Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil (DOF) in Metastatic and Unresectable Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Phase II Study with Long-Term Follow-Up.

LESSONS LEARNED: Adding docetaxel to the modified FOLFOX7 backbone (DOF) is a feasible three-drug combination therapy for advanced gastric cancer with high activity, providing evidence that leucovorin is not necessary in this setting.The DOF regimen represents an alternative to the FLOT (5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 as 24-hour infusion with leucovorin 200 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, and docetaxel 50 mg/m2) regimen that can be considered in select patients with advanced gastric cancer and is a potential choice in the curative setting. BACKGROUND: The combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) demonstrates high response rates in advanced gastric cancer, albeit with increased toxicity. Given the efficacy of platinum-taxane-fluoropyrimidine regimens, this phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and 5-FU (DOF) for the treatment of metastatic or unresectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients with metastatic or unresectable gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma with no prior therapy for metastatic disease received docetaxel 50 mg/m2 on day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-FU 2,400 mg/m2 continuous intravenous infusion over 46 hours; cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled. Assessment of treatment response and toxicity was feasible in 41 and 43 patients, respectively. ORR was 73.2% (68.3% partial response; 4.9% complete response). Therapy was discontinued for progressive disease in 53%, toxicity in 26%, and death on treatment in 16%. Two patients underwent surgical resection. Thirty-three patients (76.7%) received at least seven cycles (7-34). Grade 3-4 toxicities occurred in 31 patients (72.1%), including neutropenia (23.3%), neurologic (20.9%), and diarrhea (14.0%). Median overall survival was 10.3 months. CONCLUSION: DOF demonstrates a high response rate, expected safety profile, and prolonged survival and remains an option for select patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Identifies a Subset of Crizotinib-Responsive ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Not Detected by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.

INTRODUCTION: For patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to benefit from ALK inhibitors, sensitive and specific detection of ALK genomic rearrangements is needed. ALK break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved and standard-of-care diagnostic assay, but identification of ALK rearrangements by other methods reported in NSCLC cases that tested negative for ALK rearrangements by FISH suggests a significant false-negative rate. We report here a large series of NSCLC cases assayed by hybrid-capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in the course of clinical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hybrid-capture-based CGP using next-generation sequencing was performed in the course of clinical care of 1,070 patients with advanced lung cancer. Each tumor sample was evaluated for all classes of genomic alterations, including base-pair substitutions, insertions/deletions, copy number alterations and rearrangements, as well as fusions/rearrangements. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients (4.4%) were found to harbor ALK rearrangements, of whom 41 had an EML4-ALK fusion, and 6 had other fusion partners, including 3 previously unreported rearrangement events: EIF2AK-ALK, PPM1B-ALK, and PRKAR1A-ALK. Of 41 patients harboring ALK rearrangements, 31 had prior FISH testing results available. Of these, 20 were ALK FISH positive, and 11 (35%) were ALK FISH negative. Of the latter 11 patients, 9 received crizotinib based on the CGP results, and 7 achieved a response with median duration of 17 months. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive genomic profiling detected canonical ALK rearrangements and ALK rearrangements with noncanonical fusion partners in a subset of patients with NSCLC with previously negative ALK FISH results. In this series, such patients had durable responses to ALK inhibitors, comparable to historical response rates for ALK FISH-positive cases. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) that includes hybrid capture and specific baiting of intron 19 of ALK is a highly sensitive, alternative method for identification of drug-sensitive ALK fusions in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had previously tested negative using standard ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) diagnostic assays. Given the proven benefit of treatment with crizotinib and second-generation ALK inhibitors in patients with ALK fusions, CGP should be considered in patients with NSCLC, including those who have tested negative for other alterations, including negative results using ALK FISH testing.

A personalized treatment for lung cancer: molecular pathways, targeted therapies, and genomic characterization.

Lung cancer is a heterogeneous, complex, and challenging disease to treat. With the arrival of genotyping and genomic profiling, our simple binary division of lung cancer into non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is no longer acceptable. In the past decade and with the advent of personalized medicine, multiple advances have been made in understanding the underlying biology and molecular mechanisms of lung cancer. Lung cancer is no longer considered a single disease entity and is now being subdivided into molecular subtypes with dedicated targeted and chemotherapeutic strategies. The concept of using information from a patient's tumor to make therapeutic and treatment decisions has revolutionized the landscape for cancer care and research in general.Management of non-small-cell lung cancer, in particular, has seen several of these advances, with the understanding of activating mutations in EGFR, fusion genes involving ALK, rearrangements in ROS-1, and ongoing research in targeted therapies for K-RAS and MET. The next era of personalized treatment for lung cancer will involve a comprehensive genomic characterization of adenocarcinoma, squamous-cell carcinoma, and small-cell carcinoma into various subtypes. Future directions will involve incorporation of molecular characteristics and next generation sequencing into screening strategies to improve early detection, while also having applications for joint treatment decision making in the clinics with patients and practitioners. Personalization of therapy will involve close collaboration between the laboratory and the clinic. Given the heterogeneity and complexity of lung cancer treatment with respect to histology, tumor stage, and genomic characterization, mind mapping has been developed as one of many tools which can assist physicians in this era of personalized medicine. We attempt to utilize the above tool throughout this chapter, while reviewing lung cancer epidemiology, lung cancer treatment, and the genomic characterization of lung cancer.

Molecular biomarkers for future screening of lung cancer.

The Landmark National Lung Screening Trial established the potential for low dose CT screening (LDCT) to reduce lung cancer-specific mortality in high-risk patients as defined by smoking history and age. However, the prevalence of lung cancer in asymptomatic smokers selected based on the NLST criteria is low. Recent advances have facilitated biomarker discovery for early diagnosis of lung cancer through the analysis of surrogate tissues, including airway epithelium, sputum, exhaled breath, and blood. Although a number of candidate diagnostic biomarkers have been described, none have been validated for use in the clinical setting. The NLST ACRIN biomarker repository is a valuable resource of annotated biological specimens that were collected during the NLST trial, which has the potential to facilitate validation of candidate biomarkers for early diagnosis identified in discovery trials. It will be important to perform retrospective and prospective analysis of biomarkers to screen for lung cancer. The review below summarizes some of our understanding of biomarkers in screening.

Germline mutations in high penetrance genes are associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Objective: To determine the frequency of pathogenic mutations in high-penetrance genes (HPGs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and identify whether such mutations are associated with clinicopathologic outcomes. Methods: Patients with NSCLC who had consented to participate in a linked clinical database and biorepository underwent germline DNA sequencing using a next-generation sequencing panel that included cancer-associated HPGs and cancer risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). These data were linked to the clinical database to assess for associations between germline variants and clinical phenotype using Fisher's exact test and multivariable logistic and Cox regression. Results: We analyzed 151 patients, among whom 33% carried any pathogenic HPG mutation and 23% had a genetic risk score (GRS) >1.5. Among the patients without any pathogenic mutation, 31% were at cancer stage II or higher, compared with 55% of those with 2 types of HPG mutations (P = .0293); 40% of patients with both types of HPG mutations had cancer recurrence, compared with 21% of patients without both types (P = .0644). In multivariable analysis, the presence of 2 types of HPG mutations was associated with higher cancer stage (odds ratio [OR], 3.32; P = .0228), increased recurrence of primary tumor (OR, 2.93; P = .0527), shorter time to recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 3.03; P = .0119), and decreased cancer-specific (HR, 3.53; P = .0039) and overall survival (HR, 2.44; P = .0114). Conclusions: The presence of mutations in HPGs is associated with higher cancer stage, increased risk of recurrence, and worse cancer-specific and overall survival in patients with NSCLC. Further large studies are needed to better delineate the role of HPGs in cancer recurrence and the potential benefit of adjuvant treatment in patients harboring such mutations.

Safe Transitions and Congregate Living in the Age of COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 represents a grave risk to residents in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether establishment of an appropriate-use committee was associated with a reduction in SNF utilization. DESIGNS, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study at NorthShore University HealthSystem, a multihospital integrated health system in northern Illinois. Participants were patients hospitalized from March 19, 2019, to July 16, 2020. INTERVENTION: Creation of a multidisciplinary committee to assess appropriateness of discharge to SNF following hospitalization. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Primary outcome was total discharges to SNFs. Secondary outcomes were new discharges to SNFs, readmissions, length of stay (LOS), and COVID-19 incidence following discharge. RESULTS: Matched populations pre and post intervention were each 4424 patients. Post intervention, there was a relative reduction in total SNF discharges of 49.7% (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.38-0.47) and in new SNF discharges of 66.9% (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.25-0.34). Differences in readmissions and LOS were not statistically significant. For patients discharged to a SNF, 2.99% (95% CI, 1.59%-4.39%) developed COVID-19 within 30 days, compared with 0.26% (95% CI, 0.29%-0.93%) of patients discharged to other settings (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Implementing a review committee to assess for appropriateness of SNF use after a hospitalization during the COVID-19 pandemic is highly effective. There was no negative impact on safety or efficiency of hospital care, and reduced SNF use likely prevented several cases of COVID-19. This model could serve as a template for other hospitals to reduce the risks of COVID-19 in SNFs and as part of a value-based care strategy.

Alliance Foundation Trial 09: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 2 Trial Evaluating Two Sequences of Pembrolizumab and Standard Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: The sequence of chemotherapy and pembrolizumab may affect antitumor immune response and efficacy of immunotherapy. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of two sequences of chemotherapy and pembrolizumab in patients with stage 4 NSCLC. Both arms were considered investigational, and the study used a "pick a winner" design. The primary end point was objective response rate by independent radiologic review after eight cycles (24 wk). Patients were randomized 1:1 to arm A (chemotherapy for four cycles followed by pembrolizumab for four cycles) or arm B (pembrolizumab for four cycles followed by chemotherapy for four cycles). Patients in both arms without disease progression after the initial eight cycles continued pembrolizumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a maximum of 2 years. RESULTS: From March 2016 to July 2018, a total of 90 eligible patients were randomized (43 patients to arm A and 47 patients to arm B). The objective response rate at 24 weeks in arms A and B was 39.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 24.9%-54.1 %) and 40.4 % (95 % CI: 26.4%-54.5 %), respectively (p = 0.93). The progression-free survival in arms A and B was as follows: hazard ratio of B versus A equals to 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.68-1.66, p value equals to 0.84, and median progression-free survival of 5.8 months and 4 months, respectively. The overall survival was as follows: hazard ratio of B versus A equals to 1.04, 95 % CI: 0.63-1.74, p value equals to 0.85, and median overall survival of 15.5 months and 14 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Additional evaluation of either sequence in a phase 3 trial is not warranted.

A multicenter phase II trial of carboplatin and cetuximab for treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the activity of carboplatin and cetuximab in NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single arm, multicenter phase II trial, and the primary objective was response rate. RESULTS: The overall response rate observed was 9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3-19), the progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.9-3.6), the median overall survival was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4.9-10.5), and 1-year survival rate was 33% (95% CI, 21-45). CONCLUSION: The combination of carboplatin and cetuximab demonstrated lower activity than double agent platinum-based therapy and does not warrant further development.

Relationship between symptom change, objective tumor measurements, and performance status during chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to identify which symptoms of advanced lung cancer are most likely to change with objective tumor measurements (progressions and responses) or changes in performance status (PS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were studied during the first 12 weeks of chemotherapy. Symptoms were assessed weekly through telephone administration of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung Symptom Index-12. Data on PS were collected from patients every 3 weeks. Symptom reports were mapped onto clinical events (progression or response as determined by clinicians) and PS assessments. RESULTS: Disease progression and declining PS were associated with worsening of several symptoms. Pain, shortness of breath, cough, weight loss, and appetite loss worsened most from before to after progression. Patients with an objective response to chemotherapy reported more fatigue and difficulty breathing at response than before response. However, unlike patients who experienced progression, patients responding to chemotherapy never or rarely complained of clinically significant pain, weight loss, cough, chest tightness, nausea, or confusion before, during, or after response. With the exception of bother with side effects of treatment, confusion, and difficulty breathing, symptoms tracked fairly closely over the 12 weeks with changes in PS. Declining PS was associated with considerably more symptom worsening than unchanged or improved PS, independent of treatment response. CONCLUSION: These data can help the clinician identify symptoms of lung cancer most reliably associated with objective responses and perceived changes in functional status during chemotherapy. Symptom self-reports could be used by clinicians to monitor patient status and possibly inform treatment modification.

Clinical and molecular features of innate and acquired resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in lung cancer.

HYPOTHESIS: The majority of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy develop either innate or acquired resistance. Across tumor types, the "T cell-inflamed" tumor microenvironment correlates with clinical response to immunotherapy. We hypothesize that clinical characteristics may be predictive of resistance and that "T cell-inflamed" NSCLC tumors can be identified by gene expression profiling. RESULTS: Of 93 patients, 36 (38.7%) had innate resistance and 57 (61.3%) had initial benefit to immunotherapy. Innate resistance was associated with non-smokers (p = 0.013), more involved disease sites (p = 0.011), more prior therapy (p = 0.001), and a lower albumin level (p = 0.014). Among patients with initial benefit, factors associated with subsequent progression-free survival included higher Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (p = 0.004) and lower depth of response to anti-PD-1 therapy (p = 0.003). A "T cell-inflamed" microenvironment was identified in 42% of TCGA adenocarcinoma samples versus 21.0% of squamous cell. DISCUSSION: Specific clinical characteristics appear to be predictive of either innate or acquired resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. A "T cell-inflamed" tumor was more common in adenocarcinoma than squamous histology. METHODS: A retrospective review of NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Patients with innate resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (defined as progression at first CT evaluation) were compared to patients with initial clinical benefit. Among those with initial clinical benefit, we identified prognostic factors for time to progression (acquired resistance) or death. To further corroborate our findings on limited numbers, immune gene expression profiling of all NSCLC samples from the TCGA database was also pursued.

A Predictive 7-Gene Assay and Prognostic Protein Biomarkers for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aims to develop a multi-gene assay predictive of the clinical benefits of chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, and substantiate their protein expression as potential therapeutic targets. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The mRNA expression of 160 genes identified from microarray was analyzed in qRT-PCR assays of independent 337 snap-frozen NSCLC tumors to develop a predictive signature. A clinical trial JBR.10 was included in the validation. Hazard ratio was used to select genes, and decision-trees were used to construct the predictive model. Protein expression was quantified with AQUA in 500 FFPE NSCLC samples. RESULTS: A 7-gene signature was identified from training cohort (n = 83) with accurate patient stratification (P = 0.0043) and was validated in independent patient cohorts (n = 248, P < 0.0001) in Kaplan-Meier analyses. In the predicted benefit group, there was a significantly better disease-specific survival in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy in both training (P = 0.035) and validation (P = 0.0049) sets. In the predicted non-benefit group, there was no survival benefit in patients receiving chemotherapy in either set. The protein expression of ZNF71 quantified with AQUA scores produced robust patient stratification in separate training (P = 0.021) and validation (P = 0.047) NSCLC cohorts. The protein expression of CD27 quantified with ELISA had a strong correlation with its mRNA expression in NSCLC tumors (Spearman coefficient = 0.494, P < 0.0088). Multiple signature genes had concordant DNA copy number variation, mRNA and protein expression in NSCLC progression. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a predictive multi-gene assay and prognostic protein biomarkers clinically applicable for improving NSCLC treatment, with important implications in lung cancer chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Should health-related quality of life be measured in cancer symptom management clinical trials? Lessons learned using the functional assessment of cancer therapy.

There are several advantages to including comprehensive health-related quality of life (HRQL) in symptom trials in oncology. The most obvious is to test the hypothesis that HRQL will be improved in addition to the symptom benefit. We should not "require," however, that a successful symptom intervention also improve other dimensions of HRQL. On the other hand, we should expect that it will not make other dimensions worse through side effects or exacerbation of disease, even if it improves the symptom. HRQL assessment in the trial helps evaluate the competing risks of any therapy. Furthermore, assessment of HRQL is now accomplished with very brief assessment (usually 30 questions or less), and the knowledge gained is valuable. With HRQL, one can compare cancer patients with those with other conditions and can determine the contribution of symptoms and side effects to the more broadly defined HRQL. Examples using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy measurement system will demonstrate how HRQL assessment has contributed to our understanding of common cancer symptoms and their place in the conceptualization of HRQL. The prevalence of clinically significant symptoms is greatest in poor performance status (PS) patients compared with patients with good PS. Symptom improvement trials specifically designed for these patients should be encouraged, particularly with interventions that can provide symptomatic relief and improve multidimensional HRQL.

Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition).

BACKGROUND: Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a treatable but incurable disease. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was performed to identify pertinent peer-reviewed articles that addressed the questions posed for this section. The writing committee developed and graded recommendations, which were subsequently approved by the American College of Chest Physicians. RESULTS: Platinum-based doublets remain the standard of care in patients with good performance status (PS); there is no evidence that the addition of a third cytotoxic agent improves survival. Likewise, with only one exception, the addition of a new targeted or biological agent to platinum-based doublets does not improve survival. The one exception is the addition of bevacizumab, an antiangiogenic agent, to carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with stage IV disease and good PS. Patients for whom bevacizumab is recommended must also be selected on the basis of histology (nonsquamous), absence of brain metastases and hemoptysis, and no indication for therapeutic anticoagulation. In patients with stage IV NSCLC and PS of 2, chemotherapy is recommended, but the optimal approach has not been defined. Elderly patients, defined as >/= 70 years old, also derive benefit from chemotherapy. Most elderly patients should receive single-agent chemotherapy, but elderly patients with good PS and without significant comorbidities seem to derive a similar benefit from platinum-based doublets compared with their younger counterparts without a prohibitive difference in treatment toxicities. Because stage IV NSCLC is incurable, quality-of-life issues are important, and tools exist to monitor a patient's quality of life during therapy. Last, patients need to be informed of the implication of the diagnosis of stage IV NSCLC and be educated about treatment options that are available to them. CONCLUSIONS: Advances have been made in stage IV NSCLC, and the appropriate use of chemotherapy continues to evolve on the basis of well-designed clinical trials that address critical issues in this population.

An innovative symptom monitoring tool for people with advanced lung cancer: a pilot demonstration.

Treatment for advanced lung cancer is not curative; therefore, the primary goals of its care are to maximize symptom management and minimize treatment toxicity. Increasingly, patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes have been accepted as important endpoints; several validated measures have gained wide acceptance in research, but their use in practice has been limited. Computer technology increasingly is used to reduce patient and administrative burden in conducting assessments to produce a real-time presentation of symptom and HRQL data. This paper describes a technology-based monitoring system developed for patients with advanced lung cancer who were starting chemotherapy. Among the 90 participants, compliance with the weekly symptom survey was 92%. Patient acceptability of the system was high, as evidenced by 30 patients who elected to complete an additional monitoring interval beyond the 12-week study period. Of patients who reported discussing their responses with a provider (95%), a majority (69%) stated that the questionnaire helped them to focus on issues to be discussed with their physicians. The system also was favorably reviewed by physicians, who indicated that the report helped them to compare patients' responses over time. Next steps will include a randomized trial to test the system's efficacy in improving symptom management.

Efficacy and safety of gefitinib in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated in an Expanded Access Program.

Chemotherapy (CT) is recommended in numerous clinical guidelines for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and offers improved survival over best supportive care. However, many patients with advanced NSCLC never receive CT because of advanced age, poor performance status, comorbidities, or patient refusal. The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib has shown antitumor activity and a favorable toxicity profile in pretreated patients with recurrent advanced NSCLC and was made available in a worldwide Expanded Access Program (EAP) to >37,000 patients who did not respond to standard treatment or were ineligible for or refused CT. A retrospective chart review of 1671 consecutive patients enrolled at 11 sites in the US arm of the EAP identified 198 patients with advanced NSCLC who had not received previous CT. All patients were treated with gefitinib 250 mg/d until treatment failure or toxicity occurred. Patients were treated for a mean of 4.7 months. The most common adverse events were diarrhea (31.3%) and rash (31.3%). Complete and partial response rates were 0.7 and 5.6%, respectively, and 40.6% had stable disease. Median survival was 6 months, and estimated 1-year survival was 29.7%. The majority of patients did not receive subsequent CT.

Prognostic and Predictive Value in KRAS in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Review.

IMPORTANCE: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constituting more than 80% of all lung cancers. Non-small-cell lung cancer is a heterogenous disease, with multiple different oncogenic driver mutations representing possible therapeutic targets. The vi-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) represents one of the most common oncogenic driver mutations. Unfortunately, targeted therapies thus far have been unsuccessful. OBJECTIVE: To discuss current advancements in understanding the prognostic and predictive value of KRAS in NSCLC and explaining the treatment advancements in both the preclinical and clinical setting. EVIDENCE REVIEW: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched through February 1, 2016. English-language peer-reviewed articles published between 1964 and 2016 were found using the keywords "RAS," "KRAS," "NSCLC," "synthetic lethality," "oncogenic driver mutations," "clinical trials," and "phase 3 clinical trials." Abstracts at scientific meetings were not excluded. Of 112 records idetified, 61 articles or studies were included in qualitative synthesis for this review. FINDINGS: The KRAS oncogenic driver mutation is noted in 15% to 25% of patients with NSCLC. While there has been limited success in inhibiting the protein directly, phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated success in inhibiting downstream effectors, specifically MEK1 and/or MEK2 with selumetinib and trametinib (albeit with poor tolerability). Current clinical trials are evaluating inhibiting downstream effector pathways for improved efficacy. In the laboratory, the success of synthetic lethal approaches suggests another possible direction for future clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: KRAS is one of the most common oncogenic driver mutations in NSCLC, with prior attempts at direct inhibition being unsuccessful. In recent years, there has been significant advancement in the understanding of the biology of KRAS and its downstream effectors. This has translated into a multitude of important preclinical studies and clinical trials that are currently underway to find effective therapeutic drugs for KRAS mutant lung cancer. Ultimately, better therapeutics need to be engineered to arrive at RAS-driven precision medicine.

Targeting pathways mediating resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

INTRODUCTION: As epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in approximately 90% of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN), several therapeutic agents that target EGFR have been evaluated for the treatment of SCCHN. Although patients with SCCHN derive clinical benefit from anti-EGFR agents, most notably the EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab, these patients eventually become resistant to EGFR-based therapies; preclinical studies have shown activation of secondary signaling pathways that lead to resistance to EGFR inhibition and, as such, serve as potential therapeutic targets to overcome resistance to EGFR inhibitors. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the results of recently completed trials of anti-EGFR agents in SCCHN, highlights the various mechanisms that drive resistance to EGFR inhibitors in SCCHN, and focuses on several novel targeted agents that could potentially help overcome resistance to EGFR-based therapies in SCCHN. Expert commentary: Due to the development of resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies, novel treatment approaches to overcome resistance are a key unmet need for SCCHN.

The Chicago Thoracic Oncology Database Consortium: A Multisite Database Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: An increasing amount of clinical data is available to biomedical researchers, but specifically designed database and informatics infrastructures are needed to handle this data effectively. Multiple research groups should be able to pool and share this data in an efficient manner. The Chicago Thoracic Oncology Database Consortium (CTODC) was created to standardize data collection and facilitate the pooling and sharing of data at institutions throughout Chicago and across the world. We assessed the CTODC by conducting a proof of principle investigation on lung cancer patients who took erlotinib. This study does not look into epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but rather it discusses the development and utilization of the database involved. METHODS:  We have implemented the Thoracic Oncology Program Database Project (TOPDP) Microsoft Access, the Thoracic Oncology Research Program (TORP) Velos, and the TORP REDCap databases for translational research efforts. Standard operating procedures (SOPs) were created to document the construction and proper utilization of these databases. These SOPs have been made available freely to other institutions that have implemented their own databases patterned on these SOPs. RESULTS: A cohort of 373 lung cancer patients who took erlotinib was identified. The EGFR mutation statuses of patients were analyzed. Out of the 70 patients that were tested, 55 had mutations while 15 did not. In terms of overall survival and duration of treatment, the cohort demonstrated that EGFR-mutated patients had a longer duration of erlotinib treatment and longer overall survival compared to their EGFR wild-type counterparts who received erlotinib. DISCUSSION: The investigation successfully yielded data from all institutions of the CTODC. While the investigation identified challenges, such as the difficulty of data transfer and potential duplication of patient data, these issues can be resolved with greater cross-communication between institutions of the consortium. CONCLUSION: The investigation described herein demonstrates the successful data collection from multiple institutions in the context of a collaborative effort. The data presented here can be utilized as the basis for further collaborative efforts and/or development of larger and more streamlined databases within the consortium.

Promotion of self-management for post treatment cancer survivors: evaluation of a risk-adapted visit.

PURPOSE: The LIFE Cancer Survivorship Program at NorthShore University HealthSystem provides risk-adapted visits (RAV) facilitated by an oncology nurse during which a survivorship care plan (SCP) is provided and discussed. In this report, we describe and evaluate RAV in promoting individualized health care and self-management during survivorship transition. METHODS: Patients complete a post-RAV questionnaire at their RAV and another ≥1 year after their RAV. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred thirteen (1713) RAVs, majority for breast cancer, occurred from January 2007 to March 2014. One thousand six hundred fifteen (1615) "day-of" post-RAV questionnaires were completed. Respondents scaled statements as strongly agree/agree/disagree/strongly disagree. Combined strongly agree/agree ratings are 94 % felt more confident in communicating information about their treatments to other health care providers, 90 % felt more comfortable recognizing signs/symptoms to report to providers, and 98 % had a better appreciation for community programs/services. Of 488 respondents (RAV January 2007 to December 2012 n = 1366) to a questionnaire at least 1 year after the RAV, nearly 100 % found SCP useful to summarize medical information, 97 % to reinforce follow-up, 85 % to recognize symptoms of recurrence, 93 % to identify healthy lifestyle practices, 91 % to assist in identifying resources for support, 72 % discussed their SCP with their healthcare provider, and 97 % made at least one positive lifestyle change. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in LIFE RAV following treatment helps survivors to guide future self-care behavior. Data suggest that benefits may persist 1 year after the visit and support the feasibility of a nurse-led RAV to establish a SCP in cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Combined provision and discussion of SCPs help survivors construct a useful understanding of their cancer experience and may promote long-term self-management.