Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/classificação , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Resistência a Meticilina , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Terminologia como Assunto , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Humanos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/classificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains have emerged in the community, causing disease among healthy people lacking traditional risk factors for MRSA infection. This article describes an outbreak of MRSA among healthy full-term newborns. DESIGN: Cases were identified and corresponding medical information collected. Telephone interviews were conducted with mothers of cases and surveillance cultures from mothers and newborns were performed. MRSA isolates were genotyped. SETTING: Hospital in Chicago, Illinois, USA. PARTICIPANTS: Newborns, their mothers and hospital healthcare workers. INTERVENTION: Nursery infection control practices were enhanced. The MRSA-colonised healthcare workers received intranasal mupirocin. MAIN OUTCOME: Within 4-23 days of birth, 11 newborns were identified with pustules, vesicles or blisters located on the head, groin, perineum, ears, legs, chin and trunk. All received antimicrobials and recovered without incident. RESULTS: None of 432 peripartum women, one of 399 newborns, and two of 135 healthcare workers were nasal MRSA carriers. Available isolates from six patients, two healthcare workers, and one from an MRSA-colonised newborn were similar by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Other than contact with the hospital, no common exposures of MRSA transmission were identified. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA strains that initially emerged in the community are now causing disease in healthcare settings. Providers should be aware that MRSA can cause skin infections among healthy newborns. Adherence to standard infection control practices is important to prevent transmission of MRSA in nurseries.
Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Resistência a Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Chicago/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Controle de Infecções , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Profissional para o Paciente , Masculino , Mães , Berçários Hospitalares , Recursos Humanos em Hospital , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/transmissão , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
In the fall of 1996, fish kills in Maryland rivers were attributed to the dinoflagellate, Pfiesteria piscicida. After a group of researchers established a potential link between exposure to Pfiesteria and an illness causing memory problems, state health authorities closed a portion of the Pocomoke River. To determine the extent of illness, the range of symptoms, potential risk factors for disease, and to provide information to concerned citizens, a toll-free hotline was created. All symptomatic persons who called the toll-free number were administered a standardized questionnaire. Persons who had been exposed to Pfiesteria or Pfiesteria-laden waters were more likely to have respiratory, neurologic, dermatologic, and gastrointestinal problems than those persons without exposure. Among the persons calling the hotline, many had extensive neuropsychologic testing. Of the neuropsychologic test battery, low scores on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), a standardized measure of learning and memory, best characterized illness related to Pfiesteria exposure. Patients with low RAVLT scores were more likely to have neurologic symptoms and skin lesions than control subjects. Low RAVLT scores were associated with fishing (OR, 9.00, 95% CI, 106, 409.87), catching fish with lesions (OR, 6.17, 95% CI 1.27, 32.10), and handling fish with lesions (OR, 5.34, 95% CI, 1.05, 29.92), but not with consumption of seafood. While preliminary, these results do suggest that some risk factors for Pfiesteria-related illness may be easy to modify and used to prevent unnecessary human exposure.
Assuntos
Amnésia/epidemiologia , Dinoflagellida , Doenças dos Peixes/epidemiologia , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/epidemiologia , Adulto , Amnésia/etiologia , Animais , Dinoflagellida/patogenicidade , Surtos de Doenças , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Doenças dos Peixes/etiologia , Peixes , Linhas Diretas , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/etiologia , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
In June 2000, vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) was isolated from a 27-year-old home health-care patient following a complicated cholecystectomy. Two VISA strains were identified with identical MICs to all antimicrobials tested except oxacillin and with closely related pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types. The patient was treated successfully with antimicrobial therapy, biliary drainage, and reconstruction. Standard precautions in the home health setting appear successful in preventing transmission.