Diastolic function and cardiovascular risk among patients with severe obesity referred to a lifestyle-program - a pilot study.

Objectives. Severe obesity is associated with a high risk of comorbidities and alterations of cardiac structure and function. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the proportion of diastolic dysfunction (DD) at baseline, and changes in cardiac function from baseline (T1) to 6 months follow-up (T2) among participants with severe obesity attending a lifestyle-intervention. The secondary aim was to explore changes in body mass index (BMI), physical fitness (VO2peak) and cardiovascular risk from T1 to T2 and 12 months follow-up (T3).Design. This was an open single-site prospective observational study. Patients were recruited from an obesity clinic to a lifestyle-intervention consisting of three 3-weeks intermittent stays over 12-months period. Echocardiography was performed at T1 and T2 and BMI, VO2peak and cardiovascular risk measured at T1, T2 and T3.Results. Fifty-six patients were included (mean age 45.1 years; BMI 41.9). Six of 52 patients (12%) had grade 1 DD at T1, while five subjects had DD at T2. E/A ratio (11%, p = .005) and mitral deceleration time (9%, p = .014) were improved at T2. A reduction in BMI (-1.8, p < .001) and improvement in VO2peak (1.6 mL/kg min, p = .026) were assessed at T2 and this improvement persisted at T3. The total cardiovascular risk score was not significantly changed.Conclusion. The patients with severe obesity had low prevalence of DD. For all participants, an improvement in diastolic parameters, and an important initial weight loss was observed.Clinical Trial number: NCT02826122.

Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized study of cardiovascular effects and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Peak oxygen uptake (Vo(2peak)) strongly predicts mortality in cardiac patients. We compared the effects of aerobic interval training (AIT) versus moderate continuous training (MCT) on Vo(2peak) and quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Fifty-nine CABG patients were randomized to either AIT at 90% of maximum heart rate or MCT at 70% of maximum heart rate, 5 d/wk, for 4 weeks at a rehabilitation center. Primary outcome was Vo(2peak), at baseline, after rehabilitation (4 weeks), and after 6 months of home-based exercise (6 months). RESULTS: Vo(2peak) increased between baseline and 4 weeks in AIT (27.1 +/- 4.5 vs 30.4 +/- 5.5 mL.kg(-1).min(-1), P < .001) and MCT (26.2 +/- 5.2 vs 28.5 +/- 5.6 mL.kg(-1).min(-1), P < .001; group difference, not significant). Aerobic interval training increased Vo(2peak) between 4 weeks and 6 months (30.4 +/- 5.5 vs 32.2 +/- 7.0 mL.kg(-1).min(-1), P < .001), with no significant change in MCT (28.5 +/- 5.6 vs 29.5 +/- 5.7 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)). Quality of life improved in both groups from baseline to 4 weeks, remaining improved at 6 months. There were no changes in echocardiographic systolic and diastolic left ventricular function. Adiponectin increased between 4 weeks and 6 months in both groups (group differences, not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Four weeks of intense training increased Vo(2peak) significantly after both AIT and MCT. Six months later, the AIT group had a significantly higher Vo(2peak) than MCT. The results indicate that AIT and MCT increase Vo(2peak) similarly in the short term, but with better long-term effect of AIT after CABG.