Second primary cancers related to smoking and treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Working Cadre.

BACKGROUND: An increased risk of second primary cancers has been reported in patients who survive small-cell carcinoma of the lung. The treatment's contribution to the development of second cancers is difficult to assess, in part because the number of long-term survivors seen at any one institution is small. We designed a multi-institution study to investigate the risk among survivors of developing second primary cancers other than small-cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: Demographic, smoking, and treatment information were obtained from the medical records of 611 patients who had been cancer free for more than 2 years after therapy for histologically proven small-cell lung cancer, and person-years of follow-up were cumulated. Population-based rates of cancer incidence and mortality were used to estimate the expected number of cancers or deaths. The actuarial risk of second cancers was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Relative to the general population, the risk of all second cancers among these patients (mostly non-small-cell cancers of the lung) was increased 3.5-fold. Second lung cancer risk was increased 13-fold among those who received chest irradiation in comparison to a sevenfold increase among nonirradiated patients. It was higher in those who continued smoking, with evidence of an interaction between chest irradiation and continued smoking (relative risk = 21). Patients treated with various forms of combination chemotherapy had comparable increases in risk (9.4- to 13-fold, overall), except for a 19-fold risk increase among those treated with alkylating agents who continued smoking. IMPLICATIONS: Because of their substantially increased risk, survivors should stop smoking and may consider entering trials of secondary chemoprevention.

Phase I evaluation of all-trans-retinoic acid in adults with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Prompted by recent demonstrations that all-trans-retinoic acid (all-trans-RA) had efficacy in acute promyelocytic leukemia, a phase I trial of all-trans-RA was conducted to establish the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) before phase II testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with a histologic or cytologic diagnosis of malignancy other than leukemia were treated with single daily oral doses of all-trans-RA ranging from 45 mg/m2 to 200 mg/m2. Doses of all-trans-RA were escalated in the next cohort of patients until the MTD was determined if the preceding dose level was not associated with significant toxicity. RESULTS: Lung cancer was the most common type of tumor included in the study (26 cases) followed by head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (three cases), and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (two cases); other miscellaneous solid tumors were also represented. Toxicities included cheilitis, skin reactions, headache, and nausea and vomiting, as well as transient elevations of liver enzymes and triglyceride levels. Skin toxicities, consisting of erythema with desquamation and paronychia, were considered to be the dose-limiting toxicity, and were observed in two of six patients who received 175 mg/m2/d, and in two of five patients who received 200 mg/m2/d. Of the 30 patients with assessable lesions, response was evaluated in 26 patients and no major objective tumor response was observed. Two patients were able to receive the drug for longer than 1 year without significant toxicities. There was considerable variation in individual patients' peak plasma all-trans-RA levels, and a decrease in the area under the curve of all-trans-RA plasma concentration was observed in all four patients evaluated. CONCLUSION: For phase II study of adult patients, we recommend 150 mg/m2 of all-trans-RA administered orally once a day. However, for better optimization of drug administration schedules, further studies are needed.

Phase II study of topotecan in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the anti-tumor activity of topotecan (TPT) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously untreated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with measurable disease in nonradiated fields were eligible. Other eligibility criteria were Zubrod performance status (PS) < or = 2 and adequate renal and liver function. TPT was administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2/d for 5 days over 30 minutes every 21 days. Of 48 registered patients, 40 were fully assessable. Nineteen patients had adenocarcinoma (AD), 14 squamous carcinoma (SCC), and seven poorly differentiated carcinoma. RESULTS: Six patients (15%) achieved a partial remission (PR) (durations: 8, 14, 18, 28, 56, and 61 weeks) and four patients a minor response; 10 patients had stable disease and 20 patients progressive disease. The PR rate was 36% (five of 14 patients) in patients with SCC versus 4% (one of 26 patients) in those with other histologies (P = .014). The overall median survival time was 38 weeks and 30% of patients were alive at 1 year. Grade 3 to 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred after 76% and 10% of courses administered, respectively. No grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities were observed. Grade 1 or 2 nonhematologic toxicities consisted of nausea (46% and 5%), vomiting (31% and 7%), and fatigue (53% and 16%). CONCLUSION: TPT at the dose and schedule used has moderate antitumor activity in NSCLC; its activity is mostly limited to patients with SCC. TPT is well tolerated, with myelosuppression of short duration being the most common and limiting toxicity.

Phase I study of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and ifosfamide in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck.

The prognosis for patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck is poor. Chemotherapy has not significantly improved survival. New agents and regimens are being developed in hopes of improving the outcome for these patients. A phase I/II trial using a combination of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), cisplatin, and ifosfamide is being performed. The phase I portion is completed and reported here. Granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Overall, the regimen was well tolerated. Major responses were observed in four of 10 evaluable patients in the phase I study. The phase II trial is ongoing.

Biology and chemoprevention of head and neck cancer.

Head and neck cancer remains a common cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States and throughout the world. In spite of advances in the management of patients with advanced disease, overall survival in this group remains poor. Furthermore, although cancer mortality is lower in patients with early-stage disease, treatment results in significant morbidity, and these patients also face the risk of developing a second primary tumor. Chemoprevention is an innovative approach to decrease overall cancer morbidity and mortality using substances that are capable of preventing cancer progression. Head and neck cancer is an excellent model for chemoprevention, as its biology is consistent with the two concepts important for the development of chemoprevention strategies: field cancerization and multistep carcinogenesis. Several classes of compounds have been evaluated in chemoprevention trials. The most frequently studied agents, the retinoids, were found frequently to induce remissions in patients with oral leukoplakia. Furthermore, retinoids prevented progression to malignancy in one randomized maintenance study. Other agents, including beta-carotene and vitamin E, have been found also to have activity in the management of oral leukoplakia. However, the clinical role of chemopreventive agents in reducing cancer mortality remains to be defined. Two studies, one in head and neck cancer and one in lung cancer, have shown the ability of retinoids to prevent the development of second primary tumors. Current large randomized trials are defining the effectiveness of these agents in reducing the mortality of aerodigestive tract tumors in individuals at high risk.

A phase II study of ifosfamide in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Chemotherapy has not significantly altered the overall survival of patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; therefore, the development of new agents is essential. The purpose of the current phase II study was to define the efficacy of ifosfamide in the treatment of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. All patients were required to have squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck that had recurred following surgery or radiotherapy or both. Patients may have received prior chemotherapy. Patients were initially treated with ifosfamide 2 g/m2/day for 4 days (dose level 0). Dose level-1 was 2 g/m2/day for 3 days, and dose level-2 was 2 g/m2/day for 2 days. All patients received mesna 400 mg/m2/day prior to and 1,200 mg/m2/day as a continuous infusion after ifosfamide. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. Five patients were inevaluable for toxicity or response. Overall, the regimen was well tolerated, with grade 4 granulocytopenia the only significant toxicity occurring in 16 patients. Overall, eight of 31 evaluable patients (25.8%) had a major response. Only one of the 10 patients (10%) with prior chemotherapy responded, but seven of the 21 patients (33.3%) with no prior chemotherapy had major responses. Ifosfamide is an active agent in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Further studies of ifosfamide in combination with other agents, particularly as induction therapy in patients with locally advanced disease, are warranted.

Recovery of sexual activity with experience in aged male mice.

Aged CBF1 male mice that have been housed in isolation for prolonged periods of time often fail to show any sexual behavior when exposed acutely to receptive females. To separate the potential effects of social isolation from those of aging, the sexual responsiveness of aged males was tested both before and after a series of five-day pairings with young females. About one-half of the old males showed a complete recovery of their sexual responsiveness following these repeated pairings. Other aged males showed only a partial recovery and still others remained totally unresponsive. Changes in physical endurance, testicular steroid titer and arousability are posed as possible bases for those instances of sexual recovery that were observed.

Strategies for chemoprevention study of premalignancy and second primary tumors in the head and neck.

Recent strides in epidemiology (mutagen sensitivity assays) and basic molecular study of head and neck carcinogenesis are advancing chemoprevention in the head and neck. The clinical preventive activity of retinoids, the most studied and most active chemopreventive agents in this region, has been established in six randomized head and neck trials. Ongoing translational study of the p53 gene, nuclear retinoid receptors, and other cellular and molecular biomarkers will be necessary to achieve continuing progress in head and neck cancer chemoprevention.

Phase I/II study of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and alpha-interferon for recurrent carcinoma of the head and neck.

Current chemotherapy regimens have failed to demonstrate a significant impact on the overall survival of patients with recurrent head and neck cancer; therefore, new agents or combinations of agents are necessary to improve outcome. Alpha-interferon potentiates the activity in vitro of both agents of one of the most active regimens currently available, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer of adding alpha-interferon to cisplatin 14 mg/m2 daily and 5-fluorouracil 700 mg/m2 daily for 5 days. No significant toxicity occurred with alpha-interferon at dose level 0, 1 x 10(6) units/m2 daily for five days. Of four patients treated at dose level +1, alpha-interferon 3 x 10(6) units/m2, two developed prolonged grade III neutropenic following the fourth course. One of three patients developed grade IV thrombocytopenia and 6 of 13 courses at this dose level resulted in grade III neutropenia. A phase II study was performed in 19 patients with cisplatin 17 mg/m2/day, 5-fluoruracil 700 mg/m2/day and alpha-interferon 3 x 10(6) units/m2/day. During the phase II study grade III neutropenia occurred in 6 patients and grade IV neutropenia in another patient during at least one course. Grade III and IV thrombocytopenia occurred in one patient each during the phase II study. Overall, major responses occurred in 7 or 23 patients (30%): 5 in phase I and 2 in phase II. In conclusion, the addition of alpha-interferon to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil is feasible, but does not appear to increase response rates in recurrent head and neck cancer.

Phase II study of carboplatin and edatrexate (10-EdAM) with leucovorin rescue for patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is poorly responsive to chemotherapy in most patients; therefore, the development of new approaches is essential. Edatrexate is a new antifolate with improved preclinical antitumor activity when compared to methotrexate. The purpose of this study was to define the feasibility and efficacy of combining edatrexate with another active single agent, carboplatin in chemotherapy-naive recurrent disease. Carboplatin was given as an outpatient on day 1 at a dosage based on the formula: Dose (mg/m2) = (0.091) (creatinine clearance) (body surface area) (desired percentage change in platelet count) + 86. Edatrexate (80 mg/m2) was given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 21 day cycle. Calcium leucovorin 15 mg was given orally every 6 h for 4 doses after edatrexate. Of the 26 patients entered on the study, 1 was invaluable for toxicity or response and 3 patients were evaluable for toxicity only. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 2 patients each, and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2 and 4 patients, respectively. Grade 3 stomatitis occurred in only two patients. Overall, major responses occurred in 2 of 22 evaluable patients (9%). The combination of carboplatin and edatrexate was not superior to the results expected with either agent alone.

A phase I investigation of the sequential use of methotrexate and paclitaxel with and without G-CSF for the treatment of solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel is a novel agent with significant activity in several solid tumors. Preclinical data suggested that methotrexate prior to paclitaxel would be synergistic. To determine the qualitative and quantitative toxicity of this regimen we performed a phase I study in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid tumors previously treated with no more than two prior chemotherapy regimens were given methotrexate intravenously on day 1, followed by paclitaxel, as a 24-hour infusion on day 2. The starting dose (level '0') was 40 mg/m2 for methotrexate and 135 mg/m2 for paclitaxel. RESULTS: After achieving a maximum tolerated dose, additional patients were enrolled with the addition of G-CSF 5 mu g/kg/d on days 4-13. At the starting dose level, dose-limiting toxicity consisting of neutropenic fever occurred in 3 of 4 patients. At dose level -1, methotrexate 30 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 110 mg/m2, neutropenic fever occurred in 7 of 10 patients during the first course. At dose level -2, methotrexate 23 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 85 mg/m2, neutropenic fever occurred in 1 of 7 patients. To abrogate the neutropenia we explored the same combination with the addition of G-CSF. Neutropenic fever remained the only dose-limiting toxicity. At dose level '0' with G-CSF, 1 of 7 patients developed dose-limiting toxicity. At dose level 1 plus G-CSF, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 170 mg/m2, dose-limiting neutropenic fever occurred in 4 of 6 patients. Partial responses occurred in 4 of 41 patients entered on this study. Pharmacokinetic data suggested that methotrexate did not increase paclitaxel levels. CONCLUSION: The combination of methotrexate and paclitaxel is feasible, but neutropenic fever, even with the addition of G-CSF prevents further escalations of paclitaxel beyond 135 mg/m2 following methotrexate.

Phase II study of carboplatin and continuous infusion bleomycin followed by cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in recurrent head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is poorly responsive to most chemotherapy regimens. Carboplatin and bleomycin are effective single agents with non-overlapping toxicity; therefore, we sought to explore the efficacy of this regimen in a phase II study. In the second stage of the study, patients who did not respond to carboplatin and bleomycin were given treatment with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with carboplatin 400 mg/m2 followed by bleomycin 15 units intravenously as a continuous infusion for 4 days. Patients with no tumor response after 3 cycles of carboplatin and bleomycin were crossed-over to receive cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and 5-FU 1000 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 5 days. RESULTS: Among the 20 carboplatin-bleomycin patients evaluable for toxicity, no cases of grade 4 granulocytopenia were reported and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia developed in only three patients. Three partial responses occurred among the 19 patients (16%) [95% C.I. 0% to 32%] evaluable for response to carboplatin-bleomycin. None of the 11 patients crossed-over to cisplatin and 5-FU had a major response. CONCLUSION: The combination of carboplatin and bleomycin is well tolerated in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer, but the activity does not appear to be superior to the activity of either agent alone. Patients who did not respond to carboplatin and bleomycin were also resistant to the cisplatin and 5-FU regimen.

Phase I study of paclitaxel administered by ten-day continuous infusion.

PURPOSE: Pre-clinical data have suggested that prolonged exposure to paclitaxel enhances its cytotoxicity, but various clinical trials utilizing long-term infusions of paclitaxel have been limited by unacceptable hematologic toxicity, most notably significant neutropenia. A phase I study of paclitaxel administered over 10 days, was performed to evaluate the hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities as well as to determine the maximum-tolerated dose for the 10-day infusion duration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine solid tumor patients (predominantly non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer) were treated with paclitaxel at doses ranging from 5 mg/m2/day to 25 mg/m2/day administered as a 10-day continuous infusion via a pump every 21 days. Dose escalation was permitted within individual patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity, ANC < or = 500 or platelet count < or = 25,000 for > or = 7 days or febrile neutropenia. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the highest dose level at which less than two out of six patients developed DLT. All of the patients had received prior chemotherapy; approximately two-thirds had received prior radiation as well. All patients received standard pre-medications for paclitaxel, including anti-histamines and corticosteroids. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was not used. RESULTS: A total of 110 courses of paclitaxel were administered to 29 patients. The incidence of hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity was quite low among the patients treated at dose levels below 17 mg/m2/day. At higher doses, non-hematologic toxicities including arthralgias, myalgias, fatigue, nausea, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were seen, although nearly all of the toxicities were less than grade 3 (NCI toxicity criteria). Hematologic toxicity mostly consisted of neutropenia and was more common at dose levels of 17 mg/m2/day or higher. Nevertheless, even at the highest dose levels (21 mg/m2/day and 25 mg/m2/day) grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in only 50% of patients. Dose-limiting hematologic toxicity occurred in 2 of 4 patients treated at the 25 mg/m2/day dose level. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel can be safely administered as a 10-day infusion. The MTD for this schedule is 210 mg/m2. Unlike the 96-hour paclitaxel infusions, dose-reduction for myelosuppression may not be necessary because the MTD of paclitaxel when administered over a 10-day infusion is similar to the MTD of paclitaxel when infused over 3 or 24 hours.