Sporadic deficient mismatch repair in colorectal cancer increases the risk for non-colorectal malignancy: A European multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Disparities between tumors arising via different sporadic carcinogenetic pathways have not been studied systematically. This retrospective multicenter cohort study evaluated the differences in the risk for non-colorectal malignancy between sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients from different DNA mismatch repair status. METHODS: A retrospective European multicenter cohort study including in total of 1706 CRC patients treated between 1996 and 2019 in three different countries. The proficiency (pMMR) or deficiency (dMMR) of mismatch repair was determined by immunohistochemistry. Cases were analyzed for tumor BRAFV600E mutation, and BRAF mutated tumors were further analyzed for hypermethylation status in the promoter region of MLH1 to distinguish between sporadic and hereditary cases. Swedish and Finish patients were matched with their respective National Cancer Registries. For the Czech cohort, thorough scrutiny of medical files was performed to identify any non-colorectal malignancy within 20 years before or after the diagnosis of CRC. Poisson regression analysis was performed to identify the incidence rates of non-colorectal malignancies. For validation purposes, standardized incidence ratios were calculated for the Swedish cases adjusted for age, year, and sex. RESULTS: Of the 1706 CRC patients included in the analysis, 819 were female [48%], median age at surgery was 67 years [interquartile range: 60-75], and sporadic dMMR was found in 188 patients (11%). Patients with sporadic dMMR CRC had a higher incidence rate ratio (IRR) for non-colorectal malignancy before and after diagnosis compared to patients with a pMMR tumor, in both uni- (IRR = 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.89-3.31, p = 0.003) and multivariable analysis (IRR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.67-3.01, p = 0.004). This association applied whether or not the non-colorectal tumor developed before or after the diagnosis of CRC in both uni- (IRR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.28-2.98, p = 0.004), (IRR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.72-3.49, p = 0.004) and multivariable analysis (IRR = 1.67,95% CI = 1.05-2.65, p = 0.029), (IRR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.63-3.42, p = 0.005), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective European multicenter cohort study, patients with sporadic dMMR CRC had a higher risk for non-colorectal malignancy than those with pMMR CRC. These findings indicate the need for further studies to establish the need for and design of surveillance strategies for patients with dMMR CRC.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Microtumors (WHO 2022) Are Not Always Low-Grade Neoplasms: A Case with a Highly Increased Proliferation Rate.

Traditionally considered non-functional low proliferative benign neuroendocrine proliferations measuring less than 5 mm, pancreatic (neuro)endocrine microadenomas are now classified as pancreatic neuroendocrine microtumors in the 2022 WHO classification of endocrine and neuroendocrine tumors. This case report discussed the features of an incidentally identified 4.7-mm glucagon-expressing pancreatic neuroendocrine microtumor with MEN1 mutation only, chromosomally stable and an epigenetic alpha-like phenotype. The tumor was associated with an unexplained increased proliferation rate in Ki-67 of 15%. There was no associated DAXX/ATRX deficiency. The presented case challenges the conventional thought of a low proliferative disease of the so-called "pancreatic neuroendocrine microadenomas" and provides additional support to the 2022 WHO classification that also requires grading of these neoplasms. Despite exhibiting molecular features of less aggressive behavior, the case also underscores the biological complexity of pancreatic neuroendocrine microtumors. By recognizing the heterogenous spectrum of neuroendocrine neoplasms, the current case also contributes to ongoing discussions on how to optimize the clinical management of such tumors.

Somatic Genomic and Transcriptomic Characterization of Primary Ovarian Serous Borderline Tumors and Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas.

Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) may develop from serous borderline tumor (SBT) tissue, where the micropapillary type (mSBT) presents the highest risk for progression. The sensitivity of LGSC to standard chemotherapy is limited, so alternative therapeutic approaches, including targeted treatment, are needed. However, knowledge about the molecular landscape of LGSC and mSBT is limited. A sample set of 137 pathologically well-defined cases (LGSC, 97; mSBT, 40) was analyzed using capture DNA next-generation sequencing (727 genes) and RNA next-generation sequencing (147 genes) to show the landscape of somatic mutations, gene fusions, expression pattern, and prognostic and predictive relevance. Class 4/5 mutations in the main driver genes (KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, ERBB2, USP9X) were detected in 48% (14/29) of mSBT cases and 63% (47/75) of LGSC cases. The USP9X mutation was detected in only 17% of LGSC cases. RNA next-generation sequencing revealed gene fusions in 6 of 64 LGSC cases (9%) and 2 of 33 mSBT cases (9%), and a heterogeneous expression profile across LGSC and mSBT. No molecular characteristics were associated with greater survival. The somatic genomic and transcriptomic profiles of 35 mSBT and 85 LGSC cases are compared for the first time. Candidate oncogenic gene fusions involving BRAF, FGFR2, or NF1 as a fusion partner were identified. Molecular testing of LGSC may be used in clinical practice to reveal therapeutically significant targets.