The role of axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node micrometastases.

AIM: To identify by means of clinical and histopathological features a subset of breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph-node (sN) micrometastases and metastatic disease confined only to the sN in order to spare them an unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1998 to December 2004, 116 patients with sN micrometastases underwent standard ALND for early-stage (T1-2 N0 M0) invasive breast cancer; clinical and histopathologic parameters were prospectively collected and evaluated by means of univariate and logistic regression analysis in order to identify which patients with sN micrometastases were free of metastasis in axillary non-sN. RESULTS: Sixteen of 116 patients with sN micrometastases had tumour involvement of non-sN, with six and 10 patients having non-sN micrometastases and macrometastases, respectively. None of 19 patients with primary tumour measuring

Randomized phase III trial evaluating the role of erythropoietin in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced anemia.

PURPOSE: Although erythropoietin (EPO) is known to be useful in treating chemotherapy-induced anemia, few data are available on its potential preventive role. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of EPO in preventing the development of clinically significant anemia in patients treated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing accelerated adjuvant chemotherapy were randomized to receive EPO 150 U/kg three times a week or no additional treatment. Chemotherapy consisted of six cycles of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 (CEF) intravenously on day 1, every 2 weeks with the support of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), 5 microg/kg subcutaneously from day 4 to day 11. RESULTS: Throughout the six cycles of chemotherapy, EPO-treated patients maintained stable values of hemoglobin, whereas control patients developed a progressive anemia. At the end of chemotherapy, the mean (+/- SD) hemoglobin decrease in the control group was 3.05 g/dL (+/- 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6 to 3.5), whereas in the EPO group it was 0.8 (+/- 1.4; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.4). Clinically significant anemia (hemoglobin < or = 10 g/dL) occurred in 16 patients (52%; 95% CI, 33 to 69) in the control arm and in no patient (0%; 95% CI, 0 to 14) in the EPO arm (P = .00001). CONCLUSION: EPO prevents anemia in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Further trials are required to identify subsets of patients in which the preventive use of this drug could be cost-effective.

Immunohistochemical quantitation of thymidylate synthase expression in colorectal cancer metastases predicts for clinical outcome to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To determine whether immunohistochemical thymidylate synthase (TS) quantitation predicts for clinical outcome in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated by fluorouracil (FUra)-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TS levels were measured immunohistochemically on archival specimens of colorectal cancer metastases from 48 patients homogenously treated by bolus FUra plus methotrexate alternating with continuous-infusion FUra plus leucovorin. These measurements were retrospectively correlated with patient characteristics and clinical outcome. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between intratumoral TS expression and all the parameters of clinical outcome analyzed. In patients whose tumors had low (n = 27) and high (n = 21) TS levels, the overall response rates were 67% and 24%, respectively (P =.003). The percentage of tumor shrinkage after chemotherapy was linearly related to TS immunoreactivity (r =.56, P =.00004), and its mean values were 65% and 14% with low and high TS levels, respectively (P =.0001). By logistic regression analysis, low TS expression was the single best predictor of response to chemotherapy (relative probability, 5.0). In patients with low and high TS expression, the median time to progression was 9.6 months v 6.2 months (P =.005) and the median survival time 18.4 months v 15.4 months (P =.02), respectively. Two- and 3-year survival rates were 41% v 15% and 19% v 0% (P =.02), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of homogenously treated patients, intratumor TS content was a major predictor of clinical outcome. Immunohistochemical TS quantitation provides a convenient, low-cost technique for identifying patients unresponsive to TS inhibitors who may be candidates for alternative chemotherapy regimens.

Conventional versus cytokinetic polychemotherapy with estrogenic recruitment in metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized cooperative trial.

Diethylstilbestrol (DES) can induce a recruitment into the proliferative pool of previously resting breast cancer cells in vivo. In order to verify if estrogenic recruitment could result in a larger tumor cell killing by chemotherapy, 117 patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive CEF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2; epidoxorubicin, 60 mg/m2; and 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2 on day 1); DES-CEF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 on day 1; DES, 1 mg orally on days 5, 6, and 7; and epidoxorubicin, 60 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2, on day 8) every 21 days. No significant difference in objective response rates, survival, or progression-free survival was seen between the two regimens. Patients in the DES-CEF arm experienced a higher complete response (CR) rate (24.1% v 16.1%), which reached statistical significance in the case of soft-tissue metastasis (48% v 27.3%; P less than .05) and estrogen receptor-negative tumors (35.7% v 11.1%; P less than .025). Survival and progression-free survival of patients refractory to treatment were not worsened by estrogenic recruitment. In the subset of patients failing after adjuvant polychemotherapy, DES-CEF unexpectedly induced a significantly longer survival (greater than 802 days v 375 days; P = .029) and progression-free survival (239 days v 192 days; P = .041) than CEF. The DES-CEF regimen was more myelotoxic, and 43.3% of the DES-CEF cycles had to be delayed because of leukopenia in comparison with 11.8% of the CEF cycles (P less than .0001). In conclusion, chemotherapy with estrogenic recruitment was able to induce more CRs in certain subsets of patients and a significant prolongation in survival and progression-free survival of patients failing after adjuvant polychemotherapy. These results have been achieved despite a significantly lower dose intensity of chemotherapy.

Accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients: results of a multicenter, randomized phase III study of the Italian Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ouest-Mammella Inter Gruppo Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether an accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) chemotherapy regimen with the support of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) induces a higher activity and efficacy compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage IV breast cancer patients were randomized to receive as first-line chemotherapy either standard CEF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) administered every 21 days (CEF21) or accelerated-intensified CEF (cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2), epirubicin 80 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) administered every 14 days (HD-CEF14) with the support of G-CSF. Treatment was administered for eight cycles. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were randomized (74 patients on the CEF21 arm and 77 on the HD-CEF14 arm). In both arms, the median number of administered cycles was eight. The dose-intensity actually administered was 93% and 86% of that planned, in CEF21- and HD-CEF14-treated patients, respectively. Compared with the CEF21 arm, the dose-intensity increase in the HD-CEF14 arm was 80%. Both nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities were higher in the HD-CEF14 arm than in the CEF21 arm. During chemotherapy, four deaths occurred in the HD-CEF14 arm. No difference in overall response rate (complete plus partial responses) was observed: 49% and 51% in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.94). A slightly non-statistically significant higher percentage of complete response was observed in the HD-CEF14 arm (20% v 15%). No difference in efficacy was observed. The median time to progression was 14.3 and 12.8 months in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.69). Median overall survival was 32.7 and 27.2 months in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.16). CONCLUSION: In metastatic breast cancer patients, an 80% increase in dose-intensity of the CEF regimen, obtained by both acceleration and dose intensification, does not improve the activity and the efficacy compared with a standard dose-intensity CEF regimen.

Multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate cardioprotection of dexrazoxane versus no cardioprotection in women receiving epirubicin chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Dexrazoxane was found effective in reducing doxorubicin cardiotoxicity when given at a dose ratio (dexrazoxane: doxorubicin) of 20:1. Preclinical studies indicated that dexrazoxane at a dose ratio of 10 to 15:1 also protected against epirubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. The main objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of dexrazoxane, given at a dose ratio of 10:1 against epirubicin cardiotoxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-two advanced breast cancer patients were randomized to receive epirubicin-based chemotherapy with or without dexrazoxane. Patients who had previously received adjuvant chemotherapy that contained anthracyclines were treated with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously (IV), epirubicin 60 mg/m2 IV, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 IV, on day 1 every 3 weeks. The other patients were treated with epirubicin 120 mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 3 weeks. Cardiac toxicity was defined as clinical signs of congestive heart failure, a decrease in resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to < or = 45%, or a decrease from baseline resting LVEF of > or = 20 EF units. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients were evaluated. Cardiotoxicity was recorded in 18 of 78 patients (23.1%) in the control arm and in six of 82 (7.3%) in the dexrazoxone arm. The cumulative probability of developing cardiotoxicity was significantly lower in dexrazoxane-treated patients than in control patients (P = .006; odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence limit [CL], 0.09 to 0.78). Noncardiac toxicity, objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were similar in both arms. CONCLUSION: Dexrazoxane given at a dexrazoxane:epirubicin dose ratio of 10:1 protects against epirubicin-induced cardiotoxicity and does not affect the clinical activity and the noncardiac toxicity of epirubicin. The clinical use of dexrazoxane should be recommended in patients whose risk of developing cardiotoxicity could hamper the eventual use and possible benefit of epirubicin.

The prognostic role of the sentinel lymph node in clinically node-negative patients with cutaneous melanoma: experience of the Genoa group.

AIM: To define the benefit of intraoperative frozen section examination of the sentinel lymph node (sN), and to assess its prognostic value in clinically node-negative melanoma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1993 and December 2001, 214 patients with Stage I-II cutaneous melanoma underwent sN biopsy; complete follow-up data are available in 169 of 175 patients who underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, lymphatic mapping with Patent Blue-V and radio-guided surgery (RGS). RESULTS: In an initial subset, the sN was identified in 35 out of 39 patients; in the principal group of 169 patients, the sN was detected in all patients. The benefit of frozen section examination, that is the proportion of all patients having intraoperative histologic examination who tested positive, was 17.2% (29/169); notably, in patients with pT(1-2) vs pT(3-4) melanoma the corresponding values were 2.3 and 33.3%, respectively, (P=0.000). Cox regression analysis for overall survival indicated that sN-positive patients had a two-fold increased risk of death; the most significant predictors of relapse-free survival were sN status (P=0.004), age (P=0.015), and T stage grouping (P=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: The sN is a reliable predictor of regional lymph node status in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Frozen section examination can be useful in avoiding a 'two-stage' operative procedure in patients with tumour-positive sN, but its greatest benefit seems to be restricted to patients with pT(3)-pT(4) primary melanoma.

Advanced ovarian cancer in the elderly: results of consecutive trials with cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

From 1982 through 1996, 547 untreated advanced ovarian cancer patients were entered onto Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest (GONO) consecutive randomized trials including cisplatin-based chemotherapy. End points of analysis included the influence of age on prognosis, toxicity, clinical/surgical response rates, progression-free survival and survival. Of the entire study group, 116 patients were 65 years of age or older at diagnosis. WHO main toxicity (any grade) consisted of: emesis (93% of patients), myelotoxicity (leukopenia in 52%, anemia in 51% and thrombocytopenia in 17% of patients), nephrotoxicity in 13% of patients and neurotoxicity in 10% of patients. No significant difference in toxicity was evident between patients > or = or <65 years. Refusal of CT and early (< or =2 courses) interruption of CT due to toxicity were more frequent in elderly patients (3.4 vs. 1.4%; 3.4 vs. 0.7%, respectively). After a median follow-up of 71 months no difference was observed in survival and progression-free survival between younger and older patients. Cox multiple regression analysis of the entire study population demonstrated that age >65 years per se was not a negative prognostic factor.

No standard treatment is available for advanced pancreatic cancer.

All randomised trials, published from 1980 to 1993, of treatments in advanced and locally unresectable exocrine pancreatic carcinoma were critically reviewed to identify the most effective therapeutic strategy for use as a control arm in randomised trials for such patients. All the published randomised trials on patients with pancreatic cancer were identified, and the treatment results summarised by means of published methodological guidelines. Twenty-seven reports, including 21 on hormonal or chemotherapy and six on radio/chemotherapy were identified. Very different treatment programmes were used in the trials, without a rationale sequence for testing hypotheses. Furthermore, several methodological drawbacks undermined both the internal and the external validity of these studies. Therefore, no meta-analysis can be conducted, combining the results of the randomised controlled trials in pancreatic cancer published from 1990 to 1993; no standard treatment is currently available for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer; future studies should screen new drugs or new combinations; and an untreated control group should be included in future comparative studies until real advantages in terms of better quality of life or improved survival are demonstrated.

Impact of the treating institution on the survival of patients with head and neck cancer treated with concomitant alternating chemotherapy and radiation.

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible impact of the treating institution on the survival of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy alone or concomitant alternating chemotherapy and radiation. The National Institute for Cancer Research of Genoa (IST) was the coordinator of two multicentre randomised trials comparing an alternating chemotherapy and radiation approach to radiotherapy alone with standard fractionation (HN-8 trial: 157 patients) or accelerated fractionation (HN-9 trial: 136 patients) in patients with advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A single database of the two studies was created and a univariate analysis was performed. The Cox regression model, adjusted for the effect of other prognostic factors, was used to test the impact of the treating institution on survival. Three-year overall survival was 46% for patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation at the coordinating centre and 27% for those treated with the same approach at the affiliated centres (P=0.0001). No difference was detected between patients treated with radiation alone at the coordinating centre or outside (23% versus 21%: P=0.52). The hazard ratio of death for patients treated at the affiliated centres with concomitant alternating chemotherapy and radiation was 2.15 (95% Confidence Interval (C.I.) 1.45-3.18), while it was 1.003 (95% C.I. 0.65-1.55) for those treated with radiation alone. In our experience, the treating institution had a significant impact only on the prognosis of patients treated with the multidisciplinary approach. This finding has implications, both in terms of clinical research and clinical practice.

Long-term prognosis following macroscopic complete response at second-look laparotomy in advanced ovarian cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest.

Survival (S) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated in 129 advanced ovarian cancer patients, who achieved a macroscopic complete response (112 pathological complete response and 17 microscopic disease) at second-look after platinum-based combination chemotherapy with or without doxorubicin (DX). The impact on S and PFS of age, performance status (PS), stage, histology, grade (G), residual disease after first surgery (RD), chemotherapy regimen, disease status at second-look and consolidation therapy were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. In the 118 months observation period, median S and PFS were 81 and 34 months, respectively. Stage, G, RD, PS and disease status at second-look had significant impact on both S and PFS in univariate analysis, whereas consolidation therapy did not influence outcome. Cox's regression analysis showed that G, RD and PS had an independent impact on PFS. Test for interaction demonstrated no statistically significant relationship between RD, chemotherapy regimen and outcome. In conclusion, advanced ovarian cancer patients with macroscopically complete remission at second-look have a substantial risk of relapse after aggressive treatment. The risk of recurrence was estimated to be maximal in the first 3 years after restaging, and was correlated with poor PS, RD > 2 cm after first surgery and undifferentiated tumour.

Postoperative radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: feasibility of a biphasic accelerated treatment schedule.

PURPOSE: It has been suggested that postoperative tumor cell proliferation may influence the outcome of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas treated by surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. This Phase I pilot study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of a biphasic accelerated radiotherapy regimen with early and late concomitant boost delivery for postoperative treatment of patients with advanced head and neck cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From April 1993 to April 1994, 29 patients with advanced head and neck cancers were enrolled in this study after they underwent complete surgical resection. The basic radiation course delivered a median dose of 49 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks at 1.8-2 Gy/fraction. The concomitant boost was delivered to the high-risk areas as a second daily fraction during the first (1.4 Gy/fraction) and fifth weeks (1.6 Gy/fraction). The total dose to the high-risk areas was 64 Gy in 35 fractions over 5 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (93%) completed the treatment without interruptions. Only two patients experienced severe acute toxicity requiring treatment breaks of 6 and 8 days, respectively. All patients developed confluent mucositis; in 69% of the cases it covered >50% of the treated surface. No patient developed Grade 5 (ulceration/bleeding) mucosal reaction. Mucositis required a median time of 7 weeks for complete healing (range 3-43). Two patients developed transient bone exposure. The median weight loss was 5.5% of pretreatment body weight (range 1.2-17.1%), and four patients required nutritional assistance with nasogastric feeding tube. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that this biphasic acceleration regimen is feasible with acceptable acute toxicity.

Failure of mitomycin-vindesine combination chemotherapy as salvage treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

Mitomycin plus vindesine have been utilized as salvage therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients refractory to first line chemotherapy. No response was observed in 15 consecutively evaluable patients; according to the Gehan test a lack of effectiveness of this regimen is suggested at least in heavily pretreated patients.

Advanced colorectal cancer in the elderly: results of consecutive trials with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

To evaluate toxicity and efficacy of chemotherapy in elderly patients (> or = 65 years of age) with advanced colorectal cancer, data from two consecutive trials conducted between 1984 and 1995 at the National Institute for Cancer Research were analysed comparing the results of treatment in those 65 years of age or older and in those younger than 65 years. Of 215 patients recruited, 82 elderly patients (median age 70 years, median performance status 1) received one of the following regimens based on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU): (1) weekly 5-FU 600 mg/m2 i.v. bolus (30 patients); (2) weekly 5-FU 600 mg/m bolus plus leucovorin (LV) 500 mg/m2 2-h i.v. infusion (28 patients); (3) Weekly 5-FU 2600 mg/m2 24-h continuous i.v. infusion plus LV 100 mg 4-h i.v. infusion and 50 mg orally every 4 h for five doses (24 patients). Overall, 1071 chemotherapy cycles were administered with a median number of 12 courses per patient. The main side effects were diarrhoea, observed in 38% of patients, stomatitis in 24% of patients and hand-foot syndrome in 13% of patients, and haematological toxicity affected only 15% of patients. No patient suffered grade IV toxicity. In three patients chemotherapy was discontinued because of toxicity (two patients suffered grade III diarrhoea, one patient grade III hand-foot syndrome). No significant difference in toxicity was evident between patients older than or younger than 65 years. Analysis of median dose intensity demonstrated no difference between the two groups. Overall objective response was observed in 18% (95% confidence limits 11-29) of elderly patients (15/82) in comparison with 23% (95% CL 17-32) of patients < 65 years of age (31/133 pts). In conclusion, chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer is a safe and effective treatment with acceptable toxicity and comparable objective response rates.

Erythropoietin and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor allow acceleration and dose escalation of cyclophosphamide/epidoxorubicin/5-fluorouracil chemotherapy: a dose-finding study in patients with advanced breast cancer.

To verify whether the association of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and erythropoietin (EPO) would allow both the acceleration and the dose escalation of the cyclophosphamide/epidoxorubicin/5-fluorouracil (CEF) regimen as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer patients, we conducted a dose-finding study. Cohorts of three consecutive patients received cyclophosphamide (Ctx, dose range 800-1400 mg/m2), epidoxorubicin (Epidx, dose range 70-100 mg/m2), and 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu, 600 mg/m2, fixed dose) given as an intravenous bolus on day 1 every 14 days; GM-CSF at 5 micrograms/kg given as a subcutaneous injection from day 4 to day 11; and EPO at 150 IU/kg given as a subcutaneous injection three times a week. In no single patient was any dose escalation allowed. A total of 14 patients entered the study. At the 4th dose level (Ctx 1400 mg/m2, Epidx 100 mg/m2, 5-Fu 600 mg/m2), two patients had dose-limiting mucositis and one patient developed dose-limiting neutropenia. Therefore, the 3rd cohort received the maximum tolerated dose, i.e. Ctx at 1200 mg/m2, Epidx at 90 mg/m2, and 5-Fu at 600 mg/m2, given every 18.5 (+/-2.5) days. Toxicity was moderate and manageable in an outpatient setting. Only 1 admission at the 4th dose level was required. Throughout the 4 dose levels there was no toxicity-related death; grade IV leukopenia ranged from 24% to 75% of cycles and grade IV thrombocytopenia ranged from 6% to 8%. No grade IV anemia was recorded. Increasing the doses of Ctx and Epidx while maintaining a fixed dose of 5-Fu with the support of both EPO and GM-CSF allows safe acceleration and dose escalation of CEF chemotherapy. Further controlled studies will evaluate the activity and efficacy of this strategy.

Adjuvant Treatment of Colorectal Cancer in the Elderly.

From March 1992 until January 1994, 1,014 patients radically resected for Dukes' B(2), B(3) or C colon cancer were randomized to receive FU plus levamisole or FU plus leucovorin (LV) plus levamisole. Only 41% of patients older than age 70 years, as compared to 53% of those younger, have completed the treatment as planned. This poorer compliance was not associated with a higher incidence or degree of toxicity. Only a small difference in percentages was detected between the age groups of patients requiring dose reductions or treatment delays, while the percentages of patients that had their treatment discontinued was markedly increased in the older age group, without a parallel increase in severe toxicity. Preliminary results suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy with FU plus levamisole or FU plus LV plus levamisole is well tolerated by elderly patients and is not associated with greater toxicity in patients over 70 years of age than in younger patients. The lower adherence to the treatment plans in older patients may be due to reluctance by physicians and families to administer chemotherapy due to the misconception that the elderly are more prone to adverse reactions.

Continuous venous infusion of vindesine in metastatic breast cancer: experience with a subcutaneously implanted system and portable pump.

Fourteen patients with advanced pretreated breast cancer were treated with vindesine in continuous venous infusion (1.5 mg/sm/24 hours for 72 hours every 3 weeks). A totally implanted venous access and a portable pump were used. A total of 33 courses was administered. No objective response was observed and treatment was stopped. Drug-related toxicity consisted mainly of alopecia (64% of patients), nausea and vomiting (29%) and mucositis (29%). Catheter - related toxicity was observed in 6 patients (43%) and consisted of infection of the skin pocket in 4 patients and dislodging of the needle and catheter break in one patient. The feasibility of continuous venous infusion of vesicant drugs in outpatients is discussed.

Phase II study of weekly oxaliplatin and high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) has proven efficacy in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC), although the optimal dosage and administration schedule are still unclear. This phase II trial investigated the tolerability and activity of weekly oxaliplatin, high-dose infusional 5-FU and LV in pretreated patients with metastatic CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received weekly courses of i.v. oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2 (1-h infusion), LV 100 mg/m2 (1-h infusion) and 5-FU 2100 mg/m2 (24-h infusion) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. NCI-CTC criteria were used for assessment of side-effects (at each cycle) and WHO criteria for assessment of tumour response (every 8 cycles). For descriptive purposes, time to progression, overall survival and duration of objective response were also calculated. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled and received a total of 606 cycles (median 13/patient, range 4-33), and 70% of courses (421/606) were delivered at 100% of the planned dose. The most frequent side-effects were gastrointestinal and neurological and incidence rates were: diarrhoea 66% (grade III: 29%), nausea/vomiting 54%, neurotoxicity 34% (grade III: 2%), fatigue 27%, mucositis 22%, leucopenia 14%. No grade IV toxicity was observed. Objective response rates were: partial response 23% (10 patients), stable disease 59% (26) and progressive disease 11% (5). Median time to progression was 7 months, overall survival 13 months and the duration of partial response and stable disease were 9 and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that this regimen has a favourable tolerability profile and is an active combination in the pretreated metastatic CRC patient, deserving further evaluation in phase III trials.

Activity of high dose 24 hour 5-fluorouracil infusion plus L-leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by leucovorin (L-LV) in patients (pts) with advanced colorectal cancer has been demonstrated to produce a highly significant benefit over single-agent 5-FU in terms of tumor response rate, but this advantage does not translate into an evident improvement of overall survival. To improve the clinical efficacy of the 5-FU plus L-LV regimen a phase II study of weekly 24-hour high-dose 5-FU infusion with L-LV was undertaken. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy advanced colorectal patients were enrolled and treated by a weekly outpatient combination regimen according to the following schedule: L-LV 100 mg/sqm by 4 hours i.v. infusion followed by 5-FU 2600 mg/sqm over a 24 hours infusion combined with a fixed dose of oral L-LV (50 mg) every 4 hours for 5 times. Forty-four pts did not receive any previous CT and 26 pts were pretreated with fluoropyrimidines. RESULTS: The overall objective response rate (OR) was 35.3%; 7 CR and 11 PR (42.8% OR) were observed in the group of untreated pts, and 6 PR (23% OR) were reported among previously treated pts. Major side effects were represented by diarrhoea (grade III: 26%, grade IV: 1%), hand-foot syndrome (grade III: 4%, grade IV: 1%) and mucositis (grade III: 4%); however, this did not significantly influence the therapeutic programme. Median 5-FU dose intensity was 100% and 80% at 4 weeks, 87% and 75% at 8 weeks in untreated and pretreated pts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: L-Leucovorin modulation of weekly short-term continuous infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil appeared a well-tolerated outpatient regimen; it demonstrated a high activity in advanced colorectal cancer, both in untreated pts and in pts resistant to 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

Methylprednisolone for the control of CMF-induced emesis.

Sixty-eight breast cancer patients for outpatient adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) on a 1-day schedule entered a randomized trial comparing the antiemetic-efficacy of different doses of methylprednisolone (MPN). Treatment was administered concomitantly with the first course of CT and consisted of MPN in either 375 or 120-mg doses divided into 3 equal parts, the first administered i.v. just prior to CMF and then i.m. 6 and 12 h after CT. Overall, antiemetic protection was appreciable: complete emetic protection (no emetic episodes) was observed in 71 and 66% of patients receiving MPN 375 and 120 mg, respectively. In 43 and 54% of patients receiving MPN 375 and 120 mg, respectively, nausea did not occur. Efficacy of the two treatment arms was not statistically different for either emesis or nausea. Antiemetic protection with MPN was reproducible over time at subsequent courses: 60% of patients in either treatment arm experienced less than 5 emetic episodes at their 12th CMF course. Facial flush was the most frequently observed side effect (36% with MPN 120 mg vs. 68% with MPN 375 mg). Other acute untoward effects consisted of headache, pyrosis, and edema. However, the latter was observed only with the higher dose. In patients receiving CMF, MPN alone provides effective and reproducible emetic protection. No dose-response relationship was observed.