Potential crosstalk between SPP1 + TAMs and CD8 + exhausted T cells promotes an immunosuppressive environment in gastric metastatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy brings new hope to patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, liver metastases can reduce the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) may be the cause of this reduction in efficacy. SPP1 + TAMs are considered to have immunosuppressive properties. We aimed to investigate the involvement of SPP1 + TAMs in the metastasis of gastric cancer. METHODS: The single-cell transcriptome was combined with batched BULK datasets for analysis. Animal models were used to verify the analysis results. RESULTS: We reveal the interaction of SPP1 + TAMs with CD8 + exhausted T cells in metastatic cancer. Among these interactions, GDF15-TGFBR2 may play a key immunosuppressive role. We constructed an LR score to quantify interactions based on ligands and receptors. The LR score is highly correlated with various immune features and clinical molecular subtypes. The LR score may also guide the prediction of the efficacy of immunotherapy and prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The crosstalk between SPP1 + TAMs and CD8 + exhausted T cells plays a key immunosuppressive role in the gastric metastatic cancer microenvironment.

Different prognosis in cutaneous early-onset and late-onset Merkel cell carcinoma: a population-based retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and highly aggressive form of skin cancer. However, there is limited research on the clinicopathological features of early-onset MCC (EOMCC) and the differences between EOMCC and late-onset MCC (LOMCC). Our objective was to evaluate the clinicopathological features and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of EOMCC. METHODS: Our cohort study analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. Data from 1941 patients who were diagnosed with primary cutaneous MCC were included. We then divided the patients with MCC into two groups: those with EOMCC (526 patients) and those with LOMCC (1415 patients). CSS is used as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The EOMCC group exhibited trends toward advanced tumor progression, an expanded surgical scope, increased lymph node retrieval, intensified radiotherapy, greater utilization of systemic therapy, and a better prognosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that LOMCC (HR 3.305 [2.002-5.456], P < 0.001), advanced T stage (HR 1.430 [1.139-1.797], P = 0.002), advanced N stage (HR 1.522 [1.221-1.897], P < 0.001), M1 stage (HR 2.587 [1.480-4.521], P < 0.001), and radiation (HR 0.586 [0.410-0.837], P = 0.003) were significantly associated with CSS. Among these factors, EOMCC/LOMCC was most strongly associated with CSS, indicating that LOMCC is an independent risk factor for CSS. Interestingly, we found that regional EOMCC and localized or in situ LOMCC had almost completely overlapping survival curves (Plog-rank = 0.620). Additionally, we observed that the TNM staging + age model was a more accurate predictor of CSS among MCC patients than using TNM staging alone. CONCLUSIONS: We found that EOMCC has distinct clinicopathological features compared to LOMCC. EOMCC is associated with better CSS. The combination of TNM staging and age was more accurate for predicting patient outcomes than TNM staging alone.