Spatial characterization of the tachycardia circuit of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia.

AIMS: The exact circuit of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) remains elusive. To assess the location and dimensions of the AVNRT circuit. METHODS AND RESULTS: Both typical and atypical AVNRT were induced at electrophysiology study of 14 patients. We calculated the activation time of the fast and slow pathways, and consequently, the length of the slow pathway, by assuming an average conduction velocity of 0.04 mm/ms in the nodal area. The distance between the compact atrioventricular node and the slow pathway ablating electrode was measured on three-dimensionally reconstructed fluoroscopic images obtained in diastole and systole. We also measured the length of the histologically discrete right inferior nodal extension in 31 human hearts. The length of the slow pathway was calculated to be 10.8 ± 1.3 mm (range 8.2-12.8 mm). The distance from the node to the ablating electrode was measured in five patients 17.0 ± 1.6 mm (range 14.9-19.2 mm) and was consistently longer than the estimated length of the slow pathway (P < 0.001). The length of the right nodal inferior extension in histologic specimens was 8.1 ± 2.3 mm (range 5.3-13.7 mm). There were no statistically significant differences between these values and the calculated slow pathway lengths. CONCLUSION: Successful ablation affects the tachycardia circuit without necessarily abolishing slow conduction, probably by interrupting the circuit at the septal isthmus.

A unified theory for the circuit of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia.

Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common regular tachycardia in the human, but its exact circuit remains elusive. In this article, recent evidence about the electrophysiological characteristics of AVNRT and new data on the anatomy of the atrioventricular node, are discussed. Based on this information, a novel, unified theory for the nature of the circuit of the tachycardia is presented.

Electrophysiology testing for risk stratification of patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: a call for action.

Current guidelines recommendations, based on the results of primary sudden cardiac death prevention trials, use the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as a sole criterion for the indication of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy for primary prevention purposes. In this article, we review the sensitivity and specificity of LVEF for predicting arrhythmic vs. non-arrhythmic cardiac death and examine existing evidence on the use of electrophysiology testing for risk stratification of ischaemic patients with reduced left ventricular function.

Catheter Ablation of Atypical Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Because of its low prevalence, data on atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) are scarce, and the optimal ablation method has not been established. Our study aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of conventional slow pathway ablation, as applied for typical cases, in atypical AVNRT. METHODS: We studied 2079 patients with AVNRT subjected to slow pathway ablation. In 113 patients, mean age 48.5±18.1 years, 68 female, atypical AVNRT or coexistent atypical and typical AVNRT without other concomitant arrhythmia was diagnosed. Ablation data and outcomes were compared with a group of age- and sex-matched control patients with typical AVNRT. RESULTS: Fluoroscopy and radiofrequency current delivery times were not different in the atypical and typical groups, 20.3±12.2 versus 20.8±12.9 minutes (P=0.730) and 5.9±5.0 versus 5.5±4.5 minutes (P=0.650), respectively. Slow pathway ablation was accomplished from the right septum in 110 patients, and from the left septum in 3 patients, in the atypical group. There was no need for additional ablation lesions at other anatomic sites, and no cases of atrioventricular block were encountered. Recurrence rates of the arrhythmia were 5.6% in the atypical (6/108 patients) and 1.8% in the typical (2/111 patients) groups in the next 3 months following ablation (P=0.167). CONCLUSIONS: Conventional ablation at the anatomic area of the slow pathway is the therapy of choice for symptomatic AVNRT, regardless of whether the typical or atypical form is present.

Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with symptomatic atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: a randomized, controlled trial.

AIMS: To conduct a randomized trial in order to guide the optimum therapy of symptomatic atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with at least one symptomatic episode of tachycardia per month and an electrophysiologic diagnosis of AVNRT were randomly assigned to catheter ablation or chronic antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy with bisoprolol (5 mg od) and/or diltiazem (120-300 mg od). All patients were properly educated to treat subsequent tachycardia episodes with autonomic manoeuvres or a 'pill in the pocket' approach. The primary endpoint of the study was hospital admission for persistent tachycardia cardioversion, during a follow-up period of 5 years. Sixty-one patients were included in the study. In the ablation group, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 29 were free of arrhythmia or conduction disturbances at a 5-year follow-up. In the AAD group, three patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remainder, 10 patients (35.7%) continued with initial therapy, 11 patients (39.2%) remained on diltiazem alone, and 7 patients (25%) interrupted their therapy within the first 3 months following randomization, and subsequently developed an episode requiring cardioversion. During a follow-up of 5 years, 21 patients in the AAD group required hospital admission for cardioversion. Survival free from the study endpoint was significantly higher in the ablation group compared with the AAD group (log-rank test, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation is the therapy of choice for symptomatic AVNRT. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy is ineffective and not well tolerated.

Apical vs. non-apical right ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with heart failure. The optimal site of right ventricular (RV) stimulation in CRT has not been established. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials and observational studies comparing the mid- and long-term effects of RV apical (RVA) and non-apical (RVNA) pacing on CRT outcomes. METHODS: We systematically searched the Cochrane library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases for studies evaluating RVA vs. RVNA pacing in CRT with regards to left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) reduction, functional status improvement (defined as ≥1 New York Heart Association class improvement), and the clinical outcome of mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization. Effect estimates [standardized mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI)] were pooled using random-effect models. RESULTS: Twelve studies comprising 2670 patients (1655 with an apical and 1015 with a non-apical RV lead position) were included. In meta-analyses, LVESV reduction and functional status improvement were similar in patients with RVA and RVNA pacing (SMD 0.13, 95% CI: -0.24 to 0.50, P = 0.48; OR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.81 to 1.45, P = 0.60, respectively). Data regarding mortality and hospitalizations could not be pooled due to a small number of relevant studies with significant heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that in CRT patients the effects of RVA or RVNA pacing on LV remodelling and functional status are similar. Mortality and morbidity outcomes with different RV lead positions should be further assessed in randomized clinical trials.

Atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: prevalence, electrophysiologic characteristics, and tachycardia circuit.

AIMS: This study aimed at assessing the prevalence, electrophysiologic characteristics, and mechanism of atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 925 consecutive patients with AVNRT. Atrial-His (AH) and His-atrial (HA) intervals were measured during atypical AVNRT (HA > 70 ms), and compared with measurements in 34 patients with typical (slow-fast) AVNRT. Assuming that conduction velocity over the fast pathway is similar in the anterograde and retrograde directions, the AH interval during the fast-slow form should be smaller than the HA during slow-fast. Atypical AVNRT was diagnosed in 59 patients (6.4%), median age 50 years (range 19-79 years), and 37 (59.7%) of them female. Fast-slow AVNRT was diagnosed in 44 patients (74.5%), and slow-slow AVNRT in 9 patients (15.2%). The remaining six patients (10.2%) could not be reliably classified due to inconsistent AH, and HA/AH patterns or variable intervals. Tachycardia induction with anterograde conduction jumps was seen in two patients with the fast-slow, and in three patients with slow-slow or intermediate forms. Atrial-His in the fast-slow group was significantly longer than HA in the slow-fast group, 99.7 ± 40.5 ms vs. 45.8 ± 7.7 ms, P < 0.001. Tachycardia cycle length was longer in fast-slow compared with slow-fast, 379.1 ± 68.5 ms vs. 317.1 ± 42.8 ms, P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Of AVNRT cases, 6.4% are atypical and may display patterns that do not necessarily correspond to the fast-slow or slow-slow conventional types. Atypical fast-slow and typical AVNRT do not appear to utilize the same limb for fast conduction.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and atrial fibrillation (AF) share pathophysiological links, as supported by the high prevalence of AF within DM patients. Catheter ablation of AF (AFCA) is an established therapeutic option for rhythm control in drug resistant symptomatic patients. Its efficacy and safety among patients with DM is based on small populations, and long-term outcome is unknown. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess safety and long-term outcome of AFCA in DM patients, focusing on predictors of recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational studies including patients with DM undergoing AFCA were screened and included if matching inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fifteen studies were included, adding up to 1464 patients. Mean follow-up was 27 (20-33) months. Overall complication rate was 3.5 (1.5-5.0)%. Efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm at follow-up end was 66 (58-73)%. Meta-regression analysis revealed that advanced age (P < 0.001), higher body mass index (P < 0.001), and higher basal glycated haemoglobin level (P < 0.001) related to higher incidence of arrhythmic recurrences. Performing AFCA lead to a reduction of patients requiring treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) from 55 (46-74)% at baseline to 29 (17-41)% (P < 0.001) at follow-up end. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation of AF safety and efficacy in DM patients is similar to general population, especially when performed in younger patients with satisfactory glycemic control. Catheter ablation of AF reduces the amount of patients requiring AADs, an additional benefit in this population commonly exposed to adverse effects of AF pharmacological treatments.

Ranolazine enhances the efficacy of amiodarone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Amiodarone is used commonly for pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF), but it is limited by moderate efficacy and delayed action. Ranolazine and amiodarone are markedly synergistic in suppressing experimental AF in vitro, yet the clinical efficacy of ranolazine combined with amiodarone for AF conversion has only undergone minimal investigation. This prospective, single-blinded, randomized study compared the safety and efficacy of ranolazine added to amiodarone vs. amiodarone alone for conversion of recent-onset AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enroled 121 patients (64 ± 10 years, 45% male) with recent-onset (<48 h duration) AF who were eligible for pharmacological cardioversion. Patients received either 24 h amiodarone infusion (loading dose 5 mg/kg followed by maintenance dose of 50 mg/h; n = 60), or amiodarone infusion at the same dosage plus a single oral dose of ranolazine 1500 mg (n = 61). Patients in the amiodarone plus ranolazine group compared with the amiodarone-only group showed significantly higher conversion rates at 24 h (87 vs. 70%, respectively; P = 0.024) and at 12 h (52 vs. 32%; P = 0.021), and shorter time to conversion (10.2 ± 3.3 vs. 13.3 ± 4.1 h; P = 0.001). Subgroup analysis identified higher 24 h conversion in patients with left atrial (LA) diameter >46 mm who received the combination treatment vs. amiodarone alone (81 vs. 54%; P = 0.02), whereas the efficacy of the two interventions did not differ among patients with LA diameter ≤46 mm (P = 0.77). There was modest QT prolongation in both the groups, no serious adverse reactions, and no pro-arrhythmic events. CONCLUSION: Addition of ranolazine to amiodarone was safe and well tolerated in this study, and it demonstrated efficacy superior to amiodarone alone for conversion of recent-onset AF. These findings may have clinical implications by offering a simple therapeutic manoeuvre to enhance amiodarone's effectiveness for conversion of AF.

Relationship between brain natriuretic peptides and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful direct current cardioversion: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence is common after successful direct current cardioversion (DCCV), with a 40% rate of recurrence within the first month. Several studies have investigated the potential association between brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal (NT)-proBNP levels before DCCV and the risk of AF recurrence, but results have been inconsistent. We, therefore, conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available data to determine whether sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance after successful DCCV may be determined by preprocedural BNP and NT-proBNP levels. METHODS: We systematically searched Scopus, the Cochrane library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases to identify publications evaluating BNP or NT-proBNP levels in relation to post-DCCV AF recurrence, indexed from inception to September 2013. Among the initial 1,067 citations, 18 studies fulfilled the specified criteria. The difference in BNP and NT-proBNP concentrations in the AF recurrence and the SR-maintaining group was estimated by the standardized mean difference and the estimates of the pooled outcomes were evaluated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Baseline BNP levels in the AF recurrence group were significantly higher compared to BNP levels in the SR-maintaining group (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.51, confidence interval [CI] [-2.53, -0.48], P = 0.004). Similar results were observed for NT-proBNP levels, which were significantly higher in the AF recurrence group compared with the SR-maintaining group (SMD -0.63, CI [-1.13, -0.14], P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that low preprocedural BNP/NT-proBNP levels are associated with SR maintenance. The use of BNP or NT-proBNP for prediction of long-term response to DCCV appears to be useful and should be further evaluated.

Effect of iDose4 iterative reconstruction algorithm on image quality and radiation exposure in prospective and retrospective electrocardiographically gated coronary computed tomographic angiography.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare a commercially available reconstruction algorithm (iDose4) with filtered back projection (FBP) in terms of image quality (IQ) for both retrospective electrocardiographically gated and prospective electrocardiographically triggered cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) protocols and to evaluate the achievable radiation dose reduction. METHODS: A total cohort of 58 patients underwent either prospective CTCA or retrospective CTCA with full or reduced tube current-time product (in milliampere-second) protocol on a 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic scanner. All images were reconstructed with FBP, whereas the reduced milliampere-second images were also reconstructed using 2 levels (levels 4 and 6) of iDose4. Subjective and objective IQ was evaluated. RESULTS: Dose reductions of 43% in the retrospective CCTA protocol and 27% in the prospective CCTA protocol were achieved without compromising IQ. In the prospective CCTA protocol, the reduced-dose images were highly scored; thus, additional reduction of exposure settings is feasible. In the retrospective acquisition, dose reduction has led to similar IQ scores between the reduced-dose iDose4 images and the full-dose FBP images. Considering different reconstructions (FBP, iDose-L4 and -L6) of the same acquisition data, increase in iDose4 level resulted in less noisy images. A slight improvement was also noticed in all IQ indices; however, this improvement was not statistically significant for both acquisition protocols. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the application of iDose at CCTA facilitates significant radiation dose reduction by maintaining diagnostic quality. The combination of iDose4 with prospective acquisition is able to significantly reduce effective dose associated with CTCA at values of approximately 2 mSv and even lower.

High-resolution mapping of the circuit of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Recent anatomic and electrophysiologic evidence has provided new insight into the anatomic substrate. Previous reports on electroanatomic mapping (EAM) of the circuit of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) have been limited by mapping only the triangle of Koch on the right side of the septum and by the use of conventional mapping tools. The objectives are to obtain comprehensive high-resolution mapping of typical AVNRT and to investigate the role of the atrioventricular ring tissues in the circuit. METHODS: We employed EAM with the use of novel modules and algorithms for studying typical AVNRT from the right and the left sides of the septum. RESULTS: We performed extensive mapping of both the atrial septum and the septal vestibule of the tricuspid valve during typical AVNRT in 9 (6 females) patients, aged 49.6 ± 12.1 years. In two of these, left septal mapping was also obtained through the aorta. The earliest initial activation was variable, emanating from the superior or medial septum. The impulse consistently appeared below the orifice of the coronary sinus, at the site where its inferoanterior margin merged with the septal vestibule of the tricuspid valve at its entrance to the right atrium. It then returned to the initial activation site, presumably through the septal vestibular myocardium. The left septal activation area corresponded to that recorded on the right side. CONCLUSIONS: Typical AVNRT uses a circuit confined within the pyramid of Koch from the AV node to the septal isthmus, involving the myocardial walls of the pyramidal space.

Classification of electrophysiological types of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: a reappraisal.

Sequence of retrograde atrial activation is not a reliable criterion for the classification of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) into typical and atypical types. The conventional concept of a lower common pathway is not supported by current evidence and does not represent a reliable or reproducible criterion. The distinction between 'fast-slow' and 'slow-slow' forms is not unanimously defined, and probably of no practical significance. We suggest that AVNRT should be classified as typical or atypical according to the His-atrial interval or, when a His bundle electrogram is not reliably recorded, the ventriculo-atrial interval measured on the His bundle recording electrode.