Delayed-onset hypoxic cortical blindness: coming back from the abyss.

PURPOSE: To report a case of typical delayed-onset hypoxic cortical blindness that occurred few days after resuscitation from drowning in a young male. METHODS: Neurological and ophthalmological examination were performed including optical coherence tomography (OCT), Goldmann perimetry, pattern electroretinogram (pERG), pattern and flash visual evoked potentials (pVEP and fVEP) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: At presentation, at day 12 post-hypoxic incident, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was reduced to hand motion OU with an abolished optokinetic nystagmus, a normal fundus and no relative afferent pupillary defect. Macular and peripapillary OCT were normal. Goldmann perimetry revealed bilateral centrocecal scotoma. pERG was normal while pVEPs were undetectable and fVEPs were abnormal with delayed, decreased and disorganized responses, without interhemispheric asymmetry. Brain MRI disclosed a bilateral cortical-subcortical occipital hypersignal with laminar necrosis and thus confirmed the diagnosis of delayed-onset hypoxic cortical blindness. Visual rehabilitation, including visual stimulation in the scotomatous areas, was associated with a dramatic and rapid visual improvement with a BCVA of 20/32 OU, an ability to read after 2 weeks (day 30 post-hypoxic incident), and a reduction in the size of the scotoma. CONCLUSION: Delayed-onset hypoxic cortical blindness is a rare presentation of cortical blindness that develops few days after a cerebral hypoxic stress. While initial presentation can be catastrophic, visual improvement may be spectacular and enhanced with visual rehabilitation.

EYERUBBICS: The Eye Rubbing Cycle Study.

Purpose: Describe the cognitive and behavioral symptomatology of patients with chronic ocular rubbing in keratoconus (KC) and Ocular Surface Disease (OSD) using a self-questionnaire. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in a tertiary ophthalmology center between May and July 2021. We consecutively included all patients presenting with one of the following conditions: KC and OSD. A questionnaire including the evaluation of Goodman and CAGE-modified criteria for eye rubbing was given to patients in consultation to evaluate their ocular symptoms and medical background. Results: We included 153 patients in the study. Of these, 125 (81.7%) patients reported eye rubbing. The average Goodman score was 5.8 ± 3.1 and was ≥ 5 in 63.2% of cases. The CAGE score was ≥ 2 in 74.4% of patients. Addiction (p = 0.045) and psychiatric family history (p = 0.03) were more frequent in patients with higher scores. Ocular symptoms and eye rubbing were significantly more frequent and intense in patients with higher scores; Conclusion: Eye rubbing presents addictive-like cognitive and behavioral characteristics in patients with KC or OSD. The eye rubbing cycle could play an essential role in the onset and progression of keratoconus and could be a factor in the maintenance of dry eye.

Safety and Efficacy of the Preserflo® Microshunt in Refractory Glaucoma: A One-Year Study.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Preserflo® microshunt implantation in eyes with refractory glaucoma. Methods: In this retrospective study, a cohort of patients who underwent Preserflo® microshunt implantation between April 2019 and August 2020 for refractory glaucoma were evaluated. At the time of surgery, all eyes had uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) despite maximally tolerated medical therapy and at least one previous failed glaucoma filtering surgery. The primary outcome was a complete success, defined as postoperative IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg with an IOP reduction ≥ 20% and no repeat filtering surgery. The secondary outcome was qualified success, defined as a complete success with the use of antiglaucoma medications. The rates of needling, bleb repair, and postoperative complications were also recorded. Results: Forty-seven eyes with a mean preoperative IOP of 30.1 ± 7.1 mm Hg and a mean of 3.4 ± 1 glaucoma medications were included. The mean number of previous surgeries prior to microshunt implantation was 2.3 ± 1.3. After 1 year, the mean IOP was significantly reduced to 18.8 ± 4.6 mm Hg, with the mean number of medications significantly reduced to 1.4 ± 1.2. Complete success was achieved in 35% of eyes, and a qualified success in 60% of eyes. A decrease in IOP of at least 30% was found in 55% of eyes. Needling or bleb repair was performed in 49% of eyes. Complications were minimal and transient, except for one eye which presented with tube extrusion, and another eye with a transected tube. A repeat glaucoma surgery had to be performed in 17% of eyes. Conclusions: The Preserflo® Microshunt provided moderate success but a significant reduction in IOP, with a good safety profile after one year of follow-up in eyes at high risk for failure of filtering surgery.