Venlafaxine and oxycodone effects on human spinal and supraspinal pain processing: a randomized cross-over trial.

Severe pain is often treated with opioids. Antidepressants that inhibit serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake (SNRI) have also shown a pain relieving effect, but for both SNRI and opioids, the specific mode of action in humans remains vague. This study investigated how oxycodone and venlafaxine affect spinal and supraspinal pain processing. Twenty volunteers were included in this randomized cross-over study comparing 5-day treatment with venlafaxine, oxycodone and placebo. As a proxy of the spinal pain transmission, the nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) to electrical stimulation on the sole of the foot was recorded at the tibialis anterior muscle before and after 5 days of treatment. For the supraspinal activity, 61-channel electroencephalogram evoked potentials (EPs) to the electrical stimulations were simultaneously recorded. Areas under curve (AUCs) of the EMG signals were analyzed. Latencies and AUCs were computed for the major EP peaks and brain source analysis was done. The NWR was decreased in venlafaxine arm (P = 0.02), but the EP parameters did not change. Oxycodone increased the AUC of the EP response (P = 0.04). Oxycodone also shifted the cingulate activity anteriorly in the mid-cingulate-operculum network (P < 0.01), and the cingulate activity was increased while the operculum activity was decreased (P = 0.02). Venlafaxine exerts its effects on the modulation of spinal nociceptive transmission, which may reflect changes in balance between descending inhibition and descending facilitation. Oxycodone, on the other hand, exerts its effects at the cortical level. This study sheds light on how opioids and SNRI drugs modify the human central nervous system and where their effects dominate.

Rapid balloon distension as a tool to study cortical processing of visceral sensations and pain.

BACKGROUND: The processing of discomfort and pain in the central nervous system is normally studied with experimental methods, but it is mandatory that they are reliable over time to ensure that any interventions will result in valid results. We investigated reliability of rapid balloon distension in the rectum to elicit cortical evoked potentials (CEPs) to study the reliability of central processing of visceral sensation and discomfort/pain. METHODS: Eighteen healthy volunteers had two series of rectal balloon distensions performed on two separate days. Individualized balloon pressure, corresponding to pain detection threshold or to the maximum possible distension (30 psi), was used. Within- and between days reliability was measured in terms of amplitudes and latencies of the CEP global field power, topography and underlying brain networks. KEY RESULTS: There were two prominent peaks in the CEP recordings at mean latencies of 157 and 322 ms. There were no differences in latencies or amplitudes (p = 0.3) and they passed the Bland-Altman test for reproducibility. There were no differences in topographies (p > 0.7). Brain source connectivity revealed the cingulate-operculum network as the most consistent network within and between subjects. There were no differences in the location of brain sources in this network (p = 0.9) and the source coordinates were reproducible. Finally, the cingulate source generally had higher strength than operculum source (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: A reliable method to study central mechanisms underlying visceral sensation and pain was established. The method may improve our understanding of visceral pain and could be an objective method for studying efficacy of analgesics on visceral pain.

Morphine modifies the cingulate-operculum network underlying painful rectal evoked potentials.

The effect of opioids on brain networks underlying rectal evoked potentials (EPs) has never been investigated. This study utilized brain source connectivity to explore whether morphine induced changes in brain networks underlying painful rectal EPs would reflect changes in pain scores due to morphine. Twenty healthy volunteers were included in this placebo-controlled cross-over study. Sensory and pain thresholds to electrically induced rectal stimulation were taken before (baseline) and 70 min after placebo/morphine (30 mg) administration. The stimulation intensity required to evoke moderate pain at baseline was employed for EPs. The pain score of this stimulation intensity was recorded again 70 min after placebo/morphine administration. 62-channel EPs were recorded for both arms. Amplitudes and latencies were analysed and brain source connectivity analysis was done. Changes in any of the parameters describing EPs were correlated to changes in subjective pain ratings. Morphine increased sensory and pain thresholds by 28.8% and 27.5% (P ≤ 0.02). The pain score corresponding to moderate pain at baseline was attenuated in both placebo and morphine arms by 14.5% and 37.5% (P < 0.05). There was a 33.9% reduction in EP amplitudes due to placebo (P < 0.05), whereas EP amplitudes remained stable due to morphine. A dominating cingulate-operculum network to rectal pain was seen. Cingulate source shifted anteriorly in the morphine arm (P < 0.001) and this shift was positively correlated to the change in the pain score (r = 0.6, P < 0.05). These findings indicate that visceral pain relief due to morphine is associated with reorganization within cingulate cortex, which may be used as a biomarker of opioid effects.

Functional reorganization of brain networks in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: The underlying pain mechanisms of chronic pancreatitis (CP) are incompletely understood, but recent research points to involvement of pathological central nervous system processing involving pain-relevant brain areas. We investigated the organization and connectivity of brain networks involved in nociceptive processing in patients with painful CP. METHODS: Contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEPs) were recorded in 15 patients with CP and in 15 healthy volunteers. The upper abdominal area (sharing spinal innervation with the pancreatic gland) was used as a proxy of 'pancreatic stimulation', while stimulation of a heterologous region remote to the pancreas (right forearm) was used as a control. Subjective pain scores were assessed by visual analogue scale. The brain source organization and connectivity of CHEPs components were analysed. RESULTS: After pancreatic area stimulation, brain source analysis revealed abnormalities in the cingulate/operculo-insular network. A posterior shift of the operculo-insular source (p = 0.004) and an anterior shift of the cingulate source (p < 0.001) were seen in CP patients, along with a decreased strength of the cingulate source (p = 0.01). The operculo-insular shift was positively correlated with the severity of patient clinical pain score (r = 0.61; p = 0.03). No differences in CHEPs characteristics or source localizations were seen following stimulation of the right forearm. CONCLUSIONS: CP patients showed abnormal cerebral processing after stimulation of the upper abdominal area. These changes correlated to the severity of pain the patient was experiencing. Since the upper abdominal area shares spinal innervation with the pancreatic gland, these findings likely reflect maladaptive neuroplastic changes, which are characteristic of CP.

The brain networks encoding visceral sensation in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms due to diabetic neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence points to association between long-term diabetes mellitus and abnormal brain processing. The aim of this study was to investigate central changes due to electrical stimulation in esophagus in patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms due to diabetic neuropathy. METHODS: Twenty-three diabetes patients with upper GI symptoms and 27 healthy controls were included. A standard ambulatory 24-h electrocardiography was carried out. 122-channel esophageal evoked brain potentials to electrical stimulation were acquired. Brain source/network analysis was performed. Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index was used to evaluate upper GI symptoms and SF-36 questionnaire was utilized to assess patients' quality of life (QOL). KEY RESULTS: Diabetes patients with GI symptoms showed modifications in three brain networks: (i) brainstem/operculum/frontal cortex, (ii) operculum/cingulate, and (iii) mid-cingulate/anterior-cingulate/operculum/deep limbic structures. Operculum brain source in patients was localized deeper and more anterior in all three networks. The shift of operculum source was correlated with the severity of upper GI symptoms, decreased heart beat-to-beat interval, and decreased SD of the intervals. The activation of the first network was delayed in patients. Operculum source had higher activity than cingulate in the second network in patients, and this was correlated with decreased physical QOL. Deep limbic source was localized deeper in patients, which also correlated with decreased physical QOL. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: This study indicates involvement of central nervous system in diabetes. Reorganization within opercular cortex was correlated with GI symptoms suggesting that operculo-cingulate cortex could contribute to development and maintenance of GI symptoms in diabetes patients.

Brain networks encoding rectal sensation in type 1 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: It has been shown that patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms have abnormal processing of sensory information following stimulation in the oesophagus. In order to find less invasive stimuli to study visceral afferent processing and to further elaborate the gut-brain network in diabetes, we studied brain networks following rectal electrical stimulations. METHODS: Twelve type 1 diabetes patients with GI symptoms and twelve healthy controls were included. A standard ambulatory 24-h electrocardiography was performed. 122-channel-evoked brain potentials to electrical stimulation in the rectum were recorded. Brain source-connectivity analysis was done. GI symptoms were assessed with the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index and quality of life (QOL) with SF-36. Any changes in brain source connectivity were correlated to duration of the disease, heart beat-to-beat intervals (RRs), clinical symptoms, and QOL of the patients. RESULTS: Diabetic patients with GI symptoms showed changes relative to controls in the operculum-cingulate network with the operculum source localized deeper and more anterior (P≤0.001) and the cingulate source localized more anterior (P=0.03). The shift of operculum source was correlated with the duration of the disease, severity of GI symptoms, and decreased RR (P<0.05). The shift of the cingulate source was correlated with the mental QOL (P=0.04). In healthy controls, the contribution of the cingulate source to the network was higher than the contribution of the operculum source (P≤0.001), whereas in patients the contribution of the two sources was comparable. CONCLUSION: This study gives further evidence for CNS involvement in diabetes. Since network reorganizations were correlated to GI symptoms, irregularities of rectal-evoked potentials can be viewed as a proxy for abnormal bottom-up visceral afferent processing. The network changes might serve as a biomarker for disturbed sensory visceral processing of GI symptoms in diabetes patients.

Assessment of rectal afferent neuronal function and brain activity in patients with constipation and rectal hyposensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Blunted rectal sensation (rectal hyposensitivity: RH) is present in almost one-quarter of patients with chronic constipation. The mechanisms of its development are not fully understood, but in a proportion, afferent dysfunction is likely. To determine if, in patients with RH, alteration of rectal sensory pathways exists, rectal evoked potentials (EPs) and inverse modeling of cortical dipoles were examined. METHODS: Rectal EPs (64 channels) were recorded in 13 patients with constipation and RH (elevated thresholds to balloon distension) and 11 healthy controls, in response to electrical stimulation of the rectum at 10 cm from the anal verge using a bipolar stimulating electrode. Stimuli were delivered at pain threshold. Evoked potential peak latencies and amplitudes were analyzed, and inverse modeling was performed on traces obtained to determine the location of cortical generators. KEY RESULTS: Pain threshold was higher in patients than controls [median 59 (range 23-80) mA vs 24 (10-55) mA; P = 0.007]. Median latency to the first negative peak was 142 (±24) ms in subjects compared with 116 (±15) ms in controls (P = 0.004). There was no difference in topographic analysis of EPs or location of cortical activity demonstrated by inverse modeling between groups. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: This study is the first showing objective evidence of alteration in the rectal afferent pathway of individuals with RH and constipation. Prolonged latencies suggest a primary defect in sensory neuronal function, while cerebral processing of visceral sensory information appears normal.

Central response to painful electrical esophageal stimulation in well-defined patients suffering from functional chest pain.

BACKGROUND: Functional chest pain (FCP) of presumed esophageal origin is considered a common cause for chest pain in which central nervous system hyperexcitability is thought to play an important role. We aimed to compare cerebral responses with painful esophageal stimuli between FCP patients and healthy subjects (HS). METHODS: Thirteen patients with FCP (seven females, mean age 50.4 ± 7.5 years) and 15 HS (eight females, mean age 49.1 ± 12.9 years) were enrolled. Inclusion criteria consisted of typical chest pain, normal coronary angiogram, and normal upper gastrointestinal evaluation. Electrical stimulations evoking the pain threshold were applied in the distal esophagus, while cortical evoked potentials were recorded from the scalp. Pain scores, resting electroencephalogram (EEG), evoked potential characteristics and brain electrical sources to pain stimulation were compared between groups. KEY RESULTS: No differences were seen between patients and HS regarding (i) pain thresholds (patients: 20.1 ± 7.4 mA vs HS: 22.4 ± 8.3 mA, all P > 0.05), (ii) resting-EEG (P > 0.05), (iii) evoked brain potential latencies (N2: patients 181.7 ± 25.7 mS vs HS 182.2 ± 25.8 mS, all P > 0.05) and amplitudes (N2P2: patients 8.2 ± 7.2 µV vs HS: 10.1 ± 3.4 µV, all P > 0.05), (iv) topography (P > 0.05), and (v) brain source location (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: No differences in activation of brain areas to painful esophageal stimulation were seen in this group of well characterized patients with FCP compared with sex- and age-matched HS. The mechanism of pain in FCP and whether it originates in the esophagus remains unsolved.

Electrical low-frequency stimulation induces central neuroplastic changes of pain processing in man.

Electrical low-frequency stimulation (LFS) inhibits pain perception and nociceptive processing as shown by psychophysical and electrophysiological means (long-term depression, LTD). Information regarding central mechanisms involved in LTD induction and maintenance are still missing. This study hypothesizes that electrical LFS induces changes in activation pattern of pain-related brain areas. Thirty-two electrophysiological and psychophysical experiments were performed in 16 healthy volunteers. Painful electrical test stimulation (0.125 Hz, 60 pulses) and conditioning LFS (1 Hz, 1200 pulses) were applied by a concentric electrode to the right hand. Test stimulation series were performed before (Pre) and after LFS (Post) or no stimulation period (Control). Volunteers rated pain perception according to a verbal rating scale (0-100). Somatosensory evoked cortical potentials were recorded with 64-channel electroencephalography. Individual dipole source modeling using CURRY software (Compumedics, Hamburg, Germany) yielded information about dipole location and strength. The strongest decrease in LFS-induced pain perception was shown after LFS (p < 0.01). Topographic distribution of cortical potentials revealed reproducible negative (N1, N2) and positive (P2) components. Dipole magnitude analysis showed a significant difference between Post LFS and Post Control for P2 (p < 0.01). P2 dipole location analysis yielded a significant posterior (p < 0.05) shift following LTD induction. Thus, data reveal central changes of pain processing after LTD induction. These experiments may help judging the potency of LTD as model for electrostimulation in future analgesic therapy.

Differences in perception and brain activation following stimulation by large versus small area cutaneous surface electrodes.

INTRODUCTION: Application of electrical stimulation through conventional surface electrodes activates both non-nociceptive and nociceptive fibres. To encompass this problem, electrical stimulation through small area pin electrode was introduced where subjective description of stimulation quality indicated preferential activation of nociceptors. The present study aimed to show that brain areas involved in nociceptive processing are activated by stimulation through cutaneous pin electrode (CPE) to a larger extent than conventional surface electrodes. METHODS: Evoked potentials (EPs) were induced by electrical stimulation through conventional surface and CPE electrodes. The EPs were recorded from 62 scalp electrodes in 12 healthy volunteers where stimulation intensity was 10 times the sensory threshold. Dipolar models of brain sources were built by using the brain electrical source analysis. RESULTS: The solution for the conventional large area surface electrode was a four-dipole model including contralateral primary somatosensory cortex, bilateral secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) and mid-cingulate sources. The solution for CPE was a five-dipole model and very similar to that previously described to explain the topography of laser EPs. The solution included bilateral SII, bilateral insula and mid-cingulate sources. Since laser stimuli mainly activate nociceptive fibres, the strong similarity suggests that mainly nociceptive inputs are involved in generation of CPE-evoked responses. CONCLUSION: The current study gives evidence that CPE activates the nociceptive brain areas to a greater extent than conventional surface electrode. Therefore, CPE should preferentially be utilized in future studies where electrical stimuli are used to study nociception.