RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: IV Magnesium (IV Mg) is increasingly used as adjunctive therapy for asthma exacerbations. In obese patients, delays in recognition of asthma severity may lead to delays in IV Mg administration. Our objective was to examine whether timing of IV Mg administration varied by Body Mass Index (BMI) category and whether this relates to hospitalization course. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of IV Mg use for asthma in children 2-17 years of age hospitalized in an urban children's hospital. Weight status was categorized by BMI percentile for age. The primary outcome was time to IV Mg administration. Secondary outcomes included admission to the intensive care unit, time to discharge readiness and Length of Stay (LOS). Continuous variables were analyzed using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test, categorical variables with Chi-Square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. A linear regression model examined factors related to time to IV Mg administration. RESULTS: In 2017, 361/698 (52%) of patients admitted with acute asthma received IV Mg. Of these, 210 patients met study criteria. Except for age, baseline characteristics did not vary by BMI category. No differences were found in Time to IV Mg, rates of admission to the intensive care unit, time to discharge readiness, or LOS comparing non-overweight to overweight or obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of inner-city children who received IV Mg there were no differences in timing of IV Mg based on BMI category. Further work is needed to examine whether standardizing timing of IV Mg improves care.
Assuntos
Asma , Estado Asmático , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Criança , Humanos , Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Sobrepeso/epidemiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: Most pediatric emergency visits occur in general emergency departments (GED). Our study aims to assess whether medical decision making regarding the management of febrile infants differs in GEDs from pediatric EDs (PED) and deviates from pediatric expert consensus. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review on patients younger than 60 days with fever admitted from 13 GEDs versus 1 PED to a children's hospital over a 3-year period. Adherence to consensus guidelines was measured by frequency of performing critical components of initial management, including blood culture, urine culture, attempted lumbar puncture, and antibiotic administration (<29 days old), or complete blood count and/or C-reactive protein, blood culture, and urine culture (29-60 days old). Additional outcomes included lumbar puncture, collecting urine specimens via catheterization, and timing of antibiotics. RESULTS: A total of 176 patient charts were included. Sixty-four (36%) patients were younger than 29 days, and 112 (64%) were 29 to 60 days old. Eighty-eight (50%) patients were admitted from GEDs.In infants younger than 29 days managed in the GEDs (n = 32), 65.6% (n = 21) of patients underwent all 4 critical items compared with 96.9% (n = 31, P = 0.003) in the PED. In infants 29 to 60 days old managed in GEDs (n = 56), 64.3% (n = 36) patients underwent all 3 critical items compared with 91.1% (n = 51, P < 0.001) in the PED. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study suggests that providers managing young infants with fever in 13 GEDs differ significantly from providers in the PED examined and literature consensus. Inconsistent testing and treatment practices may put young infants at risk for undetected bacterial infection.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Febre , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Febre/terapia , Hospitalização , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactente , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the rapid implementation of an adult coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) unit using pediatric physician and nurse providers in a children's hospital and to examine the characteristics and outcomes of the first 100 adult patients admitted. STUDY DESIGN: We describe our approach to surge-in-place at a children's hospital to meet the local demands of the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead of redeploying pediatric providers to work with internist-led teams throughout a medical center, pediatric physicians and nurses organized and staffed a 40-bed adult COVID-19 treatment unit within a children's hospital. We adapted internal medicine protocols, developed screening criteria to select appropriate patients for admission, and reorganized staffing and equipment to accommodate adult patients with COVID-19. We used patient counts and descriptive statistics to report sociodemographic, system, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The median patient age was 46 years; 69% were male. On admission, 78 (78%) required oxygen supplementation. During hospitalization, 13 (13%) eventually were intubated. Of the first 100 patients, 14 are still admitted to a medical unit, 6 are in the intensive care unit, 74 have been discharged, 4 died after transfer to the intensive care unit, and 2 died on the unit. The median length of stay for discharged or deceased patients was 4 days (IQR 2, 7). CONCLUSIONS: Our pediatric team screened, admitted, and cared for hospitalized adults by leveraging the familiarity of our system, adaptability of our staff, and high-quality infrastructure. This experience may be informative for other healthcare systems that will be redeploying pediatric providers and nurses to address a regional COVID-19 surge elsewhere.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Hospitais Pediátricos/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Capacidade de Resposta ante Emergências/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Medicina Interna/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Pandemias , Respiração Artificial , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Since January 2020, there has been a worldwide pandemic of COVID-19, caused by a novel coronavirus-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The United States has been particularly affected, with the largest number of confirmed cases in a single country in the world. Healthcare systems for adults as well as children have dealt with challenges. This article will reflect on the experiences of selected children's hospitals in Seattle, New York City, and New Orleans, three of the "hotspots" in the US and share common aspects and lessons learned from these experiences. This article discusses testing and cohorting of patients, personal protective equipment utilization, limiting workplace exposure, and information sharing.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Hospitais Pediátricos , Disseminação de Informação , Isolamento de Pacientes , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Hospitais Urbanos , Humanos , Nova Orleans , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados UnidosAssuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Criança , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Capacidade de Resposta ante EmergênciasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Residency programs are required to offer a didactic curriculum and protect resident time for education. Our institution implemented an academic half day (AHD) in the 2021-2022 academic year to address issues related to the standard noon conference series. OBJECTIVE: Determine the impact of AHD implementation on education, patient safety, and workflow. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-site educational intervention study. Pre- and post-implementation surveys and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surveys assessed changes in trainee and faculty attitudes and behaviors. Patient safety and workflow were evaluated by comparing the number of safety event reports, rapid response team activations, time to admission from the ED, and time of discharge on AHD days compared to other weekdays. RESULTS: Survey response rates were: residents 68%/48%, fellows 42%/35%, and faculty 59%/29%. AHD was associated with a significant, positive change in resident attitudes and experiences and on ACGME survey items. On AHDs compared with other weekdays, there were no significant differences in safety event report rates (P = .98), nor in rapid response team activation rates (P = .99). There was not a clinically meaningful difference in median admission time from the ED on AHD weekdays (125 minutes) compared to other weekdays (130 minutes, P = .04). There was no significant difference in median discharge time on AHD vs other weekdays (P = .13). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that there is no significant difference in patient safety or workflow with the implementation of AHD. This study supports prior studies that residents strongly prefer AHD. AHD may be a useful framework for resident education without compromising patient care.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Internato e Residência , Segurança do Paciente , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Currículo , Inquéritos e Questionários , Pediatria/educação , Fluxo de Trabalho , Fatores de Tempo , Docentes de MedicinaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Both respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza-associated lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) cause serious respiratory infections in infants and toddlers. We aimed to assess the frequency of complex hospital courses among patients admitted with influenza versus RSV LRTI. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on admissions of children <2 years who were admitted for LRTI and tested positive for influenza or RSV from 2016 to 2019. The primary outcome, complex hospital course, was a composite including: intensive care unit admission, respiratory support, nasogastric tube feeds, prolonged length of stay, and death. Secondary outcomes included 7-day readmission and time to respiratory support. Differences between RSV and influenza groups were assessed and unadjusted and adjusted regression models and competing risks time to event models were developed. RESULTS: There were 1094 (89%) RSV admissions and 134 (11%) influenza admissions. Children admitted for influenza were significantly older (336 vs. 165 days, p < 0.001), more likely to present with an abnormal heart rate for age (84.3% vs. 73.5%, p < 0.01) and a fever (27.6% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.02). Admissions with RSV were significantly more likely to experience a complex hospital course (ORadj = 3.5, 95% CI: 2.2-5.6). In time to event analysis, RSV admissions had a significantly higher rate of respiratory support (HRadj = 3.2, 95% CI: 2.0, 5.2). Readmission rates were similar. CONCLUSIONS: RSV admissions were associated with a higher risk for a complex hospital course and required higher rates of respiratory support than influenza admissions. This information may help in evaluating hospital resources and admissions.
Assuntos
Influenza Humana , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial , Vírus Sincicial Respiratório Humano , Infecções Respiratórias , Lactente , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Influenza Humana/complicações , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hospitalização , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/complicações , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a respiratory virus that can cause gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, with studies demonstrating detection of stool viral RNA weeks after respiratory tract clearance. It is unknown if children who test negative for SARS-CoV-2 on a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab may be shedding the virus in their stool. OBJECTIVE: To measure the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 stool shedding in children with positive and negative SARS-CoV-2 NP polymerase chain reactions (PCR) tests, and to determine clinical factors associated with GI shedding. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled hospitalized patients 0 to 21 years old with a positive or a negative SARS-CoV-2 NP PCR test who had respiratory and/or GI symptoms. Participants were surveyed, and stool samples were sent for viral PCR testing. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate bivariate associations of stool PCR test positivity with categorical variables. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were consented; 34 patients did not provide stool samples so 33 patients were included: 17 NP-positive and 16 NP-negative for SARS-CoV-2. Eight of the 17 NP-positive patients had a positive stool PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, while none of the 16 SARS-CoV-2 NP-negative patients had a positive result (P < .01). For the 17 SARS-CoV-2 NP-positive patients, GI symptoms were associated with a positive stool PCR test (P = .05) for SARS-CoV-2, but this association was not found for all 33 patients (P = .11). No associations were found with patients in an immunocompromised state or those with a comorbid condition, fever and/or chills, respiratory symptoms, headache and/or myalgias, or anosmia and/or ageusia. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 GI shedding is common and associated with GI symptoms in NP-positive children, with 47% having positive stool PCRs for SARS-CoV-2. GI shedding was not demonstrated in SARS-CoV-2 NP-negative children.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Criança Hospitalizada , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Eliminação de Partículas Virais , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Although evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) have specified postoperative admission criteria for pediatric tonsillectomy, there is substantial variation in guideline implementation and adherence among otolaryngologists in practice. We aimed to assess pediatric otolaryngologists' post-tonsillectomy admission practices and to examine patient and surgeon factors associated with differences in admission practices. METHODS: An electronic cross-sectional survey was distributed to members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology (ASPO) to determine current practices regarding admission practices following pediatric tonsillectomy. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare differences in adherence to tonsillectomy CPGs by respondent characteristics. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 644 pediatric otolaryngologists with a response rate of 19.1%. 37% of respondents reported "always" and 60% "often" using the Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) CPG to guide decision for admission. Years in practice was the factor most strongly associated with admission practices, with 10 or fewer years in practice significantly correlated with stricter adherence to the AAO-HNS CPG of overnight observation when Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) ≥10, age <3 years, or O2 nadir <80%) (OR 4.2, p <0.001), as well as specific individual criteria such as an AHI ≥10 (OR 4.1, p = 0.03). Respondents in an academic practice setting were more likely to admit children <3 years of age than those in private practice (OR 5.0, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Admission practices varied among pediatric otolaryngologist survey respondents, and strict AAO-HNS CPG adherence was associated with fewer years in practice and academic practice setting. These results suggest that further study investigating factors influencing guideline adherence and post-tonsillectomy admission practices is warranted.
Assuntos
Otolaringologia , Tonsilectomia , Adenoidectomia/métodos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Otorrinolaringologistas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tonsilectomia/métodos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Over 300,000 tonsillectomies are performed nationwide every year. In 2017, half of children undergoing tonsillectomy at our institution were admitted to the pediatric floor, with only 10.4% being discharged before 11 AM on postoperative day 1 (POD1). Our primary objective was to increase the percentage of patients discharged before 11 AM on POD1 to at least 50% within 1 year. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational (quality improvement). METHODS: A multidisciplinary quality improvement (QI) team was assembled. The primary outcome was "timely discharges," defined as percentage of patients discharged before 11 AM on POD1; secondary outcomes were percentage of patients discharged before 1 PM and mean length of stay (hours). Seven-day readmission rate served as our balancing measure. Prior year data served as baseline. A process map, Ishikawa diagram, and Pareto chart were utilized to identify specific target areas for improvement. Key interventions included announcement of our initiative, an electronic health record-based handoff text prompt, discharge checklist, automated discharge instructions, encouragement to place discharge orders by 9 AM and implementation of early POD1 rounds. Data were collected on a biweekly basis and the primary and secondary outcomes were plotted on control charts and analyzed using rules for special cause variation. RESULTS: Within 12 months, POD1 discharges before 11 AM and before 1 PM increased to 44.9% and 83.8%, respectively, with sustained improvement for the first 6 months of the subsequent year. Mean length of stay decreased, and 7-day readmission rates were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: By understanding the factors influencing timely POD1 discharges after tonsillectomy, key interventions were implemented to achieve an increase in timely discharges. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:225-233, 2022.
Assuntos
Alta do Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade , Tonsilectomia/métodos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Alta do Paciente/normas , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients from families with limited English proficiency (LEP) are at risk for health care disparities. We examined timeliness of analgesic administration in pediatric postoperative patients with a limb fracture from LEP versus non-LEP families. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of children aged 1 year to <18 years of age, hospitalized to the general inpatient floor after surgical correction of single limb fractures between July 2016 and July 2019 were eligible. Patients whose consent was in a non-English language or for whom an interpreter was used were classified as from LEP families. The primary outcome was time to first analgesia. Secondary outcomes included time to first opioid, proportion with any analgesia and opioid analgesia, and number of pain assessments. Associations between LEP and outcomes were tested by using χ2 tests, Kaplan-Meier plots, and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: We examined 306 patients, of whom 59 (19%) were from LEP families. Children in LEP families were significantly less likely to receive any analgesia (86.4% vs 96.8%, P ≤ .01) and experienced longer time to first analgesia in unadjusted (hazard ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.92) and adjusted analyses (hazard ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.94). There was no significant association between LEP and time to first opioid, proportion given opioid analgesia, or number of pain assessments. CONCLUSION: Hospitalized children from LEP families experience a longer time to analgesia administration after surgery. The mechanisms that lead to these differences in care must be identified so that interventions can be designed to address them.
Assuntos
Analgesia , Barreiras de Comunicação , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Humanos , Idioma , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires that residents demonstrate increasing autonomy during their training. Although residents report a better educational environment with hospitalists present during family-centered rounds (FCRs), there is a concern that attending presence may reduce resident autonomy. We aim to determine the effect of FCRs without an attending during rounds on senior residents' sense of autonomy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, preintervention-postintervention study at 5 children's hospitals to evaluate the effect of rounding without an attending on senior residents' self-efficacy, using a questionnaire developed by using Bandura's principles of self-efficacy and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestones. Questions addressed skills of diagnosis and/or management, communication, teaching, and team management. We compared preintervention and postintervention results using paired t tests and Wilcoxon rank tests. One-way analysis of variance tests were used to compare means among >2 groups. RESULTS: 116 (82% response rate) of 142 eligible senior residents completed the questionnaire, which yielded a high reliability (α = 0.80) with a 1-factor score. The average composite score of self-efficacy significantly improved after intervention compared with the preintervention score (66.71 ± 6.95 vs 60.91 ± 6.82; P < .001). Additional analyses revealed meaningful improvement of each individual item postintervention. The highest gain was reported in directing bedside teaching (71.8% vs 42.5%; P < .001) and answering learner questions on rounds (70.7% vs 47.0%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Conducting FCRs without an attending increases resident reported self-efficacy regarding core elements of patient care and team leadership. In future studies, researchers should examine the impact of rounding without the attending on other stakeholders, such as students, interns, patients and/or families.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Visitas de Preceptoria , Criança , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: One in five pediatric patients suffers from adverse events related to hospital discharge. Current literature lacks evidence on effective interventions to improve caregiver comprehension (CC) of discharge instructions. We examined if a standardized framework for written and verbal discharge counseling was associated with increased CC of key discharge instructions after discharge from a general pediatric inpatient unit. METHODS: An interprofessional team created the SAFER Care framework to encourage standard, comprehensive discharge counseling. Plan-do-study-act cycles included electronic health record smartphrases, educational initiatives, data feedback, visual aids, and family outreach. Caregivers were surveyed by phone within 4 days of discharge. Our primary outcome was the proportion of caregivers correctly responding to all questions related to discharge care, comparing pre- and postintervention periods. Data were plotted on a statistical process control chart to assess the effectiveness of interventions. RESULTS: A total of 171 surveys were analyzed in the preintervention period, and 262 surveys were analyzed in the postintervention period. A total of 37% of caregivers correctly responded to all questions in the preintervention period, compared with 62% of caregivers in the postintervention period, meeting rules for special cause variation. CONCLUSIONS: Development of the SAFER Care framework and its use in written and verbal discharge counseling was associated with significantly improved CC of discharge instructions in a general pediatric inpatient unit. Further studies should be focused on expanding this to other populations, particularly limited-English-proficiency families.
Assuntos
Cuidadores , Compreensão , Sumários de Alta do Paciente Hospitalar , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Comunicação , Feminino , Hospitalização , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Alta do Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Care for many children with medical complexity (CMC) is fragmented, leading to increased family dissatisfaction and stress. We evaluated the impact of an Advanced-Practice Nurse and Care Coordination Assistant model medical care coordination program (MCCP) for CMC at an urban tertiary pediatric hospital on caregivers' perceptions of several health care indicators. METHOD: A retrospective pre-post survey was administered to parents of CMC enrolled in an MCCP for a minimum of 6 months. Questions were grouped into four domains: quality of life, caregiver satisfaction, care coordination, and caregiver self-efficacy. Mean scores of questions in each domain were compared from before program enrollment with those at the time of survey completion, using paired sample t tests. RESULT: There was an increase in the mean score in all four domains. DISCUSSION: Parents of CMC experience an Advanced-Practice Nurse and Care Coordination Assistant model MCCP to be effective in improving the navigation of and satisfaction with their child's health care environment.
Assuntos
Prática Avançada de Enfermagem , Cuidadores , Doença Crônica , Criança , Humanos , Pais , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Practice guidelines have been published for bronchiolitis and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but little is known about pediatricians' knowledge of and attitudes toward these guidelines since their publication. METHODS: We surveyed pediatric providers at 6 children's hospitals in the New York City area. Two vignettes, an infant with bronchiolitis and a child with CAP, were provided, and respondents were asked about management. Associations between respondent characteristics and their reported practices were examined using χ2 and Fisher's exact tests. Associations between questions probing knowledge and attitude barriers relevant to guideline adherence and reported practices were examined using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel relative risk estimates. RESULTS: Of 283 respondents, 58% were trainees; 57% of attending physician respondents had finished training within 10 years. Overall, 76% and 45% of respondents reported they had read the bronchiolitis and CAP guidelines, respectively. For the bronchiolitis vignette, 40% reported ordering a chest radiograph (CXR), and 38% prescribed bronchodilators (neither recommended). For the CAP vignette, 38% prescribed ceftriaxone (not recommended). Study site, level of training, and practice locations were associated with nonrecommended practices. Site-adjusted knowledge and attitude barriers were used to identify that those who agreed CXRs were useful in managing bronchiolitis were more likely to order CXRs, and those who felt bronchodilators shortened length of stay were more likely to prescribe them. Concerns about ampicillin resistance and lack of confidence using local susceptibility patterns to guide prescribing were associated with ordering ceftriaxone. CONCLUSIONS: Provider-level factors and knowledge gaps were associated with ordering nonrecommended treatments for bronchiolitis and CAP.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Bronquiolite/terapia , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatras/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Bronquiolite/diagnóstico , Humanos , Lactente , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Pediatras/normas , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Inquéritos e Questionários , Procedimentos Desnecessários/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Family-centered care promotes parental engagement in medical decision-making for hospitalized children. Little is understood about parental preferences and factors influencing the desire to involve extended family in decision-making. We explored parent and family member interest in participation in medical decision-making. METHODS: Parents of hospitalized children ≤7 years old admitted to the inpatient service were interviewed regarding preferences for self-, other parent, and extended family involvement in decision-making. Scores were calculated for each potential participant on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 indicating that parents strongly agreed with participation). Associations of decision-making preferences with parental age, education, language, and health; the involvement of a child with chronic illness; and the level of clinical acuity were assessed with χ2 tests, Wilcoxon rank tests, and the Spearman correlation. RESULTS: There were 116 participants. Parents' median level of interest in participation in decision-making was as follows: self (4.3; interquartile range [IQR]: 4-4.6); other parent (3.6; IQR: 2.7-4), and family (2.0; IQR: 1.7-2.7). Parents with better physical health (P < .001) and those in a relationship with the other parent (P < .001) were more likely to desire involvement of the other parent in medical decision-making. This was also true for those who faced higher acuity scenarios. Parents <35 years old (P < .01) and those who were interviewed in Spanish (P = .03) were more likely to desire participation of extended family members. CONCLUSIONS: Parents of hospitalized children want to participate in medical decision-making. Desire for the involvement of other family members is complex; therefore, discussions regarding parental preferences are necessary.
Assuntos
Criança Hospitalizada , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/ética , Tomada de Decisões/ética , Pais/psicologia , Relações Profissional-Família/ética , Criança , Criança Hospitalizada/psicologia , Pré-Escolar , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoAssuntos
Tutoria , Mentores , Criança , Docentes , Docentes de Medicina , Humanos , Grupo Associado , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations of children with medical complexity (CMC) account for one-half of hospital days in children, with lengths of stays (LOS) that are typically longer than those for children without medical complexity. The objective was to assess the impact of, risk factors for, and variation across children's hospitals regarding long LOS (≥10 days) hospitalizations in CMC. METHODS: A retrospective study of 954,018 CMC hospitalizations, excluding admissions for neonatal and cancer care, during 2013 to 2014 in 44 children's hospitals. CMC were identified using 3M's Clinical Risk Group categories 6, 7, and 9, representing children with multiple and/or catastrophic chronic conditions. Multivariable regression was used to identify demographic and clinical characteristics associated with LOS ≥10 days. Hospital-level risk-adjusted rates of long LOS generated from these models were compared using a covariance test of the hospitals' random effect. RESULTS: Among CMC, LOS ≥10 days accounted for 14.9% (n = 142,082) of all admissions and 61.8% ($13.7 billion) of hospital costs. The characteristics most strongly associated with LOS ≥10 days were use of intensive care unit (ICU) (odds ratio [OR]: 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4-3.5), respiratory complex chronic condition (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 2.6-2.7), and transfer from another medical facility (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 2.0-2.1). After adjusting for severity, there was significant (P < 0.001) variation in the prevalence of LOS ≥10 days for CMC across children's hospitals (range, 10.3%-21.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Long hospitalizations for CMC are costly. Their prevalence varies significantly by type of chronic condition and across children's hospitals. Efforts to reduce hospital costs in CMC might benefit from a focus on prolonged LOS. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:750-756. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.