Stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy for resected brain metastases: current pattern of care in the Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy Working Group of the German Association for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO).

PURPOSE: Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases may achieve similar local control and better leptomeningeal control rates than postoperative fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) in patients treated with elective metastasectomy. To plan a multicentre trial of preoperative SRS compared with postoperative FSRT, a survey of experts was conducted to determine current practice. METHODS: A survey with 15 questions was distributed to the DEGRO Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy Working Group. Participants were asked under what circumstances they offered SRS, FSRT, partial and/or whole brain radiotherapy before or after resection of a brain metastasis, as well as the feasibility of preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery and neurosurgical resection within 6 days. RESULTS: Of 25 participants from 24 centres, 22 completed 100% of the questions. 24 respondents were radiation oncologists and 1 was a neurosurgeon. All 24 centres have one or more dedicated radiosurgery platform and all offer postoperative FSRT. Preoperative SRS is offered by 4/24 (16.7%) centres, and 9/24 (37.5%) sometimes recommend single-fraction postoperative SRS. Partial brain irradiation is offered by 8/24 (33.3%) centres and 12/24 (50%) occasionally recommend whole-brain irradiation. Two centres are participating in clinical trials of preoperative SRS. SRS techniques and fractionation varied between centres. CONCLUSION: All responding centres currently offer postoperative FSRT after brain metastasectomy. Approximately one third offer single-fraction postoperative SRS and four already perform preoperative SRS. With regard to potential co-investigators, 18 were identified for the PREOP­2 multicentre trial, which will randomise between preoperative SRS and postoperative FSRT.

Functional autoantibodies against serpin E2 in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To search for novel autoantibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in an effort to better understand the processes of joint destruction in this disease. METHODS: Using a modified SEREX technique and complementary DNA derived from RA synovium, serpin E2 was identified as a novel autoantigen and was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Levels of anti-serpin E2 autoantibodies in serum and synovial fluid from patients with RA, osteoarthritis (OA), psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis, and/or from healthy individuals were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Since serpin E2 is an inhibitor of serine proteases, we studied the inhibitory activity of serpin E2 toward its target, urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), in vitro in the presence of isolated anti-serpin E2 autoantibodies and in vivo using the uPA activity assay. RESULTS: We identified autoantibodies against serpin E2 by the SEREX technique. Serpin E2 was overexpressed in RA synovial tissues as compared with OA synovial tissues. Significantly higher levels of anti-serpin E2 autoantibodies were present in samples of synovial fluid (28%) and serum (22%) from RA patients as compared with OA patients (0 and 6%, respectively) or with healthy individuals (6% of sera). Most importantly, anti-serpin E2 autoantibodies isolated from RA sera reversed the inhibitory activity of serpin E2 by 70%. Furthermore, the levels of anti-serpin E2 autoantibodies correlated with the uPA activity in vivo. CONCLUSION: This study characterizes a functional property of a novel autoantibody in RA. Since anti-serpin E2 autoantibodies interfere with the inhibitory activity of serpin E2 toward serine proteases, they might facilitate the joint destruction in RA.