Molecular epidemiology and change trend of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from invasive infections of a hospital in Hangzhou from 2012 to 2018.

The disease caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a global public health challenge that threatens society and patients seriously. Therefore, the molecular epidemiology and change trend of MRSA is essential for the control and treatment of diseases caused by the pathogen in their regions. To explore molecular epidemiology of MRSA in Hangzhou, we collected 162 MRSA isolates from 2012 to 2018, conducted the antimicrobial susceptibility and used polymerase chain reaction(PCR) to test the molecular typing including multilocus sequence typing (MLST), staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec), staphylococcal protein A (spa A) and Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL). All the strains was divided into community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) or hospital-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA). 162 MRSA isolates were divided into 16 STs and 30 spa types. The major ST type was ST5 (96/162, 59.3%) and the predominant spa type was t311 (83/162, 51.2%). Five SCCmec types were found and the most common SCCmec type was type II (101/162, 61.7%). ST5-II-t311 was the predominant MRSA clone. And the prevalence of ST5 MRSA gradually declined from 2014 to 2018 but the prevalence of ST59 MRSA significantly increased. At the same time, livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(LA-MRSA) ST398 and ST9 were detected. Twenty-eight isolates were PVL gene positive (28/162, 17.3%). The most prevalent PVL-positive clone was ST59-IVa-t437. Comparing with HA-MRSA, CA-MRSA had a lower probability of ST5 (9.1% vs 67.1%, P=0.000) but a higher probability of ST59 (63.6% vs 11.4%, P=0.000), not only that, it was more likely to carrying PVL-positive gene (36.4% vs 14.3%, P=0.028). In summary, the molecular types of MRSA were getting complex over time. ST5-II-t311 was the predominant clone of MRSA isolate with a downward incidence from 2014 to 2018. ST59 MRSA strains, which is thought community related strain are spreading into hospitals and has an upward incidence from 2014 to 2018.

Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections: Focus on solid organ transplantation recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a new option to treat KPC- and OXA-48 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections. However, clinical evidence is limited regarding its use in treating CRKP infections, especially in solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of CAZ-AVI in treating CRKP infections in both the general population and the SOT recipients in comparison with other antibiotic regimens. METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective cohort study of patients admitted between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2021 with the diagnosis of CRKP infections receiving either CAZ-AVI or other regimens ≥ 72 hours and clinical outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: Of 200 patients with CRKP infections, 67 received CAZ-AVI, 133 received other regimens, and 50 were SOT recipients. In the SOT cohort, 30 patients received CAZ-AVI, and 20 received other regimens. The overall 30-day mortality was 38% in the SOT cohort. Compared with patients receiving other regimens, CAZ-AVI therapy resulted in lower 30-day mortality (23.3% vs. 60%, P = 0.014) and 90-day mortality (35.7% vs. 86.7%, P = 0.003), higher clinical cure (93.3% vs. 40%, P < 0.001) and microbiological clearance. Similar promising results of CAZ-AVI were also shown in the whole population cohort. Moreover, clinical outcomes of SOT recipients receiving CAZ-AVI were not inferior to those without SOT. CONCLUSIONS: CAZ-AVI therapy was associated with better clinical outcomes in CRKP infections in both the general population and SOT recipients. Considering the limitations of the present study, well-conducted RCTs are still warranted to confirm these findings.