The diagnosis of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus: meeting the challenges.

Posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a major complication after renal transplantation due to its negative impact on patient and graft survival, and affects up to 40% of renal transplant recipients. The generation of evidence regarding its optimal treatment is now progressing with some emphasis on early postoperative insulin treatment that targets ß-cell failure. This therapy seems to benefit renal transplant patients but contrasts with previous PTDM guidelines that were following treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM): oral antidiabetics first, insulin last. Similarly, in the current PTDM consensus recommendations, diagnostic procedures are in accordance with the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommendations for diagnosis of DM. PTDM and type 2 DM, however, are distinct disease entities with different pathophysiological backgrounds. This review will discuss the significance of the standard diagnostic criteria for DM in patients after renal transplantation without prior DM. In particular, the role of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) will be reviewed. In addition, the potential role of other glycated proteins and continuous glucose monitoring will be covered, although these parameters are not yet part of the consensus recommendations.

Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin in new-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation--a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious complication after kidney transplantation, but therapeutic strategies remain underexplored. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors selectively foster insulin secretion without inducing hypoglycemia, which might be advantageous in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with NODAT. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial to assess safety and efficacy of the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin. Intraindividual differences in oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived 2-h plasma glucose (2HPG) from baseline to 3 months after treatment served as primary endpoint. Among secondary outcomes, we evaluated HbA1c, metabolic and safety parameters, as well as OGTTs at 1 month after drug discontinuation. Of 509 stable KTRs who were screened in our outpatient clinic, 63 (12.4%) had 2HPG ≥ 200 mg/dL, 33 of them were randomized and 32 completed the study. In the vildagliptin group 2HPG and HbA1c were profoundly reduced in comparison to placebo (vildagliptin: 2HPG = 182.7 mg/dL, HbA1c = 6.1%; placebo: 2HPG = 231.2 mg/dL, HbA1c = 6.5%; both p ≤ 0.05), and statistical significance was achieved for the primary endpoint (vildagliptin: 2HPG-difference -73.7 ± 51.3 mg/dL; placebo: -5.7 ± 41.4 mg/dL; p < 0.01). Adverse events were generally mild and occurred at similar rates in both groups. In conclusion, DPP-4 inhibition in KTRs with overt NODAT was safe and efficient, providing a novel treatment alternative for this specific form of diabetes.

Proceedings from an international consensus meeting on posttransplantation diabetes mellitus: recommendations and future directions.

A consensus meeting was held in Vienna on September 8-9, 2013, to discuss diagnostic and therapeutic challenges surrounding development of diabetes mellitus after transplantation. The International Expert Panel comprised 24 transplant nephrologists, surgeons, diabetologists and clinical scientists, which met with the aim to review previous guidelines in light of emerging clinical data and research. Recommendations from the consensus discussions are provided in this article. Although the meeting was kidney-centric, reflecting the expertise present, these recommendations are likely to be relevant to other solid organ transplant recipients. Our recommendations include: terminology revision from new-onset diabetes after transplantation to posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM), exclusion of transient posttransplant hyperglycemia from PTDM diagnosis, expansion of screening strategies (incorporating postprandial glucose and HbA1c) and opinion-based guidance regarding pharmacological therapy in light of recent clinical evidence. Future research in the field was discussed with the aim of establishing collaborative working groups to address unresolved questions. These recommendations are opinion-based and intended to serve as a template for planned guidelines update, based on systematic and graded literature review, on the diagnosis and management of PTDM.

CMV late phase-induced mTOR activation is essential for efficient virus replication in polarized human macrophages.

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains one of the most important pathogens following solid-organ transplantation. Mounting evidence indicates that mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors may decrease the incidence of CMV infection in solid-organ recipients. Here we aimed at elucidating the molecular mechanisms of this effect by employing a human CMV (HCMV) infection model in human macrophages, since myeloid cells are the principal in vivo targets of HCMV. We demonstrate a highly divergent host cell permissiveness for HCMV with optimal infection susceptibility in M2 but not M1 polarized macrophages. Employing an ultrahigh purified HCMV stock we observed rapamycin-independent viral entry and induction of IFN-ß transcripts, but no proinflammatory cytokines or mitogen-activated protein kinases and mTOR activation early after infection. However, in the late infection phase, sustained mTOR activation was observed in HCMV-infected cells and was required for efficient viral protein synthesis including the viral late phase proteins pUL-44 and pp65. Accordingly, rapamycin strongly suppressed CMV replication 3 and 5 days postinfection in macrophages. In conclusion, these data indicate that mTOR is essential for virus replication during late phases of the viral cycle in myeloid cells and might explain the potent anti-CMV effects of mTOR inhibitors after organ transplantation.

Camostat Mesylate Versus Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19-Results From a Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Platform Trial (ACOVACT).

Background: To date, no oral antiviral drug has proven to be beneficial in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods: In this randomized, controlled, open-label, platform trial, we randomly assigned patients ≥18 years hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia to receive either camostat mesylate (CM) (considered standard-of-care) or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV). The primary endpoint was time to sustained clinical improvement (≥48 h) of at least one point on the 7-category WHO scale. Secondary endpoints included length of stay (LOS), need for mechanical ventilation (MV) or death, and 29-day mortality. Results: 201 patients were included in the study (101 CM and 100 LPV/RTV) between 20 April 2020 and 14 May 2021. Mean age was 58.7 years, and 67% were male. The median time from symptom onset to randomization was 7 days (IQR 5-9). Patients in the CM group had a significantly shorter time to sustained clinical improvement (HR = 0.67, 95%-CI 0.49-0.90; 9 vs. 11 days, p = 0.008) and demonstrated less progression to MV or death [6/101 (5.9%) vs. 15/100 (15%), p = 0.036] and a shorter LOS (12 vs. 14 days, p = 0.023). A statistically nonsignificant trend toward a lower 29-day mortality in the CM group than the LPV/RTV group [2/101 (2%) vs. 7/100 (7%), p = 0.089] was observed. Conclusion: In patients hospitalized for COVID-19, the use of CM was associated with shorter time to clinical improvement, reduced need for MV or death, and shorter LOS than the use of LPV/RTV. Furthermore, research is needed to confirm the efficacy of CM in larger placebo-controlled trials. Systematic Review Registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04351724, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2020-001302-30/AT], identifier [NCT04351724, EUDRACT-NR: 2020-001302-30].

The multifunctional role of mTOR in innate immunity: implications for transplant immunity.

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an evolutionary conserved serine-threonine kinase that senses various environmental stimuli in most cells primarily to control cell growth. Restriction of cellular proliferation by mTOR inhibition led to the use of mTOR inhibitors as immunosuppressants in allogeneic transplantation as well as novel anticancer agents. However, distinct inflammatory side effects such as fever, pneumonitis, glomerulonephritis or anemia of chronic disease have been observed under this treatment regime. Apart from the mere cell-cycle regulatory effect of mTOR in dividing cells, recent data revealed a master regulatory role of mTOR in the innate immune system. Hence, inhibition of mTOR promotes proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-12 and IL-1beta, inhibits the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and boosts MHC antigen presentation via autophagy in monocytes/macrophages and dendritic cells. Moreover, mTOR regulates type I interferon production and the expression of chemokine receptors and costimulatory molecules. These results place mTOR in a complex immunoregulatory context by controlling innate and adaptive immune responses. In this review, we discuss the clinical consequences of mTOR-inhibitor therapy and aim to integrate this recent data into our current view of the molecular mechanisms of clinically employed mTOR inhibitors and discuss their relevance with special emphasis to transplantation.

Late onset Pneumocystis pneumonia in renal transplantation after long-term immunosuppression with belatacept.

Interference with T-cell function increases the risk of infections, especially during the early post-transplant period. Belatacept, a costimulation blocker, is currently being tested in phase III clinical trials. Here we report a renal transplant recipient who received belatacept and developed severe Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) with fatal superinfections 4 years post transplant. Cytomegalovirus infection preceded PCP, which typically occurs in overimmunosuppressed patients, but has not yet been reported under T-cell costimulation blockade in transplant patients. This case illustrates the possibility of excessive immunosuppression even with a lymphocyte-specific regimen.

Ksp-cadherin is a functional cell-cell adhesion molecule related to LI-cadherin.

Ksp- and LI-cadherin are structurally homologous proteins coexpressed with E-cadherin in renal and intestinal epithelia, respectively. Whereas LI-cadherin has been shown to mediate Ca2+-dependent homotypic cell-cell adhesion independent of stable interactions with the cytoskeleton, little is known about the physiological role of Ksp-cadherin. To analyze its potential adhesive and morphoregulatory functions, we expressed murine Ksp-cadherin in CHO cells. In this report, we show that Ksp-cadherin induces homotypic and Ca2+-dependent cell-cell adhesion that can be specifically blocked with antibodies raised against the cadherin repeats EC1 and EC2. Ksp-cadherin mediates about the same quantitative adhesive effect (aggregation index) as LI- and E-cadherin. However, the cellular phenotype induced by Ksp-cadherin resembles more closely that of LI- than E-cadherin. This could reflect our observation, that Ksp-cadherin, as well as LI-cadherin, does not directly interact with beta-catenin. In conclusion, both cadherins are thus not only structurally but also functionally related and may share other functions within their respective epithelia.