Microbial biofilms in nature: unlocking their potential for agricultural applications.

Soil environments are dynamic and the plant rhizosphere harbours a phenomenal diversity of micro-organisms which exchange signals and beneficial nutrients. Bipartite beneficial or symbiotic interactions with host roots, such as mycorrhizae and various bacteria, are relatively well characterized. In addition, a tripartite interaction also exists between plant roots, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and associated bacteria. Bacterial biofilms exist as a sheet of bacterial cells in association with AMF structures, embedded within a self-produced exopolysaccharide matrix. Such biofilms may play important functional roles within these tripartite interactions. However, the details about such interactions in the rhizosphere and their relevant functional relationships have not been elucidated. This review explores the current understanding of naturally occurring microbial biofilms, and their interaction with biotic surfaces, especially AMF. The possible roles played by bacterial biofilms and the potential for their application for a more productive and sustainable agriculture is discussed in this review.

Primary dysfunction of the afferent limb of the arterial baroreceptor reflex system in a patient with severe supine hypertension and orthostatic hypotension.

A 33 year old man with a history of recurrent episodes of orthostatic dizziness since adolescence was noted to have a supine blood pressure of 200/120 mm Hg and a standing blood pressure of 90/60 mm Hg. Results of extensive laboratory studies for secondary hypertension were negative. Studies of the autonomic nervous system function revealed normal plasma catecholamines, cold pressor test and response to 4 minute 30% of maximal static handgrip contraction and an appropriate increase in heart rate on intravenous injection of atropine. In contrast, the heart rate response to phenylephrine and sodium nitroprusside infusion, carotid massage and graded neck suction with an airtight chamber was very abnormal, indicating marked dysfunction of the afferent limb of the arterial baroreceptor reflex system. Methyldopa decreased the supine hypertension and increased the standing blood pressure.

Effects of reduction in dose and discontinuation of hydrochlorothiazide in patients with controlled essential hypertension.

We studied the effects of a reduction in dose of hydrochlorothiazide from 50 to 25 mg/d, and its discontinuation for up to 22 months in 36 well-controlled hypertensive patients. Hydrochlorothiazide was discontinued if the diastolic blood pressure remained less than or equal to 94 mm Hg after a 6-month period on the lower dose of hydrochlorothiazide. No other changes were made in medications or diet. Sitting systolic blood pressure rose from 135 +/- 15 mm Hg to 140 +/- 14 mm Hg on reduction of the hydrochlorothiazide dose and rose still further to 145 +/- 20 mm Hg on discontinuation. Even greater increases in standing blood pressure were observed. There were no significant effects on the diastolic blood pressure with reduction of dose or discontinuation of hydrochlorothiazide. A significant decrease in the serum uric acid and a rise in serum potassium occurred. There were no changes in serum glucose or lipids on reduction in the dose of hydrochlorothiazide; whereas, with discontinuation, the serum lipids and hemoglobin A1C fell significantly. These results suggest that the benefits of a reduced dose of hydrochlorothiazide may not be as great as considered heretofore.

Response to a second single antihypertensive agent used as monotherapy for hypertension after failure of the initial drug. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents.

BACKGROUND: An important issue in clinical practice is how to treat patients whose blood pressure does not respond to the first antihypertensive drug selected. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the antihypertensive response of patients who had failed to achieve their diastolic blood pressure goal (< 90 mm Hg at the end of 8 to 12 weeks of titration) with one of six randomly allocated drugs or placebo to the random allocation of an alternate drug. METHODS: We initially randomized 1292 men with diastolic blood pressure of 95 to 109 mm Hg to treatment with hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, captopril, clonidine hydrochloride, diltiazem hydrochloride (sustained release), prazosin hydrochloride, or placebo. Of 410 men in whom initial treatment failed, 352 qualified for randomization to the alternate drug. RESULTS: Of the 352 patients, 173 (49.1%) achieved their goal diastolic blood pressure, in 133 (37.8%) the alternate drug failed, and 46 (13.1%) left the study for various reasons. Overall response rates were as follows: diltiazem, 63%; clonidine, 59%; prazosin, 47%; hydrochlorothiazide, 46%; atenolol, 41%; and captopril, 37%. The best response rate for patients in whom hydrochlorothiazide failed was achieved with diltiazem (70%); after atenolol failure, clonidine (86%); after captopril failure, prazosin (54%); after clonidine failure, diltiazem (100%); after diltiazem failure, captopril (67%); and after prazosin failure, clonidine (53%). The combined response rate for patients initially randomized to an active treatment was 76.0%, which is similar to that achieved by the combination of two drugs in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that sequential single-drug therapy is a rational approach for treatment of hypertension in patients in whom initial drug therapy has failed.

FUNGAL SYMBIONTS. Global assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus diversity reveals very low endemism.

The global biogeography of microorganisms remains largely unknown, in contrast to the well-studied diversity patterns of macroorganisms. We used arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus DNA from 1014 plant-root samples collected worldwide to determine the global distribution of these plant symbionts. We found that AM fungal communities reflected local environmental conditions and the spatial distance between sites. However, despite AM fungi apparently possessing limited dispersal ability, we found 93% of taxa on multiple continents and 34% on all six continents surveyed. This contrasts with the high spatial turnover of other fungal taxa and with the endemism displayed by plants at the global scale. We suggest that the biogeography of AM fungi is driven by unexpectedly efficient dispersal, probably via both abiotic and biotic vectors, including humans.

Prazosin in hypertension with and without methyldopa.

The efficacy of prazosin was assessed in 21 patients with essential hypertension who failed to respond adequately to a combination of methyldopa and hydrochlorothiazide. The patients were divided randomly into two groups; in the first group prazosin was substituted for methyldopa and in the second group prazosin was added to the combination. In group 1, the average blood pressure (BP) fell from 144/102 mmHg (sitting) and 142/105 mmHg (standing) to 136/91 mmHg (sitting) and 129/91 mmHg (standing) after prazosin (17 mg) was substituted for methyldopa. The fall in the diastolic BP was statistically significant (p less than 0.01). In group 2, BP fell from 146/101 mmHg (sitting) and 143/103 mmHg (standing) to 126/87 mmHg (sitting) and 118/86 mmHg (standing) when prazosin 14 mg was added to methyldopa and hydrochlorothiazide. The reductions in systolic and diastolic pressures were statistically significant (p less than 0.001).

Simultaneous treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon and orthostatic hypotension.

Treatment of a 55-year-old woman with Raynaud's phenomenon and orthostatic hypotension secondary to lumbar sympathectomy performed for Raynaud's phenomenon is described. Indomethacin increased the blood pressure but caused severe gastrointestinal bleeding. It was possible to treat the symptoms of Raynaud's phenomenon with drugs generally used to treat hypertension without causing an undue decrease in blood pressure and, at the same time, to combat orthostatic hypotension with drugs to increase blood pressure.

Comparison of nifedipine and propranolol used in combination with diuretics for the treatment of hypertension.

One hundred patients participated in a double-blind, randomized study to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of sustained-release nifedipine and propranolol in hypertensive patients whose diastolic blood pressure exceeded 95 mm Hg while receiving diuretic therapy. Nifedipine (mean dose, 79.6 mg per day) decreased blood pressure by 11.4/10.5 mm Hg; propranolol (mean dose, 198.4 mg per day) decreased blood pressure by 13.5/10.3 mm Hg. Reduction of diastolic blood pressure to below 90 mm Hg was achieved in 63 percent of nifedipine-treated patients and in 57 percent of propranolol-treated patients. Nifedipine therapy was associated with an increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and a decrease in serum triglyceride levels. In contrast, propranolol therapy was associated with a decrease in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and an increase in serum triglyceride levels. Nifedipine is as effective as propranolol in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension whose blood pressure is inadequately controlled by diuretic therapy.

Prazosin versus propranolol plus prazosin: a comparison in diuretic-treated hypertensive patients.

The antihypertensive efficacy of prazosin was compared with that of a combination of prazosin and propranolol in 14 patients with essential hypertension. All patients had sitting diastolic blood pressures greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg despite daily therapy with 50 mg of hydrochlorothiazide and 240 mg of propranolol. After a 4-week monitoring period, patients were divided randomly into 2 groups in whom either (1) propranolol was reduced to 120 mg/day (to avoid potential hypotension) and prazosin was added, starting with an initial dose of 1 mg twice daily, or (2) propranolol was tapered and discontinued as prazosin was added. The average doses of prazosin were 7.4 and 7.6 mg/day, respectively. After 12 weeks of therapy, blood pressure was reduced in both groups, and there was no significant difference in the reduction of blood pressure or dose of prazosin in the 2 groups. Mean heart rate increased significantly in both groups (p less than 0.01), but more so in the group of patients who discontinued propranolol therapy. Thus, when a combination of 50 mg/day of hydrochlorothiazide and 240 mg/day of propranolol is insufficient to control hypertension, the addition of prazosin is shown to decrease blood pressure whether or not propranolol is continued.

Comparison of plasma lipid and lipoprotein profiles in hypertensive black versus white men. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents.

An abnormal plasma lipid and lipoprotein profile is an independent and strong predictor of mortality and morbidity from coronary artery disease (CAD). We report on plasma lipid and lipoprotein profiles with respect to race, age, obesity, blood pressure (BP), smoking, and drinking history in 1,292 male veterans with a diastolic BP of 95 to 109 mm Hg while off antihypertensive medications. Blacks had 24% (p <0.001) lower triglycerides than whites. In contrast, the following parameters were higher in blacks than in whites by the indicated percentages: high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, 16% (p <0.001); HDL2 cholesterol, 36% (p <0.001); apolipoprotein (Apo) A1, 8% (p <0.001); HDL/low-density lipoprotein (LDL), 18% (p = 0.018); HDL2/LDL, 36% (p = 0.031); HDL2/HDL3, 21% (p <0.001); and Apo A1/Apo B, 15% (p <0.001). Triglycerides were unchanged up to age 60, but were lower by 24% (p <0.001) in those aged > or = 70. Apo A1 levels were higher (p <0.001), whereas LDL cholesterol was lower (p <0.008) in moderate alcohol consumers versus abstainers. Triglycerides were higher (p <0.001), whereas HDL, HDL2 cholesterol, and Apo A1 were lower (p <0.001) with increasing obesity. Moderate alcohol consumption had a strong favorable effect on HDL, HDL2, and HDL3 cholesterol among subjects of normal weight, but this effect was diminished in obese subjects. Total and LDL cholesterol were higher by 6.4% (p = 0.001) and 9.4% (p <0.003), respectively, whereas HDL cholesterol remained unchanged in those with diastolic BP of 105 to 109 mm Hg versus those with diastolic BP of 95 to 99 mm Hg. We conclude that hypertensive black men have lipid and lipoprotein profiles indicative of less CAD risk than white men. Chronic moderate alcohol consumption correlates with a favorable plasma lipid and lipoprotein profile in normal, but not obese, men. Obesity is associated with an adverse plasma lipid and lipoprotein profile. Thus, race, alcohol intake, and obesity may be important modifiers of CAD in untreated hypertensive men.

Hypersomnolence with beta-adrenergic blockers.

An elderly, mildly demented, hypertensive male patient developed hypersomnolence on administration of propranolol for treatment of hypertension; no other cause for hypersomnolence was detected. Upon replacement of propranolol with atenolol, he felt better but continued to be quite somnolent. When atenolol was discontinued, he reported to have lack of sleep. On readministration of subtherapeutic doses of the same beta-adrenergic blocking agents, he once again experienced excessive sleepiness. By discontinuing beta-blocking agents and introducing captopril, he felt much better, became pleasant and talkative, and blood pressure was well controlled. Beta antagonists are important drugs in the management of many cardiovascular problems. Propranolol, a lipophilic beta-blocking agent, and atenolol, a hydrophilic beta-blocking agent, are two of the major agents currently used clinically in the United States. Numerous neuropsychiatric side-effects of the beta-adrenergic blocking drugs have been reported, but hypersomnolence is not readily recognized as one of them.

Matrix study of irbesartan with hydrochlorothiazide in mild-to-moderate hypertension.

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and antihypertensive dose-response effects of irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. After a 4- to 5-week single-blind placebo lead-in period, 683 patients with seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) between 95 and 110 mm Hg were randomized to receive once-daily dosing with one of 16 different double-blind, fixed combinations of irbesartan (0, 37.5, 100, and 300 mg irbesartan) and HCTZ (0, 6.25, 12.5, and 25 mg HCTZ) for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in trough SeDBP after 8 weeks of therapy. Data were analyzed by response surface modeling. At Week 8, mean changes from baseline in trough SeDBP (mm Hg) ranged from -3.5 for placebo, -7.1 to -10.2 for the irbesartan monotherapy groups, -5.1 to -8.3 for the HCTZ monotherapy groups, and -8.1 to -15.0 for the combination groups. Irbesartan plus HCTZ produced additive reductions in both SeDBP and seated systolic BP, with at least one combination producing greater BP reduction than either drug alone (P < .001). All treatments were well tolerated; there were no treatment-related serious adverse events. Irbesartan tended to ameliorate the dose-related biochemical abnormalities associated with HCTZ alone. In conclusion, the combination of HCTZ in doses up to 25 mg with irbesartan, in doses up to 300 mg, is safe and produces dose-dependent reductions in BP.

A comparison of the safety of therapeutically equivalent doses of isradipine and diltiazem for treatment of essential hypertension.

We compared the safety of a new dihydropyridine calcium entry blocker, isradipine, with an equipotent dose of diltiazem in 174 mild hypertensives (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 95 to 105 mm Hg). After appropriate washout and placebo periods, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1.25 mg isradipine twice daily (Group I) or 40 mg diltiazem thrice daily (Group D). If DBP remained above 90 mm Hg, doses were increased to a maximum of 5 mg isradipine twice daily or 120 mg diltiazem thrice daily. Active therapy was given for a total of 12 weeks. Only 18 patients (nine from each group) did not complete the protocol. The patients were well-matched at baseline with a mean BP of 149/100 mm Hg for those who were randomized to isradipine and completed the protocol and 153/99 mm Hg for the diltiazem group. The responses to each drug were excellent with 72% of the isradipine patients and 73% of the diltiazem group having DBP less than 90 mm Hg at the completion of the study. Of the 156 patients who completed the protocol, only 18 patients (ten in Group I and eight in Group D) failed to respond. Both drugs were well-tolerated. No adverse reactions were reported by 68 percent of the patients in Group I and 65% of those in Group D. The most common side effect was headache (9.0% in Group I and 7.8% in Group D) followed by fatigue (5.2% in Group I and 3.9% in Group D). Age and race did not predict response to either agent but men responded slightly better to diltiazem than women. We conclude that isradipine and diltiazem are equally well tolerated and can be used successfully as a monotherapy to treat hypertension in a wide variety of patients.

Concomitant therapy with labetalol and hydrochlorothiazide in moderate to moderately severe essential hypertension.

Labetalol is a competitive, nonselective antagonist of both beta 1 and beta 2 adrenoceptors. It has been suggested that labetalol reduces blood pressure (BP) predominantly by decreasing peripheral vascular resistance while maintaining cardiac output. We conducted a double-blind, randomized study to assess the antihypertensive effect of labetalol in patients with a standing diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) between 105 and 119 mm Hg. The study consisted of three separate phases in succession. Phase I was a single-blind, placebo washout phase, two to four weeks in length. Those patients with a SDBP greater than or equal to 105 mm Hg at the end of phase I entered phase II, in which they were administered labetalol in a forced titration of 100 mg bid to 400 mg bid. Those with a SDBP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg on the 400 mg bid regimen for two weeks were maintained on labetalol alone (N = 8). Those patients whose BP was not controlled (SDBP greater than or equal to 99 mm Hg, N = 15) were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or placebo in addition to labetalol for the next five weeks. Eight of the 15 patients received HCTZ and seven received placebo. The BPs at baseline and at the end of phase II were similar in the two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A 52-week comparison of lisinopril, hydrochlorothiazide, and their combination in hypertension.

Lisinopril is a long-acting converting-enzyme inhibitor. A 52-week study was undertaken to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of lisinopril, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), and a combination of the two drugs in 24 patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 90 to 120 mm Hg. After a four-week single-blind placebo-washout phase, ten patients received lisinopril, ten received HCTZ, and four received the combination in increasing doses in a double-blind fashion for the next 12 weeks. The target blood pressure was less than 90 mm Hg DBP and a decrease of at least 10 mm Hg. For the next 12 weeks, the responders continued to receive the same medications; however, the nonresponders from the two groups received the combination, increasing the number of patients receiving both to 13. The DBP was controlled in eight of the ten patients with lisinopril, three of the ten patients with HCTZ, and 11 of 13 (four original and nine nonresponders) with the combination. For the next 28 weeks, 17 patients agreed to continue into a single-blind phase, during which blood pressure was controlled in six of the seven patients who were treated with lisinopril alone and nine of ten who received the combination. The heart rate rose significantly in the HCTZ-treated patients during the short-term treatment and decreased significantly in those treated with lisinopril during the long-term phase. Side effects were more frequent in patients receiving the combination but were always mild and subsided spontaneously. Lisinopril appeared to be more effective than HCTZ as a step-1 drug, and the combination was superior to either agent alone.

Sequential monotherapy of hypertension.

In most cases, the antihypertensive therapy for an individual patient is selected through a process of trial and error. This study determined if, by treating each hypertensive patient sequentially, with six antihypertensive drugs, one from each of the major classes, one could decide on the best possible drug for control of hypertension. In a randomized open-label crossover study, 19 patients (16 male and 3 female), 28-70 years of age with a sitting diastolic blood pressure of 95-110 mm Hg were given atenolol, captopril, clonidine, indapamide, prazosin, and verapamil in a sequential manner. Each drug was started at the minimum recommended or lower dose and titrated upwards every 2 weeks, if well tolerated, until blood pressure was controlled (diastolic BP < 90 mm Hg). If blood pressure was controlled, the drug was continued for another 2 weeks. A washout period of at least 2 weeks was allowed between drugs. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressures were reduced significantly with all of the six drugs. In 18 of the 19 patients, blood pressure was controlled with at least one of six drugs, frequently with the lowest dose. The authors conclude that if hypertension is not controlled with the lowest recommended dose of a drug, other antihypertensive drugs should be tried sequentially rather than increasing the dose or adding a second drug.

Lack of interaction between sulindac or naproxen and propranolol in hypertensive patients.

Seventeen patients with hypertension and osteoarthritis participated in a single-blind crossover study comparing the effects of sulindac 200 mg twice daily, naproxen 500 mg twice daily, and placebo on blood pressure. All patients were treated for hypertension with propranolol monotherapy. Blood pressures were back-titrated to achieve a baseline diastolic blood pressure of 90 to 100 mm Hg while taking naproxen. There were no significant differences in mean sitting or standing blood pressures among the patients receiving naproxen, sulindac, or placebo treatments. There was no change in pulse, weight, or any of the laboratory measurements at the end of each treatment phase. These results suggest that neither sulindac nor naproxen interferes with propranolol therapy for uncomplicated hypertension.

Plasma dopamine-beta-hydroxylase in uremia--increase in enzyme activity after renal transplantation.

Plasma dopamine-beta-hydroxylase in uremia. Plasma dopamine-beta-hydroxylase (DBH) activity was found to be low in 26 uremic patients when compared with 56 normal individuals (p less than 0.001). Hemodialysis caused only a slight increase in plasma DBH levels in the uremic group. In contrast, a group of kidney transplanted patients with a return of good renal function had DBH values similar to the normal group (p greater than 0.1). The mean plasma DBH activity in eight patients measured pre- and post-transplantation increased from 4.5 to 28 International Units/l (p less than 0.01). No evidence was found to indicate that the depressed levels of plasma DBH in uremia were secondary to genetic or enzyme inhibiting factors. It is suggested that low levels of DBH activity in patients with renal failure may be a consequence of altered sympathetic nervous activity which is known to occur in the uremic state.

A medical school-based GME consortium in Milwaukee.

Consortia have been recommended as a local mechanism for allocating housestaff positions and overseeing graduate medical education (GME) training programs. They also could serve to simplify the execution of a national health care policy in the future. Such a consortium has existed in Milwaukee for the last 16 years. It involves 23 health care institutions affiliated with the Medical College of Wisconsin. Known as the Medical College of Wisconsin Affiliated Hospitals, Inc. (MCWAH), this consortium employs 749 housestaff, for whom it provides salary and benefits. It also ensures accreditation of all of its residency and fellowship programs and assists in providing direction and coordination for the member institutions. The authors describe the genesis and operation of the MCWAH in detail. The accomplishments of existing consortia, in Milwaukee and elsewhere, indicate that a GME consortium should enable its members to function effectively and efficiently in meeting the challenging GME training requirements of the future.

Mentors in graduate medical education at the Medical College of Wisconsin.

In 1988, 40 senior faculty members at the Medical College of Wisconsin were surveyed to determine their perceptions of the extent and benefits of mentor relationships between faculty and residents. Seventy-eight percent thought mentor activity was feasible in their own departments; however, only 18% felt that a majority of residents in their departments had a mentor. Seventy-five percent reported having been a mentor, and 90% indicated they had a mentor either currently or previously. All 25 faculty who reported having a mentor felt that this arrangement had assisted them in their career advancement, 88% reported it had enhanced their personal development, and 72% indicated the relationship had helped them deal with stress. The mentor relationship appears to have significant benefits for the medical trainee and should be promoted.