The prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing and associated risk factors in patients with decompensated congestive heart failure in Mozambique.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in patients with congestive heart failure and has important implications regarding symptoms and prognosis. However, the burden of SDB on those with heart failure has not been well characterized in developing countries, including Mozambique in sub-Saharan Africa. Diagnosing SDB in individuals with congestive heart failure is important because treatment of SDB may improve outcomes. METHODS: Between September 2014 and April 2017, patients hospitalized in a specialized cardiology unit in Maputo, Mozambique with decompensated congestive heart failure were recruited using convenience sampling. We determined the prevalence of SDB and associated risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients were recruited, of which 145 had evaluable sleep study data. The overall prevalence of SDB in patients with decompensated congestive heart failure was 72%, and of these 46% had Cheyne-Stokes respirations. Male sex, higher body mass index, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction were all associated with a higher likelihood of SDB and more severe SDB. Cheyne-Stokes respirations were associated with male sex, lower ejection fraction, and larger left atrial size. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in sub-Saharan Africa SDB is common in decompensated congestive heart failure and strongly predicted by demographic and echocardiographic parameters. This study highlights the need for the development of diagnostic tools and management strategies for patients with severe heart failure in resource-limited settings. CITATION: Lo S, Mbanze I, Orr JE, et al. The prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing and associated risk factors in patients with decompensated congestive heart failure in Mozambique. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(6):1103-1110.

Drinking water and the implications for gender equity and empowerment: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence.

BACKGROUND: Safe drinking water is a fundamental human right, yet more than 785 million people do not have access to it. The burden of water management disproportionately falls on women and young girls, and they suffer the health, psychosocial, political, educational, and economic effects. While water conditions and disease outcomes have been widely studied, few studies have summarized the research on drinking water and implications for gender equity and empowerment (GEE). METHODS: A systematic review of primary literature published between 1980 and 2019 was conducted on drinking water exposures and management and the implications for GEE. Ten databases were utilized (EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, ProQuest, Campbell, the British Library for Development Studies, SSRN, 3ie International Initiative for Impact Evaluation, and clinicaltrials.gov). Drinking water studies with an all-female cohort or disaggregated findings according to gender were included. RESULTS: A total of 1280 studies were included. GEE outcomes were summarized in five areas: health, psychosocial stress, political power and decision-making, social-educational conditions, and economic and time-use conditions. Water quality exposures and implications for women's health dominated the literature reviewed. Women experienced higher rates of bladder cancer when exposed to arsenic, trihalomethanes, and chlorine in drinking water and higher rates of breast cancer due to arsenic, trichloroethylene, and disinfection byproducts in drinking water, compared to men. Women that were exposed to arsenic experienced higher incidence rates of anemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to those that were not exposed. Water-related skin diseases were associated with increased levels of psychosocial stress and social ostracization among women. Women had fewer decision-making responsibilities, economic independence, and employment opportunities around water compared to men. CONCLUSION: This systematic review confirms the interconnected nature of gender and WaSH outcomes. With growing attention directed towards gender equity and empowerment within WaSH, this analysis provides key insights to inform future research and policy.