Impact of selective reporting bias on stroke trials: potential compromise in evidence synthesis - A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Accurate reporting of outcomes is crucial for interpreting the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, selectively reporting outcomes in publications to achieve researchers' anticipated results still occurs frequently. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of selective reporting of outcomes in RCTs on treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS), identify factors contributing to this issue, and assess its potential impact on the degree and direction of intervention effect. METHODS: A search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to collect interventional RCTs on AIS published from 2020 to 2022. Full texts of RCTs were reviewed, and only those reporting International Clinical Trials Registry Platform primary registry numbers were included. Registration information of the RCTs was extracted from the registry platforms and compared with the publications' details to assess the selective reporting of outcomes. Bayesian multilevel logistic regression was used to analyze the reasons behind selective reporting. RESULTS: Among the total of 159 AIS RCTs identified, 82 (51.6%) were ultimately included, as they reported registration numbers, which encompassed 819 outcomes. Among them, 72 RCTs (87.8%) and 497 outcomes (60.7%) exhibited selective reporting. Omission-type selective reporting (downgrading, omitting, or ambiguously reporting) accounted for 36.4%, while addition-type selective reporting (upgrading, adding, or altering the measurement scope of outcomes) comprised 63.6%. Omission-type selective reporting correlated with negative results (OR: 7.39; 95% CI: 4.08-13.44), whereas addition-type selective reporting correlated with positive results (OR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.34-3.26) and publication in journals that are not in the top quartile of the Journal Citation Reports (OR: 2.48; 95% CI: 1.15-5.38). CONCLUSIONS: Registered interventional AIS RCTs still face significant issues regarding selective reporting of outcomes. Therefore, it is necessary to further evaluate the influence of selective reporting bias on the positive results obtained from individual AIS RCTs and the systematic reviews based on these RCTs.

The Underappreciated Placebo Effects and Responses in Randomized Controlled Trials on Neck Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify placebo effects and responses in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on neck pain and explore how they would influence the treatment of neck pain. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from the inception of August 15, 2021, to identify relevant RCTs. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: The abstracts and full texts of potential studies were independently screened, and data extraction was also independently performed by 2 researchers. Scales of the score measuring neck pain and the scores both at baseline and the endpoint were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 60 RCTs were included. The mean improvement in the pain score after placebo treatment was 15.65 (mean difference [MD]=-15.65, 95% confidence interval; CI [-19.19, -12.12]; P<.05), which we defined as the placebo response. In the active groups, it was 25.91 (MD=-25.91, 95% CI [-29.15, -22.68]; P<.05), and in the no-treatment groups, it was 5.80 (MD=-5.80, 95% CI [13.28, 1.69]; P=.13). Using the 3 MDs from the 3 groups, the placebo effect was calculated to account for 38.0% of the pain score improvement in the active group. CONCLUSIONS: The pain scores of patients with neck pain were reduced after treatment with placebos, but the magnitude of pain score reduction was not clinically significant enough. The 38.0% amount of pain score reduction in patients treated with active interventions was caused by placebo. Interventions with considerable clinically significance for neck pain were still required.

Is the CyberKnife© radiosurgery system effective and safe for patients? An umbrella review of the evidence.

Background: The CyberKnife© system combines real-time image guidance and a dynamic tracking system to implement frameless radiotherapy. This umbrella review is aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CyberKnife. Methods: A comprehensive search of health technology assessments and systematic reviews was performed among the Embase, PubMed and other grey databases until July 2020. Treatment outcomes were extracted, and the quality of included studies were assessed using AMSTAR-2. Results: Nineteen studies were eligible. CyberKnife not only had a wide range of applications, long overall survival and great local control, but also had a limited toxicity and good cost-effectiveness compared with other radiotherapy equipment. Conclusion: Despite the relatively low quality of the evidence, our findings can still provide a decision reference for policymakers.

An umbrella review on the effectiveness and safety of the CyberKnife^© system was performed by comprehensively searching for all related publications. The CyberKnife system had excellent effect on treatment of cancer and some noncancer diseases, with limited toxicity. Additionally, it was a cost-effective treatment compared with other types of radiotherapy. Despite the relatively low quality of the included evidence, our findings can still provide a comprehensive decision reference for policymakers of patients, government and hospitals.

Hemostatic Agent May Improve Perioperative Outcomes in Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hemostatic agents (HAs) are used to achieve hemostasis and prevent postoperative complications in multiple surgeries, but the role of HAs is ambiguous during partial nephrectomy (PN), so this study aimed to assess the role of HAs in PN. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies regarding the comparison of HA use alone and standard suturing during PN on January 17, 2020. RevMan 5.3 was used to conduct meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were performed based on surgical procedures and HA types. RESULTS: Six studies involving 1,066 patients were included. The quality of studies was moderate to high. There were significant reductions in warm ischemia time (mean difference [MD] = -6.30 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.70 to -4.90, p < 0.00001), operative time (MD = -19.81 min, 95% CI -27.54 to -12.08, p < 0.00001), and estimated blood loss (MD = -108.62 mL, 95% CI -177.27 to -39.9, p = 0.002) in the HA group, and HA use alone did not increase postoperative complications. The results were similar in the subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: HA may be an effective and safe surgical material in PN, which can improve postoperative outcomes. High-quality and randomly designed studies are needed to validate the applicability.

Publishing clinical prActice GuidelinEs (PAGE): Recommendations from editors and reviewers.

Transparency Ecosystem for Research and Journals in Medicine (TERM) working group summarized the essential recommendations that should be considered to review and publish a high-quality guideline. These recommendations from editors and reviewers included 10 components of essential requirements: systematic review of existing relevant guidelines, guideline registration, guideline protocol, stakeholders, conflicts of interest, clinical questions, systematic reviews, recommendation consensus, guideline reporting and external review. TERM working group abbreviates them as PAGE (essential requirements for Publishing clinical prActice GuidelinEs), and recommends guideline authors, editors, and peer reviewers to use them for high-quality guidelines.

Dental caries and salivary alterations in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The association between dental caries, salivary alterations, and type 2 diabetes (T2D) is inconclusive. This systematic review evaluated the caries status and salivary alterations in adults with T2D. DATA: Observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, or cohort studies) that evaluated the association between type 2 diabetes and dental caries and/or salivary changes were included. SOURCES: Systematic searches of PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant literature published up to January 2024 were performed. STUDY SELECTION: Ninety-eight studies were selected from the 1981 records obtained after screening the databases. Thirty-nine studies that met the eligibility criteria were included in the qualitative synthesis, and twenty-eight of the included studies were suitable for the quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed that compared to non-diabetic individuals, type 2 diabetic individuals had higher DMFT (mean difference: 2.27; 95 % CI, 1.31 to 3.22; P < 0.00001). Moreover, type 2 diabetic individuals had lower salivary flow rate (standardized mean difference: -2.62; 95 % CI, -4.38 to -0.86; P = 0.003), salivary pH (standardized mean difference: -1.35; 95 % CI, -1.89 to -0.80; P < 0.00001) and salivary buffering capacity (standardized mean difference: -0.60; 95 % CI, -0.93 to -0.27; P = 0.0004). Whereas DMFT (mean difference: -2.15; 95 % CI, -6.47 to 2.17; P = 0.33) and salivary buffering capacity (standardized mean difference: -0.05; 95 % CI, -0.48 to 0.37; P = 0.80) were not significantly different between individuals with well-controlled diabetes and those with poorly-controlled diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Type 2 diabetes may lead to an increased index of dental caries and a reduction in salivary flow rate, salivary pH, and salivary buffering capacity in adults. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Individuals with type 2 diabetes exhibit an elevated risk of dental caries and salivary alterations that facilitate the progression of dental caries. It is recommended that dentists and endocrinologists focus their attention on the oral health of this population.

The impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomized clinical trials on acupuncture: A meta-epidemiological study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sole impact of blinding patients and outcome assessors in acupuncture randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment effects while considering the type of outcome measures. METHODS: We searched databases for the meta-analyses on acupuncture with both blinded and non-blinded RCTs. Mixed-effects meta-regression models estimated the average ratio of odds ratios (ROR) and differences in standardized mean differences (dSMD) for non-blinded RCTs versus blinded mixed-effects meta-regression model. RESULTS: The study included 96 meta-analyses (1012 trials). The average ROR for lack of patient blinding was 1.08 (95% confidence intervals 0.79-1.49) in 18 meta-analyses with binary patient-reported outcomes. The average ROR for lack of outcome assessor blinding was 0.98 (0.77-1.24) in 43 meta-analyses with binary subjective outcomes. The average dSMD was -0.38 (-0.96 to 0.20) in 10 meta-analyses with continuous patient-reported outcomes. The average dSMD was -0.13 (-0.45 to 0.18) in 25 meta-analyses with continuous subjective outcomes. The results of the subgroup analysis were consistent with the primary analysis findings. CONCLUSIONS: Blinding of participants and outcome assessors does not significantly influence acupuncture treatment efficacy. It underscores the practical difficulties of blinding in acupuncture RCTs and the necessity to distinguish between trials with and without successful blinding to understand treatment expectations' effects. Enhancing blinding procedures' quality and assessment in future research is crucial for improving RCTs' internal validity and reliability.

Rapid review: A review of methods and recommendations based on current evidence.

Rapid review (RR) could accelerate the traditional systematic review (SR) process by simplifying or omitting steps using various shortcuts. With the increasing popularity of RR, numerous shortcuts had emerged, but there was no consensus on how to choose the most appropriate ones. This study conducted a literature search in PubMed from inception to December 21, 2023, using terms such as "rapid review" "rapid assessment" "rapid systematic review" and "rapid evaluation". We also scanned the reference lists and performed citation tracking of included impact studies to obtain more included studies. We conducted a narrative synthesis of all RR approaches, shortcuts and studies assessing their effectiveness at each stage of RRs. Based on the current evidence, we provided recommendations on utilizing certain shortcuts in RRs. Ultimately, we identified 185 studies focusing on summarizing RR approaches and shortcuts, or evaluating their impact. There was relatively sufficient evidence to support the use of the following shortcuts in RRs: limiting studies to those published in English-language; conducting abbreviated database searches (e.g., only searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL); omitting retrieval of grey literature; restricting the search timeframe to the recent 20 years for medical intervention and the recent 15 years for reviewing diagnostic test accuracy; conducting a single screening by an experienced screener. To some extent, the above shortcuts were also applicable to SRs. This study provided a reference for future RR researchers in selecting shortcuts, and it also presented a potential research topic for methodologists.

The reporting quality of meta-epidemiological studies needs substantial improvement: a research on research study.

BACKGROUND: Meta-epidemiological research plays a vital role in providing empirical evidence needed to develop methodological manuals and tools, but the reporting quality has not been comprehensively assessed, and the influence of reporting guidelines remains unclear. The current study aims to evaluate the reporting quality of meta-epidemiological studies, assess the impact of reporting guidelines, and identify factors influencing reporting quality. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for meta-epidemiological studies. The reporting quality of these studies was assessed for adherence to established reporting guidelines. Two researchers independently screened the studies and assessed the quality of the included studies. Time-series segmented linear regression was used to evaluate changes in reporting quality over time, while beta-regression analysis was performed to identify factors significantly associated with reporting quality. RESULTS: We initially identified 1720 articles, of which 125 meta-epidemiological studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 65 (52%) had low reporting quality, 60 (48%) had moderate quality, and none achieved high quality. Of the 24 items derived from established reporting guidelines, 4 had poor adherence, 13 had moderate adherence, and 7 had high adherences. High journal impact factor (≥ 10) (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.80; P = 0.003) and protocol registration (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.22; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with better reporting quality. The publication of the reporting guideline did not significantly increase the mean reporting quality score (- 0.53, 95% CI: - 3.37, 2.31; P = 0.67) or the trend (- 0.38, 95% CI: - 1.02, 0.26; P = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed suboptimal reporting quality in meta-epidemiological studies, with no improvement post-2017 guidelines. This potential shortcoming could hinder stakeholders' ability to draw reliable conclusions from these studies. While preregistration could reduce reporting bias, its adoption remains low. Registration platforms could consider creating tailored types for meta-epidemiological research, and journals need to adopt more proactive measures to enforce reporting standards.

Early discontinuation and results reporting of robot-assisted surgery studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: a research on research study.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of robot-assisted surgery studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and identify factors associated with early trial discontinuation and timely results reporting. DESIGN: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify interventional studies on robot-assisted surgery on 24 May 2021. All structured information of the potential studies was downloaded and reviewed. A descriptive analysis was performed. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were respectively performed to determine the significance of the association of study characteristics with results reporting and early discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 529 interventional studies on robot-assisted surgery were included, with 45 studies reporting results and 54 studies being stopped early. Of the 289 due studies, only 45 (16%) had submitted their results, and only 6 (2%) had submitted their results within the 1-year deadline. Funding source was associated with results reporting: academic funded were 63% less likely than industry to report results (OR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.83, p=0.02). Studies related to device feasibility were associated with greater risk of early discontinuation compared to treatment-related studies (HR=2.30, 95% CI: 1.08 to 4.89, p=0.03). Surprisingly, National Institutes of Health-funded studies were at greater hazard of discontinuation compared to industry-funded studies (HR=3.30, 95% CI: 1.09 to 10.00, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: There was poor compliance with results reporting requirements for robot-assisted surgical studies. It is important that investigators remain informed about the regulatory requirements, and should be helped to develop a sense of responsibility for reporting results. Also, they need to ensure the careful design of the study protocol and adequate resources to reduce the risk of early discontinuation.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: A cross-sectional analysis of characteristics, early discontinuation, and reporting results.

Objective Contrast-enhanced ultrasound offers numerous potential applications in diagnostic and interventional radiology. However, systematic studies on the status of clinical studies are limited. Hence, the aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of registered contrast-enhanced ultrasound studies on ClinicalTrials.gov and identify features associated with early discontinuation and results reporting. METHODS: A data set containing all contrast-enhanced ultrasound clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov registered was downloaded. Then, a cross-sectional descriptive study of clinical contrast-enhanced ultrasound studies was conducted. Cox and logistic regression of early discontinuation and reported results, respectively, were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 225 studies were identified; 174 were interventional and 51 were observational. Regarding the outcomes measure, 175 (77.78%) were diagnosis-oriented, and the remaining 50 (22.22%) were interventional radiology studies. The most common regions of interest were abdominal (56%), superficial (14.22%), or vascular (7.11%) organs. As of the contrast agents, SonoVue/Lumason (39.11%) was most frequently used, followed by Definity (20.89%) and Sonazoid (8.89%). Of all contrast-enhanced ultrasound studies, 32 (14.22%) were discontinued early, and 29 (12.89%) completed studies reported their results. Cox regression analysis revealed that a large sample size and US registration were factors reducing early discontinuation risk. Among completed studies, factors associated with reported results were industry funding and US registration. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the number of contrast-enhanced ultrasound studies has grown over time, but is still small. Developing new advancements in contrast-enhanced ultrasound will require a concerted effort to increase the quality and quantity of clinical studies in this field.

Core outcomes were rarely reported overall in systematic reviews on acupuncture for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional meta-epidemiological study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify a comprehensive list of outcomes and explore the reporting rate of core outcome sets (COS) and related factors in systematic reviews (SRs) of acupuncture for osteoarthritis (OA). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Databases were searched for the relative SRs. Descriptive statistics were calculated as frequencies and percentages. Binary logistic regression was used to explore the factors affecting the reporting rate of COS. RESULTS: We included 59 SRs. Outcome measures reported in the SRs were classified into 11 domains and 67 unique outcomes. No SR completely reported COS. In COS released in 2016, 75% of outcomes (6/8) were only reported by ⩽5% SRs. In COS released in 2019, the reporting rate was very low (from 0% to 17%) for 73.3% of outcomes (11/15). SRs published in the most recent 5 years had a significantly greater possibility of reporting COS (odds ratio (OR) = 4.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.33 to 16.88, p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Core outcomes were rarely reported in systematic reviews of acupuncture for OA, with considerable heterogeneity in the use of outcomes. The publication of COS in the COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) database may help promote the reporting of COS. We encourage systematic reviewers to use relevant COS.

DNA Methylation Architecture Provides Insight into the Pathogenesis of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Numerous studies suggested methylation modifications play an important role in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but few have depicted DNA methylation architecture on the pathological process of UTUC. We aimed to better understand the pathogenesis of UTUC and provide precision medicine references when managing UTUC patients. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched for UTUC until December 31, 2020. Methodological quality assessment was conducted according to NIH recommendations. Meta-analysis was conducted to assess the prognostic effect of methylated genes. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to validate methylated genes and cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) sites. RESULTS: Eleven studies (3619 patients) were eligible to investigate 12 methylated genes and 10 CpGs. The quality of all the studies was fair to good. Meta-analysis found the pooled effect of eligible methylated genes had a low risk of tumor recurrence (HR = 0·67; 95% CI: 0·51-0·87; P = ·003), but a high risk of tumor progression (HR = 1·60; 95% CI: 1·17-2·18; P = ·003) and cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1·35; 95% CI: 1·06-1·72; P = ·01). For individual methylation status of GDF15, HSPA2, RASSF1A, TMEFF2, and VIM, the pooled effect of each gene was found pleiotropic on both diagnosis and prognosis. Survival analysis suggested higher methylation of SPARCL1 had a better disease-specific survival (P = ·048). CONCLUSION: We combined meta-analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using the most updated evidence on the methylation of UTUC. Candidate biomarkers with essential diagnosis and prognosis function might provide precision medicine references for personalized therapies.

Results Reporting and Early Termination of Childhood Obesity Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Objective: Childhood obesity is one of the most severe challenges of public health in the twenty-first century and may increase the risk of various physical and psychological diseases in adulthood. The prevalence and predictors of unreported results and premature termination in pediatric obesity research are not clear. We aimed to characterize childhood obesity trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and identify features associated with early termination and lack of results reporting. Methods: Records were downloaded and screened for all childhood obesity trials from the inception of ClinicalTrials.gov to July 29, 2021. We performed descriptive analyses of characteristics, Cox regression for early termination, and logistic regression for lack of results reporting. Results: We identified 1,312 trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Among clinicalTrials.gov registered childhood obesity-related intervention trials, trial unreported results were 88.5 and 4.3% of trials were prematurely terminated. Additionally, the factors that reduced the risk of unreported outcomes were US-registered clinical studies and drug intervention trials. Factors associated with a reduced risk of early termination are National Institutes of Health (NIH) or other federal agency funding and large trials. Conclusion: The problem of unreported results in clinical trials of childhood obesity is serious. Therefore, timely bulletin of the results and reasons for termination remain urgent aims for childhood obesity trials.

Publishing clinical prActice GuidelinEs (PAGE): Recommendations from editors and reviewers.

Transparency Ecosystem for Research and Journals in Medicine (TERM) Working Group summarized the essential recommendations that should be considered to review and publish a high-quality guideline. These recommendations from editors and reviewers included the ten components of essential requirements: systematic review of existing relevant guidelines, guideline registration, guideline protocol, stakeholders, conflicts of interest, clinical questions, systematic reviews, recommendation consensus, guideline reporting, and external review. TERM Working Group abbreviates them as PAGE (essential requirements for Publishing clinical prActice GuidelinEs), recommends guideline authors, editors, and peer reviewers use them for high-quality guidelines.

A search of only four key databases would identify most randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: A meta-epidemiological study.

Little research has been conducted to assess which specific databases should be searched when performing a systematic review (SR) on acupuncture. The current study aimed to identify key databases and the optimal database combination to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on acupuncture for inclusion in SRs. A systematic search for SRs in the field of acupuncture was conducted in order to identify target databases and RCTs were extracted from the SRs that had searched all target databases. The proportions of SRs that had achieved 100%, 95%, or 90% recall of RCTs and the total recall of RCTs in various combinations of target databases were calculated. Sensitivity analysis was performed on those SRs that included 10 or more RCTs. CNKI, WanFang, VIP, PubMed, CENTRAL and Embase were regarded as target databases. A total of 4349 acupuncture RCTs were extracted from 286 SRs. Searching all six target databases retrieved 99.3% of all RCTs while 99.1% were recalled by searching the combination of CNKI, WanFang, PubMed and CENTRAL. There were no significant differences on total recall of RCTs (p = 0.549) or in the proportion of SRs with 90% recall of RCTs (97.2% vs. 97.6%; p = 0.794) between searching the above four and the full six target databases. Most results were similar in the sensitivity analysis. The combined retrieval power of CNKI, WanFang, PubMed and CENTRAL was considered an efficient choice to retrieve acupuncture RCTs included in SRs.

Network architecture of non-coding RNAs provides insights into the pathogenesis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Numerous studies suggested that non-coding RNA modifications play an important role in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but few have depicted the architecture of non-coding RNA on the pathological process of UTUC. We aimed to better understand the pathogenesis of UTUC and provide precision medicine references of non-coding RNA when managing UTUC patients. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus were searched for UTUC until December 31, 2020. Methodological quality assessment was conducted according to NIH recommendations. Enrichment analyses and network analyses were conducted to explore the interactions of miRNA with genes and other non-coding RNAs. Survival analyses were performed to validate the novel genes. A total of 12 pairs of UTUC tumors and adjacent normal tissues were also included to validate the gene expressions regulated by miRNAs from the miRNA-gene network. Thirteen studies with 945 patients were eligible, investigating 106 miRNAs mutations. The quality of all the studies was fair to good. Most miRNAs were enriched in tissue/organs, diseases, and specific anti-cancer drugs (false discovery rate <0.05). Other non-coding RNAs, i.e.,: miR-34a, DLGAP1-AS1, USP39, and RNA5SP479, were highlighted by network analyses to have potential in the pathogenesis of UTUC. Top hub genes in the miRNA-gene network, namely ZNF460, NUFIP2, and E2F3, were all validated by survival analysis(P < 0.05). Using own cohort data, the differential expression analyses identified 368 overlapped significant genes, including above 3 hub genes (false discovery rate <0.05). Novel biomarkers identified in our studies might play essential roles in UTUC, from the perspectives of the molecule, tissue/organ, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Candidate biomarkers could be significant references for personalized and target therapies.

Development and internal validation of a Wasp Sting Severity Score to assess severity and indicate blood purification in persons with Asian wasp stings.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the incidence of wasp sting has increased annually in China. Organ damage and high mortality due to mass wasp envenomation remain major challenges. Timely and appropriate medical intervention can improve survival. However, there are currently no normalized tools for early assessment of severity. METHODS: The clinical data of wasp sting patients hospitalized from 2011 to 2019 were used as a training set. Logistic regression was used to explore major risk factors for the development of a severe case of wasp sting (SC). The Wasp Sting Severity Score (WSS) was determined considering these risk factors to identify SCs and was tested in a validation dataset that was prospectively collected in 2020. RESULTS: The data of 1131 wasp sting patients from 2011 to 2019 were included in the training set. Logistic regression analysis showed that tea-colored urine, number of stings, and lactate dehydrogenase and total bilirubin levels were risk factors for developing an SC. The WSS was developed considering these four risk factors, and the total possible WSS was 20 points. The WSS was tested using the validation dataset, comprising the data of 153 patients, in 2020, and we found that a WSS ≥3 points was an important indication for blood purification, with a sensitivity of 71.9%, specificity of 92.6% and an area under the curve of 0.918 (95% confidence interval 0.873-0.962). Among patients with more than 30 stings, mortality in those who underwent plasma exchange (PE) within 24 h after admission was significantly lower than that in those who did not receive PE treatment (14.3% versus 46.9%, P = 0.003). However, continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) (P = 0.317) and hemoperfusion (HP) (P = 0.869) did not significantly reduce mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with WSS scores ≥3 should be considered for blood purification as early as possible in addition to routine treatment. In addition, PE is better than CVVH and HP at reducing mortality in patients suffering from severe wasp stings.

Comparison of Four Lymph Node Stage Methods for Predicting the Prognosis of Distal Cholangiocarcinoma Patients After Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The metastatic status of regional lymph nodes is an effective risk factor for the prognosis of distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA). But existing lymph node staging is not accurate enough and is susceptible to interference. This study aims to explore the predictive ability of the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) staging system of dCCA compared with existing lymph node staging systems. METHODS: A total of 928 dCCA patients were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database as the training cohort, and 207 dCCA patients from West China Hospital who underwent surgery were reviewed as the validation cohort. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression were conducted to identify the most meaningful factors relevant to prognosis. The performance of four lymph node stage systems was compared by a model-based approach. RESULT: Age at diagnosis, pathological grade, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor 7th T stage, tumor size, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and lymph node stage system were independent prognostic factors. The model with the LODDS system had a better model fit with the highest C-index (0.679) and 1-/3-/5- area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.739/0.671/0.658) as well as the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) (5,020.52). External validation results from 207 dCCA patients showed a C-index of 0.647 and 1-/3-/5-AUC of 0.740/0.683/0.589. Compared with the lymph node ratio (LNR), AJCC 8th N system, and 7th N system, the 5-year net reclassification improvement (NRI) of the LODDS system was 0.030 (95% CI: -0.079 to 0.147), 0.042 (95% CI: -0.062 to 0.139), and 0.040 (95% CI: -0.057 to 0.146), respectively. The integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) of LODDS improved compared with the LNR model (0.016; 95% CI: -0.001 to 0.036), AJCC 8th N system (0.020; 95% CI: 0.003-0.037), and AJCC 7th N system (0.019; 95% CI: 0.002-0.036). Decision curve analysis (DCA) also shows a greater net benefit of LODDS. In lymph node-negative patients, LODDS reveals a positive linear relationship with the hazard ratio (HR). The stage capacity of LODDS in a subgroup analysis stratified by examined lymph node number (ELNN) was consistent. CONCLUSIONS: The LODDS lymph node stage system has superior predictive performance as compared with the LNR, AJCC 7th, and 8th lymph node stage systems. Meanwhile, LODDS has a more detailed staging ability and good stability.

Use and reporting of risk of bias tools in 825 systematic reviews of acupuncture: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use and reporting of risk of bias (RoB) tools in systematic reviews (SRs) of acupuncture. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We extracted and analyzed information relating to RoB in acupuncture SRs via Medline, Embase and the Chinese CNKI (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure), WanFang and VIP databases from their inception to 24 November 2017. Three subgroup analyses were used to check the influence of language, journal type and impact factor, following which we used descriptive analysis. RESULTS: We included 825 acupuncture SRs, of which 48% used the Cochrane RoB tool. Only 36% used the latest version of the Cochrane Handbook (version 5.1.0 at time of writing) with higher proportions among Cochrane SRs (65%) versus non-Cochrane SRs (34%), and high impact factor journals (58%) versus low or no impact factor journals (28% and 38%, respectively). In the last decade, there were notable increases in the use of the Cochrane RoB tool and Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0, of 43% and 19%, respectively. Chinese-language SRs demonstrated proportionally higher tendencies to report an incorrect Cochrane Handbook version, increasing by 14% in the last 5 years. Additionally, 7% SRs did not report any results, and only 10% reported relatively complete and adequate RoB assessment. Cochrane SRs reported more complete assessments than Chinese-language or non-Cochrane English-language SRs. CONCLUSION: Use and reporting of RoB tools were suboptimal. Proportionally, use of the Cochrane RoB tool and Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0 was low but rising. Our results highlight the prevalence and concerns of using unsuitable tools and the issue of incomplete RoB reporting. RoB tool application requires further improvement.