RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the causes of failed dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery, recommend specific endoscopic endonasal techniques in revision DCR, and report postoperative success rates. METHODS: Retrospective case series in a tertiary referral center of 19 consecutive, endonasal revision DCR surgeries in 17 adult patients with previous failed DCR. All cases were revised endonasally by 1 surgeon. Analysis of etiology of failure and techniques of surgery were supplemented by review of surgical video and medical records. Surgical outcomes were measured functionally by resolution of epiphora and anatomically by patency of nasolacrimal duct system on syringing and positive functional endoscopic dye test. RESULTS: The most common cause for failed DCR was a blocked ostium due to membranous scarring (74%). Multiple causes for failure were found in 9 of 19 cases. Adjunctive procedures during revision surgery included partial middle turbinectomy (53%) and anterior ethmoidectomy (21%). The serrated oscillating blade was required in 89% cases, the high-speed diamond bur in 26%. Mean follow up was 15 months (range 7-26 months). All 19 cases had an anatomically successfully outcome. Fifteen of 19 cases (79%) had a functionally successful outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the most frequent cause of failed DCR was a scarred ostium, which is optimally visualized endonasally and precisely managed with the oscillating blade. Using the abovementioned specific endonasal techniques, the authors have demonstrated a high success rate in endonasal revision DCR surgery.
Assuntos
Dacriocistorinostomia , Endoscopia , Cavidade Nasal/cirurgia , Ducto Nasolacrimal/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ducto Nasolacrimal/patologia , Reoperação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
A 65-year-old man with a history of renal transplantation presented with facial pain, purulent nasal discharge, and periorbital swelling. Signs of optic nerve compromise developed and persisted despite medial orbital wall decompression. Further imaging revealed an orbital floor abscess secondary to direct communication of a maxillary pseudomonal sinusitis. Full recovery was achieved after further surgical drainage via an endoscopic endonasal approach. Failure to improve after surgical decompression is an indication for repeat imaging. Immunocompromised patients can present atypically. Orbital floor abscess secondary to sinusitis without an underlying odontogenic or traumatic cause has not previously been reported. The authors highlight the importance of clinical vigilance, serial imaging, microbiological investigations, and early surgical intervention in high-risk patients.
Assuntos
Abscesso/etiologia , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Doenças Orbitárias/etiologia , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Sinusite/complicações , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical excision of periocular skin cancer allows for optimum control in terms of tumour recurrence. Although Mohs' technique gives the best outcome, it is not widely available. Processing paraffin sections is slower but histologically superior to Mohs' frozen sections. We report the results of using a standard paraffin section (non-Mohs') technique to confirm histological clearance. METHOD: A retrospective study between 1/6/95 and 1/6/99 of all consecutive patients who had excision of periocular cancer was performed. All patients had surgical excision of the tumour with a 3-mm margin. Rapid (24-hour) paraffin sections were done and reconstruction performed if histological clearance was confirmed. If tumour was still present, a further 3-mm margin was excised at the appropriate edge(s) before reconstruction took place. RESULTS: This study yielded 93 basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) of which 86 were of primary origin and 7 were recurrent tumours. The tumour characteristics were as follows: 88% nodular BCCs, 82% had a maximum surface measurement less than or equal to 10 mm, 39.8% were inner canthal and 49.5% were localised to the lower lid. In the 30 (35.4%) cases that required further excision based on the initial histological reports, tumour was seen in only four (11.4%) cases. Overall histological clearance for primary BCCs was achieved in 81/86 (94.2%) cases. There was only one late recurrence at 4 years and 5 months. Among recurrent BCCs, there was one recurrence (12.5%) and this was despite histological clearance having been reported. CONCLUSION: For primary BCCs the recurrence rate in this study was low and comparable to that following Mohs' technique. This approach, using routine pathological facilities, therefore offers a viable technique for managing periocular BCCs.