Role of robotic approach in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): A systematic review of the literature.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become standard surgical treatment of choice in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in which the medical management fails. Despite the wide use of laparoscopic method, the enhanced and innovative features that come with the robotic platform, such as endo-wrist technology, 3D visualization, surgeon-controlled camera and motion scaling, make it an appealing choice. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of robotic approach for proctectomy or proctocolectomy with IPAA as compared to conventional laparoscopic approach. A systematic review was completed for studies done between 2010 and 2022 comparing the robotic approach with the laparoscopic approach. Nine studies were found to be feasible to be included in this review. In terms of the outcomes, although the mean operating time was slightly higher than the laparoscopic approach, the other outcomes, such as mean blood loss, return of the bowel movement, mean hospital stay, and conversion to open, were found to be significantly lower in the robotic approach as compared to both laparoscopic and conventional open techniques. Despite the overall increased rate of complications combined from all the studies, the rate of significant complications such as anastomotic leaks requiring readmission and return to theater was also found to be substantially less. This study concludes that although robotic approach is in its initial stages for pelvic surgeries, it can be safely employed due to improved dexterity and visibility.

A Good Medical Practice of the Patients' Right to Information: An Audit Cycle of Patient Understanding and Satisfaction With Information Provided to Patients With Acute Pancreatitis.

Introduction Acute pancreatitis (AP), characterized by the inflammation of the pancreas, is a common acute surgical condition accounting for approximately 3% of all surgical admissions with abdominal pain and has an incidence of approximately 56 cases per 100,000 population every year. The General Medical Council (GMC), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and Royal College of Nursing best practice guidelines recommend that such patients and their family members should be provided with both verbal and written information about acute pancreatitis and its management in a way that they can understand. The aim of this audit cycle was to find out the compliance with information provided to patients with acute pancreatitis as per the GMC good medical practice and NICE guidelines and assess their satisfaction. Method A closed-loop audit consisting of two cycles was carried out. Thirty patients who were admitted to the department of general surgery with acute pancreatitis were provided with a questionnaire containing 11 questions asking about the information provided to them about their condition by healthcare professionals; then, interventions were carried out in the form of developing patient information leaflets (PILs) and encouraging healthcare professionals to distribute them and provide information to the patients and their family members. Results Overall, improvements were seen in all aspects of the information being provided to patients, and particularly, more than 100% improvement was seen in patient satisfaction related to the information provided to them in the second cycle after the implementation of interventions. Conclusions This study concludes that patients should be given all the information they require in accordance with their right to information, in line with GMC best practice, NICE, and Royal College of Nursing best practice guidelines. A very effective way to improve the health outcomes and satisfaction of patients is to give them access to a patient information leaflet, which can allow patients to consider their options and understand what can happen during treatment, especially when doctors have limited time to carry out detailed discussions with the patient.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Lifestyle Modification in Class I Obesity in Pakistani Population: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Introduction The American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery has stated that bariatric surgery is indicated in Class I obesity patients with one or more comorbidities. However, other weight loss options, such as diet plus exercise, are available to patients with a body mass index (BMI) ranging from 30 to 35 kg/m2. This study aimed to prospectively compare the results of Class I obesity patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or using a weight control program (WCP). Methods A prospective analysis was conducted of patients with Class I obesity and comorbid diabetes and hypertension, with follow-ups at 6, 12, and 18 months. Subjects were divided into two groups: the LSG group of patients who had undergone LSG, and the WCP group who adhered to a WCP. The percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) and comorbidity remission (diabetes mellitus and hypertension) were tracked with measurements of hemoglobin A1C (HBA1C) levels and systolic blood pressure. Self-esteem was also tracked using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (SES) at 0 and 18 months. The overall patient satisfaction score was calculated using a visual analogue scale. Results Of the 150 patients enrolled in the study, 106 were included in the LSG group, and 103 were included in the WCP group. The reduction in HBA1C was more pronounced in the LSG group, and the differences between the two were statistically significant after 6, 12, and 18 months (LSG 5.6 ± 0.47 vs. WCP 6.5 ± 0.64, CI 1.04-0.73, P < 0.05). At 12 and 18 months, there were statistically significant reductions in systolic blood pressure after LSG (LSG 134.2 ± 7.16 vs. WCP 145.63 ± 5.94, CI 13.2-9.6, P < 0.05). Self-esteem levels measured by the Rosenberg SES increased for all participants, while patient satisfaction score was higher in the LSG group than that in the WCP group (P < 0.05). The %EBMIL at 6 months in the LSG group was 35.48%, compared to the WCP group at only 7.23%. At 12 months, the %EBMIL had increased twofold in the LSG group, at 68.19%, compared to 14.53% in the WCP group. At the final 18-month follow-up, the %EBMIL in the LSG group was 99.60% but was only 25.70% in the WCP group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Our study elucidates a clear superiority of LSG over any structured WCP with regard to weight reduction, improvement in glycemic control, and reduction in blood pressure in Class I obesity patients. Additionally, patients having LSG reported markedly improved self-esteem and satisfaction when compared with those who undertook a WCP.

Preoperative and Operative Risk Factors for Conversion of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Open Cholecystectomy in Pakistan.

Introduction The currently available literature suggests a wide range of conversion (4.9-20%) from laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to open cholecystectomy (OC) despite the increase in surgical expertise. Open cholecystectomy is important as the last resort for safe surgical practice in complicated cases. Increased number of pre-operative and perioperative risk factors need to be identified to pre-empt conversion. However, there has been a significant decrease in conversion rates over the past few decades. This study was conducted to determine conversion rates in our population and to identify any significant risks for conversion. Methods This prospective study was conducted at the Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan, including 1081 cholecystectomies, performed over a two-year period from January 2017 to January 2019. Comparison of risk factors between the two groups; laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) group and conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC) group was done. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 24.0.1. P<0.05 were considered significant. Results In our study, the overall conversion rate was 7.78%. Factors of conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC) included age ≥65, morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, and previous abdominal surgery. Deranged alkaline phosphatase (ALP), increased total bilirubin, increased common bile duct (CBD) diameter, and multiple stones in ultrasonography showed a statistically significant association with the conversion. Per-operative findings of increased adhesions >50%, empyema gallbladder (GB), perforated GB, and scleroatrophic GB showed a higher risk of conversion too (p <0.05). However, there was no statistical association with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to OC in our population. Conclusion An open cholecystectomy is a safe approach for patients with complicated gallbladder disease. No doubt laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard having its outstanding benefits. This study identifies predictors of choice for OC in addition to the decision to convert to OC. In view of the raised morbidity and mortality associated with open cholecystectomy, distinguishing these predictors will serve to decrease the rate of OC and to address these factors preoperatively.

Early Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcomes in Terms of Weight Loss.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in terms of weight loss. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive cohort study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from January 2009 to January 2015. METHODOLOGY: A total of 100 consecutive patients were included in the study through retrospective chart review. A5-port technique was utilized with the gastric sleeve being created using endostapler. Postoperatively, patients gradually progressed from clear liquid diet and oral rehydration salts to nutritional supplements over three days. By two weeks postoperatively, patients had progressed to a solid diet. SPSS was used for data entry and analysis. Body mass index (BMI) and weight in kg were determined. RESULTS: From 100 patients, 17 were lost to follow-up less than a week into the postoperative period. Of the remaining, average age of the patients was 34.7 ±11.3 years at the time of surgery. The majority of patients were females (72%). Mean preoperative and postoperative BMI was 45.3 ±10.4 kg/m2 and 35.0 ±10 kg/m2, respectively. Of the 83 patients, 62 were followed-up for longer than 1 month (average 419 days). For patients in this category, mean reduction in BMI was 10.3 ±6.5 kg/m2 with average weight loss of 34.3 ±18.2 kg. There were no mortalities associated with LSG. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and effective intervention in young Pakistani females with encouraging outcomes at a mean follow-up of over one year.