RESUMO
A set of circular collimators and treatment cones from 5 to 12 cm diameter has been designed for an intraoperative accelerator (6-18 MeV) that has an optical docking system. Electron beam scattering theory has been used to minimize their weight while minimizing leakage radiation. Both acrylic and brass were evaluated as possible materials; however, because of substantial electron leakage through the lateral cone wall for acrylic, we have concluded that 2 mm thick brass walls are more desirable than acrylic walls. At 18 MeV, isodose measurements beneath the cones showed hot spots as great as 120% for both materials. The placement and dimension of an internal trimmer ring inside the brass cone was studied as a method for reducing the hot spots, and it was found this could only be accomplished at the expense of decreasing coverage of the 90% isodose surface. The effects of 1 degree cone misalignment on the dose distribution has been studied and found to generate changes of less than 5% in the dose and 3 mm in position of the 90% isodose surface. In a study of the contribution of the cone and its matching collimator assembly to x-ray room leakage, it was noted that although the treatment cone had a negligible contribution, the upper annuli of the upper collimator assembly contributed as much as 80% of the leakage at 16 MeV for the 5-cm cone.
Assuntos
Aceleradores de Partículas/instrumentação , Proteção Radiológica/instrumentação , Humanos , Período Intraoperatório , Radiometria , Raios XRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the volume of nodal irradiation associated with breast-conserving therapy, we defined the anatomic relationship of sentinel lymph nodes and axillary level I and II lymph nodes in patients receiving tangential breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis of 65 simulation fields in women with breast cancer treated with sentinel lymph node surgery and 39 women in whom radiopaque clips demarcated the extent of axillary lymph node dissection was performed. We measured the relationship of the surgical clips to the anatomic landmarks and calculated the percentage of prescribed dose delivered to the sentinel lymph node region. RESULTS: A cranial field edge 2.0 cm below the humeral head the sentinel lymph node region was included or at the field edge in 95% of the cases and the entire extent of axillary I and II dissection in 43% of the axillary dissection cases. In the remaining 57%, this field border encompassed an average of 80% of cranial/caudal extent of axillary level I and II dissection. In 98.5% of the cases, all sentinel lymph nodes were anterior to the deep field edge and 71% were anterior to the chest wall-interface, whereas 61% of the axillary dissection cohort had extension deep to the chest wall-lung interface. If the deep field edge had been set 2 cm below the chest wall-lung interface, the entire axillary dissection would have been included in 82% of the cases, and the entire sentinel lymph node would have been covered with a 0.5-cm margin. The median dose to the sentinel lymph node region was 98% of the prescribed dose. CONCLUSIONS: By extending the cranial border to 2 cm below the humeral head and 2 cm deep to the chest wall-lung interface, the radiotherapy fields used to treat the breast can include the sentinel lymph node region and most of axillary levels I and II.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Axila , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
A dosimetric study of anterior electron beam irradiation for treatment of retinoblastoma was performed to evaluate the influence of tissue heterogeneities on the dose distribution within the eye and the accuracy of the dose calculated by a pencil beam algorithm. Film measurements were made in a variety of polystyrene phantoms and in a removable polystyrene eye incorporated into a tissue substitute phantom constructed from a human skull. Measurements in polystyrene phantoms were used to demonstrate the algorithm's ability to predict the effect of a lens block placed in the beam, as well as the eye's irregular surface shape. The eye phantom was used to measure dose distributions within the eye in both the sagittal and transverse planes in order to test the algorithm's ability to predict the dose distribution when bony heterogeneities are present. Results show (1) that previous treatment planning conclusions based on flat, uniform phantoms for central-axis depth dose are adequate; (2) that a three-dimensional heterogeneity correction is required for accurate dose calculations; and (3) that if only a two-dimensional heterogeneity correction is used in calculating the dose, it is more accurate for the sagittal than the transverse plane.
Assuntos
Elétrons , Neoplasias Oculares/radioterapia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Retinoblastoma/radioterapia , Humanos , Modelos EstruturaisRESUMO
This report specifically describes the use of a unique anthropomorphic breast phantom to validate the accuracy of three-dimensional dose calculations performed by a commercial treatment-planning system for intact-breast tangential irradiation. The accuracy of monitor-unit calculations has been corroborated using ionization chamber measurements made in this phantom. Measured doses have been compared to those calculated from a variety of treatment plans. The treatment plans utilized a 6-MV x-ray beam and incorporated a variety of field configurations and wedge combinations. Dose measurements at several clinically relevant points within the breast phantom have confirmed the accuracy of calculated doses generated from the variety of treatment plans. Overall agreement between measurements and calculations averaged 0.998+/-0.009. These results indicate that the dose per monitor-unit calculations performed by the treatment-planning system can be confidently utilized in the fulfillment of clinical dose prescriptions.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Imagens de Fantasmas , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/instrumentação , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Monitoramento de Radiação , Dosagem RadioterapêuticaRESUMO
Several recent reports have described methods for calculating enhanced dynamic wedge factors (EDWFs). Many of these reports use the monitor-unit (MU) fraction method to predict EDWFs as a function of field size. Although simple in approach, MU fraction methods do not produce accurate EDWFs in large or asymmetric fields. A recently described technique, based on the MU fraction method works well for large and asymmetric fields, but only when the calculation point is in the center of the field. Other existing methods based on beam-segment superposition do not have this limitation. These beam summation methods, however, are difficult to implement in routine clinical MU calculation schemes. In this paper, we present a simple calculation method that estimates EDWFs at off-axis calculation points in both symmetric and asymmetric fields. Our method, which also is based on the MU fraction method, similarly uses empirically determined field-size corrections but also applies wedged-field profiles to estimate EDWFs that are independent of calculation-point location and field symmetry. EDWF measurements for a variety of field sizes and calculation-point locations for both 6- and 18-MV x-ray beams were performed to validate our calculations and those of our ADAC Pinnacle3 Treatment Planning System. The disagreement between the calculated and measured EDWFs over the useful clinical range of field sizes and calculation-point locations was less than 2%. The worst disagreement was 3% and occurred at a point 8.5 cm from the center of an asymmetric 25 (wedged direction)x20 cm2 60 degrees-wedged field. Detailed comparisons of measurements with calculations and wedge factors obtained from the ADAC Pinnacle3 Treatment Planning System will be presented. In addition, the strengths and weaknesses of this calculation method will be discussed.