Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 200(5): W510-7, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23617518

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We compared results from various methods of analysis of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data from a single dataset consisting of 10 healthy adolescents. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All subjects were imaged on a single 3-T MRI system (single-shot echo-planar imaging pulse sequence; b value, 1000 s/mm(2)). We measured fractional anisotropy (FA), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and axial and radial diffusivity values using 64-pixel rectangular regions of interest (ROIs) in the right side, midline, and left side of the central portion of the splenium of the corpus callosum for fixed (i.e., at same sites in all subjects) and targeted (i.e., at sites of highest FA values) locations. We compared results with those obtained using 64-pixel oval ROIs and 100-pixel rectangular ROIs in the same locations. Finally, we compared results from ROI-based methods and from tractography. All comparisons used the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the intraclass correlation of individual values. RESULTS: Compared to tractography, the average of mean ROI-based values was significantly higher for fixed (approximately 14%) and targeted (approximately 39%) FA values and was significantly lower for ADC (approximately 16%) and radial diffusivity (approximately 38%) values. For solely ROI-based comparisons, statistically significant differences were found in the following comparisons: 64- versus 100-pixel ROI, oval versus rectangular ROI, targeted FA left of midline versus mean targeted FA value, and targeted ROI right of midline versus mean targeted FA value. CONCLUSION: Markedly different values were obtained when using either ROI- or tractography-based techniques or ROI analysis techniques that differ only relatively slightly.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Corpo Caloso/anatomia & histologia , Imagem de Tensor de Difusão/métodos , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Fibras Nervosas Mielinizadas/ultraestrutura , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
J Child Neurol ; 32(5): 458-466, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28090797

RESUMO

Mirsky proposed a model of attention that included these dimensions: focus/execute, sustain, stabilize, encode, and shift. The neural correlates of these dimensions were investigated within corona radiata subregions in healthy youth. Diffusion tensor imaging and neuropsychological assessments were conducted in 79 healthy, right-handed youth aged 4-17 years. Diffusion tensor imaging maps were analyzed using standardized parcellation methods. Partial Pearson correlations between neuropsychological standardized scores, representing these attention dimensions, and diffusion tensor imaging measures of corona radiata subregions were calculated after adjusting for gender and IQ. Significant correlations were found between the focus/execute, sustain, stabilize, and shift dimensions and imaging metrics in hypothesized corona radiata subregions. Results suggest that greater microstructural white matter integrity of the corona radiata is partly associated with attention across 4 attention dimensions. Findings suggest that white matter microstructure of the corona radiata is a neural correlate of several, but not all, attention dimensions.


Assuntos
Atenção/fisiologia , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/fisiologia , Substância Branca/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Imagem de Tensor de Difusão , Função Executiva/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes Neuropsicológicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA