Undergraduate rural medical training experiences and uptake of rural practice: a retrospective cohort study in South Australia.

BACKGROUND: Rural medical training experiences provided by Rural Clinical Schools (RCS) can encourage future practice in rural locations. However, the factors influencing students' career choices are not well understood. This study explores the influence of undergraduate rural training experiences on graduates' subsequent practice location. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all medical students who completed a full academic year at the University of Adelaide RCS training program between 2013-2018. Details of student characteristics, experiences, and preferences were extracted from the Federation of Rural Australian Medical Educators (FRAME, 2013-2018) survey and linked to graduates' recorded practice location obtained from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA, January 2021). The rurality of the practice location was defined based on the Modified Monash Model (MMM 3-7) or Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS 2-5). Logistic regression was used to examine associations between student rural training experiences and rural practice location. RESULTS: A total of 241 medical students (60.1% females; mean age 23.2 ± 1.8 years) completed the FRAME survey (response rate 93.2%). Of these, 91.7% felt well supported, 76.3% had a rural-based clinician mentor, 90.4% reported increased interest in a rural career, and 43.6% preferred a rural practice location after graduation. Practice locations were identified for 234 alumni, and 11.5% were working rurally in 2020 (MMM 3-7; 16.7% according to ASGS 2-5). In adjusted analysis, the odds of working rurally were 3-4 times more likely among those with a rural background or lived the longest in a rural location, 4-12 times more likely among those preferring a rural practice location after graduation, and increased with the student's rural practice self-efficacy score (p-value < 0.05 in all cases). Neither the perceived support, having a rural-based mentor, or the increased interest in a rural career were associated with the practice location. CONCLUSIONS: These RCS students consistently reported positive experiences and increased interest in rural practice after their rural training. Student reported preference for a rural career and rural practice self-efficacy score were significant predictors of subsequent rural medical practice. Other RCS could use these variables as indirect indicators of the impact of RCS training on the rural health workforce.

Evaluating the impact of the Adelaide Rural Clinical School longitudinal clinical placement on the rural medical workforce: A retrospective cohort study of graduates, 2004-2019.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of the Adelaide Rural Clinical School (ARCS) longitudinal integrated clerkship to the rural medical workforce. METHODS: Design: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Practice location data were sourced from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA, January 2021) and matched using university records. PARTICIPANTS: University of Adelaide medical school alumni graduating between 2004 and 2019 (ARCS alumni who completed a full year of rural training [n = 423], metropolitan-trained peers [n = 1655]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportions of medical graduates working in a rural location (Modified Monash Model [MMM3-7] or Australian Statistical Geography Standard [ASGS-RA2-5] classifications). Logistic regression was used to examine the association between ARCS training and working rurally, and the influence of rural background and sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: Working in a rural location was almost three times more frequent among ARCS alumni than their metropolitan-trained peers, using the MMM3-7 (14.7% vs. 5.3%) classification; for ASGS-RA2-5 classification (21.3% vs. 8.9%). In adjusted analysis, working rurally (MMM3-7) was associated with having a rural/remote residence on enrolment (OR 8.29, 95% CI 4.22-16.26) and was 3.1 times more likely for ARCS alumni (OR 3.06, 95% CI 2.06-4.53) than their peers. The magnitude of the effects of ARCS training on whether they are working rurally was similar among those with metropolitan or rural background (p-value for interaction 0.873). Similar associations were observed using ASGS-RA2-5 classifications. CONCLUSIONS: Extended rural placements through the Adelaide Rural Clinical School increased the rural medical workforce, with a similar impact among those with a rural or metropolitan background.