Preoperative B-Type Natriuretic Peptides to Predict Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Post-operative atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication following cardiac surgery. There has been extensive exploration of clinical variables, imaging, and biomarkers to predict its occurrence after cardiac surgery. In this study, we examine the emerging biomarkers B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) to assess their pre-operative values and correlations with the occurrence of post-operative AF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE via Ovid, ClinicalTrials.Gov, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify studies published until March 2023. The studies were included if they reported pre-operative BNP or NT-proBNP values and the development of post-operative AF in cardiac surgery patients. Subsequently, data were extracted, and a meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020) and SPSS version 28 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) to assess the difference between pre-operative BNP and NT-proBNP levels between patients with post-operative AF (AF group) and those without (No-AF group) using a random-effect model. Further analysis was performed in three subgroups: isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, isolated valve, and combined/mixed surgery group. RESULT: A total of 20 studies, including 9,079 participants were identified and included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Pre-operative BNP levels were reported in 11 studies, and NT-proBNP levels were reported in 10 studies, of which one study reported both BNP and NT-proBNP levels. There is an overall significant difference between pre-operative levels of BNP (p=0.03, I2=95%) and NT-proBNP (p<0.001, I2=65%) when compared between AF and No-AF groups. Nonetheless, subgroup analysis showed there is no significant difference in pre-operative BNP levels, except in isolated valve surgery (p<0.001), whereas all subgroups showed significantly different pre-operative levels of NT-proBNP. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated levels of both BNP and NT-proBNP were observed in patients who developed post-operative AF after undergoing cardiac surgery. In particular, pre-operative NT-proBNP levels were elevated in all patients irrespective of the type of surgical procedure, but elevated pre-operative BNP was only seen in valve surgery patients. These findings suggest the potential usefulness of NT-proBNP as a promising biomarker for predicting the occurrence of post-operative AF following cardiac surgery.

Pericardiotomy and atrial fibrillation after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and pericardial effusion are notable complications following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), contributing to increased morbidity and healthcare costs. Posterior pericardiotomy has been proposed to mitigate these complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy of posterior pericardiotomy in reducing postoperative AF and pericardial effusion in isolated CABG patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase, Scopus, the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov up to December 2023. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylactic posterior pericardiotomy to control treatments in adult CABG patients were included. The primary outcomes assessed were the incidences of postoperative AF and pericardial effusion. RESULTS: The meta-analysis incorporated 16 RCTs with a total of 2414 patients. The findings demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of postoperative AF (Odds Ratio = 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.25-0.48, P < 0.00001) and pericardial effusion (Odd Ratio = 0.24, 95 % CI: 0.15-0.38, P < 0.0001) in the group undergoing posterior pericardiotomy. However, the analysis revealed substantial heterogeneity and publication bias in the included studies. CONCLUSION: The posterior pericardiotomy is effective in reducing the incidences of AF and pericardial effusion in patients undergoing isolated CABG. Despite the positive outcomes, the presence of heterogeneity and publication bias warrants a cautious interpretation of the results and underscores the need for further multicentre RCTs in this area.