Association of oral toxicity and taste changes during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a preliminary study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to characterize the taste changes and taste bud atrophy observed in the period of neutropenia of HCT and to determine the influence of transplantation toxicity on these changes. METHODS: Autologous and allogeneic HCT patients (n = 51) were selected to perform taste acuity tests prior to conditioning (T0) and during neutropenia (T1). The frequency and time duration of oral mucositis, presence of tongue depapillation, and salivary flow rate were also evaluated. Quality of life was assessed using specific questionnaires. RESULTS: We observed a significant increase in hypogeusia (66.6%, p = 0.001) and dysgeusia (21.4%, p = 0.013) at T1, compared with T0. Bitter taste was the most altered, mainly when the patient underwent conditioning with melphalan (OR = 4.47, p = 0.049). Prolonged oral mucositis (≥ 8 days) (OR = 5.62, p = 0.039) and autologous transplantation (OR = 4.08, p = 0.033) were predictive factors for tongue depapillation. Changes in sour taste (OR = 10.70, p = 0.045) and reduced salivary flow (OR = 21.00, p = 0.013) were associated to body weight loss at T1. Taste changes significantly reduced the quality of life at T1, compared with T0. CONCLUSIONS: Frequency of hypogeusia was high in the neutropenia period of the HCT. None of the taste changes was determined by oral mucositis, tongue depapillation, or reduced salivary flow, but melphalan conditioning reduced the bitter taste sensation. Loss of body weight and poor quality of life were associated with taste changes and reduced salivary flow. Further studies are necessary to elucidate this association and the risk factors for taste changes in HCT.

Quantificação de células CD 34+ em sangue periférico, produto de aférese e cordão umbilical: estudo comparativo de três diferentes metodologias / Quantification of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood, leukapheresis products and cord blood: a comparative study of three different cytometric methodologies

A quantificação das células CD34+ em sangue periférico é utilizada para determinar o melhor momento de iniciar a aférese, enquanto que na leucoaférese e no sangue de cordão umbilical determinam a quantidade de células CD34+ para o transplante de células progenitoras. O objetivo deste trabalho foi comparar três diferentes metodologias de quantificação de células CD34+. Foram utilizados três diferentes tipos de amostras: a) 32 amostras de sangue periférico, coletadas de pacientes estimulados com G-CSF 50 µg/Kg/dose total, sem quimioterapia na mobilização. b) 31 amostras de produto de aférese de pacientes estimulados com o mesmo protocolo de G-CSF. c) 20 amostras de sangue de cordão coletadas em CPDA-1, por punção de veia umbilical. As amostras permaneceram à temperatura ambiente no máximo até 24h da análise. O citômetro de fluxo utilizado foi o Epics XL-MCL (Coulter) com os protocolos de dupla plataforma: ISHAGE e Mulhouse modificado para análise de maior numero de eventos, e o citômetro Imagn 2000 (Biometric Imaging) de plataforma única, conforme técnicas recomendadas. Os anticorpos monoclonais utilizados foram: CD45-FITC, CD34-PE, e isotipo IgG1-PE da Immunotech. As análises estatísticas foram: ANOVA e correlação de teste t de Student. Os resultados não apresentaram diferenças estatisticamente significativas nos três métodos

CD34 cell quantification in peripheral b lood is useful to determinate the best moment to begin apheresis while, when applied in leukapheresis products and umbilical cord blood it is important to establish the total number of CD34+ in stem cell transplantation. We aimed at comparing three different methodologies of CD34+ cell quantification. Three different blood products were analyzed: a) peripheral blood samples from 32 patients collected using EDTA, mobilized without previous chemotherapy and with G-CSF 50 mcg/Kg/total: b) 31 leukapheresis samples obtained using a CS 3000 (Baster) cell separator; c) 20 cord blood samples collected using umbilical venipuncture. All samples were maintained at room temperature and analyzed until 24h after collection by three different methods: double platform protocols ISHAGE, a Mulhouse modified (for analysis of a bigher number of events) applied in a Epics XL flow cytometer (Coulter) and a single platform for a fixed volume cytometer IMAGN 2000 (Biometric Imaging) according to manufacturer instructions. Monoclonal antibodies used were:CD 45-FITC, CD 34-PE and IgC1-PE, isotype control (Immunotech, Marseille, FR). Statistical analysis was made using ANOVA and T Student test. Results showed no statistical differences (p