Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 79(7): 937-945, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37184597

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Pharmacokinetic interactions exist between apixaban or rivaroxaban, and CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitors such as amiodarone, verapamil and diltiazem. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of exposure to this drug-drug association (DDA) and to assess the bleeding risk associated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using a representative 1/97th sample of the French healthcare insurance database between 2014 and 2019. Patients with AF receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban were included and followed-up until hospitalization for bleeding, death, discontinuation of apixaban or rivaroxaban, exposure to strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, or until December 31st 2019, whichever came first. Primary outcome was hospitalization for bleeding registered as primary diagnosis. The association between the exposure to the DDA and hospitalization for bleeding was evaluated as a time-dependent variable in Cox model. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2019, the AF population under apixaban or rivaroxaban represented 10,392 patients. During the study period, the annual average prevalence of DDA exposure in this population was 38.9%. Among the 10,392 patients, 223 (2.1%) were hospitalized for bleeding, of which 75 (33.6%) received the association and 148 (66.4%) received apixaban or rivaroxaban alone. There was no association between DDA exposure and risk of hospitalization for bleeding (aHR = 1.19, [95% CI: 0.90, 1.58]). Age (HR 1.03 [1.02, 1.05]) and male gender (HR 1.72 [1.28, 2.30]) were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for bleeding. CONCLUSION: Exposure to antiarrhythmic drugs was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for bleeding in patients with AF under rivaroxaban or apixaban.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Masculino , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Antiarrítmicos/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Prevalência , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Piridonas/efeitos adversos , Atenção à Saúde , Dabigatrana/efeitos adversos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia
2.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 47(5): 867-872, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34888912

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lockdowns and physical distancing have dramatically limited the circulation of SARS-CoV-2 and other common communicable infections. However, little is known about their impact on head lice and scabies. AIM: To assess the impact of the 2020 French National lockdowns (17 March-11 May 2020, and 30 October-15 December 2020) and physical distancing recommendations (from February 2020) on the dynamics of head lice and scabies infestations. METHODS: The weekly sales of topical head lice treatments, topical scabies treatments and oral ivermectin were extracted from the database of the healthcare science company IQVIA (60% of all French retail pharmacies) and analysed over a 5-year period (March 2016-December 2020). A periodic regression model was fitted to drug sales before the COVID-19 period (2016-2019) and extrapolated to compare the observed sales in 2020 to the expected sales. RESULTS: A decrease of the sales of tracer topical treatments for head lice and scabies was observed from March 2020, synchronously with the first French national lockdown. For the period March-December 2020, the mean reduction in observed vs. expected sales for head lice and scabies topical treatments was 44% and 14%, respectively. By contrast, although there was an observed decrease in oral ivermectin sales after March 2020, it was much lower (4%), probably because of studies reporting the potential positive effects of this drug on COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 lockdown and physical distancing reduce circulation of head lice and scabies in France. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term impact of these social behaviour changes.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infestações por Piolhos , Pediculus , Escabiose , Animais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Humanos , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Infestações por Piolhos/tratamento farmacológico , Infestações por Piolhos/epidemiologia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Escabiose/tratamento farmacológico , Escabiose/epidemiologia , Escabiose/prevenção & controle
3.
Euro Surveill ; 27(17)2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35485270

RESUMO

IntroductionIn France, three complementary surveillance networks involving hospitals and paediatrician practices currently allow pertussis surveillance among infants (<1 year old) and children (1-12 years old). Data on incidences among adolescents (13-17 years old) and adults (≥ 18 years) are scarce. In 2017, a sentinel surveillance system called Sentinelles network, was implemented among general practitioners (GPs).AimThe purpose of Sentinelles network is to assess pertussis incidence, monitor the cases' age distribution and evaluate the impact of the country's vaccination policy. We present the results from the first 4 years of this surveillance.MethodsGPs of the French Sentinelles network reported weekly numbers of epidemiologically or laboratory-confirmed cases and their characteristics.ResultsA total of 132 cases were reported over 2017-2020. Estimated national incidence rates per 100,000 inhabitants were 17 (95% confidence interval (CI): 12-22) in 2017, 10 (95% CI: 6-14) in 2018, 15 (95% CI: 10-20) in 2019 and three (95% CI: 1-5) in 2020. The incidence rate was significantly lower in 2020 than in 2017-2019. Women were significantly more affected than men (83/132; 63% of women, p = 0.004); 66% (87/132) of cases were aged 15 years or over (median age: 31.5 years; range: 2 months-87 years). Among 37 vaccinated cases with data, 33 had received the recommended number of doses for their age.ConclusionsThese results concur with incidences reported in other European countries, and with studies showing that the incidences of several respiratory diseases decreased in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results also suggest a shift of morbidity towards older age groups, and a rapid waning of immunity after vaccination, justifying to continue this surveillance.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Clínicos Gerais , Coqueluche , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pandemias , Coqueluche/diagnóstico , Coqueluche/epidemiologia , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle
4.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 76(12): 1675-1682, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32632714

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) require monitoring in an aging population with increasing polypharmacy exposure. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of exposure to potential DDIs using the French healthcare insurance system database, for six DDIs with various clinical relevance: angiotensin II receptor blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ARBs-ACEIs + NSAIDs), antiplatelet agents and NSAIDs (AAP + NSAIDs), serotonergic drugs and tramadol (SD + T), statins and macrolides (S + M), oral anticoagulant and NSAIDs (OAC + NSAIDs), and colchicine and macrolides (C + M). METHODS: We used exhaustive healthcare data from a 1/97th random sample of the population covered by the French health insurance system (EGB) between 2006 and 2016. Exposure to a DDI was defined as overlapping exposure to two interacting drugs. The prevalence of exposure was estimated by year. RESULTS: Prevalence of exposure in 2016 was estimated at 3.7% for ARBs-ACEIs + NSAIDs, 1.5% for AAP + NSAIDs, 0.76% for SD + T, 0.36% for S + M, 0.24% for AOC + NSAIDs, and 0.02% for C + M. In 26% to 58% of episodes of exposure, the two interacting drugs were prescribed by the same physician and dispensed by the same pharmacy the same day. Between 2006 and 2016, the yearly prevalence was increasing for SD + T and for DDIs involving NSAIDs, and it was decreasing for those involving macrolides. CONCLUSION: Exposures to potential DDIs in France are not uncommon with a high proportion resulting from a co-prescription by the same physician. Monitoring the prevalence of exposure to DDIs is needed to implement prevention measures. Administrative data enable this surveillance in large and representative cohorts.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Interações Medicamentosas , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/farmacologia , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/farmacologia , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/farmacologia , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/farmacologia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/farmacologia , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/farmacologia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Polimedicação , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Serotoninérgicos/farmacologia , Serotoninérgicos/uso terapêutico , Tramadol/farmacologia , Tramadol/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
5.
Euro Surveill ; 25(14)2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32290901

RESUMO

Several French regions where coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been reported currently show a renewed increase in ILI cases in the general practice-based Sentinelles network. We computed the number of excess cases by region from 24 February to 8 March 2020 and found a correlation with the number of reported COVID-19 cases so far. The data suggest larger circulation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the French population than apparent from confirmed cases.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Coronavirus , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Surtos de Doenças , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Euro Surveill ; 24(25)2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31241041

RESUMO

BackgroundVaccination policy in France was previously characterised by the coexistence of eight recommended and three mandatory vaccinations for children younger than 2 years old. These 11 vaccines are now mandatory for all children born after 1 January 2018.AimTo study the French population's opinion about this new policy and to assess factors associated with a positive opinion during this changing phase.MethodsA cross-sectional survey about vaccination was conducted from 16 November-19 December 2017 among the GrippeNet.fr cohort. Data were weighted for age, sex and education according to the French population. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with a favourable opinion on mandatory vaccines' extension and defined in the '3Cs' model by the World Health Organization Strategic Advisory Group of Experts working group on vaccine hesitancy.ResultsOf the 3,222 participants (response rate 50.5%) and after adjustment, 64.5% agreed with the extension of mandatory vaccines. It was considered a necessary step by 68.7% of the study population, while 33.8% considered it unsafe for children and 56.9% saw it as authoritarian. Factors associated with a positive opinion about the extension of mandatory vaccines were components of the confidence, complacency and convenience dimensions of the '3Cs' model.ConclusionsIn our sample, two thirds of the French population was in favour of the extension of mandatory vaccines for children. Perception of vaccine safety and benefits were major predictors for positive and negative opinions about this new policy.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Programas de Imunização , Programas Obrigatórios , Recusa de Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , França , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Componente Principal , Características de Residência , Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência , Vacinas , Adulto Jovem
7.
PLoS One ; 17(12): e0278266, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36520827

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most studies published to date have investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicidal acts using hospital data. Trends from primary care in a country such as France are crucial, as individuals may not consult hospital services after suicide attempts (SAs) but rather see their general practitioner (GP). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate whether the incidence and characteristics of SAs and completed suicides (CSs) reported to French GPs were different during the COVID-19 pandemic than those of before. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from a nationwide monitoring system, the French Sentinel Network (FSN). All SAs and CSs reported by GPs to the FSN from January 1, 2010, to March 10, 2022 were included. The annual incidence rates (IRs) and the characteristics of SAs and CSs during the pandemic (March 11, 2020, to March 10, 2022) were compared to those of before. In total, 687 SAs and 169 CSs were included. The IRs remained stable for SAs and CSs before and during the pandemic (overlap in confidence intervals). The mean IRs were 52 (95%CI = 44; 57) per 100,000 inhabitants for SAs during the pandemic versus 47 [36; 57] during the pre-pandemic period (p = 0.49), and 5 (95%CI = 2; 9) for CSs versus 11 [6; 16] (p = 0.30). During the pandemic, SA were slightly different from those before in terms of age and occupational status (young/students and older/retirees over-represented), history of consultation and expression of suicidal ideas to GP (more frequent), and CS in terms of occupational status (students over-represented) (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic had no major effect on the overall incidence of SAs and CSs reported to French GPs. However, more suicidal acts were reported among younger and older individuals. Suicidal patients and GPs have adapted by improving the expression of suicidal ideas.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Clínicos Gerais , Suicídio Consumado , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , França/epidemiologia
8.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 62(5): 636-645, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34787325

RESUMO

Concomitant nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) and antithrombotic drug use is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, mainly gastrointestinal. The goal of this study was to quantify the transient increase in the risk of hospitalization for bleeding associated with NSAID use in patients treated with antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants. We performed a unidirectional case-crossover study using the EGB (Échantillon généraliste de bénéficiaires), a permanent random sample of the French nationwide health database. Patients receiving antithrombotic therapy and hospitalized for bleeding between 2009 and 2017 were included. We compared their NSAID exposure during a 15-day hazard window immediately before hospital admission to 3 earlier 15-day control windows. The risk of hospitalization for bleeding associated with the recent use of NSAIDs was estimated using conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs). During the study period, 33 patients treated with anticoagulants and 253 treated with antiplatelet agents received NSAIDs and were included in the case-crossover analysis. We found an increased risk of hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding after exposure to NSAIDs, with an adjusted OR of 3.59 (95%CI, 1.58-8.17) in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy and 1.44 (95%CI, 1.07-1.94) in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. The risk of nongastrointestinal bleeding was also increased after exposure to NSAIDs with an adjusted OR of 2.72 (95%CI, 1.23-6.04) in patients exposed to anticoagulant therapy. The risk of gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal bleeding increases after NSAID use in patients treated with anticoagulants, while the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding increases, but to a lesser extent in those treated with antiplatelets.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Estudos Cross-Over , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Humanos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco
9.
PLoS One ; 16(10): e0258391, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34634090

RESUMO

In France, social distancing measures have been adopted to contain the spread of COVID-19, culminating in national Lockdowns. The use of hand washing, hydro-alcoholic rubs and mask-wearing also increased over time. As these measures are likely to impact the transmission of many communicable diseases, we studied the changes in common infectious diseases incidence in France during the first year of COVID-19 circulation. We examined the weekly incidence of acute gastroenteritis, chickenpox, acute respiratory infections and bronchiolitis reported in general practitioner networks since January 2016. We obtained search engine query volume for French terms related to these diseases and sales data for relevant drugs over the same period. A periodic regression model was fit to disease incidence, drug sales and search query volume before the COVID-19 period and extrapolated afterwards. We compared the expected values with observations made in 2020. During the first lockdown period, incidence dropped by 67% for gastroenteritis, by 79% for bronchiolitis, by 49% for acute respiratory infection and 90% for chickenpox compared to the past years. Reductions with respect to the expected incidence reflected the strength of implemented measures. Incidence in children was impacted the most. Reduction in primary care consultations dropped during a short period at the beginning of the first lockdown period but remained more than 95% of the expected value afterwards. In primary care, the large decrease in reported gastroenteritis, chickenpox or bronchiolitis observed during the period where many barrier measures were implemented imply that the circulation of common viruses was reduced and informs on the overall effect of these measures.


Assuntos
Bronquiolite/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Varicela/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/transmissão , COVID-19/virologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doenças Transmissíveis/virologia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estações do Ano , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA