Biomechanical effects of valgus knee bracing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To review and synthesize the biomechanical effects of valgus knee bracing for patients with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). Electronic databases were searched from their inception to May 2014. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility, rated study quality and extracted data. Where possible, data were combined into meta-analyses and pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated. Thirty studies were included with 478 subjects tested while using a valgus knee brace. Various biomechanical methods suggested valgus braces can decrease direct measures of medial knee compressive force, indirect measures representing the mediolateral distribution of load across the knee, quadriceps/hamstring and quadriceps/gastrocnemius co-contraction ratios, and increase medial joint space during gait. Meta-analysis from 17 studies suggested a statistically significant decrease in the external knee adduction moment (KAM) during walking, with a moderate-to-high effect size (SMD = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.83; P < 0.001). Meta-regression identified a near-significant association for the KAM effect size and duration of brace use only (ß, -0.01; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.0001; P = 0.06); with longer durations of brace use associated with smaller treatment effects. Minor complications were commonly reported during brace use and included slipping, discomfort and poor fit, blisters and skin irritation. Systematic review and meta-analysis suggests valgus knee braces can alter knee joint loads through a combination of mechanisms, with moderate-to-high effect sizes in biomechanical outcomes.

The effect of walking poles on the knee adduction moment in patients with varus gonarthrosis.

OBJECTIVES: (1) Test the hypothesis that walking poles decrease the external knee adduction moment during gait in patients with varus gonarthrosis, and (2) explore potential mechanisms. DESIGN: Thirty-four patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA) and varus alignment underwent three dimensional (3D) gait analysis with and without using walking poles. Conditions were randomized and walking speed was maintained ±5% of the self-selected speed of the initial condition. The pole held in the hand of the unaffected side was instrumented with a compression load cell. RESULTS: Student's t tests for paired samples indicated small but statistically significant increases (P < 0.001) in knee adduction moment (calculated from inverse dynamics) for its first peak, second peak and angular impulse when using the poles; mean increases (95% confidence interval - CI) were 0.17%BW*Ht (0.08, 0.27), 0.17%BW*Ht (0.04, 0.30) and 0.15%BW*Ht*s (0.09, 0.22), respectively. There was a decrease (P = 0.015) in vertical ground reaction force (-0.02 BW (-0.04, -0.01)), yet increase (P < 0.001) in its frontal plane lever arm about the knee (0.30 cm (0.15, 0.44)), at the time of the first peak knee adduction moment. Pole force in the vertical direction was inversely related (r = -0.34, P = 0.05) to the increase in first peak adduction moment. CONCLUSION: Although results are variable among patients, and may be related to individual technique, these overall findings suggest that walking poles do not decrease knee adduction moments, and therefore likely do not decrease medial compartment loads, in patients with varus gonarthrosis. Decreases in knee joint loading should not be used as rationale for walking pole use in these patients.