Quality of life in patients cured from a carcinoma of the head and neck by radiotherapy: the importance of the target volume.

PURPOSE: To assess the health-related quality of life (QOL) of long-term survivors of carcinomas of different subsites of the head and neck following curative radiotherapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients continuously free from recurrence or second primary tumors treated 1988-1994 were contacted 5.1 to 5.9 years after RT and asked to fill in the EORTC QLQ-C30 core questionnaire and the H&N cancer module. RT had been restricted to the glottis (group A; carcinomas of the vocal cord T1-2 N0), or had included bilateral neck nodes and the primary tumor outside the nasopharynx (group B; AJC Stage II to IV) or within the nasopharynx, respectively (group C; Stage II to IV). Response rate was 97% (group A; n = 41), 69% (group B; n = 26) and 71% (group C; n = 12), respectively. The groups were different with respect to age (older in group A), alcohol consumption (absent in group C) and proportion of females (more in group C). RESULTS: Patients with nasopharyngeal cancer reported the highest morbidity on the H&N module (dry mouth, sticky saliva, trismus, problems with teeth, trouble eating). However, these symptoms did not have a high impact on global QOL or function scores on the QLQ-C30 core questionnaire. Patients in group B reported a lower global QOL but less severe symptoms on the module. CONCLUSION: The high morbidity of patients treated for a nasopharyngeal cancer may be explained by the location of the target volume which included the bilateral temporo-mandibular joints and the salivary glands. These patients require appropriate care during follow-up and will probably profit most from new RT techniques with sparing of normal tissues.

Radiotherapy for metastatic carcinomas of the kidney or melanomas: an analysis using palliative end points.

PURPOSE: To assess the rate and duration of response to palliative radiotherapy (RT) in patients with metastatic melanoma or renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1992 to 1995, 90 patients were entered into a nonrandomized study. Goals of palliative RT were prospectively defined and subjective response was documented at the end of RT, after 2-6 weeks, and every 3 months thereafter. Most patients were treated with 5 x 4 Gy or 10 x 3 Gy. RESULTS: Relief of pain from bone lesions was observed in 26 of 40 cases, with a duration of response of 2.4 months, corresponding to 57% of the remaining lifetime. A total of 55% of patients with persistent neurologic dysfunction despite corticosteroids improved, for a duration of 2.5 months (86% of the further lifespan). Freedom from symptoms in patients treated for impending neurological complications from metastases to the brain, spine, or nerve plexus was documented for 86-100% of their lifetime. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the methodological flaws discussed, the efficacy of a short course of palliative RT for so-called radioresistant tumors is demonstrated.

IMRT using simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) in head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary very encouraging clinical results of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in Head Neck Cancer (HNC) are available from several large centers. Tumor control rates seem to be kept at least at the level of conventional three-dimensional radiation therapy; the benefit of normal tissue preservation with IMRT is proven for salivary function. There is still only limited experience with IMRT using simultaneously integrated boost (SIB-IMRT) in the head and neck region in terms of normal tissue response.The aim of this work was (1) to establish tumor response in HNC patients treated with SIB-IMRT, and (2) to assess tissue tolerance following different SIB-IMRT schedules. RESULTS: Between 1/2002 and 12/2004, 115 HNC patients have been curatively treated with IMRT. 70% received definitive IMRT (dIMRT), 30% were postoperatively irradiated. In 78% concomitant chemotherapy was given. SIB radiation schedules with 5-6 x 2 Gy/week to 60-70 Gy, 5 x 2.2 Gy/week to 66-68.2 Gy (according to the RTOG protocol H-0022), or 5 x 2.11 Gy/week to 69.6 Gy were used. After mean 18 months (10-44), 77% of patients were alive with no disease. Actuarial 2-year local, nodal, and distant disease free survival was 77%, 87%, and 78%, respectively. 10% were alive with disease, 10% died of disease. 20/21 locoregional failures occurred inside the high dose area. Mean tumor volume was significantly larger in locally failed (63 cc) vs controlled tumors (32 cc, p <0.01), and in definitive (43 cc) vs postoperative IMRT (25 cc, p <0.05); the locoregional failure rate was twofold higher in definitively irradiated patients. Acute reactions were mild to moderate and limited to the boost area, the persisting grade 3/4 late toxicity rate was low with 6%. The two grade 4 reactions (dysphagia, laryngeal fibrosis) were observed following the SIB schedule with 2.2 Gy per session. CONCLUSION: SIB-IMRT in HNC using 2.0, 2.11 or 2.2 Gy per session is highly effective and safe with respect to tumor response and tolerance. SIB with 2.2 Gy is not recommended for large tumors involving laryngeal structures.

Endometrial carcinoma in patients aged 75 years or older: outcome and complications after postoperative radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone.

A retrospective analysis is reported of 89 patients at least 75 years old (median age 79 years) treated with irradiation for endometrial carcinoma between 1972 and 1989, the median follow-up being 39 months. In 66 patients radiotherapy was given postoperatively and in one case preoperatively, 22 patients were treated with radiotherapy alone: intravaginal insertions exclusively in 22 patients (median dose 60 Gy to the mucosa) and combined with external radiotherapy in 53 patients (median external target dose 45 Gy; three or four fields, all treated daily, 1.8 to 2.0 Gy per fraction, five fractions per week; 30 Gy to the vaginal mucosa with low-dose rate). A few patients were treated with external radiotherapy or intrauterine insertions only. 65% of the patients treated with radiotherapy alone and 34% of the patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy had FIGO stage II or III disease. Five-year actuarial overall survival and disease-free survival for all patients with adenocarcinomas treated with curative intent was 47.5% and 57.2%, respectively. In 48 patients with surgical stages I and II, treated with postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy, overall actuarial survival is 58.2% and disease-free survived 65.5% at five years. After postoperative vaginal insertions only, no vaginal recurrence occurred. With combined external and intravaginal radiotherapy in surgical stage I and II, 4/36 patients (11%) showed a recurrence in the vagina only, the abdominal and pelvic recurrence rate being 8.3%. Grade 3 to 4 late toxicity was observed in 6/53 patients (11.3%) treated with external and intravaginal radiotherapy. However, in patients receiving external radiotherapy less than 45 Gy and intravaginal radiotherapy 30 to 40 Gy, as is standard postoperative adjuvant treatment today, only one grade 3 late toxicity was observed in 17 patients (5.9%). We conclude, that treatment of elderly patients with adenocarcinoma of the uterus should follow the same pattern as in younger patients, the acute side-effects and late toxicity of radiotherapy being similar.

Localized prostate cancer in elderly patients. Outcome after radiation therapy compared to matched younger patients.

PURPOSE: To detect a difference in outcome (disease-specific survival, local tumor progression, late toxicity, quality of life) after curative radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer in elderly as compared to younger patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis 59 elderly patients (> 74 years old) were matched 1:2 with younger patients from the data base according to tumor stage, grading, pre-treatment PSA values and year of radiotherapy. Surviving patients were contacted to fill in a validated questionnaire for quality of life measurement (EORTC QLQ-C30). Median follow-up for elderly and younger patients was 5.2 and 4.5 years, respectively. RESULTS: Overall survival at 5 years was 66% for the elderly and 80% for younger patients. Intercurrent deaths were observed more frequently in the elderly population. There was no age-specific difference in disease-specific survival (78% vs 82%), late toxicity or quality of life. Clinically meaningful local tumor progression was observed in 15% and 14%, respectively, corresponding to data from the literature following hormonal ablation. CONCLUSIONS: There is no obvious difference in outcome including disease-specific survival, late toxicity and quality of life in elderly patients, compared to a matched younger population. A clinically meaningful local tumor progression following radiotherapy or hormonal ablation only is rare. Local radiotherapy or, alternatively, hormonal ablation is recommended to preserve local progression-free survival in elderly patients except for very early stage of disease (i.e. T1 G1-2 M0).