose-dependent antagonistic effect on prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF)-induced vasoconstriction. This circumstance could be used in antagonizing delayed cerebral vasospasm (dCVS), one of the main complications after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), leading to delayed cerebral ischemia and ischemic neurological deficits. Data already exist that identified neuroprotective effects of levosimendan in a traumatic brain injury model and additionally, it has been proven that this compound prevents narrowing of the basilar artery (BA) luminal area after SAH in an in vitro rabbit model. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, a severe ventricular dysfunction, is also a well-known complication after SAH, associated with pulmonary edema and prolonged intubation. METHODS: The polypeptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) plays a key role in the development of dCVS after SAH. Therefore, the aim of the present investigation was to detect functional interactions between the calcium-sensitizing and the ET-1-dependent vasoconstriction after experimental-induced SAH; interactions between levosimendan and a substrate-specific vasorelaxation in the BA were also examined. It was reviewed whether levosimendan has a beneficial influence on endothelin(A) and/or endothelin(B1) receptors (ET-(A) and ET-(B1) receptors) in cerebral vessels after SAH. We also examined whether this drug could have antagonistic effects on a PGF-induced vasoconstriction. RESULTS: Under treatment with levosimendan after SAH, the endothelin system seems to be affected. The ET-1-induced contraction is decreased, not significantly. In addition, we detected changes in the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (NO-cGMP) pathway. Preincubation with levosimendan causes a modulatory effect on the ET-(B1) receptor-dependent vasorelaxation. It induces an upregulation of the NO-cGMP pathway with a significantly increased relaxation. Even after PGF-induced precontraction a dose-dependent relaxation was registered, which was significantly higher (Emax) and earlier (pD2) compared to the concentration-effect curve without levosimendan. CONCLUSIONS: After experimental-induced dCVS, levosimendan seems to restore the well-known impaired function of the vasorelaxant ET-(B1) receptor. Levosimendan also reversed the PGF-induced contraction dose-dependently. Both of these mechanisms could be used for antagonizing dCVS in patients suffering SAH. Levosimendan could even be used additionally in treating patients developing takotsubo cardiomyopathy.

Liberal transfusion strategy to prevent mortality and anaemia-associated, ischaemic events in elderly non-cardiac surgical patients - the study design of the LIBERAL-Trial.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative anaemia leads to impaired oxygen supply with a risk of vital organ ischaemia. In healthy and fit individuals, anaemia can be compensated by several mechanisms. Elderly patients, however, have less compensatory mechanisms because of multiple co-morbidities and age-related decline of functional reserves. The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether elderly surgical patients may benefit from a liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategy compared to a restrictive transfusion strategy. METHODS: The LIBERAL Trial is a prospective, randomized, multicentre, controlled clinical phase IV trial randomising 2470 elderly (≥ 70 years) patients undergoing intermediate- or high-risk non-cardiac surgery. Registered patients will be randomised only if Haemoglobin (Hb) reaches ≤9 g/dl during surgery or within 3 days after surgery either to the LIBERAL group (transfusion of a single RBC unit when Hb ≤ 9 g/dl with a target range for the post-transfusion Hb level of 9-10.5 g/dl) or the RESTRICTIVE group (transfusion of a single RBC unit when Hb ≤ 7.5 g/dl with a target range for the post-transfusion Hb level of 7.5-9 g/dl). The intervention per patient will be followed until hospital discharge or up to 30 days after surgery, whichever occurs first. The primary efficacy outcome is defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, acute ischaemic stroke, acute kidney injury (stage III), acute mesenteric ischaemia and acute peripheral vascular ischaemia within 90 days after surgery. Infections requiring iv antibiotics with re-hospitalisation are assessed as important secondary endpoint. The primary endpoint will be analysed by logistic regression adjusting for age, cancer surgery (y/n), type of surgery (intermediate- or high-risk), and incorporating centres as random effect. DISCUSSION: The LIBERAL-Trial will evaluate whether a liberal transfusion strategy reduces the occurrence of major adverse events after non-cardiac surgery in the geriatric population compared to a restrictive strategy within 90 days after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03369210 ).

Occurrence of vasospasm and infarction in relation to a focal monitoring sensor in patients after SAH: placing a bet when placing a probe?

INTRODUCTION: Vasospastic brain infarction is a devastating complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Using a probe for invasive monitoring of brain tissue oxygenation or blood flow is highly focal and may miss the site of cerebral vasospasm (CVS). Probe placement is based on the assumption that the spasm will occur either at the dependent vessel territory of the parent artery of the ruptured aneurysm or at the artery exposed to the focal thick blood clot. We investigated the likelihood of a focal monitoring sensor being placed in vasospasm or infarction territory on a hypothetical basis. METHODS: From our database we retrospectively selected consecutive SAH patients with angiographically proven (day 7-14) severe CVS (narrowing of vessel lumen >50%). Depending on the aneurysm location we applied a standard protocol of probe placement to detect the most probable site of severe CVS or infarction. We analyzed whether the placement was congruent with existing CVS/infarction. RESULTS: We analyzed 100 patients after SAH caused by aneurysms located in the following locations: MCA (n = 14), ICA (n = 30), A1CA (n = 4), AcoA or A2CA (n = 33), and VBA (n = 19). Sensor location corresponded with CVS territory in 93% of MCA, 87% of ICA, 76% of AcoA or A2CA, but only 50% of A1CA and 42% of VBA aneurysms. The focal probe was located inside the infarction territory in 95% of ICA, 89% of MCA, 78% of ACoA or A2CA, 50% of A1CA and 23% of VBA aneurysms. CONCLUSION: The probability that a single focal probe will be situated in the territory of severe CVS and infarction varies. It seems to be reasonably accurate for MCA and ICA aneurysms, but not for ACA or VBA aneurysms.