Point prevalence study of antibiotic use in a paediatric hospital in Italy.

A survey aimed to describe the prevalence of antibiotic use in hospitalised children was conducted in June 2007, in Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital in Rome which has the highest annual number of inpatients among paediatric hospitals in Italy. Data were collected by reviewing medical charts of all patients hospitalised for >48 hours. A total of 412 hospitalised children were evaluated; their median age was 42.3 months, and 55.6% were males. Antibiotics were prescribed to 181 of the 412 patients (43.9%). The prevalence was lowest (37.7%) in medical wards, higher (51.1%) in intensive care units and highest (52.2%) in surgical wards. Of the patients treated with antibiotics in surgical wards, 71% received the treatment as prophylaxis. The most frequently prescribed antibiotics were ceftazidime and the combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid. The observed prevalence of antibiotic use was within the range recently reported from other paediatric hospitals in Europe; however, it is advisable to collect data from all over the country in order to identify priority areas and design interventions. These results also highlight the need to implement guidelines for surgical prophylaxis in children, and to further investigate reasons for prescription of parenteral antibiotic therapy in paediatric hospitals.

[Organizational appropriateness evaluation of hospital discharges related to DRGs at high risk of inappropriateness in a pediatric observation ward from 2000 to 2004]. / Valutazione della appropriatezza organizzativa dei ricoveri ordinari attribuiti ai DRG ad alto rischio di inappropriatezza effettuati in un Reparto di Osservazione Pediatrica nel periodo 2000-2004.

The aim of the study is to measure and to describe organizational appropriateness of a Paediatric Temporary Observation Ward in the Emergency Department. We selected hospital discharges related to 43 DRGs at high risk of inappropriateness (DPCM 29/11/2001); we studied the relationship between appropriateness and patient's or discharge characteristics. We also investigated the inappropriateness to find tools for improving ward's efficiency. Assessment of selected paediatric clinical records was performed using PRUO protocol and showed that 41.5% of hospital discharges are completely appropriated and only 13.8% are completely not appropriated and, consequently, could be provided in a different organizational setting. Inappropriateness in our study is lower than the expected one; this finding shows that the ward under investigation is able to provide health assistance with good level of appropriateness. The used tool to evaluate appropriateness is a modified PRUO version, specific for pediatric hospital stays. Pediatric PRUO protocol is easy to be applied even if reasonable and shared evaluation criteria do not seem able to recognise some peculiar characteristics of Pediatric Temporary Observation Ward in the Emergency Department.

Quality improvement measures adopted by the Italian National Health Service.

The reform process underway within the Italian National Health System is aimed at making decision makers responsible for appropriate and efficient resource utilisation and at ensuring quality of care, eliminating conflict between fairness, quality and cost control. The risk for the quality of the services provided entailed by resource rationalisation is avoidable and controllable. This article explains how the Italian NHS has managed the reform process assuring quality improvement, and describes the policy and the tools adopted. As well as involving all players and the system as a whole in constant improvement, the Italian NHS's policy in pursuing quality of care is based on the adoption of a wide range of measures: measurement of health care and of clinical outcomes, systematic data collection, team work and protocols. The tools adopted, currently under implementation, to support quality control are: an integrated system of indicators for measuring efficiency and quality of NHS structures (demand and accessibility indicators, resource related indicators, activity indicators and result indicators); compulsory accreditation as a prerequisite for health care providers; a system to monitor and control the effects of the new prospective payment system; clinical guidelines (each related to a specific clinical problem); a menu of services (Carta dei Servizi) released by all NHS accredited service providers with full information and warranties regarding the services provided and their quality.

[DRGs and MDCs in the evaluation of surgical departments: the experience of Local Health Screening Unit No. 13 of the Veneto Region]. / DRG e MDC nella valutazione dei reparti chirurgici: l'esperienza dell'U.L.S.S. N. 13 Regione Veneto.

This paper discusses the utilization of MDC and DRG for the evaluation of the activities of surgical divisions. Discharge data on 1901 admissions of the second semester 1992 (97.1% of admissions) to three surgical divisions of ULSS 13 in Veneto Region were assigned to HCFA-DRG, 6th version: 423 (22.3%) in division A; 681 (35.8%) in B; 797 (41.9%) in C. MDC 6 (Diseases and Disorders of the Digestive System) was the most frequent MDC in every division; MDC 4 (Diseases and Disorders of the Respiratory System) had an high proportion only in division A, showing the peculiar feature of this division that effects the thoracic surgery of the whole ULSS. Division A had the highest proportion (56.3%) of admissions for surgical DRGs; division C the lowest (35.4%). DRG 119 (Vein Ligation and stripping) was the most frequent surgical DRG in every division: in the whole sample its DRG specific pre-surgical average length of stay was 1.7 days, and the total average length of stay was 4.7 days. MDC and DRG were usefull in describing case-mix, but it is fundamental to have an appropriate knowledge of these instruments, to avoid in reaching inappropriate considerations, because it was inappropriate the use of the same instruments.

Epidemiologic study of use of resources in patients with unstable angina: the EARISA registry. On behalf on the EARISA Investigators (Epidemiologia dell'Assorbimento di Risorse nell'Ischemia, Scompenso e Angina).

AIM: The EARISA Registry was designed to describe diagnostic and therapeutic resources used in Italian cardiology centers for patients with the epidemiologically most relevant cardiac diseases. This article focuses on patients with unstable angina; characteristics associated with invasive procedures were specifically analyzed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Information was collected over a 2-week period on 1420 patients with unstable angina discharged from 308 cardiology centers. The mean length of stay was 9 +/- 6 days; 51% of patients were admitted to a coronary care unit (mean length of stay, 4 +/- 3 days). Noninvasive procedures included echocardiography (64%), Holter monitoring (25%), exercise stress testing (24%), and echocardiographic stress testing or nuclear imaging (7%). Invasive procedures were coronary angiography (39%) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting (13%). Unstable angina had a greater impact on invasive procedures than acute myocardial infarction. Variables independently associated with a higher rate of coronary angiographic procedures were younger age, higher technologic level of the hospital, and need for intravenous therapy. CONCLUSION: In Italy, approximately half the patients with unstable angina are admitted to hospitals without catheterization laboratories or cardiac surgery facilities. This fact supports the concept that treatments that can be administered in all types of hospitals are more likely to affect the outcome of patients with unstable angina. Overall, the rates of coronary angiography and revascularization procedures appeared low, and the setting where cardiologists practice, rather than patient characteristics, is the major determinant of the care given to patients with unstable angina.