Should continuous dopaminergic stimulation be a standard of care in advanced Parkinson's disease?

The standard of care is a term that refers to the level of care, skill, and treatment that a healthcare provider should offer to a patient based on the current scientific evidence and the level of medical knowledge available in the field. For Parkinson's disease (PD), the standard care is mostly considered to be oral treatment with dopaminergic drugs, particularly levodopa which remains the 'gold standard'. However, effective management with levodopa during the later stages of the disease becomes increasingly challenging due to the ongoing neurodegenerative process, the consequences of its pulsatile dopaminergic stimulation, and the gastrointestinal barriers to effective drug absorption. As a result, the concept of applying continuous dopaminergic stimulation has emerged with infusion therapies (continuous subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, and levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion). These therapies seek to provide continuous stimulation of striatal dopamine receptors that is efficient not only in alleviating clinical symptoms, but also in delaying, reducing, and possibly preventing the onset of levodopa-related motor (fluctuations, dyskinesia) and non-motor complications; and they are also associated with clinically relevant side effects. Clinical studies and real-life experience support the notion that infusion therapies should be accepted as part of the standard of care for patients with advanced PD who have refractory, severe, and disabling motor complications that affect their quality of life. However, they should be considered based on the needs of individualized patients and the access to these advanced therapies needs to be made more accessible to the general PD population.

Non-oral continuous drug delivery based therapies and sleep dysfunction in Parkinson's disease.

Continuous drug delivery (CDD) has emerged as a feasible and pragmatic therapeutic option for dopamine replacement therapy in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). CDD aims to mimic the physiological tonic dopamine release from striatal dopaminergic neurons and thus reduces the severity and duration of motor and non-motor fluctuations partly related to pulsatile levodopa stimulation. Non-motor symptoms and fluctuations are ubiquitous in PD and include sleep dysfunction, a problem that occurs in over 90% of PD patients across all stages, from prodromal to palliative. In this review, we discuss the currently available and in development non-oral dopaminergic CDD strategies with a focus on their efficacy in the treatment of the burdensome sleep dysfunction in PD.

Adopting the Rumsfeld approach to understanding the action of levodopa and apomorphine in Parkinson's disease.

Dopaminergic therapies dominate the treatment of the motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) but there have been no major advances in therapy in many decades. Two of the oldest drugs used appear more effective than others-levodopa and apomorphine-but the reasons for this are seldom discussed and this may be one cause for a lack of progress. This short review questions current thinking on drug action and looks at whether adopting the philosophy of ex-US Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld reveals 'unknown' aspects of the actions of levodopa and apomorphine that provide clues for a way forward. It appears that both levodopa and apomorphine have a more complex pharmacology than classical views would suggest. In addition, there are unexpected facets to the mechanisms through which levodopa acts that are either forgotten as 'known unknowns' or ignored as 'unknown unknowns'. The conclusion reached is that we may not know as much as we think about drug action in PD and there is a case for looking beyond the obvious.

Exploring cocoa properties: is theobromine a cognitive modulator?

Nutritional qualities of cocoa have been acknowledged by several authors; a particular focus has been placed on its high content of flavanols, known for their excellent antioxidant properties and subsequent protective effect on cardio- and cerebrovascular systems as well as for neuromodulatory and neuroprotective actions. Other active components of cocoa are methylxanthines (caffeine and theobromine). Whereas the effects of caffeine are extensively researched, the same is not the case for theobromine; this review summarizes evidence on the effect of theobromine on cognitive functions. Considering animal studies, it can be asserted that acute exposition to theobromine has a reduced and delayed nootropic effect with respect to caffeine, whereas both animal and human studies suggested a potential neuroprotective action of long-term assumption of theobromine through a reduction of Aß amyloid pathology, which is commonly observed in Alzheimer's disease patients' brains. Hence, the conceivable action of theobromine alone and associated with caffeine or other cocoa constituents on cognitive modulation is yet underexplored and future studies are needed to shed light on this promising molecule.