RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) do not achieve complete control of their symptoms with current available treatments. In a dose-finding phase 2b study, ligelizumab improved urticaria symptoms in patients with H1-antihistamine (H1-AH) refractory CSU. Here, we report the efficacy and safety outcomes from two ligelizumab phase 3 studies. METHODS: PEARL-1 and PEARL-2 were identically designed randomised, double-blind, active-controlled and placebo-controlled parallel-group studies. Patients aged 12 years or older with moderate-to-severe H1-AH refractory CSU were recruited from 347 sites in 46 countries and randomly allocated in a 3:3:3:1 ratio via Interactive Response Technology to 72 mg ligelizumab, 120 mg ligelizumab, 300 mg omalizumab, or placebo, dosed every 4 weeks, for 52 weeks. Patients allocated to placebo received 120 mg ligelizumab from week 24. The primary endpoint was change-from-baseline (CFB) in weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) at week 12, and was analysed in all eligible adult patients according to the treatment assigned at random allocation. Safety was assessed throughout the study in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. The studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03580369 (PEARL-1) and NCT03580356 (PEARL-2). Both trials are now complete. FINDINGS: Between Oct 17, 2018, and Oct 26, 2021, 2057 adult patients were randomly allocated across both studies (72 mg ligelizumab n=614; 120 mg ligelizumab n=616; 300 mg omalizumab n=618, and placebo n=209). A total of 1480 (72%) of 2057 were female, and 577 (28%) of 2057 were male. Mean UAS7 at baseline across study groups ranged from 29·37 to 31·10. At week 12, estimated treatment differences in mean CFB-UAS7 were as follows: for 72 mg ligelizumab versus placebo, -8·0 (95% CI -10·6 to -5·4; PEARL-1), -10·0 (-12·6 to -7·4; PEARL-2); 72 mg ligelizumab versus omalizumab 0·7 (-1·2 to 2·5; PEARL-1), 0·4 (-1·4 to 2·2; PEARL-2); 120 mg ligelizumab versus placebo -8·0 (-10·5 to -5·4; PEARL-1), -11·1 (-13·7 to -8·5; PEARL-2); 120 mg ligelizumab versus omalizumab 0·7 (-1·1 to 2·5; PEARL-1), -0·7 (-2·5 to 1·1; PEARL-2). Both doses of ligelizumab were superior to placebo (p<0·0001), but not to omalizumab, in both studies. No new safety signals were identified for ligelizumab or omalizumab. INTERPRETATION: In the phase 3 PEARL studies, ligelizumab demonstrated superior efficacy versus placebo but not versus omalizumab. The safety profile of ligelizumab was consistent with previous studies. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma.
Assuntos
Antialérgicos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Urticária Crônica , Urticária , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Antialérgicos/efeitos adversos , Doença Crônica , Urticária Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos H1/uso terapêutico , Omalizumab/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento , Urticária/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Angioedema (AE) manifests with intermittent, localized, self-limiting swelling of the subcutaneous and/or submucosal tissue. AE is heterogeneous, can be hereditary or acquired, may occur only once or be recurrent, may exhibit wheals or not, and may be due to mast cell mediators, bradykinin, or other mechanisms. Several different taxonomic systems are currently used, making it difficult to compare the results of studies, develop multicenter collaboration, and harmonize AE treatment. OBJECTIVE: We developed a consensus on the definition, acronyms, nomenclature, and classification of AE (DANCE). METHODS: The initiative involved 91 experts from 35 countries and was endorsed by 53 scientific and medical societies, and patient organizations. A consensus was reached by online discussion and voting using the Delphi process over a period of 16 months (June 2021 to November 2022). RESULTS: The DANCE initiative resulted in an international consensus on the definition, classification, and terminology of AE. The new consensus classification features 5 types and endotypes of AE and a harmonized vocabulary of abbreviations/acronyms. CONCLUSION: The DANCE classification complements current clinical guidelines and expert consensus recommendations on the diagnostic assessment and treatment of AE. DANCE does not replace current clinical guidelines, and expert consensus algorithms and should not be misconstrued in a way that affects reimbursement of medicines prescribed by physicians using sound clinical judgment. We anticipate that this new AE taxonomy and nomenclature will harmonize and facilitate AE research and clinical studies, thereby improving patient care.
Assuntos
Angioedema , Consenso , Terminologia como Assunto , Humanos , Angioedema/classificação , Angioedema/diagnóstico , Abreviaturas como Assunto , Técnica DelphiRESUMO
Wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA) is a life-threatening food allergy triggered by wheat in combination with the second factor such as exercise. The identification of potential genetic risk factors for this allergy might help high-risk individuals before consuming wheat-containing food. We aimed to identify genetic variants associated with WDEIA. A genome-wide association study was conducted in a discovery set of 77 individuals with WDEIA and 924 control subjects via three genetic models. The associations were confirmed in a replication set of 91 affected individuals and 435 control individuals. Summary statistics from the combined set were analyzed by meta-analysis with a random-effect model. In the discovery set, a locus on chromosome 6, rs9277630, was associated with WDEIA in the dominant model (OR = 3.95 [95% CI, 2.31-6.73], p = 7.87 × 10-8). The HLA-DPB1∗02:01:02 allele displayed the most significant association with WDEIA (OR = 4.51 [95% CI, 2.66-7.63], p = 2.28 × 10-9), as determined via HLA imputation following targeted sequencing. The association of the allele with WDEIA was confirmed in replication samples (OR = 3.82 [95% CI, 2.33-6.26], p = 3.03 × 10-8). A meta-analysis performed in the combined set revealed that the HLA-DPB1∗02:01:02 allele was significantly associated with an increased risk of WDEIA (OR = 4.13 [95% CI, 2.89-5.93], p = 1.06 × 10-14). Individuals carrying the HLA-DPB1∗02:01:02 allele have a significantly increased risk of WDEIA. Further validation of these findings in independent multiethnic cohorts is needed.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia/patologia , Exercício Físico , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Cadeias beta de HLA-DP/genética , Polimorfismo Genético , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/patologia , Adulto , Alelos , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/metabolismoRESUMO
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a debilitating skin disease characterized by intensely itchy wheals, angioedema, or both. Symptoms recur spontaneously, on a near-daily basis, over >6 weeks; many patients experience flare-ups over several years and, consequently, reduced quality of life. Differences between the inflammatory profiles of the skin of CSU patients (wheals and nonlesional sites) and healthy controls indicate that key drivers such as mast cells, eosinophils, and basophils interact, release vasoactive mediators, and prime the skin, leaving patients predisposed to symptoms. Many cytokines and chemokines involved in these inflammatory networks and their corresponding intracellular signaling cascades have been identified. These insights informed the development of therapies such as omalizumab, dupilumab, and Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, marking a renewed focus on pathogenesis in CSU clinical research. Despite progress, current therapies provide symptomatic control but do not appear to redress the inflammatory balance in the skin permanently. A deeper understanding of CSU pathogenesis will permit a more targeted approach to developing novel treatments with curative intent. Here, we review what is known about the pathogenesis of CSU and consider how this can be used to identify rational targets to improve patient care further.
Assuntos
Antialérgicos , Urticária Crônica , Urticária , Humanos , Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Doença Crônica , Urticária/diagnóstico , Urticária/tratamento farmacológico , Urticária/etiologia , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Urticária Crônica/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common skin disorder characterized by daily or almost daily recurring skin edema and flare with itch and pruritus anywhere on the body for more than 6 weeks. Although basophil- and mast cell-released inflammatory mediators, such as histamine, play important roles in the pathogenesis of CSU, the detailed underlying mechanism is not clear. Since several auto-antibodies, IgGs which recognize IgE or the high-affinity IgE receptor (FcεRI) and IgEs against other self-antigens, are detected in CSU patients, they are considered to activate both mast cells in the skin and basophils circulating in the blood. In addition, we and other groups demonstrated that the coagulation and complement system also contribute to the development of urticaria. Here, we summarized the behaviors, markers and targets of basophils in relation to the coagulation-complement system, and for the treatment of CSU.
Assuntos
Urticária Crônica , Urticária , Humanos , Basófilos , Urticária/etiologia , Pele , Receptores de IgE , Proteínas do Sistema Complemento , Doença CrônicaRESUMO
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterized by daily recurring wheal and flare with itch for more than 6 weeks. The extrinsic coagulation system has been shown to be activated in correlation with CSU severity. We have reported that tissue factor (TF), a trigger of the extrinsic coagulation cascade, is synergistically expressed on vascular endothelial cells by simultaneous stimulation with TF inducers (TFI), followed by activation of the extrinsic coagulation cascade and hyper permeability in vitro. However, vascular endothelial cells are not likely to be simultaneously stimulated by multiple TFIs under physiological conditions. Therefore, in order to know whether sequential, rather than simultaneous, stimuli with interval may induce synergistic activation of TF, we investigated the time course of the priming effects of each TFI for synergistic TF expression in vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs). We stimulated HUVECs with a TFI (first stimulation) and then stimulated cells with another TFI at indicated time points (second stimulation) and detected TF expression and activity. The TF expression induced by simultaneous stimulation diminished in a few hours. However, both synergistic enhancement of TF expression and activation level of the coagulation cascade were detected even when the second stimulation was added 18 or 22 h after the first stimulation. Thus, the priming effect of TFI for synergistic TF expression may persist for a half day or longer.
Assuntos
Células Endoteliais , Tromboplastina , Humanos , Tromboplastina/genética , Tromboplastina/metabolismo , Células Endoteliais/metabolismo , Coagulação Sanguínea , Células CultivadasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients has been established, but real-world long-term data remain scarce, especially in Japan. METHODS: 52-week, open-label, single-arm, observational study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of first-time omalizumab in Japanese CSU patients responding inadequately to conventional therapies. RESULTS: Overall, 235 of 280 patients completed the study. Most patients were aged ≥ 18 and < 65 years; adolescents (≥ 12 and ≤ 18 years) accounted for 9.6% of the total population. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) duration of CSU at baseline was 1.6 ± 3.1 years; 46.1% of patients had had CSU for < 6 months. At baseline, the mean ± SD of Urticaria Control Test (UCT) score, Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were 5.1 ± 3.2, 25.2 ± 11.9, and 8.4 ± 5.9, respectively. The mean ± SD duration of the observation period was 330.3 ± 86.2 days. Relapse was reported in 65 patients, 51, 9, and 5 of whom required retreatment with omalizumab 1, 2, and ≥ 3 times, respectively. The incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was reported in 11.8%, 1.4%, and 3.9% of patients, respectively. The most common AEs were urticaria (1.8%) and eczema (1.1%). No adolescents experienced ADRs. A cumulative of 92.8% of patients responded in the Physician's Global Impression of Change, with 81.3%, 75.0%, and 95.1% of patients achieving UCT ≥ 12, UAS7 ≤ 6, and DLQI ≤ 5 up to Week 52, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the safety and effectiveness of omalizumab in CSU patients who responded inadequately to conventional therapies in real-world clinical practice in Japan.
Assuntos
Antialérgicos , Urticária Crônica , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Urticária , Humanos , Omalizumab/efeitos adversos , Antialérgicos/efeitos adversos , População do Leste Asiático , Urticária Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Urticária/tratamento farmacológico , Urticária/induzido quimicamente , Doença Crônica , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare and potentially life-threatening genetic disorder characterized by recurrent attacks of angioedema. HAE types I and II result from deficient or dysfunctional C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH). This Phase 3 study assessed the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of subcutaneous (SC) C1-INH in Japanese patients with HAE. METHODS: The prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm Phase 3 study recruited patients with HAE types I or II to an initial run-in period, followed by a 16-week treatment period where patients received 60 IU/kg C1-INH (SC) twice weekly. The two primary endpoints were the time-normalized number of HAE attacks per month and C1-INH functional activity at Week 16. RESULTS: Nine patients entered the treatment period and completed the study. Treatment with C1-INH (SC) significantly reduced the mean monthly attack rate from 3.7 during the run-in period to 0.3 during treatment (exploratory p value of within-patient comparison = 0.004). After the last dose of C1-INH (SC) at Week 16, the mean trough concentration of C1-INH was 59.8%, and the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve to the end of the dosing period and to the last sample were 5317.1 and 13,091.5 hâ¢%, respectively. During the study, there were no deaths, serious adverse events, or adverse events leading to study discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: C1-INH (SC) (60 IU/kg twice weekly) was efficacious and well tolerated as a prophylaxis against HAE attacks in Japanese patients with HAE types I or II, which was supported by the increased and maintained C1-INH functional activity. EudraCT Number 2019-003921-99; JapicCTI-205273.
Assuntos
Angioedemas Hereditários , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1 , Humanos , Angioedemas Hereditários/tratamento farmacológico , Angioedemas Hereditários/prevenção & controle , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/farmacocinética , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/uso terapêutico , População do Leste Asiático , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In patients with wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA), anaphylactic shock occurs frequently, therefore avoidance of wheat products is recommended. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of long-term omalizumab treatment for adult patients with WDEIA. METHODS: In this phase 2, multicentre single-arm trial, 20 adult patients with WDEIA were enrolled (UMIN 000019250). All patients were administered 150-600 mg of omalizumab subcutaneously and evaluations (basophil activation and blood examination) were performed at regular intervals during administration period (0-48 weeks) and observation period (48-68 weeks). Primary endpoint was proportion of the patients who achieved a basophil activation rate below 10% with fractionated wheat preparations, and secondary endpoint was proportion of the patients with no allergic reactions after wheat products ingestion. RESULTS: During the omalizumab treatment, more than 80% of the patients achieved the basophil activation rate less than 10% against all fractionated wheat preparations, and 68.8% of the patients who achieved the primary endpoint experienced no allergic reaction. During the observation period, the proportion of the patients who achieved a basophil activation rate below 10% decreased gradually, and the proportion of patients with positive allergic reactions increased gradually thereafter and reached maximum of 46.7%. Severe adverse events were not observed during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term omalizumab treatment is safe and effective for adult patients with WDEIA when assessed by basophil activation rate with wheat allergens as well as allergic reactions after lifting of restrictions on wheat intake. However, this is not enough to achieve desensitization.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Alergias Induzidas por Exercício , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo , Adulto , Humanos , Alérgenos , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Basófilos , Exercício Físico , Gliadina , Omalizumab/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/tratamento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidade a Trigo/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Schnitzler syndrome is a rare disorder with chronic urticaria, and there is no report summarizing the current status in Japan. METHODS: A nationwide survey of major dermatology departments in Japan was conducted in 2019. We further performed a systematic search of PubMed and Ichushi-Web, using the keywords "Schnitzler syndrome" and "Japan" then contacted the corresponding authors or physicians for further information. RESULTS: Excluding duplicates, a total of 36 clinically diagnosed cases were identified from 1994 through the spring of 2022, with a male to female ratio of 1:1. The median age of onset was 56.5 years. It took 3.3 years from the first symptom, mostly urticaria, to reach the final diagnosis. The current status of 30 cases was ascertained; two patients developed B-cell lymphoma. SchS treatment was generally effective with high doses of corticosteroids, but symptoms sometimes recurred after tapering. Colchicine was administered in 17 cases and was effective in 8, but showed no effect in the others. Tocilizumab, used in six cases, improved laboratory abnormalities and symptoms, but lost its efficacy after several years. Rituximab, used in five cases, was effective in reducing serum IgM levels or lymphoma mass, but not in inflammatory symptoms. Four cases were treated with IL-1 targeting therapy, either anakinra or canakinumab, and achieved complete remission, except one case with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: Since Schnitzler syndrome is a rare disease, the continuous collection and long-term follow-up of clinical information is essential for its appropriate treatment and further understanding of its pathophysiology.
Assuntos
Urticária Crônica , Síndrome de Schnitzler , Urticária , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome de Schnitzler/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Schnitzler/tratamento farmacológico , Urticária/diagnóstico , Proteína Antagonista do Receptor de Interleucina 1/uso terapêutico , Urticária Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Japão/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ligelizumab, a next-generation, humanized anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibody is in development as a treatment for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria, whose symptoms are inadequately controlled with standard-of-care therapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term safety and re-treatment efficacy of ligelizumab 240 mg in patients who completed the core study and extension study. METHODS: This open-label, single-arm, long-term Phase 2b extension study was designed to assess patients who were previously administered various doses of ligelizumab, omalizumab or placebo in the Phase 2b, dose-finding core study and who presented with active disease after Week 32. In the extension study, patients received ligelizumab 240 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, for 52 weeks and were monitored post-treatment for 48 weeks. RESULTS: Overall, ligelizumab was well-tolerated with no newly identified safety signals. A total of 95.4% (226/237) screened patients received ligelizumab 240 mg in the extension study; 84.1% (190/226) of patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. Most reported events were mild (41.6%) or moderate (35.8%) and mostly unrelated to the study treatment. At Week 12, 46.5% of patients had a complete response increasing to 53.1% after 52 weeks. Following 52 weeks of extension study treatment, 75.8% (95% confidence interval, 69.9, 81.3) of patients had cumulative complete responses. The median time to relapse in complete responders was 38 weeks. CONCLUSION: The long-term safety profile of ligelizumab 240 mg in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria was consistent with the core study and re-treatment efficacy was shown. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477332 and NCT02649218.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Urticária Crônica , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Urticária Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare and disabling disease for which early diagnosis and effective therapy are critical. This revision and update of the global WAO/EAACI guideline on the diagnosis and management of HAE provides up-to-date guidance for the management of HAE. For this update and revision of the guideline, an international panel of experts reviewed the existing evidence, developed 28 recommendations, and established consensus by an online DELPHI process. The goal of these recommendations and guideline is to help physicians and their patients in making rational decisions in the management of HAE with deficient C1 inhibitor (type 1) and HAE with dysfunctional C1 inhibitor (type 2), by providing guidance on common and important clinical issues, such as: (1) How should HAE be diagnosed? (2) When should HAE patients receive prophylactic on top of on-demand treatment and what treatments should be used? (3) What are the goals of treatment? (4) Should HAE management be different for special HAE patient groups such as children or pregnant/breast-feeding women? and (5) How should HAE patients monitor their disease activity, impact, and control? It is also the intention of this guideline to help establish global standards for the management of HAE and to encourage and facilitate the use of recommended diagnostics and therapies for all patients.
Assuntos
Angioedemas Hereditários , Angioedemas Hereditários/prevenção & controle , Angioedemas Hereditários/terapia , Criança , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/genética , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/uso terapêutico , Consenso , Feminino , Humanos , GravidezRESUMO
This update and revision of the international guideline for urticaria was developed following the methods recommended by Cochrane and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group. It is a joint initiative of the Dermatology Section of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA²LEN) and its Urticaria and Angioedema Centers of Reference and Excellence (UCAREs and ACAREs), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF; EuroGuiDerm), and the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology with the participation of 64 delegates of 50 national and international societies and from 31 countries. The consensus conference was held on 3 December 2020. This guideline was acknowledged and accepted by the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). Urticaria is a frequent, mast cell-driven disease that presents with wheals, angioedema, or both. The lifetime prevalence for acute urticaria is approximately 20%. Chronic spontaneous or inducible urticaria is disabling, impairs quality of life, and affects performance at work and school. This updated version of the international guideline for urticaria covers the definition and classification of urticaria and outlines expert-guided and evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for the different subtypes of urticaria.
Assuntos
Angioedema , Asma , Urticária , Angioedema/diagnóstico , Angioedema/etiologia , Angioedema/terapia , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Prevalência , Qualidade de Vida , Urticária/diagnóstico , Urticária/epidemiologia , Urticária/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Food anaphylaxis is commonly elicited by unintentional ingestion of foods containing the allergen above the tolerance threshold level of the individual. While labeling the 14 main allergens used as ingredients in food products is mandatory in the EU, there is no legal definition of declaring potential contaminants. Precautionary allergen labeling such as "may contain traces of" is often used. However, this is unsatisfactory for consumers as they get no information if the contamination is below their personal threshold. In discussions with the food industry and technologists, it was suggested to use a voluntary declaration indicating that all declared contaminants are below a threshold of 0.5 mg protein per 100 g of food. This concentration is known to be below the threshold of most patients, and it can be technically guaranteed in most food production. However, it was also important to assess that in case of accidental ingestion of contaminants below this threshold by highly allergic patients, no fatal anaphylactic reaction could occur. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to assess whether a fatal reaction to 5mg of protein or less has been reported, assuming that a maximum portion size of 1kg of a processed food exceeds any meal and thus gives a sufficient safety margin. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched until 24 January 2021 for provocation studies and case reports in which one of the 14 major food allergens was reported to elicit fatal or life-threatening anaphylactic reactions and assessed if these occurred below the ingestion of 5mg of protein. A Delphi process was performed to obtain an expert consensus on the results. RESULTS: In the 210 studies included, in our search, no reports of fatal anaphylactic reactions reported below 5 mg protein ingested were identified. However, in provocation studies and case reports, severe reactions below 5 mg were reported for the following allergens: eggs, fish, lupin, milk, nuts, peanuts, soy, and sesame seeds. CONCLUSION: Based on the literature studied for this review, it can be stated that cross-contamination of the 14 major food allergens below 0.5 mg/100 g is likely not to endanger most food allergic patients when a standard portion of food is consumed. We propose to use the statement "this product contains the named allergens in the list of ingredients, it may contain traces of other contaminations (to be named, e.g. nut) at concentrations less than 0.5 mg per 100 g of this product" for a voluntary declaration on processed food packages. This level of avoidance of cross-contaminations can be achieved technically for most processed foods, and the statement would be a clear and helpful message to the consumers. However, it is clearly acknowledged that a voluntary declaration is only a first step to a legally binding solution. For this, further research on threshold levels is encouraged.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Alérgenos/análise , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Animais , Ovos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Rotulagem de Alimentos , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) occasionally cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in various organs, the prevalence of irAEs and potential risk factors have not been clarified. We identified irAE predictive factors and examined the relationship between the effect of ICIs and irAEs for patients with malignancies. METHODS: A total of 533 cases treated with ICIs, including programmed death 1 (PD-1), PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), for various malignancies were included retrospectively. We recorded irAEs from medical records and graded them using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5. Prevalence and predictive factors associated with immune-related liver injury and the relationship between irAE and treatment response were analyzed. RESULTS: During a median of 10 (1-103) cycles with a median follow-up after several ICI initiations of 384 (21-1715) days, irAEs with all grades and with grade ≥ 3 developed in 144 (27.0%) and 57 (10.7%) cases. Cumulative irAE development rates were 21.9, 33.5, and 43.0% in all grades and 8.8, 14.9, and 20.7% in grade ≥ 3 at 5, 10, and 20 cycles, respectively. Patients who received anti-CTLA4 therapy were more likely to develop irAEs compared to those who received anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy. Liver injury was the most common irAE. Multivariate analysis identified the combination of PD-1 and anti-CTL-4 antibodies (hazard ratio [HR], 17.04; P < 0.0001) and baseline eosinophil count ≥130/µL (HR, 3.01 for < 130; P = 0.012) as independent risk factors for the incidence of immune-related liver injury with grade ≥ 2. Patients who developed irAEs had a higher disease control rate (P < 0.0001) and an increased overall survival rate compared to those without irAEs (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTL-4 antibodies resulted in higher a frequency of irAEs. Baseline absolute eosinophil count was found to be a predictive factor for immune-related liver injury. Occurrence of irAEs may be associated with higher efficacy of ICI treatment and longer survival among patients who receive ICI therapy.
Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias , Humanos , Prevalência , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Japão/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Previous studies have shown the efficacy of delgocitinib (DEL) ointment, a topical Janus kinase inhibitor, against atopic dermatitis (AD). However, there is no available information regarding the efficacy of DEL ointment in maintaining remission. Data of patients with AD who received remission maintenance therapy twice weekly with DEL or topical corticosteroid (TCS) on the affected skin of each upper limb were extracted from the medical records. Efficacy was assessed based on changes in pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) score, stratum corneum hydration (SCH), erythema index (EI). Of 25 patients, four patients (16%) had eczema flare-ups on the TCS side and eight patients (32%) on the DEL side. The extent of change in each parameter between TCS- and DEL-treated areas of the skin did not differ significantly. The mean changes in the NRS and EI showed a slight improvement on the side treated with TCS and were slightly worse on the side treated with DEL. However, the SCH of the DEL group was maintained, while that of the TCS group worsened. TCS is more likely to be effective than DEL in terms of remission maintenance therapy. However, topical DEL is as effective as topical steroid in the maintenance therapy of AD in dry skin patients.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Adulto , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Emolientes , Glucocorticoides , Humanos , Pomadas , Pirróis , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Cytotoxic agents are classified according to the severity of skin injury after extravasation. However, injuries caused by extravasation of noncytotoxic agents have not been sufficiently investigated, although the risk of extravasation is mentioned in medical safety information published by the Japan Council for Quality Health Care. Therefore, in this study, we focused on noncytotoxic electrolyte solutions and infusions and evaluated skin injuries during leakage using extravasation model rats. Rats were anesthetized and intradermally injected with 100 µL of an electrolyte solution or infusion. Injection lesions were macroscopically and histopathologically evaluated for extravasation injuries. Each electrolyte solution and infusion were classified into three categories (vesicants, irritants, and non-tissue-damaging agents) depending on the degree of skin injury. Similar to saline, 0.3% potassium chloride and 0.6% magnesium sulfate showed almost no injury, and 3% sodium chloride and BFLUID® caused erythema and induration. Erythema, induration, and ulceration were observed with the following: 10% sodium chloride, 2% calcium chloride, 8.5% calcium gluconate, 12.3% magnesium sulfate, MAGSENT®, FESIN®, and Intralipos®. The duration of damage with these agents was markedly prolonged. Electrolyte solutions and infusions can be classified into vesicants (10% sodium chloride, 2% calcium chloride, 8.5% calcium gluconate, 12.3% magnesium sulfate, MAGSENT®, FESIN®, and Intralipos®), irritants (3% sodium chloride and BFLUID®), and non-tissue-damaging agents (0.3% potassium chloride and 0.6% magnesium sulfate) according to their composition. The characteristic symptoms and severity of each drug extravasation revealed in this study will provide basic information for preparation of guidelines for treatment of extravasation.
Assuntos
Gluconato de Cálcio , Sulfato de Magnésio , Animais , Cloreto de Cálcio , Eletrólitos , Eritema , Infusões Intravenosas , Irritantes , Sulfato de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Cloreto de Potássio , Ratos , Cloreto de SódioRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare, life-threatening genetic disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of subcutaneous or submucosal angioedema. The ultimate goals of treatment for HAE remain ill-defined. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this Delphi process was to define the goals of HAE treatment and to examine which factors should be considered when assessing disease control and normalization of the patient's life. METHODS: The Delphi panel comprised 23 participants who were selected based on involvement with scientific research on HAE or coauthorship of the most recent update and revision of the World Allergy Organization/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guideline on HAE. The process comprised 3 rounds of voting. The final round aimed to aggregate the opinions of the expert panel and to achieve consensus. RESULTS: Two direct consensus questions were posed in round 2, based on the responses received in round 1, and the panel agreed that the goals of treatment are to achieve total control of the disease and to normalize the patient's life. For the third round of voting, 21 statements were considered, with the participants reaching consensus on 18. It is clear from the wide-ranging consensus statements that the burdens of disease and treatment should be considered when assessing disease control and normalization of patients' lives. CONCLUSIONS: The ultimate goal for HAE treatment is to achieve no angioedema attacks. The availability of improved treatments and disease management over the last decade now makes complete control of HAE a realistic possibility for most patients.
Assuntos
Angioedemas Hereditários/terapia , Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1/genética , Pele/imunologia , Angioedemas Hereditários/genética , Animais , Consenso , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tingling dermal pain triggered by sweating impairs the lives of patients with cholinergic urticaria and generalized anhidrosis. However, dermal pain evoked by sweating stimuli has been under investigated. METHODS: To clarify characteristics of tingling dermal pain on sweating, we retrospectively evaluated clinical and histopathological manifestations in 30 patients having the main problem of dermal pain on sweating, and the efficacy of treatments. RESULTS: Dermal pain upon sweating affected mostly young males. It accompanied eruptions upon sweating and/or hypohidrosis in 24 patients, while 6 patients had dermal pain independently of hypohidrosis or eruptions. Dermal pain appeared immediately upon exposure to sweating stimuli, and disappeared within mostly 30 or 10 min. Hypohidrosis was not necessarily generalized but localized or absent. Histological analysis revealed that dermal pain could occur even without morphological changes and inflammation of sweat glands. Hypersensitivity to sweat contents was found only in 26% of patients. Sweat histamine and increase of plasma histamine after thermal induction in patients were significantly higher than those in healthy subjects. Effectiveness of steroid pulse therapy was demonstrated for dermal pain with hypohidrosis. Medications acting on nervous systems and regular sweat-inducing activities for promoting perspiration were also effective. CONCLUSIONS: Short-lasting tingling dermal pain appears immediately upon exposure to sweating stimuli, regardless of developing eruptions and/or presence of hypohidrosis, but possibly in association with sweat and plasma histamine.
Assuntos
Hipo-Hidrose , Urticária , Histamina , Humanos , Hipo-Hidrose/complicações , Hipo-Hidrose/tratamento farmacológico , Hipo-Hidrose/patologia , Masculino , Dor/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sudorese , Urticária/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Autoantibodies (AAbs) against immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies (Abs) and their high-affinity receptor alpha subunits (FcεRIα) are key factors in the elicitation of type IIb autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria (type IIb aiCSU). In this study, we aimed to develop a new method to detect functional anti-FcεRIα and anti-IgE AAbs, which can crosslink the plural FcεRÐα molecules and IgE Abs on the surface of mast cells and basophils, in sera from aiCSU patients using the amplified luminescence proximity homogeneous assay (Alpha). METHODS: Sera were obtained from 14 aiCSU patients, as diagnosed by recurrent chronic spontaneous urticaria episodes and positive results for the autologous serum skin test and/or histamine release test (HRT). The AAbs to FcεRIα and IgE Abs were determined in sera from aiCSU patients using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Alpha by cross-linking (AlphaCL) of IgE Abs and/or FcεRÐα. RESULTS: Serum anti-FcεRIα and anti-IgE AAb levels were not significantly different between aiCSU patients and healthy subjects in ELISA. Anti-FcεRIα AAbs were detected in 10 of 14 aiCSU patients who displayed positive (5/5) and negative (5/9) results in the HRT for anti-FcεRIα AAbs by AlphaCL, whereas no signals were observed in healthy subjects. Additionally, anti-IgE AAbs were detected in two of four aiCSU patients who displayed positive results in the HRT for anti-IgE AAbs. CONCLUSIONS: A new assay method using AlphaCL can detect anti-FcεRIα and anti-IgE AAbs with FcεRIα- and IgE-crosslinking abilities in sera from aiCSU patients. This simple and practical assay method may be available as a diagnostic tool for urticaria patients.