The brain H3-receptor as a novel therapeutic target for vigilance and sleep-wake disorders.

Brain histaminergic neurons play a prominent role in arousal and maintenance of wakefulness (W). H(3)-receptors control the activity of histaminergic neurons through presynaptic autoinhibition. The role of H(3)-receptor antagonists/inverse agonists (H(3)R-antagonists) in the potential therapy of vigilance deficiency and sleep-wake disorders were studied by assessing their effects on the mouse cortical EEG and sleep-wake cycle in comparison to modafinil and classical psychostimulants. The H(3)R-antagonists, thioperamide and ciproxifan increased W and cortical EEG fast rhythms and, like modafinil, but unlike amphetamine and caffeine, their waking effects were not accompanied by sleep rebound. Conversely, imetit (H(3)R-agonist) enhanced slow wave sleep and dose-dependently attenuated ciproxifan-induced W, indicating that the effects of both ligands involve H(3)-receptor mechanisms. Additional studies using knockout (KO) mice confirmed the essential role of H(3)-receptors and histamine-mediated transmission in the wake properties of H(3)R-antagonists. Thus ciproxifan produced no increase in W in either histidine-decarboxylase (HDC, histamine-synthesizing enzyme) or H(1)- or H(3)-receptor KO-mice whereas its waking effects persisted in H(2)-receptor KO-mice. These data validate the hypothesis that H(3)R-antagonists, through disinhibition of H(3)-autoreceptors, enhancing synaptic histamine that in turn activates postsynaptic H(1)-receptors promoting W. Interestingly amphetamine and modafinil, despite their potent arousal effects, appear unlikely to depend on histaminergic mechanism as their effects still occurred in HDC KO-mice. The present study thus distinguishes two classes of wake-improving agents: the first acting through non-histaminergic mechanisms and the second acting via histamine and supports brain H(3)-receptors as potentially novel therapeutic targets for vigilance and sleep-wake disorders.

Reproducibility of the model of induced ventricular tachycardia in conscious dogs with infarction.

The canine model of ventricular tachycardias (VT) induced by programmed stimulation is used routinely in several laboratories to test antiarrhythmic drugs. The aim of the present study was to determine the rate of success and reproducibility of this model. We analyzed a group of 58 dogs that underwent a 2-hr occlusion and were submitted to programmed electrical stimulation at least 4 days after the surgery. Only 29 dogs (50%) were inducible and included in the study, as 22 dogs died following myocardial infarction, and seven dogs were never inducible. Out of 130 trials, 92 (70%) performed on inducible dogs were positive with 11% of nonsustained ventricular tachycardias, 63% of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardias, and 26% of ventricular fibrillation. Inducibility decreased over time in a subgroup of 19 dogs that was submitted to four trials during the first month after the infarction (68% of inducible dogs versus 46% in trials 1 and 4, respectively). Ventricular effective refractory period decreased significantly from 146 +/- 7 msec at trial 1 to 114 +/- 6 msec at trial 4, and the severity of the induced ventricular tachycardias increased. This variability should be considered when planning studies on antiarrhythmic drugs in this model.

Proarrhythmic effects of a quinidine analog in dogs with chronic A-V block.

The proarrhythmic effects of 3-hydroxy-hydroquinidine (3-OH-HQ) and quinidine were compared in a canine model of QT-dependent ventricular arrhythmias. Eight hypokalemic ([K+] < or = 3.2 mmol/l) dogs with AV block (around 45 bpm) were given either drug in a randomized order at 2-day intervals. Each drug was given as two 1 hour doses, with a bolus (low dose: 5 mg/kg or high dose: 10 mg/kg) plus infusion (25 or 50 micrograms/kg/min) protocol. Propranolol infusion was combined with a third hour of the high dose infusion. Electrophysiologic measurements were performed at baseline and 30 minutes after the beginning of each dose and propranolol infusion, and proarrhythmic events were recorded 30 minutes before and during the experiment. Neither drugs altered the ventricular cycle length. Quinidine and 3-OH-HQ prolonged the QT interval similarly and significantly when paced at 60 bpm after the low dose (+39 +/- 18 and +28 +/- 22 msec, respectively) and after the high dose (+51 +/- 29 and +50 +/- 22 msec). Quinidine was more arrhythmogenic than 3-OH-HQ: 7/8 dogs (p < or = 0.05) developed ventricular arrhythmias (isolated, repetitive ventricular beats, or polymorphic ventricular tachycardias) during quinidine infusion (low dose: 4 dogs) compared to 3/8 dogs (NS) during 3-OH-HQ infusion (low dose: 1 dog). Addition of propranolol-induced bradycardia (around 30 bpm) caused torsades de pointes (wave burst arrhythmias) or polymorphic ventricular tachycardias after both drugs (in 3 dogs after quinidine and in 2 dogs after 3-OH-HQ). Thus 3-OH-HQ was slightly less arrhythmogenic than quinidine in this model of torsades de pointes, but the addition of an extra favouring factor (bradycardia) reduced that difference.

Antiarrhythmic effect of a sotalol-mexiletine combination on induced ventricular tachycardia in dogs.

Mexiletine was recently shown to antagonize the effects of sotalol on repolarization of canine Purkinje fibers. The significance of this interaction for the antiarrhythmic properties of these drugs remains unknown. The antiarrhythmic effects of sotalol and mexiletine alone and in combination on induced ventricular tachycardias (VTs) were assessed in 20 conscious dogs with chronic infarction. Electrophysiological measurements and programmed stimulation were performed before and after the infusion of sotalol (4 mg/kg) or mexiletine (4 mg/kg), and after infusion of the combination. The electrophysiological parameters didn't change after mexiletine. Sotalol alone and the combination both similarly prolonged the QT interval and VERP. Induction of VT by programmed stimulation was not prevented by mexiletine, but the cycle length of monomorphic VT was increased in 7 of 10 dogs. The induction of VT was prevented by sotalol (11/16 dogs), but VTs were not slowed significantly. Sotalol plus mexiletine prevented VT as did sotalol alone (11/16 dogs). The combination also increased the cycle length of VT in all eight dogs with monomorphic VT. Thus, the antagonism shown in vitro appears to have no consequences in this model. On the contrary, the sotalol-mexiletine combination showed some additive antiarrhythmic effects on induced VT in dogs.

Methods and limitations of an experimental model of long QT syndrome.

An experimental model of the long QT syndrome has been developed in conscious dogs. This report discusses the methods used in its preparation and the strengths and weaknesses of the model. This new model is suitable for screening the bradycardia-dependent proarrhythmic effects of drugs and for studying the electrophysiology of "torsades de pointes." Permanent bradycardia (RR: 1558 +/- 83 ms) was obtained in 37 dogs by chemically-induced complete atrioventricular block. A 10% further increase of ventricular repolarization (QT: 306 +/- 7.0 ms to 331 +/- 5.5 ms) was obtained in 28 of these dogs by diuretic-induced hypokalemia. Diuretics, despite saline replacement, induced some degree of functional renal failure and extracellular volume losses. The QT interval increased although ventricular cycle length decreased slightly. These biological and electrophysiological parameters were reproducible except for a slow increase in plasma creatinine. Cardiac failure and sudden death rarely occurred. The most severe, but reversible, renal failure occurred in some dogs given the highest diuretic doses. Hypokalemia resulted in ventricular arrhythmias in only 6 dogs, 2 of them exhibiting runs of ventricular tachycardia and even "torsade de pointes" as their potassium levels fell below 2 mmol/L. The results of studies with several drugs using the model, with or without hypokalemia, or with bradycardia worsened by propranolol are analysed.