Clinical versus Histological Assessment of Basal Cell Carcinoma Subtype and Thickness of Tumours Selected for Photodynamic Therapy.

Photodynamic therapy is an approved treatment for primary, superficial, and small nodular basal cell carcinomas with a thickness of < 2 mm located on low-risk sites. Histologically verified basal cell carcinomas clinically assessed as suited for photodynamic therapy were included. The study aimed to investigate the agreement between clinical and histological assessments of basal cell carcinoma subtypes and thickness of tumours selected for photodynamic therapy with histopathological evaluation as a reference. A total of 343 tumours were included. The agreement between clinical and histological diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma subtype was 72% (p < 0.001). Clinical assessment of subtype had a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 55% for superficial tumours and a sensitivity of 55% and specificity of 85% for nodular tumours. The mean ± SD thickness values by clinical and histological assessments were 0.95 ± 0.53 and 0.86 ± 0.75. The difference of 0.09 mm was statistically significant (p = 0.017), but not considered to be clinically relevant, although the differences between specific subgroups could be relevant. Among basal cell carcinomas clinically diagnosed as superficial, 91% were histologically consistent with the current photodynamic therapy criteria. The main results suggest that histopathological evaluation should precede photodynamic therapy to ensure selection of suitable basal cell carcinomas. In selected cases, the clinical diagnosis alone may be adequate before proceeding with photodynamic therapy.

New, simplified versus standard photodynamic therapy (PDT) regimen for superficial and nodular basal cell carcinoma (BCC): A single-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an approved and widely used treatment for low-risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC), comprising two sessions with an interval of 1 week. Simplification of the treatment course can be cost-effective, easier to organize, and cause less discomfort for the patients. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed an investigator-initiated, single-blind, non-inferiority, randomized controlled multicentre study with the objective of investigating whether a simpler and more flexible PDT regimen was not >10% less effective than the standard double PDT in the treatment of primary, superficial, and nodular ≤2 mm-thick BCC and evaluate the cosmetic outcome. With a non-inferiority margin of 0.1 and an expected probability complete response of 0.85, 190 tumours were required in each group. Histologically verified BCCs from seven centres in Norway were randomly assigned (1:1) to either receive a new regimen of single PDT with one possible re-treatment of non-complete responding tumours, or the standard regimen. The primary endpoint was the number of tumours with complete response or treatment failure at 36 months of follow-up, assessed by investigators blinded to the treatment regimen. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. The cosmetic outcome was recorded. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT-01482104, and EudraCT, 2011-004797-28. A total of 402 BCCs in 246 patients were included; 209 tumours assigned to the new and 193 to the standard regimen. After 36 months, there were 61 treatment failures with the new and 34 failures with the standard regimen. Complete response rate was 69.5% in the new and 81.1% in the standard treatment group. The difference was 11.6% (upper 97.5% CI 20.3), i.e. > than the non-inferiority margin of 10%. Cosmetic outcomes were excellent or good in 92% and 89% following the new and standard regimens, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Single PDT with possible re-treatment of primary, superficial, and nodular ≤ 2-mm-thick BCC was significantly less effective than the approved standard double treatment. The cosmetic outcome was favorable and comparable between the two treatment groups.

Clinical consequences of infliximab immunogenicity and the effect of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring: exploratory analyses of the randomised, controlled NOR-DRUM trials.

BACKGROUND: Antidrug antibodies to TNF inhibitors might affect clinical outcomes. Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring allows for early detection of antidrug antibodies and might reduce negative clinical consequences. We aimed to explore how antidrug antibodies to the TNF inhibitor infliximab influence treatment outcomes, and to assess the effect of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring. METHODS: This was a predefined exploratory analysis of data from the randomised, controlled NOR-DRUM trials. The trials were conducted in rheumatology, gastroenterology, and dermatology departments at 21 Norwegian hospitals. Adult patients (aged 18-75 years) with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases were randomly assigned to proactive therapeutic drug monitoring or standard infliximab dosing in the NOR-DRUM A trial (30-week follow-up) and the NOR-DRUM B trial (52-week follow-up). Antidrug antibodies were assessed with a drug-sensitive assay before each infusion. The outcomes of remission (at week 30), disease worsening (during 52 weeks), infusion reactions, and infliximab discontinuation were assessed according to the presence of antidrug antibodies and use of therapeutic drug monitoring. FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2017, and Dec 12, 2019, 616 patients were included in the NOR-DRUM trials, of whom 615 had at least one serum infliximab and antidrug antibody assessment and were included in the present analyses. Mean age was 45 years (IQR 32-56), 305 (50%) patients were women, and 310 (50%) patients were men. Antidrug antibodies were detected in 147 (24%) patients. Remission at week 30 occurred in 25 (35%) of 72 patients with antidrug antibodies and 180 (54%) of 335 without antidrug antibodies (risk ratio 0·62 [95% CI 0·45-0·86]; p=0·0037). In patients with antidrug antibodies compared with patients without antidrug antibodies, higher rates were found for: disease worsening over 52 weeks (0·76 per person-year vs 0· 35 per person-year, hazard ratio [HR] 2·02 [95% CI 1·33-3·07]; p=0·0009), infusion reactions (0·16 per person-year vs 0·03 per person-year, HR 17·02 [6·98-41·47]; p<0·0001), and infliximab discontinuation (1·00 per person-year vs 0·20 per person-year, HR 6·64 [4·84-9·11]; p<0·0001). These associations were more pronounced in patients with high concentrations of antidrug antibodies than in those with low concentrations of antidrug antibodies. Independent of antibody status, therapeutic drug monitoring was associated with a lower risk of disease worsening (HR 0·41 [0·29-0·59]; p=0·0001) or an infusion reaction (HR 0·30 [0·12-0·73]; p=0·0076), and was associated with an increase in the rate of infliximab discontinuation (HR 1·37 [1·02-1·83]; p=0·037). INTERPRETATION: In patients where antidrug antibodies were detected, remission was less likely to be reached and sustained, and infusion reaction or discontinuation of infliximab was more likely. Timely detection of antidrug antibodies by proactive therapeutic drug monitoring facilitated treatment decisions that reduced the negative consequences, both regarding infliximab effectiveness and safety. This highlights the role of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring in optimising infliximab therapy. FUNDING: Inter-regional KLINBEFORSK grants and South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority grants.