Influence of arteriovenous sampling on remifentanil pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

INTRODUCTION: Remifentanil is a new, short-acting, rapidly metabolized opioid. Because remifentanil is metabolized in blood and tissues by nonspecific esterases, there is a substantial difference between arterial and venous remifentanil concentrations. This difference may greatly affect the estimation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of sampling site on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of remifentanil. METHODS: Ten healthy female subjects received intravenous remifentanil at an infusion rate of 3 microg/kg/min for 10 minutes. Serial blood samples were collected during and after drug administration from the radial artery and antecubital vein. A spectral edge measure was derived from the processed electroencephalographic and used as a measure of opioid effect. RESULTS: Venous concentrations were lower than arterial concentrations during the infusion of remifentanil. Pharmacokinetic parameters estimated from venous and arterial data differed significantly. When arterial concentrations were plotted against electroencephalographic effect, a classic counterclockwise hysteresis loop was observed, indicating a time-lag between changes in concentration and changes in effect. However, concentrations from venous blood produced a clockwise hysteresis loop that would classically suggest the development of acute tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: If this study had been conducted with venous samples alone, inappropriate conclusions such as acute tolerance could have been inferred. When designing studies to measure the acute time course (ie, non-steady state) of concentration and effect, the potential effects of sampling site on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics must be carefully considered, particularly when the arteriovenous drug concentration difference is large.

Comparison of verapamil, diltiazem, and labetalol on the bioavailability and metabolism of imipramine.

Twelve healthy male subjects completed this randomized, placebo controlled, four-period crossover trial to determine the effect of verapamil, diltiazem, and labetalol on the bioavailability and metabolism of imipramine. Subjects received a 7-day course of one of four treatments; verapamil (120 mg every 8 hr), diltiazem (90 mg every 8 hr), labetalol (200 mg every 12 hr), or placebo (every 12 hr) during each study period. Imipramine (100 mg) was administered orally on the morning of day 4 of each study period. Plasma and urine samples were collected periodically over the ensuing 96 hours. Samples were assayed by HPLC for imipramine, desipramine, 2-hydroxyimipramine, and 2-hydroxydesipramine. Verapamil, diltiazem, and labetalol increased imipramine area under the plasma concentration time curve (relative bioavailability) as compared with placebo by 15%, 30%, and 53%, respectively. Verapamil and diltiazem did not demonstrate consistent changes in the formation of the measured metabolites. Labetalol caused a significant decrease in the amount of imipramine metabolized to 2-hydroxyimipramine (mean decrease: 22%) and from desipramine to 2-hydroxydesipramine (mean decrease: 8%). The molar ratios of plasma AUC of 2-hydroxyimipramine and 2-hydroxydesipramine to the parent compounds were significantly decreased. Since these metabolic processes are dependent on the cytochrome P450IID6 isozyme, these data suggest that labetalol decreases the oral clearance of imipramine by inhibiting this system. All three of these commonly used agents decreased the oral clearance of imipramine. These drug interactions could lead to elevated imipramine concentrations and have the potential for clinically important adverse events.

Pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in patients with hepatic insufficiency.

Ondansetron is primarily eliminated via hepatic metabolism; thus, liver disease may affect its clearance. The pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in patients with different degrees of hepatic insufficiency (N = 12 with hepatic impairment, as categorized by Pugh's classification method) were assessed and the results compared with results for age- and gender-matched control subjects with normal liver function (n = 12). A secondary objective was to correlate the Pugh method of assessing hepatic impairment and quantitative metabolic markers used to assess hepatic function (antipyrine clearance and indocyanine green clearance) with changes in the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron. This was an open-label study in which 8 mg ondansetron was given orally and intravenously, following a randomized crossover design. Clearance of ondansetron was lower among patients with hepatic impairment that control subjects. After a single, oral dose of ondansetron, mean absolute bioavailability increased markedly with increased hepatic insufficiency (approaching 100% in the group with severe hepatic impairment versus 66% for control subjects). These data suggest that there is a reduced first-pass effect in patients with liver disease resulting in a higher AUC0-infinity. A correlation existed between clearance of ondansetron and decreased antipyrine clearance; a smaller correlation existed between ondansetron clearance and indocyanine green clearance. Mean percent of ondansetron bound to plasma proteins was significantly lower in patients with liver disease than in control subjects. None of the patients experienced any severe adverse reactions attributed to ondansetron. A reduction in the clearance of ondansetron is associated with increasing degrees of hepatic insufficiency; therefore, patients with severe hepatic impairment (Pugh score of > 9) should have their daily dose of ondansetron limited to 8 mg (or 0.15 mg/kg).

Comparison of quantitative methods to assess hepatic function: Pugh's classification, indocyanine green, antipyrine, and dextromethorphan.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare three quantitative metabolic markers used to assess hepatic function, indocyanine green (ICG), a high-extraction marker; antipyrine, a low-extraction marker; and dextromethorphan, a P-450IID6 marker, with the clinically used Pugh's classification. DESIGN: Comparison of 12 healthy controls with 12 age- and sex-matched patients with different degrees of liver disease. SETTING: Research center in a university-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: The 12 patients had different degrees of liver disease: 4 mild (Pugh's score 6 or 7); 4 moderate (Pugh's score 8 or 9); and 4 severe (Pugh's score > or = 10). Each level had an equal number of men and women subjects. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clearance of ICG detected mild alterations in hepatic function as efficiently as it did for moderate and severe impairment, but it lacked the specificity to distinguish among the classification groups. In contrast, antipyrine was effective in identifying moderate and severe hepatic impairment; however, its clearance was not reduced in mild liver disease. Pugh's classification appears to be a clinically useful method of assessing the global degree of hepatic impairment in patients with chronic disease, and there was a significant correlation between it and antipyrine clearance (r = 0.67, p = 0.0003) and ICG clearance (r = 0.86, p = 0.0001). Four of eight patients with a Pugh's score greater than 8 had a dextromethorphan metabolic ratio expression reflective of a poor metabolizer phenotype based on 0- to 4-hour urine collection, but only two of those eight patients were classified as poor metabolizers based on 4- to 12-hour urine collection. These percentages of poor metabolizers are substantially higher than for historical controls (8.5-10.4%) and most likely reflect a decrease in the P-450IID6 functional ability with progression of liver disease. However, due to small sample size and lack of knowledge of the patients' genotypes, these data are only suggestive. CONCLUSION: Pugh's classification appears to be a reliable indicator of the degree of chronic liver disease and could be employed as a drug development research classification tool; however, it does not replace quantitative metabolic markers, especially isozyme-specific markers.

Visual and semantic factors in recognition from long-term memory.

In recognition tests, physical and semantic relationships between targets and distractors have been shown, in separate manipulations, to affect the latency of subject's decision. Recognition was tested for distractors which were visually similar or dissimilar to targets and which belonged to the target categories or to nontarget categories in order to examine the interaction of these dimensions. Rejection latency was longer for target category than for nontarget category distractors. Latency was also longer for visually similar than visually dissimilar distractors, but only when combined with target category probes. This interaction can be explained by the hypothesis that word recognition depends on the analysis of several dimensions of the probe stimulus, and rejection can occur before all such analyses have been completed.

Determination of the potency of remifentanil compared with alfentanil using ventilatory depression as the measure of opioid effect.

BACKGROUND: Remifentanil is a new opioid with properties similar to other mu-specific agonists. To establish its pharmacologic profile relative to other known opioids, it is important to determine its potency. This study investigated the relative potency of remifentanil compared with alfentanil. METHODS: Thirty young healthy males were administered double-blind remifentanil or alfentanil intravenously for 180 min using a computer-assisted continuous infusion device. Depression of ventilation was assessed by the minute ventilatory response to 7.5% CO2 administered via a "bag in the box" system. The target concentration of the study drug was adjusted to obtain 40-70% depression of baseline minute ventilation. Multiple blood samples were obtained during and following the infusion. The concentration-effect relationship of each drug was modeled, and the concentration needed to provide a 50% depression of ventilation (EC50) was determined. RESULTS: Only 11 subjects in each drug group completed the study; however, there were sufficient data in 28 volunteers to model their EC50 values. The EC50 (mean and 95% confidence interval) for depression of minute ventilation with remifentanil was 1.17 (0.85-1.49) ng/ml and the EC50 for alfentanil was 49.4 (32.4-66.5) ng/ml. CONCLUSION: Based on depression of the minute ventilatory response to 7.5% CO2, remifentanil is approximately 40 (26-65) times more potent than alfentanil when remifentanil and alfentanil whole-blood concentrations are compared. As alfentanil is usually measured as a plasma concentration, remifentanil is approximately 70 (41-104) times more potent than alfentanil when remifentanil whole-blood concentration is compared with alfentanil plasma concentration. This information should be used when performing comparative studies between remifentanil and other opioids.

Remifentanil versus alfentanil: comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adult male volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Remifentanil is an esterase-metabolized opioid with a rapid clearance. The aim of this study was to contrast the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil and alfentanil in healthy, adult male volunteers. METHODS: Ten volunteers received infusions of remifentanil and alfentanil on separate study sessions using a randomized, open-label crossover design. Arterial blood samples were analyzed to determine drug blood concentrations. The electroencephalogram was employed as the measure of drug effect. The pharmacokinetics were characterized using a moment analysis, a nonlinear mixed effects model (NONMEM) population analysis, and context-sensitive half-time computer simulations. After processing the raw electroencephalogram to obtain the spectral edge parameter, the pharmacodynamics were characterized using an effect compartment, inhibitory maximum effect model. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetically, the two drugs are similar in terms of steady-state distribution volume (VD(SS)), but remifentanil's central clearance (CLc)) is substantially greater. The NONMEM analysis population pharmacokinetic parameters for remifentanil include a CLc of 2.9 l x min(-1), a VDss of 21.81, and a terminal half-life of 35.1 min. Corresponding NONMEM parameters for alfentanil are 0.36 l x min(-1), 34.11, and 94.5 min. Pharmacodynamically, the drugs are similar in terms of the time required for equilibration between blood and the effect-site concentrations, as evidenced by a T(12)k(e0) for remifentanil of 0.75 min [corrected] and 0.96 min for alfentanil. However, remifentanil is 19 times more potent than alfentanil, with an effective concentration for 50% maximal effect of 19.9 ng x ml(-1) versus 375.9 ng x ml(-1) for alfentanil. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to alfentanil, the high clearance of remifentanil, combined with its small steady-state distribution volume, results in a rapid decline in blood concentration after termination of an infusion. With the exception of remifentanil's nearly 20-times greater potency (30-times if alfentanil partitioning between whole blood and plasma is considered), the drugs are pharmacodynamically similar.

The pharmacokinetics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil (GI87084B) in healthy adult male volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Remifentanil (GI87084B) is a new short-acting opioid with a unique ester structure. Metabolism of remifentanil by ester hydrolysis results in very rapid elimination. The aim of this study was to characterize in detail the pharmacokinetic profile of remifentanil in healthy male volunteers. METHODS: Ten healthy adult male volunteers received a zero-order infusion of remifentanil at doses ranging from 1 to 8 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 for 20 min. Frequent arterial blood samples were drawn and analyzed by gas chromatographic mass spectroscopy to determine the remifentanil blood concentrations. The raw pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using three different parametric compartmental modeling methods (traditional two-stage, naive pooled data, and NONMEM). The raw pharmacokinetic data also were analyzed using numeric deconvolution and a nonparametric moment technique. A computer simulation using hte pharmacokinetic parameters of the NONMEM compartmental model was performed to provide a more intuitively meaningful and clinically relevant description of the pharmacokinetics. The simulation estimated the time necessary to achieve a 50% decrease in remifentanil concentration after a variable-length infusion. RESULTS: For each parametric method, a three-compartment mamillary model that accurately describes remifentanil's concentration decay curve was constructed. The NONMEM analysis population pharmacokinetic parameters included a central clearance of 2.8 l/min, a volume of distribution at steady state of 32.8 l, and a terminal half-life of 48 min. The mean results of the nonparametric moment analysis included a clearance of 2.9 l/min, a volume of distribution at steady state of 31.8 l, and a mean residence time of 10.9 min. The computer simulation revealed the strikingly unique pharmacokinetic profile of remifentanil compared to that of the currently available fentanyl family of opioids. CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil is a new, short-acting opioid with promising clinical potential in anesthesiology.

Influence of gastrointestinal site of drug delivery on the absorption characteristics of ranitidine.

The absorption characteristics of ranitidine after delivery to three locations in the gastrointestinal tract were compared in an open-label study of eight healthy males. Subjects received ranitidine HCl (150 mg) for injection via a nasoenteric tube directly into their stomach, jejunum, or cecum sequentially in three separate periods (24 hr apart). Plasma samples were collected at periodic time intervals for 12 hr following each dosing and analyzed for ranitidine concentration by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Mean concentrations following cecal dosing were lower (P less than 0.05) than concentrations following gastric or jejunal dosing at each sampling time except baseline. Mean concentrations following gastric and jejunal dosing were similar except at 2 hr (gastric greater than jejunal). Mean pharmacokinetic parameters for cecal administration were different (P less than 0.05) from either the gastric or the jejunal periods with the exception of Tmax. There was no difference in any pharmacokinetic parameter after gastric or jejunal dosing. The relative bioavailability after cecal administration was less than 15% of that observed after administration into the stomach or jejunum. Additionally, Wagner-Nelson analysis indicated that the rate of ranitidine absorption was much slower following cecal administration than after gastric or jejunal dosing. Two plasma concentration peaks were observed in three of eight subjects after gastric dosing, in eight of eight subjects after jejunal dosing, and in zero of eight subjects after cecal dosing. These data demonstrate that the absorption profile of ranitidine is equivalent, in extent and duration, after delivery to the stomach or jejunum, while absorption from the cecum is significantly less.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Measured context-sensitive half-times of remifentanil and alfentanil.

BACKGROUND: The context-sensitive half-time, rather than the terminal elimination half-life, has been proposed as a more clinically relevant measure of decreasing drug concentration after a constant infusion of a given duration. The context-sensitive half-time is derived from computer modelling using known pharmacokinetic parameters. The modelled context-sensitive half-time for a 3-h infusion of alfentanil is 50-55 min and is 3 min for remifentanil. The terminal elimination half-life is 111 min for alfentanil and 12-30 min for remifentanil. It has not been tested whether the modelled context-sensitive half-time reflects the true time for a 50% decrease in drug concentration or drug effect. METHODS: Thirty volunteers received a 3-h infusion of remifentanil or alfentanil at equieffective concentrations. Depression of minute ventilation to 7.5% ETCO2 was used as a measure of drug effect. Minute ventilation response was measured, and blood samples for drug concentration were taken during and after drug infusion. The recovery of minute ventilation (drug effect) and decrease in blood drug concentration was plotted, and the time for a 50% change was determined. RESULTS: The measured pharmacokinetic context-sensitive half-time for remifentanil after a 3-h infusion was 3.2 +/- 0.9 min, and its pharmacodynamic offset was 5.4 +/- 1.8 min. Alfentanil's measured pharmacokinetic context-sensitive half-time was 47.3 +/- 12 min, and its pharmacodynamic offset was 54.0 +/- 48 min. The terminal elimination half-life modelled from the volunteers was 11.8 +/- 5.1 min for remifentanil and 76.5 +/- 12.6 min for alfentanil. CONCLUSIONS: The measured context-sensitive half-times were in close agreement with the context-sensitive half-times previously modelled for these drugs. The results of this study confirm the value of the context-sensitive half-time in describing drug offset compared to the terminal elimination half-life.

Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported conflicting results concerning the influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil. METHODS: Sixty-five healthy adults (38 men and 27 women) ages 20 to 85 y received remifentanil by constant-rate infusion of 1 to 8 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 for 4 to 20 min. Frequent arterial blood samples were drawn and assayed for remifentanil concentration. The electroencephalogram was used as a measure of drug effect. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling was performed using the software package NONMEM. The influence of volunteer covariates were analyzed using a generalized additive model. The performances of the simple (without covariates) and complex (with covariates) models were evaluated prospectively in an additional 15 healthy participants ages 41 to 84 y. RESULTS: The parameters for the simple three-compartment pharmacokinetic model were V1 = 4.98 l, V2 = 9.01 l, V3 = 6.54 l, Cl1 = 2.46 l/min, Cl2 = 1.69 l/min, and Cl3 = 0.065 l/min. Age and lean body mass were significant covariates. From the ages of 20 to 85 y, V1 and Cl1 decreased by approximately 25% and 33%, respectively. The parameters for the simple sigmoid Emax pharmacodynamic model were Ke0 = 0.516 min-1, E0 = 20 Hz, Emax = 5.62 Hz, EC50 = 11.2 ng/ml, and gamma = 2.51. Age was a significant covariate of EC50 and Ke0, with both decreasing by approximately 50% for the age range studied. The complex pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model performed better than did the simple model when applied prospectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified (1) an effect of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil; (2) an effect of lean body mass on the pharmacokinetic parameters; and (3) no influence of gender on any pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameter.