Ultrasound-guided lymph node sampling: accuracy of FNAC, end-cutting (Franseen), and side-cutting (Temno) needle biopsy techniques.

AIM: To compare technical success, diagnostic accuracy, and histological yield of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), side-cutting (Temno) needle biopsy, and end-cutting (Franseen) needle biopsy for ultrasound-guided sampling of groin and axillary lymph nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 270 abnormal groin and axillary nodes were sampled using one of the three techniques. Nodes with a maximum length of <2.5 cm underwent FNAC or Franseen biopsy, while nodes >2.5 cm underwent Temno biopsy. Mean size of nodes sampled by FNAC (21.2 mm) and Franseen (19.7 mm) were similar while nodes sampled by Temno were larger (34.4 mm, p<0.0001). RESULTS: Technical success rates of FNAC (82/93, 88%), Franseen (105/111, 95%), and Temno (59/66, 89%) biopsies were similar (p>0.05 for all). Lymphoid tissue yield by FNAC (mean total area 1.51 mm2) was less than that by Franseen (7.14 mm2, p=0.002) or Temno biopsy (19.44 mm2, p<0.0001). Diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was lower for FNAC (22/30, 73%) than Franseen (25/26, 96%, p=0.02) or Temno biopsy (32/32, 100%, p=0.002). For malignant nodes, determining the likely organ of origin was also lower for FNAC (7/30, 23%) than Franseen (19/26, 73%, p=0.0002) or Temno biopsy (29/32, 91%, p<0.0001), with a similar pattern observed in the identification of lymphoma. CONCLUSION: For similarly sized nodes, Franseen biopsy provided more lymphoid material, a higher diagnostic accuracy for malignancy including lymphoma, and better identification of the likely organ of origin than FNAC. Routine use of Franseen biopsy is advocated rather than FNAC for percutaneous sampling of lymph nodes not suitable for side-cutting needle biopsy.

Ultrasound carpal tunnel syndrome: additional criteria for diagnosis.

AIM: To define the usefulness of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve distal to the carpal tunnel in addition to other established common parameters in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four wrists from 24 symptomatic CTS patients and 32 wrists from 17 asymptomatic volunteers were evaluated by ultrasound. The CSA of the median nerve was measured at four pre-selected levels, i.e., proximal, inlet, outlet, and distal to the carpal tunnel. The flattening ratio, intraneural vascularity, neural fasciculation, and retinacular palmar bowing were also assessed. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the CTS and control groups for median nerve CSA proximal and distal (p<0.001) to the tunnel as well as retinacular bowing (p<0.001). Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of using a cut-off of >14 mm2 of CSA proximal and distal to the tunnel were 75%, 87.5%, 86.8% and 63.6%, 100%, 78.9%, respectively. Using either CSA proximal or distal to the tunnel or bowing retinaculum at the outlet >1 mm yielded a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100%, 84.3% and 93.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The median nerve CSA proximal and distal to the carpal tunnel and bowing of the retinaculum at the outlet are helpful in diagnosis of CTS.