Understanding Respiratory Rate Assessment by Emergency Nurses: A Health Care Improvement Project.

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory rate is the first sign of patient decline. Monitoring and recording respiratory rate are essential nursing competencies. However, health care system emergency nurses' ability to differentiate normal from abnormal respiratory rates was unknown. We conducted a health care improvement project to assess emergency nurses' accuracy in "spot" and "formal" assessments, understand assessment practices, and determine competency and training needs. METHODS: In an anonymous cross-sectional survey, 78 emergency nurses from 1 health care system viewed 3 "spot" and 3 "formal" mock patient videos and answered questions in REDCap (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN). Accuracy (abnormal/normal), systematic error (bias), and random error (imprecision) were assessed. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and qualitative content analysis of open-ended questions were reported. RESULTS: Most emergency nurses identified respiration as abnormal in spot and formal assessment videos. Accuracy was lowest for the video displaying 6 breaths per minute. Emergency nurses were more likely to identify abnormal breathing in all formal assessment videos (n = 59, 75.7%) than in all spot assessment videos (n = 41, 52.6%) (McNemar χ2 = 10.32, P = 0.001). Most emergency nurses reported a willingness to use formal assessments and thought that respiratory rate was a good indicator of a patient's condition. The barriers to accurate assessment included time limitations, prior training focusing on assessments lasting less than 30 seconds, and monitor and staff errors. DISCUSSION: Respiratory rate assessment may be best assessed formally, particularly for bradypnea, where formal checks may outperform spot checks. The results present areas for improving respiratory rate assessment training and clinical practice.

Implementation of the MEDFRAT to Promote Quality Care and Decrease Falls in Community Hospital Emergency Rooms.

ABSTRACTPURPOSE: To identify and implement an evidence-based fall-risk assessment tool for use in emergency departments at Essentia Health, a large, primarily rural health care delivery system with 12 emergency departments. METHODS: The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care was used to guide the process. The Memorial Emergency Department Fall-Risk Assessment Tool (MEDFRAT) was programmed into the electronic medical record, along with interventions that could be selected for 2 fall-risk levels. An education session was developed for emergency nurses about falls and MEDFRAT, with planned time for discussion about any concerns in the implementation of MEDFRAT. MEDFRAT was selected for implementation by nursing leadership because it is evidence based and appeared to be conducive to implementation in the diverse emergency departments across 12 sites in 3 states. RESULTS: Education sessions were presented to nurses at 11 of 12 emergency departments. Suggestions to support site-specific implementation were programmed into the electronic health record. Nurses expressed appreciation that they were consulted, and their feedback was incorporated into the tool before it was implemented. Resources needed at each site to implement recommended MEDFRAT interventions in the tool were identified. Needed resources were then provided to the emergency departments before implementation of MEDFRAT. CONCLUSIONS: The Iowa Model was a useful framework to select an evidence-based tool and then engage nurses in the process of implementing evidence-based practice changes in emergency departments across a diverse health care system serving a largely rural population. Ongoing follow-up will determine if this process results in fewer falls.