A pilot study of the implementation of WHO surgical checklist in Finland: improvements in activities and communication.

BACKGROUND: World Health Organisation (WHO) has introduced a surgical safety checklist that has reduced post-operative morbidity and mortality. Prior to national checklist implementation, we assessed its possible impact on the operating room (OR) process, safety-related issues and communication among surgical staff in a high-income country. METHODS: In four university and teaching hospitals, a structured questionnaire was delivered to OR personnel involved in consecutive operations over 4-6 weeks before and after the checklist implementation. The questionnaire resembled the WHO checklist and comprised multiple-choice questions relating to performance of safety checks and communication. Anaesthesiologists (A), surgeons (S) and circulating nurses (CN) answered the questions independently. The WHO checklist was modified for national needs. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned from 1748 operations, 901 before and 847 after the checklist. Patient's identity was more often confirmed (A: 62.7% vs. 84.0%, S: 71.6% vs. 85.5%, CN: 81.6% vs. 94.2%, P < 0.001) and knowledge of names and roles among team members (A: 65.7% vs. 81.8%, S: 71.1% vs. 83.6%, CN: 87.7% vs. 93.2%, P < 0.01) improved with the checklist. Anaesthesiologists and surgeons discussed critical events pre-operatively (A: 22.0% vs. 42.6%, S: 34.7% vs. 46.2%, P < 0.001) more frequently after the checklist. In addition, fewer communication failures (43 vs. 17, P < 0.05) were reported with checklist. CONCLUSIONS: The checklist increased OR teams' awareness of patient-related issues, the procedure and expected risks. It also enhanced team communication and prevented communication failures. Our findings support use of the WHO checklist in various surgical fields.

Teaching hospital physicians' skills and knowledge of resuscitation algorithms are deficient.

BACKGROUND: The resuscitation skills of 78 on-call physicians in a tertiary referral center were evaluated in a simulated sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). METHODS: The study subjects consisted of physicians whose on-call duty included handling emergency situations. First they were drawn without warning to a simulated witnessed cardiac arrest (ventricular fibrillation (VF)). They were provided with two nurses and all the equipment and medicine needed to treat SCA. Second, they were asked to write the current treatment protocols for basic life support (BLS) and VF. RESULTS: The median time to defibrillation was 2.38 min, and only 31% of the physicians were able to use the defibrillator correctly. Thirty per cent treated asystole according to the guidelines of the time. Twenty-four per cent were able to return the spontaneous circulation and the median time to ROSC (return of spontaneous circulation) was 5.75 min Only 25% of the physicians wrote the guideline for treatment of VF and basic life support correctly or nearly correctly. CONCLUSION: Regular resuscitation education should be compulsory to all physicians responsible for on-call duties in hospitals. Hospitals should have at least one employee part-time responsible for this duty.