Intensive care unit family satisfaction survey.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the level of family satisfaction in a local intensive care unit and its performance in comparison with international standards, and to determine the factors independently associated with higher family satisfaction. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey. SETTING: A medical-surgical adult intensive care unit in a regional hospital in Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: Adult family members of patients admitted to the intensive care unit for 48 hours or more between 15 June 2012 and 31 January 2014, and who had visited the patient at least once during their stay. RESULTS: Of the 961 eligible families, 736 questionnaires were returned (response rate, 76.6%). The mean (± standard deviation) total satisfaction score, and subscores on satisfaction with overall intensive care unit care and with decision-making were 78.1 ± 14.3, 78.0 ± 16.8, and 78.6 ± 13.6, respectively. When compared with a Canadian multicentre database with respective mean scores of 82.9 ± 14.8, 83.5 ± 15.4, and 82.6 ± 16.0 (P<0.001), there was still room for improvement. Independent factors associated with complete satisfaction with overall care were concern for patients and families, agitation management, frequency of communication by nurses, physician skill and competence, and the intensive care unit environment. A performance-importance plot identified the intensive care unit environment and agitation management as factors that required more urgent attention. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first intensive care unit family satisfaction survey published in Hong Kong. Although comparable with published data from other parts of the world, the results indicate room for improvement when compared with a Canadian multicentre database. Future directions should focus on improving the intensive care unit environment, agitation management, and communication with families.

Carnitine therapy for the treatment of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease: evidence and controversies.

As the incidence of metabolic syndrome increases, there is also a growing interest in finding safe and inexpensive treatments to help lower associated risk factors. L-carntine, a natural dietary supplement with the potential to ameliorate atherosclerosis, has been the subject of recent investigation and controversy. A majority of studies have shown benefit of L-C supplementation in the metabolic syndrome or cardiovascular risk factors. However, recent work has suggested that dietary L-C may accelerate atherosclerosis via gut microbiota metabolites, complicating the role of L-C supplementation in health.

Enhanced Protein-Energy Provision via the Enteral Route Feeding (PEPuP) protocol in critically ill surgical patients: a multicentre prospective evaluation.

Suboptimal levels of feeding in critically ill patients are associated with poor clinical outcomes. The Enhanced Protein-Energy Provision via the Enteral Route Feeding (PEPuP) protocol was developed to improve nutritional delivery in the critically ill and has been studied in several hospitals. However, the experience with this protocol in surgical patients is limited to date. The objective of this analysis was to describe the experience with this protocol in surgical patients. We analysed observational patient data obtained from the 2013 International Nutrition Survey. We compared nutritional practices and outcomes of patients admitted for surgical and medical reasons to ICUs in sites that implemented the PEPuP protocol. We used surgical ICU patients in non-PEPuP sites as a concurrent control group. In sites that implemented the PEPuP protocol, surgical patients received a smaller proportion of prescribed calories (43% versus 61%, P=0.004) and protein (38% versus 57%, P=0.002) compared to medical patients. When compared to the cohort of surgical patients from control sites, the surgical patients from PEPuP sites received similar amounts of calories and protein. Although surgical PEPuP patients were more likely to receive trophic and volume-based feeds compared to surgical patients in control sites, other aspects of the PEPuP protocol were not adequately implemented. We conclude that nutritional delivery to surgical patients remains inadequate and the PEPuP protocol seems ineffective in improving nutritional intake in this population. Further research to determine methods of optimising PEPuP protocol implementation and adherence in surgery patients is needed.

Do potential patients prefer tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) over streptokinase (SK)? An evaluation of the risks and benefits of TPA from the patient's perspective.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute myocardial infarction, TPA (compared to SK), has been shown to reduce the 30-day mortality rate at the expense of an increased rate of stroke. The assumption in the literature is that were it not for cost issues, all patients presenting with a myocardial infarction would choose TPA. Our hypothesis is that, for many informed individuals, regardless of cost, the increased risk of stroke may deter them from selecting TPA over SK. OBJECTIVE: To assess which thrombolytic drug informed patients would prefer and to explore the clinical and economic implications of such preferences. DESIGN: Prospective survey. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: 120 hospitalized patients with cardiac disease who would be "at risk" for a myocardial infarction. INTERVENTIONS: Face-to-face interviews utilizing a decision instrument. MEASUREMENTS: To minimize bias in soliciting patients' preferences and to standardize the presentation of information we developed a decision instrument which portrays a case scenario of a myocardial infarction, describes treatment outcomes (survival and stroke rate), and displays the likelihood of these outcomes with SK and TPA using three scenarios: a base stroke risk (all patients data), a lower stroke risk (<75 years old data), a higher stroke risk (>75 years old data). Outcome data were derived from the published literature (GUSTO study). RESULTS: When presented the overall results of the GUSTO study, 60/120 (50%) expressed a preference for SK. When presented the outcome data for the subgroups of patients <75 years old (lower stroke rate), 37/120 (31%) preferred SK. When presented the subgroup data for patients >75 years old (higher stroke risk), 67/120 (56%) preferred SK. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the scenario that individuals were presented with, a substantial proportion of individuals (31-56%) who could potentially require thrombolytic therapy chose SK over TPA. This study should be repeated in other settings to establish the generalizability of our results. Assuming that these results will be consistent, considering the patient's perspective has significant implications on clinical decision making as well as from an economic perspective.

The clinical utility of invasive diagnostic techniques in the setting of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of bronchoscopy with protected brush catheter (PBC) and BAL for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Ten tertiary care ICUs in Canada. PATIENTS: Ninety-two mechanically ventilated patients with a clinical suspicion of VAP who underwent bronchoscopy were compared with 49 patients with a clinical suspicion of pneumonia who did not. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We compared antibiotic use, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and mortality. In addition, for patients who received bronchoscopy, we administered a questionnaire (before and after bronchoscopy) to evaluate the effect of PBC or BAL on (1) physician perception of the probability of VAP, (2) physician confidence in the diagnosis of VAP, and (3) changes to antibiotic management. After bronchoscopy results became available, from the physician's perspective, the diagnosis of VAP was deemed much less likely (p < 0.001), confidence in the diagnosis increased (p = 0.03), and level of comfort with the management plan increased (p = 0.02). Following the results of invasive diagnostic tests, in the group that underwent bronchoscopy, patients were receiving fewer antibiotics (31/92 vs 9/49, p = 0.05) and more patients had treatment with all their antibiotics discontinued (18/92 vs 3/49, p = 0.04) compared with the group that did not undergo bronchoscopy. Duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay were similar between the two groups, but mortality was lower in the group that underwent bronchoscopy with PBC or BAL (18.5% vs 34.7%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Invasive diagnostic testing may increase physician confidence in the diagnosis and management of VAP and allows for greater ability to limit or discontinue antibiotic treatment. Whether performing PBC or BAL affects clinically important outcomes requires further study.

Is it 'worthwhile' to continue treating patients with a prolonged stay (>14 days) in the ICU? An economic evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost and consequences of a policy of continuing to care for patients with a prolonged stay in the ICU with a proposed policy of withdrawing support. DESIGN: Economic evaluation using data derived from a prospective cohort study. SETTING: Adult medical/surgical ICU in a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients admitted to the ICU. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We performed a cost-accounting analysis on each patient in the ICU and followed up patients until 12 months after admission to ICU and assessed components of quality of life in survivors. RESULTS: During the study period, 690 patients were admitted to the ICU. Only 61 (9%) patients remained in the ICU for > 14 days. For this group, the mean length of stay in the ICU was 24.5 (+/-11.7) days and duration in hospital was 57.9 (+/-56.9) days. At 12 months, 27 (44%) were alive. Overall, the mean quality of life score at 12 months did not differ between patients with a short or prolonged stay in the ICU. The average ICU cost per day per patient was $1,565 (Canadian) resulting in a total cost for the whole cohort of Can $1,917,382. Over the same time period, 58 patients had life support withdrawn. On average, patients survived another day in the ICU, 2 more days in hospital, and all patients ultimately died. When treatment was discontinued, the costs of treating this cohort was Can $156,465. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is Can $65,219 per life saved or Can $4,350 per life-year saved. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of patients with a prolonged length of stay in the ICU survive their critical illness. Furthermore, their long-term quality of life seems reasonable. Our data suggest that continuing treatment for patients with a prolonged ICU stay may represent an efficient use of hospital resources and should be considered in the context of local budgets.

Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a critical review of the evidence.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between enteral nutrition (EN) and infection in the critically ill. SETTING: Computerized search of published research and review of relevant reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: 151 citations were reviewed and 39 articles met selection criteria. Primary studies were included if they evaluated EN in critically ill humans and its effect on infectious morbidity and mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Relevant data were abstracted on the timing and impact of EN on morbidity, the optimal route of administration, composition and pH of EN, and bacterial contamination of EN. The evidence from human studies that EN, particularly early EN, results in reduced septic morbidity as compared to parenteral nutrition is limited to small, unblinded studies with non-rigorous definitions of pneumonia. There is no evidence to support a preference of feeding into the stomach versus the small bowel. The addition of fish oil, arginine, glutamine and fiber to enteral feeds has a variable impact on survival in animal models; there are no trials in critically ill patients that demonstrate a reduction in infectious morbidity and mortality. Acidification of enteral nutrition results in decreased bacterial colonization of the stomach in critically ill patients. Bacterial contamination of enteral nutrition is an important source of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from experimental data in critically ill patients suggests that enteral nutrition may have a favourable impact on gastrointestinal immunological function and infectious morbidity.

Impaired gastric emptying in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE: To measure gastric emptying in critically ill patients using an acetaminophen absorption model and determine which variables are associated with impaired gastric emptying. DESIGN: A prospective, cohort study. SETTING: A medical/surgical ICU at a tertiary care hospital: Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 72 mechanically ventilated patients expected to remain in the ICU for more than 48 h. Our results were compared to those in healthy volunteers. INTERVENTION: Within 48 h of admission to the ICU, 1.6 g acetaminophen suspension were administered via a nasogastric tube into the stomach. Blood samples were drawn a t = 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min for measurement of plasma acetaminophen levels determined by the enzymatic degradation method. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Maximal concentration of acetaminophen was 94.1 (75.3) mumol/l compared to 208.4 (33.1) mumol/l in a control population (p < 0.0001). The time to reach the maximal concentration was 105 min (60-180) compared to 30 min (15-90) in controls (p < 0.0001). The area under the time-acetaminophen concentration curve t = 120 was 9301 (7343) mumol/min per l compared to 11644 (1336) mumol/min per l in the controls (p = 0.28). The variables associated with delayed gastric emptying were age, sex and use of opioids for analgesia and sedation. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric emptying is delayed in critically ill patients. The important consequences of this phenomenon include intolerance to enteral nutrition and gastric colonization. Strategies to minimize the use of narcotics may improve gastric emptying. Studies to examine the effect of gastrointestinal prokinetic agents on gastric emptying are needed.

Measuring family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: the development of a questionnaire and preliminary results.

PURPOSE: To develop and test the feasibility of administering a questionnaire to measure family members' level of satisfaction with care provided to them and their critically ill relative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To develop the questionnaire, existing conceptual frameworks of patient satisfaction, decision making, and quality of end-of-life care were used to identify important domains and items. We pretested the questionnaire for readability, clarity, and sensibility in 21 family members and 16 professionals. To assess validity, we measured the correlation between satisfaction with overall care and satisfaction with decision making. To assess the reliability of the questionnaire, we administered the questionnaire to next of kin of surviving patients on discharge and 7 to 10 days later. RESULTS: Questionnaires were mailed out to 33 family members of nonsurvivors; 24 were returned completed but only 22 (66%) were usable.Twenty-five family members of eligible surviving critically ill patients participated in the test-retest part of this study. Of the 47 respondents, 84% were very satisfied with overall care and 77% were very satisfied with their role in the decision making. There was good correlation between satisfaction with overall care and satisfaction with decision making (correlation coefficient =.64). The assessment of overall satisfaction with care was shown to be reliable (correlation coefficient =.85). CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire has some measure of reliability and validity and is feasible to administer to next of kin of critically ill patients.

Nutritional support in the critically ill patients. A critical review of the evidence.

Providing nutritional support has become a standard component of managing critically ill patients. While many studies have documented that providing nutritional support can change nutritional outcomes (e.g., amino acid profile, weight gain, nitrogen balance), data are lacking that demonstrate that nutrition actually influences clinically importance endpoints. This article systematically reviews and critically appraises the literature, examining the relationship between nutritional support and infectious morbidity and mortality in the critically ill patient. In addition, evidence-based recommendations are made.

Enteral and parenteral nutrition in the seriously ill, hospitalized patient: a critical review of the evidence.

Providing nutritional support has become a standard component of managing seriously ill patients. While many studies have documented that providing nutrition support can change nutritional outcomes (amino acid profile, weight gain, nitrogen balance, etc.), there are limited da ta that demonstrate that nutrition support actually influences clinicall y important endpoints. The purpose of this paper is to systematically r eview and critically appraise the literature to examine the relationship between nutritional support and morbidity and mortality in the seriously ill patient. As a product of this critical appraisal of the evidence, clinical recommendations based on rules of evidence are put forward.

End-of-life decision making in the seriously ill hospitalized patient: an organizing framework and results of a preliminary study.

Recent studies of patient/family satisfaction with end-of-life care suggest that improvements in communication and decision making are likely to have the greatest impact on improving the quality of end-of-life care. The apparent failure of recent studies specifically designed to improve decision making strongly suggest that there are powerful determinants of the decision making process that are not completely understood. In this paper, we present an organizing framework that describes the decision making process and breaks it into three analytic steps: information exchange, deliberation, and making the decision. In addition, we report the results of a preliminary study of end-of-life decision making that incorporates aspects of this organizing framework. Thirty-seven seriously ill hospitalized patients were interviewed. The majority wanted to share decisional responsibility with physicians. We demonstrated the feasibility of measuring certain aspects of the decision making process in such patients. By providing and using a framework related to end-of-life decision making, we hope to better understand the complex interaction and processes between dying patients, caregivers, and physicians.

Dying in Canada: is it an institutionalized, technologically supported experience?

Although preliminary evidence shows that people generally prefer to die at home, very little is known about where Canadians die. Understanding the epidemiology of dying in Canada may illuminate opportunities to improve quality of end-of-life care and related health policy. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of death records in Canada to determine the proportions of deaths occurring in hospitals and special care units. Our analysis found that deaths in Canada occur in hospitals with provincial and territorial proportions ranging from 87% in Quebec to 52% in the Northwest Territories. In hospitals recording deaths in special care units, 18.64% of all deaths occurred in special care units. The proportion of deaths in special care units ranged from 25% in Manitoba to 7% in the Northwest Territories. The proportion of deaths in special care units varied by size and nature (teaching vs. non-teaching) of hospitals. It increased with the size of the hospital from 8% in hospitals with 1-49 beds, to 23% for hospitals with 400 or more beds. In teaching hospitals, 27% of deaths occurred in special care units, and in non-teaching hospitals the proportion was 15%. In conclusion, the majority of deaths in Canada occur in hospitals and a substantial proportion occur in special care units, raising questions about the appropriateness and quality of current end-of-life care practices in Canada.

Mind the gap: Opportunities for improving end-of-life care for patients with advanced heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced heart failure (HF) experience progressive symptoms, decreased quality of life, and more frequent hospitalizations as they approach the end of life (EOL). Understanding patient perspectives and preferences regarding EOL issues is necessary to identify key opportunities for improving care. OBJECTIVE: To identify, from the patient's perspective, the major opportunities for improving EOL care for patients hospitalized because of advanced HF. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of patient perspectives regarding EOL care was administered via interview of 106 hospitalized patients who had advanced HF in five tertiary care centres across Canada. The study compared which aspects of EOL care patients rated as 'extremely important' and their level of satisfaction with these aspects of EOL care to identify key opportunities for improvement of care. RESULTS: The greatest opportunities for improvement in EOL care were reducing the emotional and physical burden on family, having an adequate plan of care following discharge, effective symptom relief and opportunities for honest communication. The three most important issues ranked by patients were avoidance of life support if there was no hope for a meaningful recovery, communication of information by the doctor and avoidance of burden for the family. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced care planning that seamlessly bridges hospital and home must be standard care for patients who have advanced HF. Components must include coordination of care, caregiver support, comprehensive symptom management, and effective communication regarding HF and EOL issues.

Parenteral nutrition in the critically-ill patient: more harm than good?

While many studies have reported that providing parenteral nutrition (PN) can change nutritional outcomes, there are limited data that demonstrate that PN influences clinically-important end points in critically-ill patients. The purpose of the present paper is to systematically review and critically appraise the literature to examine the relationship between PN and morbidity and mortality in the critically-ill patient. Studies comparing enteral nutrition (EN) with PN and studies comparing PN with no PN were reviewed. The results suggest that EN is associated with reduced infectious complications in some critically-ill subgroups. PN, on the other hand, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in critically-ill patients. When nutritional support is indicated, EN should be used preferentially over PN. Further studies are needed to define the optimal timing and composition of PN in patients not tolerating sufficient EN. Strategies to optimize EN delivery and minimize PN utilization in critically-ill patients are indicated.

In search of the magic nutraceutical: problems with current approaches.

Over the last few decades, substrates with immune-modulating properties have been identified in all groups of micro- and macronutrients. Numerous experimental studies have focused on evaluating these substances, either alone or in combination. After hundreds of experiments, no clear, consistent signal exists that any of these agents result in significant treatment benefits in critically ill patients. The current approach to establishing the efficacy of nutritional interventions suffers from several limitations. First, the majority of studies focus on surrogate or substitute end points rather than clinically important end points. Second, the majority of clinical studies are small, and as such are underpowered to detect a significant treatment effect on clinically important end points. Third, the methodological quality of individual randomized trials varies. Methodological limitations, prevalent in nutrition studies, limit the strength of clinical inference that can be made from study results. High quality studies have been shown to differ significantly from low quality studies in their estimation of treatment effect. Fourth, the generalizability of single-site studies is limited. Finally, studies sponsored solely by industry are considered to be less believable than studies conducted under the auspices of peer-review agencies. Future evaluations must be done in the context of large, multicenter, well-designed, randomized trials focusing on clinically important end points that are sponsored from a variety of sources (including peer-reviewed agencies). Although such trials are costly, they are feasible and are much more likely to be believable and generalizable than the current approach.

Does the formulation of enteral feeding products influence infectious morbidity and mortality rates in the critically ill patients? A critical review of the evidence.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between the formulation of enteral nutrition and nosocomial infection in critical illness. DATA SOURCES: Computerized search of published research and reference list review. STUDY SELECTION: Review of 151 citations. Included are 31 primary studies in which the authors described the formulation of enteral nutrition and its effect on infectious morbidity and mortality rates in critically ill humans or animals. DATA EXTRACTION: Abstraction of the methods of primary studies and the impact of the composition of enteral nutrition on infectious morbidity and mortality rates. DATA SYNTHESIS: There is no evidence that the addition of branch-chain amino acids or nucleotides to enteral nutrition reduces infectious morbidity in animals or humans. Supplementation with fish oil, arginine, or glutamine has a variable impact on survival in animal models; there are no clinical trials in critically ill patients that demonstrate reduced infectious morbidity or mortality rates. Some animal studies suggest that intestinal overgrowth and bacterial translocation may be related to the type of fiber used, or elemental or polymeric formulas. Preliminary evidence suggests that Modular Tube Feeds (an enteral formula developed at the Shriner's Burn Institute, Cincinnati, OH), and a commercially available enteral formula (enhanced with omega-3-fatty acids, arginine, and yeast RNA; Impact, Sandoz Nutrition, Minneapolis, MN) may result in decreased infections in burn and postoperative cancer patients, respectively, but not in critically ill patients. Acidification of enteral feeding results in decreased bacterial colonization of the stomach in critically ill patients. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient experimental data exist to permit conclusions that enteral nutrition formulations or supplements reduce infectious morbidity and mortality rates, but results are promising enough to warrant further research.