Introducing FDG PET/CT-guided chemoradiotherapy for stage III NSCLC in low- and middle-income countries: preliminary results from the IAEA PERTAIN trial.

PURPOSE: Patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) continue to have a poor prognosis. It is known that FDG PET/CT improves staging, treatment selection and target volume delineation (TVD), and although its use has grown rapidly, it is still not widely available in LMIC. CRT is often used as sequential treatment, but is known to be more effective when given concurrently. The aim of the PERTAIN study was to assess the impact of introducing FDG PET/CT-guided concurrent CRT, supported by training and quality control (QC), on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with stage III NSCLC. METHODS: The study included patients with stage III NSCLC from nine medical centres in seven countries. A retrospective cohort was managed according to local practices between January 2010 and July 2014, which involved only optional diagnostic FDG PET/CT for staging (not for TVD), followed by sequential or concurrent CRT. A prospective cohort between August 2015 and October 2018 was treated according to the study protocol including FDG PET/CT in treatment position for staging and multimodal TVD followed by concurrent CRT by specialists trained in protocol-specific TVD and with TVD QC. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess OS and PFS in the retrospective and prospective cohorts. RESULTS: Guidelines for FDG PET/CT image acquisition and TVD were developed and published. All specialists involved in the PERTAIN study received training between June 2014 and May 2016. The PET/CT scanners used received EARL accreditation. In November 2018 a planned interim analysis was performed including 230 patients in the retrospective cohort with a median follow-up of 14 months and 128 patients in the prospective cohort, of whom 69 had a follow-up of at least 1 year. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, OS was significantly longer in the prospective cohort than in the retrospective cohort (23 vs. 14 months, p = 0.012). In addition, median PFS was significantly longer in the prospective cohort than in the retrospective cohort (17 vs. 11 months, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: In the PERTAIN study, the preliminary results indicate that introducing FDG PET/CT-guided concurrent CRT for patients with stage III NSCLC in LMIC resulted in a significant improvement in OS and PFS. The final study results based on complete data are expected in 2020.

Influence of experience and qualification on PET-based target volume delineation. When there is no expert--ask your colleague.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The integration of positron emission tomography (PET) information for target volume delineation in radiation treatment planning is routine in many centers. In contrast to automatic contouring, research on visual-manual delineation is scarce. The present study investigates the dependency of manual delineation on experience and qualification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 44 international interdisciplinary observers each defined a [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET based gross tumor volume (GTV) using the same PET/CT scan from a patient with lung cancer. The observers were "experts" (E; n = 3), "experienced interdisciplinary pairs" (EP; 9 teams of radiation oncologist (RO) + nuclear medicine physician (NP)), "single field specialists" (SFS; n = 13), and "students" (S; n = 10). Five automatic delineation methods (AM) were also included. Volume sizes and concordance indices within the groups (pCI) and relative to the experts (eCI) were calculated. RESULTS: E (pCI = 0.67) and EP (pCI = 0.53) showed a significantly higher agreement within the groups as compared to SFS (pCI = 0.43, p = 0.03, and p = 0.006). In relation to the experts, EP (eCI = 0.55) showed better concordance compared to SFS (eCI = 0.49) or S (eCI = 0.47). The intermethod variability of the AM (pCI = 0.44) was similar to that of SFS and S, showing poorer agreement with the experts (eCI = 0.35). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that interdisciplinary cooperation could be beneficial for consistent contouring. Joint delineation by a radiation oncologist and a nuclear medicine physician showed remarkable agreement and better concordance with the experts compared to other specialists. The relevant intermethod variability of the automatic algorithms underlines the need for further standardization and optimization in this field.

Thromboprophylaxis for lung cancer patients--multimodality assessment of clinician practices, perceptions and decision support tools.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the opinions and self-reported practices of clinicians, as well as the availability of decision support tools, regarding appropriate thromboprophylaxis for patients with lung cancer to identify variation in practice and/or divergence from evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPG). METHODS: A computer-generated survey (SurveyMonkey software) was distributed to surgical, radiation and medical oncologists with lung cancer specialisation, via membership of the Australian Lung Cancer Trials Group (ALTG) from May to September 2013. RESULTS: Seventy-two clinicians, from public, private, specialist and general hospitals, completed the survey (46% response rate). Hospital-endorsed CPG were widely available (91%); however, these routinely lacked robust recommendations for the ambulatory care setting (98%) and risk stratification tools (65%). Clinicians consistently identified ambulatory care treatment modalities (chemotherapy, alone or in combination with radiotherapy) as having similar (high) thrombotic risk as surgery. Timing and duration of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis prescribing among surgical oncologists varied and were divergent from guideline recommendations. Fifty-eight percent of surveyed clinicians cited a lack of high-quality data to guide preventative strategies in lung cancer patients. CONCLUSION: Clinicians consistently identified patients with lung cancer as having a high thromboembolic risk in both ambulatory and surgical settings, but with differences in recommendations and variation in practice. CPG lacked robust recommendations for the ambulatory care setting, the main arena for the multimodality lung cancer treatment paradigm.

Minimising critical organ irradiation in limited stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a dosimetric study of the benefit of involved node radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy plus radiotherapy is the standard of care for patients with limited stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Radiotherapy is evolving from involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) to involved node radiotherapy (INRT) to decrease radiotherapy-related morbidity. In the absence of long-term toxicity data, dose-volume metrics of organs at risk (OAR) provide a surrogate measure of toxicity risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten female patients with stage I-IIA supradiaphragmatic HL were randomly selected. All patients had pre-chemotherapy computerised tomography (CT) and CT-positron emission tomography staging. Using CT planning, three radiotherapy plans were produced per patient: (i) IFRT, (ii) INRT using parallel-opposed beams and (iii) INRT using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Radiotherapy dose was 30.6 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions. OAR evaluated were lungs, breasts, thyroid, heart and coronary arteries. RESULTS: Compared with IFRT, INRT significantly reduced mean doses to lungs (P < 0.01), breasts (P < 0.01), thyroid (P < 0.01) and heart (P < 0.01), on Wilcoxon testing. Compared with conventional INRT, VMAT improved dose conformality but increased low-dose radiation exposure to lungs and breasts. VMAT reduced the heart volume receiving 30 Gy (V30) by 85%. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction from IFRT to INRT decreased the volumes of lungs, breasts and thyroid receiving high-dose radiation, suggesting the potential to reduce long-term second malignancy risks. VMAT may be useful for patients with pre-existing heart disease by minimising further cardiac toxicity risks.

Long-term Survival with 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-directed Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Synchronous Solitary Brain Metastasis.

AIMS: At diagnosis, <1% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have synchronous solitary brain metastasis (SSBM). In prior cohorts without 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) staging, definitive treatment to intracranial and intrathoracic disease showed a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 11-21%. We investigated the long-term survival outcomes for patients with SSBM NSCLC, diagnosed in the FDG-PET/CT era and treated definitively with local therapies to both intracranial and intrathoracic sites of disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study assessed patients staged with FDG-PET/CT who received definitive lung and SSBM treatment from February 1999 to December 2017. A lung-molecular graded prognostic assessment (lung-molGPA) score was assigned for each patient using age, performance status score, and, where carried out, molecular status. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox proportional hazard models determined OS and PFS prognostic factors. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients newly diagnosed with NSCLC and SSBM had a median age of 63 years (range 34-76). The median follow-up of all patients was 3.9 years. Thirty-three patients (67%) had ≥T2 disease, 23 (47%) had ≥N2. At 2 years, 45% of first failures were intracranial only (95% confidence interval 30-59). At 3 and 5 years, OS was 45% (95% confidence interval 32-63) and 30% (95% confidence interval 18-51), respectively. In ≥N1 disease, 5-year OS was 34% (95% confidence interval 18-63). The 3- and 5-year PFS was 8% (95% confidence interval 3-22) and 0%, respectively. Higher lung-molGPA was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.61, P = 0.002). Higher lung-molGPA (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.71, P = 0.005) and lower N-stage (hazard ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.15, P = 0.007) were associated with longer PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive treatment of patients with NSCLC and SSBM staged with FDG-PET/CT can result in 5-year survivors, including those with ≥N1 disease.

Radiotherapy for low-grade gastric marginal zone lymphoma: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with low-grade gastric marginal zone lymphoma. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive cases of gastric marginal zone lymphoma treated by radical RT at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Radiation Oncology Victoria between January 1980 and September 2003 was carried out. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (11 men and 7 women) were identified. The median age at commencement of RT was 65 years (range 42-84 years). Prior treatment included Helicobacter pylori eradication in 12 patients, chemotherapy in 7 and surgery in 2, whereas 2 patients had no prior therapy. The median time to progression after commencement of last treatment before RT was 4.8 months (range 0-129.4 months). The radiation fields included the stomach plus perigastric and coeliac nodes in 15 patients (83%), stomach plus spleen in 2 patients (11%) and stomach plus para-aortic nodes in 1 patient (6%). The median RT dose was 30 Gy (range 30-36 Gy) in a median 20 fractions (range 17-24 fractions). One patient required treatment interruption for acute toxicity. A complete response on post-RT biopsies was achieved in 17 of 18 patients (94%). With a median follow up of 4.5 years after RT, 3 of these 17 patients (18%) have had a recurrence. At the last follow up, 11 patients were alive in continuous complete histological remission. No late renal toxicity was identified. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for patients with low-grade gastric marginal zone lymphoma, including those who have had prior therapy.

Clinical impact of (18)F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: To prospectively study the impact of (18)F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) on clinical management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred five consecutive patients with NSCLC undergoing (18)F FDG PET were analyzed. Before PET, referring physicians recorded scan indication, conventional clinical stage, and proposed treatment plan. PET scan results were reported in conjunction with available clinical and imaging data, including results of computed tomography (CT). Subsequent management and appropriateness of PET-induced changes were assessed by follow-up for at least 6 months or until the patient's death. RESULTS: Indications for PET were primary staging (n = 59), restaging (n = 34), and suspected malignancy subsequently proven to be NSCLC (n = 12). In 27 (26%) of 105 of cases, PET results led to a change from curative to palliative therapy by upstaging disease extent. Validity of the PET result was established in all but one case. PET appropriately downstaged 10 of 16 patients initially planned for palliative therapy, allowing either potentially curative treatment (four patients) or no treatment (six patients). PET influenced the radiation delivery in 22 (65%) of 34 patients who subsequently received radical radiotherapy. Twelve patients considered probably inoperable on conventional imaging studies were downstaged by PET and underwent potentially curative surgery. PET missed only one primary tumor (5-mm scar carcinoma). CT and PET understaged three of 20 surgical patients (two with N1 lesions < 5 mm and one with unrecognized atrial involvement), and PET missed one small intrapulmonary metastasis apparent on CT. No pathological N2 disease was missed on PET. CONCLUSION: FDG PET scanning changed or influenced management decisions in 70 patients (67%) with NSCLC. Patients were frequently spared unnecessary treatment, and management was more appropriately targeted.

Comparison of Single-fraction and Multi-fraction Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Patients with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-staged Pulmonary Oligometastases.

AIM: To compare outcomes of single-fraction and multi-fraction stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for pulmonary metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review from two academic institutions of patients with one to three pulmonary metastases staged with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scans. For single-fraction SABR, 26 Gy was prescribed for peripheral targets and 18 Gy for central targets. In the multi-fraction cohort, 48 Gy/4 or 50 Gy/5 was prescribed for peripheral targets and 50 Gy/5 was prescribed for central targets. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were delivered using heterogeneity corrections. Conformity indices at an intermediate dose (R50%) and at a high dose (R100%) were used to assess a relationship with the planning target volume (PTV). Overall survival, local and distant progression and toxicity rates were analysed from the date of treatment completion. RESULTS: Between February 2010 and June 2013, 65 patients with 85 pulmonary metastases were reviewed. The median follow-up was 2.1 years. Metastases most commonly originated from colorectal cancer (31%), followed by non-small cell lung cancer (25%). 3D-CRT was used in 52 targets, IMRT in 21 and VMAT in 12. 3D-CRT showed a lower median R50% (P=0.01), but a higher median R100% than IMRT/VMAT (P=0.04). The R50% index was inversely correlated to the PTV with all techniques (P=0.01). Overall survival at 1 and 2 years in all patients was 93% (95% confidence interval 87-100%) and 71% (95% confidence interval 58-86%), respectively. The 2 year freedom from local and distant progression was 93% (95% confidence interval 86-100%) and 38% (95% confidence interval 27-55%), respectively. There were no significant differences between overall survival (P=0 .14), time to distant progression (P=0.06) or toxicity rates (P=0.75) between single- and multi-fraction cohorts. CONCLUSION: We report comparable local control, overall survival and toxicity rates between single-fraction and multi-fraction SABR treatments in patients with FDG-PET-staged pulmonary oligometastases. We propose a guideline for R50% conformity incorporating 3D-CRT/IMRT/VMAT techniques with heterogeneity corrected planning algorithms.

Hypobaric hypoxia: a method for testing bioreductive drugs in vivo.

Hypobaric hypoxia has been used to induce tumor hypoxia for in vivo comparison of the anti-tumor effects of the bioreductive agents SR 4233 (3-amino-1,2,4-benzotriazine-1,4-dioxide), RSU 1069 (1(2-nitro-1-imidazolyl)-3-aziridino-2-propanol), and Nitromin (methylbis(2-chloroethyl)amine N-oxide). BDF mice bearing the T50/80 mammary carcinoma were treated with these agents over a range of doses under normobaric (oxic) and hypobaric (hypoxic) conditions. The time taken for the tumor to double treatment volume (volume doubling time) was used as a measure of anti-tumor effect. Volume doubling time was plotted against log dose and dose response curves were fitted. A dose enhancement ratio (the ratio of drug doses required to give an equivalent anti-tumor effect under oxic and hypoxic conditions) was determined. The dose enhancement ratios for SR 4233 and RSU 1069 were 8.8 and 8.5, respectively, showing that these agents had an equivalent and substantial enhancement of their cytotoxicity when combined with hypobaric hypoxia. For Nitromin, no significant dose response effect was obtained under oxic conditions precluding the calculation of the dose enhancement ratio. SR 4233 was found to have increased systemic toxicity when combined with hypobaric hypoxia, suggesting that it is more readily activated than the other drugs tested. This in vivo test system will allow determination of the dose enhancement ratio for novel bioreductive agents and facilitate their comparison.

Radiation myelopathy following transplantation and radiotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Combined modality therapy with chemotherapy and radiotherapy has become increasingly popular in the management of solid malignancies. However, unexpected toxicities may arise from their interactions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We report the case of a young woman with a large mediastinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who underwent high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation and involved field radiotherapy, and who developed radiation myelopathy after a latent period of only 3 months. The spinal cord dose did not exceed 40.3 Gy in 22 fractions over 4.5 weeks, which is well within accepted tolerance limits. She had no other identifiable risk factors for radiation myelopathy, suggesting an adverse drug-radiation interaction as the most likely cause of her injury. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This represents the first report of radiation myelopathy at accepted safe radiation doses following high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation, and we recommend caution in the choice of radiotherapeutic dose in this setting.

Long-term results of irradiation for patients with progressive Graves' ophthalmopathy.

PURPOSE: To determine the long-term outcome of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with progressively symptomatic thyroid eye disease and to evaluate the potential long-term sequelae. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four hundred fifty-three patients provided written informed consent and received retrobulbar RT for Graves' ophthalmopathy at Stanford University Medical Center; 197 with 1 year of follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 197 patients, 189 received RT to the bilateral retrobulbar regions, and 4 received unilateral RT. The technical information was unavailable for 4 patients. Patients were assessed by chart review, telephone interview, questionnaire, and multidisciplinary physician examination. Eye impairment was scored using the SPECS system. The end point review included the before and after treatment SPECS score, surgical intervention, and patient satisfaction. Potential complications, including cataract development, retinopathy, and tumor formation, were investigated. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the prognostic variables. RESULTS: Improvement or resolution was 89% for soft-tissue findings; 70% for proptosis; 85% for extraocular muscle dysfunction; 96% for corneal abnormalities; and 67% for sight loss. The response to RT may take >6 months to stabilize. Factors predictive of response varied in the individual SPECS categories but included the initial SPECS score, pretreatment thyroid status, female gender, a 20-Gy RT dose, and a history of hypertension. Nonpredictive factors included a history of tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, steroids, and prior cataracts. Only 16% required surgical intervention to preserve their vision or restore binocular vision. Twenty-two patients (12%) developed cataracts after irradiation (median 11 years). No patient developed a tumor within the RT field during the follow-up period (range 1-29 years). Ninety-eight percent of patients were pleased with their results, and 2% believed their symptoms progressed despite RT. CONCLUSIONS: Retrobulbar irradiation (20 Gy) is safe and effective treatment for progressive Graves' ophthalmopathy, with a 96% overall response rate, 98% patient satisfaction rate, and no irreparable long-term sequelae, with follow-up extending 29 years. The most common late effect observed was cataract development, which occurred more frequently in older patients and was reversible with extraction. Elective surgical intervention after RT should be withheld until patients have demonstrated a plateau in response.

High rate of detection of unsuspected distant metastases by pet in apparent stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: implications for radical radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Most radical radiotherapy (RT) candidates with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have Stage III disease and ultimately die with distant metastases. We tested the hypothesis that positron emission tomography (PET) using 18-F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) would detect more unsuspected metastases in apparent Stage III disease than in Stages I-II. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Staging FDG-PET was performed for 167 NSCLC patients, with Stage I-III by conventional workup, who were candidates for curative therapy with surgery (n = 8), radical chemo/RT or RT (n = 156), or preoperative chemo/RT (n = 3). Each patient was allocated a conventional "pre-PET stage" and a "post-PET stage" that relied on PET when discordance with conventional staging occurred. RESULTS: Stage distribution pre-PET was n = 39 (Stage I), n = 28 (Stage II), and n = 100 (Stage III). In 32 patients (19%), PET detected distant metastasis, most commonly abdominal with 17 cases (adrenal, n = 7; liver, n = 4; other, n = 6). Other sites included lung (n = 10) and bone (n = 6). PET-detected metastasis increased with increasing pre-PET stage from I (7.5%) through II (18%) to III (24%, p = 0.016), and, in particular, was significantly higher in Stage III (p = 0.039). Biopsy confirmation was not routine, but progression occurred at PET-detected metastatic sites or other metastatic sites in all but 3 of the 32 patients by last review. CONCLUSION: PET staging is recommended for radical RT candidates with NSCLC. The highest yield of unexpected distant metastases is observed in Stage III.

The utility of (18)F-FDG PET for suspected recurrent non-small cell lung cancer after potentially curative therapy: impact on management and prognostic stratification.

UNLABELLED: After potentially curative therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), masses or symptoms suggestive of relapse are common but may be difficult to characterize. Early detection is important because salvage therapies are available for localized recurrence. This study evaluated whether (18)F-FDG PET is useful and predictive of outcome in this setting. METHODS: For 63 consecutive patients with suspected relapse >6 mo after definitive treatment of NSCLC, the apparent extent of disease on conventional restaging was compared with that on FDG PET. Patients with already confirmed systemic metastases were excluded unless locally aggressive treatment of these was being considered. Serial imaging and pathologic results were obtained during a median follow-up of 19 mo to validate diagnostic findings. Prognostic significance was tested using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: PET had positive findings in 41 of 42 patients with confirmed relapse (sensitivity, 98%). No disease was evident during a minimum follow-up of 12 mo in 14 of 15 patients with clinically suspected relapse but negative PET findings (negative predictive value, 93%). PET induced a major management change in 40 patients (63%), including 6 whose treatment was changed from curative to palliative, 3 whose treatment was changed from palliative to curative, and 9 for whom negative PET findings prevented active management. Both the presence (P = 0.012) and the extent (P < 0.0001) of relapse on PET were highly significant prognostic factors. There was also significant prognostic stratification based on the treatment delivered after the PET study (P = 0.011), but after adjustment for this treatment, PET status remained highly predictive of survival. CONCLUSION: PET better assesses the status of disease and stratifies prognosis than does conventional staging, affects patient management, and should be incorporated into paradigms for suspected recurrence of NSCLC.

(18)F-FDG PET provides high-impact and powerful prognostic stratification in staging newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer.

UNLABELLED: Survival of lung cancer patients remains poor despite increasingly aggressive treatment. Conventional staging has well-described limitations. (18)F-FDG PET has been shown to stage lung cancer more accurately than does CT scanning, but the impact on patient treatment and outcome is poorly defined. This study evaluated this impact in routine clinical practice within a tertiary oncology facility. METHODS: For 153 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer, the treatment plan based on conventional staging methods was compared with the treatment plan based on incorporation of PET findings. Survival was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: For broad groupings of stage, 10% of cases were downstaged and 33% upstaged by PET. When assessable, the PET stage was confirmed in 89% of patients. PET had a high impact on 54 patients (35%), including 34 whose therapy was changed from curative to palliative, 6 whose therapy was changed from palliative to curative, and 14 whose treatment modality was changed but not the treatment intent. For 39 patients (25%), a previously selected therapy was altered because of the PET findings. The Cox model indicated that the pre-PET stage was significantly associated with survival (P = 0.013) but that the post-PET stage provided much stronger prognostic stratification (P < 0.0001) and remained significant after adjustment for treatment delivered. CONCLUSION: Staging that incorporated PET provided a more accurate prognostic stratification than did staging based on conventional investigations. Further, the additional information provided by PET significantly and appropriately changed management in the majority of patients.

Phase I/II study of concurrent twice-weekly paclitaxel and weekly cisplatin with radiation therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

The optimal chemoradiation regimen for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been determined. In this phase I/II study, the use of twice-weekly paclitaxel concomitant with weekly cisplatin and thoracic radiotherapy (RT) was evaluated. Patients with stage III NSCLC (without pleural effusion or cervical lymphadenopathy) were treated with thoracic RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) with concurrent weekly cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) and escalating doses of twice-weekly paclitaxel (starting dose of paclitaxel of 20 mg/m(2) increased in increments of 5 mg/m(2)) in successive cohorts of three to six patients until two or more patients experienced dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) at a particular dose level. All patients were planned to be given a further two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 5 after completion of RT. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in this study from two institutions. At a dose of paclitaxel 35 mg/m(2), two of four treated patients had DLTs (1 grade 3 oesophagitis and pulmonary toxicity; 1 grade 3 oesophagitis and infection). The recommended dose was therefore determined to be 30 mg/m(2) and a total of 15 patients were enrolled in an expanded cohort at this level. The overall response rate for all patients was 64% (95% CI: 43-82%). The estimated median survival was 23.6 months with an estimated 1-year and 2-year survival of 72 and 49%, respectively. Paclitaxel can be safely given twice-weekly at a dose of 30 mg/m(2) in combination with weekly cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)) and thoracic RT (60 Gy), and this regimen has significant activity in stage III NSCLC.

Performance of sodium iodide based (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the characterization of indeterminate pulmonary nodules or masses.

The purpose of this study was to document the accuracy of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) with sodium iodide detectors in characterizing indeterminate lung nodules or masses and in identifying additional extra-lesional findings. 50 consecutive patients without a confident diagnosis of malignancy on CT underwent (18)FDG PET with and without attenuation correction. The diagnosis of malignancy was made using visual diagnostic criteria, and tumour-to-blood pool ratios were calculated. The final diagnosis was established by surgery, biopsy or long-term follow-up. Any additional findings made at PET were recorded and similarly verified. Using blinded visual diagnostic criteria for the differentiation of malignant from benign nodules, sodium iodide PET achieved a sensitivity of 91% (30 of 33 cases), a specificity of 88% (15 of 17 cases), a positive predictive value for malignancy of 94% (30 of 32 cases) and a negative predictive value of 83% (15 of 18 cases). False positives occurred with active tuberculosis and sarcoidosis. False negatives were a 3 cm bronchoalveolar carcinoma, a 1.3 cm sarcoma metastasis and a 1 cm carcinoma. Use of tumour-to-blood pool ratios did not improve performance. PET suggested the presence of nodal or distant metastases in 13 of 33 patients with a malignant pulmonary lesion. These PET findings were confirmed in 11 patients. These results indicate that sodium iodide PET is an accurate tool for the characterization of indeterminate pulmonary masses or nodules and simultaneously provides non-invasive staging information that can alter patient management in up to one-third of such patients. Performance of sodium iodide PET is comparable with reported results for PET scanners using other detector materials.

Spontaneous regression of metastatic renal cell carcinoma following palliative irradiation of the primary tumour.

A 58 years old man presented with a bulky renal primary tumour, paratracheal lymphadenopathy and multiple pulmonary metastases. Spontaneous regression of intrathoracic metastases occurred after low dose palliative irradiation of the primary tumour. Serum levels of Interleukin-2 receptor were elevated during the period of tumour regression but concentrations of other cytokines were normal. Progressive abdominal disease eventually caused death. Autopsy confirmed the presence of renal cell carcinoma with intrathoracic metastases.

Display of positron emission tomography with Cadplan.

Recent clinical experience at Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute (PMCI) with the use of unregistered Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images for radiotherapy target marking in the lung suggests that co-registered PET images would be invaluable. PMCI has three radiotherapy treatment planning systems but none of them currently is able to display or co-register PET images with Computed Tomography (CT) images. This paper details the approach taken to display co-registered PET images with the CADPLAN treatment planning system. CT Image files are normally transferred to Cadplan by DICOM transfer, but the Cadplan DICOM server will not receive (has no presentation context for) PET images. The fundamental design of the CADPLAN system envisages display of only a single image dataset, which must be a CT scan for planning reasons. The problem of data transfer is crudely solved by File Transfer Protocol (FTP) over the network. Fortunately the multislice format of the PET image files makes individual transfer manageable. A menu based C program running at the same time as Cadplan is invoked to sample the DICOM PET Image and create multiple Cadplan CART image format files that are co-registered with each existing transverse CT slice. With the Cadplan in contour mode, the program allows the co-registered PET images to be swapped in and out of the image section of the CART files promptly, while keeping the contour information. This allows radiotherapy target volumes to be marked using transverse PET emission images, and effectively circumvents the design constraints prohibiting the display of more than one image set. Contours can be over-laid for review on reconstructed sagittal or coronal views of CT or PET images constructed using the standard Cadplan tools. Co-registration is facilitated by identical positioning with the aid of lasers and FDG loaded fiducial markers on the PET scanner and CT couch. A polyurethane cast fixed with EFFILOCK is used to ensure identical patient orientation on the CT and PET couches. Since both imaging modalities are without significant geometric distortion the co-registration is then simply a translation. PET transmission images can be used for co-registration verification. The practical implementation of display of PET images with CADPLAN has enabled us to begin a trial of 10 patients, the results of which will be reported separately.

Accuracy of blood glucose concentrations determined by four visually read reagent strips.

Two new reagent strips have recently been introduced for blood glucose measurement by direct visual reading. Results obtained with these strips (Glucostix and Hypogard GA) were compared with those obtained using other commonly employed strips (BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44 and Visidex II) and a standard laboratory method. Blood glucose estimations were performed on samples of venous blood drawn from 125 patients attending the diabetic clinic using each of the four strips and the laboratory method. Results obtained with the strips correlated with the laboratory values as follows: BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44, r=0.93; Glucostix r=0.93; Hypogard GA r=0.87 and Visidex II r=0.92. The lower correlation with Hypogard GA reflected consistent underestimation of the laboratory value (slope of regression line = 0.63). Readings in error by 20% or more were: BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44, 14%; Glucostix, 15%; Hypogard GA, 31%, and Visidex II, 14%. With Hypogard GA strips, 57% of readings above 16 mmol/l were inaccurate. We conclude that Hypogard GA strips cannot be recommended for direct visual reading. Acceptable results may, however, be obtained using the other three strips.Reagent strips allow reasonably accurate determinations of blood glucose concentrations when used with a reflectance meter.(1, 2) Nevertheless many diabetic patients prefer to read the reagent strips visually. This method avoids the problems associated with meter calibration, is cheaper and also is more portable. Direct visual readings with BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44 (Boehringer Corporation) and Visidex II (Ames) have been shown to be acceptable in the hands of medical and technical personnel.(3, 4) Recently two new reagent strips have been marketed, Hypogard GA (Hypogard UK Ltd) and Glucostix (Ames), and it is claimed that they are also suitable for direct visual reading. To test the validity of these claims, we have compared results obtained using the newer strips with readings from BM-Test-Glycemie 1-44 and Visidex II and with a standard laboratory method.

Thromboembolism in lung cancer - an area of urgent unmet need.

INTRODUCTION: Thromboembolism is common in lung cancer. Current thromboprophylaxis guidelines lack specific recommendations for appropriate strategies in this high thrombotic risk patient cohort. We profiled lung cancer patients receiving anti-cancer therapy. Thromboembolism incidence and thromboembolism-related mortality rates are reported and we explored patient, disease, and treatment-related risk factors associated with higher thrombotic rates. METHODS: Retrospective review of lung cancer patients referred to a Comprehensive Cancer Centre between 01/07/2011 and 30/06/2012 for anti-cancer therapy. Data were collected from medical, pharmacy, pathology and diagnostic imaging electronic records. RESULTS: After a median follow up of 10 months (range: 0.03-32 months), 24/222 patients (10.8%) had developed radiologically confirmed thromboembolism; 131 events per 1000 person-years (95%CI 87-195). Thromboembolism occurred equally in patients with non-small cell and small cell lung cancer (10.8% and 10.5% respectively), and more frequently among patients with adenocarcinoma compared to squamous cell carcinoma (14.7% and 5.3% respectively). Chemotherapy-treated patients experienced thromboembolism more often than patients who did not receive chemotherapy (HR 5.7 95%CI 2.2-14.8). Radiotherapy was also associated with more frequent thromboembolism (HR 5.2 95%CI 2.0-13.2). New lung cancer diagnosis, presence of metastatic disease, second primary malignancy and Charlson Index ≥ 5 were also associated with higher rates of thromboembolism. Importantly, pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (P-TP) was not routinely or systematically prescribed for ambulant lung cancer patients during any treatment phase, at this institution. The majority (83%) of thromboembolic events occurred in the ambulatory care setting. CONCLUSION: Morbidity and mortality from thromboembolism occurs frequently in lung cancer. Thromboprophylaxis guidelines should be developed for the ambulatory care setting.