Travel preparation and health risks in Dutch and Belgian medical students during an elective in low- or middle-income countries: A prospective self-reporting cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Medical schools offer students the opportunity to perform international electives. This study aimed to assess health risks among medical students, to tailor institutional guidelines. METHODS: Multicenter study at Dutch and Belgian universities, among medical students who visited low- or middle-income countries. Students completed four questionnaires: once before the elective and two weeks, three- and six months after return. RESULTS: Data was complete for 479 students (follow-up rate 84%). Most traveled to Surinam (29%) and South-Africa (14%). Half of the students encountered difficulties in adapting to local culture. Almost 40% visited malaria endemic countries. Nearly all (87%) used chemoprophylaxis as prescribed. Definite needle-stick or splash injuries were reported by 7%. All were dealt with adequately in accordance with national guidelines. However, less than half of 24 possible incidents were handled adequately. Two-and-a-half percent had unprotected sex with a new partner. The incidence of travelers' diarrhea (TD) was 46%. In those with TD, the incidence of post-travel new-onset abdominal complaints was 3%. Three percent were involved in a minor traffic accident, 18% were injured during leisure activities, 5% were threatened or experienced physical violence. Only half of the students visiting a highly endemic country were screened for tuberculosis post-travel. For schistosomiasis this was 6%. CONCLUSIONS: Students abroad are exposed to medical and non-medical challenges, which should be addressed during pre-travel counseling. Contact details of a professional back home should be provided, so students can confer in case of problems while abroad. Lastly, we recommend a centrally organized post-travel health check.

Comparison of the immunogenicity of Dukoral® oral cholera vaccine between renal transplant recipients on either a calcineurin inhibitor or mycophenolate - A controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The evidence for recommendations regarding vaccination in solid organ transplant recipients is sparse. There is little data comparing vaccine responses between groups on different immunosuppressive drugs. This study was conducted to evaluate the antibody response to Dukoral® oral cholera vaccine in renal transplant recipients (RTR). METHODS: In a single-center non-randomized controlled clinical trial, healthy volunteers (n = 21) and renal transplant recipients (n = 30) were vaccinated with the oral whole cell/recombinant B subunit cholera vaccine Dukoral® (Valneva Inc., Vienna, Austria). The RTR were stratified according to their maintenance immunosuppressive therapy: either prednisone and a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus; P/CNI group; n = 15) or prednisone and mycophenolate (P/MMF group; n = 15). All volunteers ingested Dukoral® at baseline and at day 14. Serum samples were drawn at day 0 and day 21. The primary outcome was seroconversion, defined as either a 3-fold IgA serum titer increase in anti-cholera toxin B antibodies and/or a 4-fold rise in the serum vibriocidal titer. RESULTS: Follow-up was complete. Seroconversion after vaccination was 57% (standard error, SE 9%) in RTR and 81% (SE 9%) in healthy controls (Relative Risk, RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.48-1.02). When stratified according to maintenance immunosuppression, the seroconversion rate was 67% (SE 12%) in the P/CNI group (RR compared with controls 0.82; 95% CI 0.55-1.25) and 47% (SE 13%) in the P/MMF group (RR compared with controls 0.58; 95% CI 0.32-1.03). CONCLUSION: Adverse events were mild to moderate and transient. The response to Dukoral was weaker and the seroconversion rate was lower in renal transplant recipients than in healthy controls. In particular, those using mycophenolate had a poor response. Nevertheless, more than half of the transplant recipients seroconverted. Therefore oral vaccines should not be discarded as a potential tool for protection of solid organ transplant recipients. This trial is registered in clinicaltrials.gov under NCT01109914.

Safety and immunogenicity of fractional dose intradermal injection of two quadrivalent conjugated meningococcal vaccines.

BACKGROUND: Vaccination with conjugated meningococcal vaccines is the best way to prevent invasive meningococcal disease. Changes in serogroup epidemiology have led to the inclusion of quadrivalent vaccines in the national immunization programs of several countries, but vaccines are frequently in short supply. Intradermal administration has the potential to increase vaccine availability through dose reduction, without sacrificing efficacy. It has never before been investigated for glycoconjugate meningococcal vaccines. METHODS: Different fractional doses of two quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccines (MenACWY-CRM197 (Menveo®) and MenACWY-TT (Nimenrix®)) were administered intradermally to sequential groups of 4 participants, according to an adaptive dose escalation design, starting at 1/10th of the original dose. Booster doses were given after 4-6 months based on interim serology results using a multiplex bead-based assay (MIA). Final analyses were based on serum bactericidal antibody titers (rSBA). RESULTS: A total of 12 subjects were enrolled (average 25 years old, range 19-48). MenACWY-CRM197 became unavailable during the course of the study and was only evaluated for a 1/10th dose. This dose resulted in less than complete seroprotection for serogroup A but complete protection against the other serogroups. MenACWY-TT was evaluated for a 1/10th and 1/5th dose level. Both fractional doses of MenACWY-TT resulted in complete seroprotection against all vaccine serogroups. Geometric mean titers 1 month after vaccination were lower and decayed faster in the MenACWY-CRM197 group. Adverse events were mild and there were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Fractional intradermal vaccination against meningococcal disease with quadrivalent conjugate vaccine appears to be safe and effective in our small dose finding study. Tetanus toxoid conjugated vaccine (Nimenrix®) shows a trend towards higher antibody levels compared to CRM197-conjugated vaccine (Menveo®). The 1/5th fractional dose of MenACWY-TT appears to result in higher antibody levels than does the 1/10th dose. These results can be used for a larger non-inferiority study. This trial was registered in clinicaltrials.gov under NCT01782066.

Single visit rabies pre-exposure priming induces a robust anamnestic antibody response after simulated post-exposure vaccination: results of a dose-finding study.

BACKGROUND: The current standard 3-dose intramuscular rabies PrEP schedule suffers from a number of disadvantages that severely limit accessibility and availability. The cost of is often prohibitive, it requires 3 visits to the clinic, and there are regular vaccine shortages. METHODS: Volunteers ( N = 30) were randomly assigned to 4 study arms: 1 standard dose intramuscular (IM) dose of PVRV (purified Vero cell rabies vaccine, Verorab), and 1/5th, 2/5th or 3/5th- fractional intradermal (ID) dose of PVRV in a single visit. All subjects received a simulated rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (D0, D3) 1 year later. Rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNA) were determined by virus neutralization microtest (FAVN) on D0, D7, D28, Y1 and Y1 + D7. RESULTS: 28 out of 30 subjects (93%) seroconverted 1 month after primary vaccination; 1 subject in the 1-dose IM arm and 1 in the 1/5th-fractional dose ID arm did not. After 1 year, 22 out of 30 subjects (73%) no longer had RVNA above 0.5 IU/ml, with no discernible difference between study groups. After 1 year, all 30 subjects mounted a booster response within 7 days after simulated PEP, with the highest titers found in the single dose IM group ( P < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This dose finding study demonstrates that priming with a single dose of rabies vaccine was sufficient to induce an adequate anamnestic antibody response to rabies PEP in all subjects 1 year later, even in those in whom the RVNA threshold of 0.5 IU/ml was not reached after priming.

Comparison of the PRNT and an immune fluorescence assay in yellow fever vaccinees receiving immunosuppressive medication.

BACKGROUND: The 17D-yellow fever (YF) vaccination is considered contraindicated in immune-compromised patients; however, accidental vaccination occurs. In this population, measuring the immune response is useful in clinical practice. METHODS: In this study we compare two antibody tests (the Immune Fluorescence Assay and the Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test) in a group of Dutch immune-compromised travellers with a median of 33 days (IQR [28-49]) after primary YF vaccination. RESULTS: We collected samples of 15 immune-compromised vaccinees vaccinated with the 17D yellow fever vaccine between 2004 and 2012. All samples measured in the plaque reduction neutralization test yielded positive results (>80% virus neutralization with a 1:10 serum dilution). Immune Fluorescence Assay sensitivity was 28% (95% CI [0.12-0.49]). No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: All immune-compromised patients mounted an adequate response with protective levels of virus neutralizing antibodies to the 17-D YF vaccine. No adverse effects were reported. Compared to the plaque reduction neutralization test, the sensitivity of the Immune Fluorescence Assay test was low. Further research is needed to ascertain that 17D vaccination in immune-compromised patients is safe.

A Single 17D Yellow Fever Vaccination Provides Lifelong Immunity; Characterization of Yellow-Fever-Specific Neutralizing Antibody and T-Cell Responses after Vaccination.

INTRODUCTION: Prompted by recent amendments of Yellow Fever (YF) vaccination guidelines from boost to single vaccination strategy and the paucity of clinical data to support this adjustment, we used the profile of the YF-specific CD8+ T-cell subset profiles after primary vaccination and neutralizing antibodies as a proxy for potentially longer lasting immunity. METHODS AND FINDINGS: PBMCs and serum were collected in six individuals on days 0, 3, 5, 12, 28 and 180, and in 99 individuals >10 years after YF-vaccination. Phenotypic characteristics of YF- tetramer+ CD8+ T-cells were determined using class I tetramers. Antibody responses were measured using a standardized plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). Also, characteristics of YF-tetramer positive CD8+ T-cells were compared between individuals who had received a primary- and a booster vaccination. YF-tetramer+ CD8+ T-cells were detectable on day 12 (median tetramer+ cells as percentage of CD8+ T-cells 0.2%, range 0.07-3.1%). On day 180, these cells were still present (median 0.06%, range 0.02-0.78%). The phenotype of YF-tetramer positive CD8+ T-cells shifted from acute phase effector cells on day 12, to late differentiated or effector memory phenotype (CD45RA-/+CD27-) on day 28. Two subsets of YF-tetramer positive T-cells (CD45RA+CD27- and CD45RA+CD27+) persisted until day 180. Within all phenotypic subsets, the T-bet: Eomes ratio tended to be high on day 28 after vaccination and shifted towards predominant Eomes expression on day 180 (median 6.0 (day 28) vs. 2.2 (day 180) p = 0.0625), suggestive of imprinting compatible with long-lived memory properties. YF-tetramer positive CD8+ T-cells were detectable up to 18 years post vaccination, YF-specific antibodies were detectable up to 40 years after single vaccination. Booster vaccination did not increase titers of YF-specific antibodies (mean 12.5 vs. 13.1, p = 0.583), nor induce frequencies or alter phenotypes of YF-tetramer+ CD8+ T-cells. CONCLUSION: The presence of a functionally competent YF-specific memory T-cell pool 18 years and sufficient titers of neutralizing antibodies 35-40 years after first vaccination suggest that single vaccination may be sufficient to provide long-term immunity.

Advances and controversies in yellow fever vaccination.

Ever since its development in 1937, the live-attenuated 17D yellow fever (YF) vaccine has been one of the most effective vaccines available to man. In this review we highlight the major steps in the development of 17D YF vaccine. We discuss the use of neutralizing antibodies as a surrogate marker for protection, and explore the strengths and weaknesses of the current plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT), a technique developed in the 1960s that continues to be superior to every modern test in both sensitivity and specificity. The neutralizing antibodies demonstrated by the PRNT can be detected for several decades after vaccination, possibly even for the remainder of the recipient's natural life. We review the available evidence on the duration of protection after primary vaccination, a topic that has been the subject of controversy over the last few months. For persons who are immunocompromised due to disease, medication or advancing age, the duration of protection may be shorter: they should always have their vaccine response checked by PRNT. Due to the higher risk of severe adverse events after vaccination with 17D YF in this group, the development of a new, inactivated vaccine will have substantial benefits in this population.