Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acute Med ; 12(1): 18-20, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23650665

RESUMO

The severe sequelae of infection from the conventionally termed 'benign' forms of malaria are being increasingly recognised, and delayed diagnosis and treatment lead to worse outcomes. The clinical picture can be non-specific and malaria epidemiology is constantly changing, presenting challenges for the acute clinician. The most critical step in the diagnosis of patients presenting in the U.K. is the clinician's awareness of the disease and its key presenting features. We describe a case of Plasmodium vivax malaria in a young man who presented with fever and diarrhoea, who had never travelled to a recognised malaria-endemic area.


Assuntos
Citodiagnóstico , Malária Vivax/diagnóstico , Plasmodium vivax/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Diagnóstico Tardio , Humanos , Malária Vivax/tratamento farmacológico , Malária Vivax/epidemiologia , Malária Vivax/parasitologia , Masculino , República da Coreia/etnologia , Viagem
2.
Br J Biomed Sci ; 66(4): 175-9, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20095124

RESUMO

Currently, the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) relies on the detection of toxins A and B in faeces but the sensitivity of these tests has been questioned, particularly in advanced disease. In this context, additional methods to enhance the diagnosis of C. difficile have been investigated. In this study, 1007 faecal samples are tested using toxigenic culture, an immunoassay for toxins AB and the C. difficile-specific glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) test. Samples positive by any of the above tests are evaluated for the presence of faecal lactoferrin as an indicator of intestinal inflammation. Patients with evidence of inflammation but with negative toxin AB tests are followed up to assess clinical outcome. The toxin AB test was positive in 35 samples (3.4%), while 121 (12%) samples were culture-positive, 87 (8.6%) of which were toxigenic. Glutamate dehydrogenase proved to be a sensitive and specific marker of C. difficile with a negative predictive value of 99.3% (95% CI: 0.98-1.00). Faecal lactoferrin was positive in 52/129 (40.3%) samples tested. A cohort of 15 patients with a negative faecal toxin AB and a positive lactoferrin test was C. difficile culture-positive with a toxigenic isolate; clinically, all had advanced CDI. All demonstrated faecal toxin between five and 41 days later on repeat testing. It is suggested that a two-step algorithm be used to include screening faecal samples for GDH, with positive samples tested for faecal toxin AB and lactoferrin. Patients who present with a negative faecal toxin AB test and a positive lactoferrin test were serially tested for faecal toxin AB every five to seven days until a diagnosis was established. More sensitive tests than enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of faecal toxin, or the use of a rapid specific test for the presence of a toxigenic strain, must be considered in such patients.


Assuntos
Toxinas Bacterianas/análise , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Fezes/microbiologia , Glutamato Desidrogenase/análise , Lactoferrina/análise , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Proteínas de Bactérias , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Enterotoxinas , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Reações Falso-Negativas , Fezes/química , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Reino Unido
3.
Br J Biomed Sci ; 66(1): 1-5, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19348118

RESUMO

Faecal samples from 1007 patients suspected of having diarrhoea caused by Clostridium difficile infection are investigated for the presence of toxins A and B and for the presence of C. difficile-specific glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH). Toxigenic culture is performed on all samples and is used as the 'gold standard' for the purpose of the study. A marker for intestinal inflammation, faecal lactoferrin, is used on any samples that give a positive result in any of the above tests. Part of the study also involves an assessment of six commercial toxin kits to detect the presence of C. difficile toxins in faecal samples. This study revealed that the commercial toxin detection kits used can give rise to false-positive and false-negative results and that all demonstrated poor sensitivity when compared to the gold standard of toxigenic culture. Testing of faecal samples for GDH can be useful as a negative screening method as the results of this test show high correlation with culture. Faecal toxin testing can then be performed on all GDH-positive samples (GDH positivity is independent of toxigenicity in strains of C. difficile). The combined use of GDH and toxin testing, coupled with toxigenic culture, revealed that some patients with diarrhoea who harboured toxigenic strains of C. difficile were faecal toxin-negative. Lactoferrin appears to be a useful marker for the presence of inflammatory diarrhoea.


Assuntos
Toxinas Bacterianas/análise , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/diagnóstico , Fezes/microbiologia , Glutamato Desidrogenase/análise , Lactoferrina/análise , Idoso , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Proteínas de Bactérias , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Portador Sadio , Clostridioides difficile/patogenicidade , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/epidemiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/fisiopatologia , Enterotoxinas , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico/normas , Recidiva , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA