Catchment-scale Phosphorus Export through Surface and Drainage Pathways.

The site-specific nature of P fate and transport in drained areas exemplifies the need for additional data to guide implementation of conservation practices at the catchment scale. Total P (TP), dissolved reactive P (DRP), and total suspended solids (TSS) were monitored at five sites-two streams, two tile outlets, and a grassed waterway-in three agricultural subwatersheds (221.2-822.5 ha) draining to Black Hawk Lake in western Iowa. Median TP concentrations ranged from 0.034 to 1.490 and 0.008 to 0.055 mg P L for event and baseflow samples, respectively. The majority of P and TSS export occurred during precipitation events and high-flow conditions with greater than 75% of DRP, 66% of TP, and 59% of TSS export occurring during the top 25% of flows from all sites. In one subwatershed, a single event (annual recurrence interval < 1 yr) was responsible for 46.6, 84.0, and 81.0% of the annual export of TP, DRP, and TSS, respectively, indicating that frequent, small storms have the potential to result in extreme losses. Isolated monitoring of surface and drainage transport pathways indicated significant P and TSS losses occurring through drainage; over the 2-yr study period, the drainage pathway was responsible for 69.8, 59.2, and 82.6% of the cumulative TP, DRP, and TSS export, respectively. Finally, the results provided evidence that particulate P losses in drainage were greater than dissolved P losses. Understanding relationships between flow, precipitation, transport pathway, and P fraction at the catchment scale is needed for effective conservation practice implementation.

Digital mapping of structural conservation practices in the Midwest U.S. croplands: Implementation and preliminary analysis.

The application of best management practices is a long-term conservation effort in Midwest U.S. croplands, and many farmers have adopted structural conservation practices (SCPs) to reduce soil erosion and surface water runoff, such as terraces and grassed waterways. Despite that, the geographic distribution of these practices is barely known in the region, and mapping initiatives are required to develop timely and spatially explicit inventories of SCP areas. This study presents the first mapping of SCPs in the agricultural areas over 12 Midwest U.S. states. Semantic segmentation model (adapted U-Net) and National Agriculture Imagery Program 2018-2019 data were used to map the SCP areas at 2-m spatial resolution (490.2 billion pixels). In general, mapping results achieved 78.2% overall accuracy across 20 counties. Our results indicate that 52% of SCP areas are distributed over Iowa (26%), Illinois (15%), and Nebraska (11%). In contrast, the states with the lowest SCP areas are Michigan and North Dakota, with less than 4% of SCP areas. Since the SCP extent is also dependent on the number of cropland areas per state, the percentage of SCP per cropland area was calculated. Specifically, the average percentage of SCP area per cropland is ~1.19%, ranging from 0.8 (e.g., North Dakota and south Minnesota) to 5.5% (e.g., northeast Kansas and southwest Iowa). Interestingly, results also illustrate that regions with high soil erosion rates present the largest percentage of SCP areas in croplands, indicating conservation efforts by farmers. While this preliminary analysis shows some limitations in the mapping quality (mislabel, non-accurate location or discontinuity of SCP areas), the framework has a potential for operational conservation monitoring. The development of such mapping has positive implications for conservation programs, and this geospatial inventory is easily accessible information for the large-area evaluation of conservation practices across Midwest U.S. croplands.

Differences in soil biological activity by terrain types at the sub-field scale in central Iowa US.

Soil microbial communities are structured by biogeochemical processes that occur at many different spatial scales, which makes soil sampling difficult. Because soil microbial communities are important in nutrient cycling and soil fertility, it is important to understand how microbial communities function within the heterogeneous soil landscape. In this study, a self-organizing map was used to determine whether landscape data can be used to characterize the distribution of microbial biomass and activity in order to provide an improved understanding of soil microbial community function. Points within a row crop field in south-central Iowa were clustered via a self-organizing map using six landscape properties into three separate landscape clusters. Twelve sampling locations per cluster were chosen for a total of 36 locations. After the soil samples were collected, the samples were then analysed for various metabolic indicators, such as nitrogen and carbon mineralization, extractable organic carbon, microbial biomass, etc. It was found that sampling locations located in the potholes and toe slope positions had significantly greater microbial biomass nitrogen and carbon, total carbon, total nitrogen and extractable organic carbon than the other two landscape position clusters, while locations located on the upslope did not differ significantly from the other landscape clusters. However, factors such as nitrate, ammonia, and nitrogen and carbon mineralization did not differ significantly across the landscape. Overall, this research demonstrates the effectiveness of a terrain-based clustering method for guiding soil sampling of microbial communities.

Imagining tomorrow's university in an era of open science.

As part of a recent workshop entitled "Imagining Tomorrow's University", we were asked to visualize the future of universities as research becomes increasingly data- and computation-driven, and identify a set of principles characterizing pertinent opportunities and obstacles presented by this shift. In order to establish a holistic view, we take a multilevel approach and examine the impact of open science on individual scholars as well as on the university as a whole. At the university level, open science presents a double-edged sword: when well executed, open science can accelerate the rate of scientific inquiry across the institution and beyond; however, haphazard or half-hearted efforts are likely to squander valuable resources, diminish university productivity and prestige, and potentially do more harm than good. We present our perspective on the role of open science at the university.