Occurrence, presence and severity of bruxism and its association with altered state of consciousness in individuals with severe acquired brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Excessive jaw muscle activity is a frequent complication after acquired brain injury (ABI). OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to identify the occurrence and severity of jaw muscle activity and its association with altered state of consciousness in patients with ABI. METHODS: A total of 14 severe ABI patients with varied altered state of consciousness were recruited. A single-channel electromyographic (EMG) device was used to assess the jaw muscle activity for three consecutive nights during Week 1 and Week 4 following admission. Differences in number of EMG episodes/h between Week 1 and 4 were analysed using non-parametric tests and association between the EMG activity and altered state of consciousness were analysed using Spearman's correlation test. RESULTS: Nine of fourteen (64%) patients showed indications of bruxism (cutoff: >15 EMG episodes/h). The average EMG episodes/h at admission were 44.5 ± 13.6 with no significant changes after Week 4 of admission (43 ± 12.9; p = .917). The EMG episodes/h ranged from 2 to 184 during Week 1 and 4-154 during Week 4. There were no significant correlations between the number of EMG episodes/h during the three nights and the individuals altered state of consciousness during Week 1 and Week 4. CONCLUSION: Patients with ABI had a conspicuously high but variable level of jaw muscle activity at admission and it tend to remain high after 4 week of hospitalisation which could potentially lead to adverse effects such as excessive tooth wear, headaches and pain in jaw muscles. The lack of associations between individuals altered level of consciousness and EMG activity could be due to low sample size and further studies are clearly warranted in this patient group with special needs. Single-channel EMG devices can record jaw muscle activity early in the hospitalisation period and might be a helpful tools for early detection of bruxism in ABI patients.

Internal structure and validity of the bedside oral examination tool in patients with brain injury at neurorehabilitation setting.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the internal structure and validity of the 'bedside oral examination' (BOE) instrument in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI). METHODS: Ninety ABI individuals were examined using BOE in their first week of neurorehabilitation. BOE measures oral health within eight categories including: swallow, tongue, odour, teeth, lips, saliva, mucosa and gingiva. To assess the validity of BOE, full-mouth clinical examination (gold standard) was performed. The internal structure of BOE was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. To measure the validity, the BOE scores were dichotomised into excellent oral health and altered oral health. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the six/eight BOE items were compared with their related clinical oral examination tool. RESULTS: Overall, the patients had poor oral health irrespective of the oral examination tool used. Factor analyses indicated two factors within BOE: 'oral hygiene' (teeth, gingiva and mucosa) and 'orofacial health' (lips, swallow and saliva). BOE tongue and odour items loaded in neither factor. BOE items showed low validity since the highest area under the ROC curve was 0.60. Findings on the sensitivity value ranged from 35.0 to 74.2, while specificity from 44.4 to 83.3, depending on the item evaluated. CONCLUSION: Bedside oral examination does not seem to be an ideal 'single' outcome tool in a neurorehabilitation setting as it lacks validity. BOE evaluates oral health as two independent but correlated components and treat them separately indicating precision treatment depending on their oral health dysfunction. It is advisable to use BOE as a screening tool. However, it should be complimented by proper clinical examination before establishing a treatment plan for oral health in patients with ABI.

Assessment and rehabilitation interventions for central facial palsy in patients with acquired brain injury: a systematic review.

Objectives: To do a systematic review covering assessments and interventions for central facial palsy (CFP) in patients with acquired brain injury.Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, PsycInfo, and Web of Science were screened until April 2019. Assessments were defined as clinical- and instrumental tools and rating scales. Interventions were defined as rehabilitation interventions alleviating CFP.Results: 690 articles were screened based on the title and abstract. Interrater agreement was 98.12%. Sixteen articles were included: six clinical trials and 10 observational studies. Assessment: Commonest scale for assessing CFP was the House-Brackmann facial nerve Grading System. Strain gauges for measuring lip and cheek strength were applied in five studies and neurophysiological methods of assessing motor neuron pathways were applied in three studies. Interventions: An oral screen for improving lip strength was reported in three studies. Other interventions reported were neuromuscular electrical stimulation, Castillo Morales therapy, mirror therapy, exercises with electromyography feedback, and acupuncture.Conclusions: Scales for assessing peripheral facial palsy were applied for assessing CFP. Based on neurophysiological differences in the manifestation of peripheral facial palsy and CFP, these scales should be validated in patients with CFP. More studies on interventions for CFP are required before conclusions may be drawn about their effectiveness.

Periodontitis and orofacial health-related systemic impairment in patients with brain injury: a factor analysis approach.

Aim: To investigate the association of periodontitis to orofacial health-related systemic impairment in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI).Methods: Ninety individuals with ABI were included. Full mouth periodontal examination was performed. Orofacial health-related 'motor' and 'cognitive' scores, dysphagia and feeding status, onset of pneumonia were retrieved from e-journal. Factor analysis dubbed periodontal data as 'moderate' and 'severe' periodontitis while orofacial health-related brain injury scores were dubbed into 'motor' and 'cognitive' domains. Association between periodontal findings and systemic impairments were analyzed using multivariable linear regression models.Results: Higher scores of 'moderate' periodontitis were significantly associated with lower scores of motor impairment (ß = -0.2), feeding tube dependency (ß = 0.2) and dysphagia (ß = 1.21), whereas higher scores of 'severe' periodontitis were associated with lower scores of cognition (ß = -0.2) and reduced dental visits (ß = -0.2). Both periodontal domains were significantly associated with aging (ß = 0.02) and onset of pneumonia (ß = 0.5-0.7).Conclusions: Robust association between 'moderate' periodontitis and motor impairment, feeding problems and dysphagia, reflects an acute clinical condition, demanding cross-disciplinary intervention. Periodontal examination can be an early indicator tool for systemic chronic conditions, as ABI and periodontitis share a common environmental, social and biological background. Periodontitis majorly affects ageing population and are prone to pneumonia, compromising rehabilitation plan.

Changes in oral health related quality of life and its associated factors in individuals with brain injury.

Purpose: To evaluate changes in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and associated factors in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) during hospitalization.Methods: Forty-six individuals with ABI were examined at week 1 and 5 of hospitalization. OHRQoL was recorded through Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14), clinical oral examinations were conducted, while orofacial health-related 'motor' and 'cognitive' scores were retrieved from patients' e-journal. Association between variables were investigated using factor analysis and multilevel regression modeling.Results: There were no significant differences in the OHIP-14 scores between week 1 and 5. Factors analysis revealed two OHIP-14 domains, 'psychosocial' and 'physica'. Individuals who improved their cognitive skills over study period and those with 'severe' periodontitis at baseline had increased scores of OHIP-14 'psychosocial' domain. Individuals who improved orofacial health-related 'motor' skills over study period had decreased 'physical' domain scores. Increased cognition over study period, current smoking and dental calculus were associated with increased 'physical' domain.Conclusions: The OHRQoL was poor both at week 1 and 5. Individual's cognitive and motor skills as well as their oral health status influenced their OHRQoL. Thus, individual's awareness and involvement in addition to oral care seem to be imperative in improving the OHRQoL in neurorehabilitation setting.

Oral health: something to worry about in individuals with acquired brain injury?

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the oral health status in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI) admitted at neurorehabilitation setting. METHODS: 132 individuals with ABI were examined within their first week of admission. Individuals' socio-behavioral history, length of stay in acute care etc. were recorded. Comprehensive clinical oral examination consisting of acute conditions [dental plaque, bleeding on probing (BOP)] and chronic conditions [periodontal status, tooth loss] were recorded. RESULTS: The average length of stay in acute care was 41 days before admission at neurorehabilitation. It was observed that 42% and 50% of the patients with ABI had visible plaque and active BOP in >60% of all examined sites respectively. All patients suffered from periodontitis and 74% had severe periodontitis (Stage III), indicating a chronic inflammatory destruction of the supporting tissues. Each participant had at least two decayed teeth, five filled and five extracted teeth. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of dental plaque and BOP, an acute condition, speculates that poor oral health worsened while patients were at acute care setting. Majority of individuals had severe periodontitis indicating chronic poor oral health. Thus, indicating the need of not only planning treatment strategies while hospitalization but also uplifting the prevention of oral diseases much earlier in life.

Effectiveness of Standard Oral Care Plan During Hospital Stay in Individuals With Brain Injury.

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of an existing standard oral care program (SOCP) and factors associated with it during hospitalization in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI). Material and Methods: A total of 61 individuals underwent a SOCP for 4 weeks in a longitudinal observational study. Rapidly noticeable changes in oral health were evaluated by performing plaque, calculus, bleeding on probing (BOP) and bedside oral examination (BOE) at weeks 1 and 5. Individuals' brushing habits, eating difficulties, and the onset of pneumonia were retrieved from their medical records. Association between oral-health outcomes to systemic variables were investigated through multilevel regression models. Results: Dental plaque (P = 0.01) and total BOE score (P < 0.05) decreased over time but not the proportion of dental calculus (P = 0.30), BOP (P = 0.06), and tooth brushing frequency (P = 0.06). Reduction in plaque and BOE over time were negatively associated with higher periodontitis scores at baseline (coef. -6.8; -1.0), respectively, which in turn were associated with an increased proportion of BOP (coef. ≈ 15.0). An increased proportion of calculus was associated with eating difficulties (coef. 2.3) and the onset of pneumonia (coef. 6.2). Conclusions: Nursing care has been fundamental in improving oral health, especially reducing dental plaque and BOE scores. However, our findings indicate a need for improving the existing SOCP through academic-clinical partnerships. Clinical Relevance: Early introduction of oral care program to brain-injured individuals is beneficial in reducing plaque accumulation and improving oral health.

Standardization of muscle palpation- methodological considerations.

OBJECTIVES: To compare test-retest variability of palpation between a new palpometer and manual palpation using (1) right or left hand, (2) index or middle finger, (3) randomized or fixed sequence of force levels, (4) palpation on soft or hard surface, and (5) palpation for 2 or 10 seconds. METHODS: Twelve clinicians were instructed to target 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kg on a force meter using a palpometer (adjustable spring-coil with a small pin touching the examiner's hand when the correct pressure is achieved) and manual palpation with right or left hand, index or middle finger, randomized or fixed sequence of force levels, on hard or soft surface, and for 2 or 10 seconds. During all experiments, 10 force measures were taken and variability was determined as coefficient of variation (CV) and compared with analyses of variance. RESULTS: In all experiments, the palpometer had lower variability compared with manual palpation (P<0.001). There were no differences between the CVs of right and left hand (P=0.122), index and middle finger (P=0.240), and soft and hard surface (P=0.240). Random sequence of force levels had higher CVs than fixed sequence with manual palpation (P=0.004), but not with palpometer (P=0.856). CVs for 2 seconds palpation were higher than 10 seconds (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The palpometer had low test-retest variability and provided a more accurate and reproducible pressure stimulus than manual palpation. The findings of this study may help to standardize palpation of human muscles required for accurate and reliable diagnosis of musculoskeletal pain conditions.