NACOB presentation CSB New Investigator Award. Balance recovery from medio-lateral perturbations of the upper body during standing. North American Congress on Biomechanics.

Postural control strategies have in the past been predominantly characterized by kinematics, surface forces, and EMG responses (e.g. Horak and Nashner, 1986, Journal of Neurophysiology 55(6), 1369-1381). The goal of this study was to provide unique and novel insights into the underlying motor mechanisms used in postural control by determining the joint moments during balance recovery from medio-lateral (M/L) perturbations. Ten adult males received medio-lateral (M/L) pushes to the trunk or pelvis. The inverted pendulum model of balance control (Winter et al., 1998, Journal of Neurophysiology 80, 1211-1221) was validated even though the body did not behave as a single pendulum, indicating that the centre of pressure (COP) is the variable used to control the centre of mass (COM). The perturbation magnitude was random, and the central nervous system (CNS) responded with an estimate of the largest anticipated perturbation. The observed joint moments served to move the COP in the appropriate direction and to control the lateral collapse of the trunk. The individual joints involved in controlling the COP contributed differing amounts to the total recovery response: the hip and spinal moments provided the majority of the recovery (approximately 85%), while the ankles contributed a small, but significant amount (15%). The differing contributions are based on the anatomical constraints and the functional requirements of the balance task. The onset of the joint moment was synchronous with the joint angle change, and occurred too early (56-116 ms) to be result of active muscle contraction. Therefore, the first line of defense was provided by muscle stiffness, not reflex-activated muscle activity.

Altered kinetic strategy for the control of swing limb elevation over obstacles in unilateral below-knee amputee gait.

Our goal was to document the kinetic strategies for obstacle avoidance in below-knee amputees. Kinematic data were collected as unilateral below-knee traumatic amputees stepped over obstacles of various heights in the walking path. Inverse dynamics were employed to calculate power profiles and work during the limb-elevation and limb-lowering phases. Limb elevation was achieved by employing a different strategy of intra-limb interaction for elevation of the prosthetic limb than for the sound limb, which was similar to that seen in healthy adult non-amputees. As obstacle height increased, prosthetic side knee flexion was increased by modulating the work done at the hip, and not the knee, as seen on the sound side. Although the strength of the muscles about the residual knee was preserved, the range of motion of that knee had previously been found to be somewhat limited. Perhaps more importantly, potential instability of the interface between the stump and the prosthetic socket, and associated discomfort at the stump could explain the altered limb-elevation strategy. Interestingly, the limb-lowering strategy seen in the sound limb and in non-amputees already features modulation of rotational and translational work at the hip, so an alternate strategy was not required. Thus, following a major insult to the sensory and neuromuscular system, the CNS is able to update the internal model of the locomotor apparatus as the individual uses the new limb in a variety of movements, and modify control strategies as appropriate.

A technique to analyse the kinetics and energetics of cane-assisted gait.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to develop a biomechanical technique to analyse the kinetics of cane-assisted gait. Biomechanical measures such as ground reaction forces (force platforms), cane reaction forces, and kinematics have been routinely measured. However, a full kinetic analysis of both the lower limb and the cane-assisted limb has not been reported: joint reaction forces, moments of force and mechanical powers. Such estimates give the researcher and clinician insight into the levels at each of the joints and the kinetics of the muscles responsible for the altered locomotion and stability. Standard inverse dynamics techniques were employed using a three-dimensional force transducer in the tip of the cane and as the subject walked over a force platform while his movement was recorded on video. Special problems existed when both the cane and foot bore weight on the force platform; the resultant indeterminacy problem was resolved so that independent solutions could be applied to both the lower and upper limbs. RELEVANCE: A full kinetic and energetic biomechanical analysis is needed to identify motor pattern changes at each joint resulting from the use of the cane. Such information will be useful in pinpointing not only motor pattern changes at an affected joint but also adaptive motor pattern changes at other joints. Also, the contribution of the muscles at the wrist, elbow, and shoulder becomes evident not only to the stability of the gait but also to the energetics of forward propulsion.

Ankle muscle stiffness in the control of balance during quiet standing.

This research presents new data and reanalyzed information to refute the criticisms of our model of stiffness control during quiet standing. A re-review of their references to biomechanical research on muscle ankle stiffness confirmed muscle stiffness estimates of the ankle series elastic elements that agreed closely with our estimates. A new technique is presented that directly estimates the muscle stiffness from the ankle moment (N. m) and sway angle (deg). The linear regression of 10 subjects standing quietly for 10 s estimated the stiffness (N x m/deg) to be safely above the gravitational spring. The R(2) scores for this linear regression averaged 0.92, confirming how closely the model approached a perfect spring that would have an R(2) = 1. These results confirm our model of a simple muscle stiffness control and refutes the criticisms.

Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing.

Our goal was to provide some insights into how the CNS controls and maintains an upright standing posture, which is an integral part of activities of daily living. Although researchers have used simple performance measures of maintenance of this posture quite effectively in clinical decision making, the mechanisms and control principles involved have not been clear. We propose a relatively simple control scheme for regulation of upright posture that provides almost instantaneous corrective response and reduces the operating demands on the CNS. The analytic model is derived and experimentally validated. A stiffness model was developed for quiet standing. The model assumes that muscles act as springs to cause the center-of-pressure (COP) to move in phase with the center-of-mass (COM) as the body sways about some desired position. In the sagittal plane this stiffness control exists at the ankle plantarflexors, in the frontal plane by the hip abductors/adductors. On the basis of observations that the COP-COM error signal continuously oscillates, it is evident that the inverted pendulum model is severely underdamped, approaching the undamped condition. The spectrum of this error signal is seen to match that of a tuned mass, spring, damper system, and a curve fit of this "tuned circuit" yields omega n the undamped natural frequency of the system. The effective stiffness of the system, Ke, is then estimated from Ke = I omega n2, and the damping B is estimated from B = BW X I, where BW is the bandwidth of the tuned response (in rad/s), and I is the moment of inertia of the body about the ankle joint. Ten adult subjects were assessed while standing quietly at three stance widths: 50% hip-to-hip distance, 100 and 150%. Subjects stood for 2 min in each position with eyes open; the 100% stance width was repeated with eyes closed. In all trials and in both planes, the COP oscillated virtually in phase (within 6 ms) with COM, which was predicted by a simple 0th order spring model. Sway amplitude decreased as stance width increased, and Ke increased with stance width. A stiffness model would predict sway to vary as Ke-0.5. The experimental results were close to this prediction: sway was proportional to Ke(-0.55). Reactive control of balance was not evident for several reasons. The visual system does not appear to contribute because no significant difference between eyes open and eyes closed results was found at 100% stance width. Vestibular (otolith) and joint proprioceptive reactive control were discounted because the necessary head accelerations, joint displacements, and velocities were well below reported thresholds. Besides, any reactive control would predict that COP would considerably lag (150-250 ms) behind the COM. Because the average COP was only 4 ms delayed behind the COM, reactive control was not evident; this small delay was accounted for by the damping in the tuned mechanical system.