RESUMO
Healthcare systems continue to struggle with providing safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable and patient-centered (STEEEP) care. Upon audit by clinicians, treatment processes such as those completed following clinical pathways appear to manage care safely. However, when reviewing the treatment process through the patient and/or their family's lens, the experience is quite different. This article will use a vignette detailing care provided in a primary care physician's office along with the patient's outpatient testing experience to reveal opportunities for improvement, a glimpse into the patient's experience and share methods for achieving STEEEP healthcare.
Assuntos
Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Satisfação do Paciente , HumanosRESUMO
A palpable pulse on organizational culture is imperative for allowing senior leadership to understand the current state and use this as a starting point to measure the gap between the current state and where the organization should be to meet strategic goals related to quality and safety. Knowledge gleaned from causal analysis and coding of safety events provides the organization with that information. Our organization was unknowingly making decisions on a small quantity of coded and classified events, which led to mistakes on our journey to becoming a high-reliability organization. To remedy this, the Quality and Safety Team improved the user interface of the event reporting system and created standard work for all frontline staff, physicians, area managers and senior leaders. After several interventions, we reduced the time between reported events and documented resolution by 15.28% and increased the quantity of coded and classified safety events tenfold. These changes improved our organization's ability to make better informed decisions and plot a more precise course on the journey to becoming a high-reliability organization.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Cultura Organizacional , Tomada de Decisões , LiderançaRESUMO
Disparate clinical outcomes have been reported for patients with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) in the emergency department setting, including increased length of stay, diagnostic error rates, readmission rates, and dissatisfaction. Our emergency department had no standard processes for LEP patient identification or interpreter encounter documentation and a higher rate of 48-hour LEP return visits (RV) than English proficient patients. The aim was to eliminate gaps by increasing appropriate interpreter use and documentation (AIUD) for Spanish-speaking LEP (LEP-SS) patients from 35.7% baseline (10/17-05/18) to 100% by October 2020. METHODS: LEP-SS patient data were reviewed in the electronic medical record to determine the AIUD and RV rates. Using the Model for Improvement and multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, a multi-disciplinary team encouraged stakeholder engagement and identified improvement opportunities, implemented an electronic tracking board LEP icon (PDSA1), standardized documentation using an LEP Form linked to the icon (PDSA2), and included color changes to the icon for team situational awareness (PDSA3). RESULTS: The mean of LEP-SS patients with AIUD improved from 35.7% to 64.5% without significant changes in balancing measures. During the postintervention period (6/1/2018-10/31/2020), no special cause variation was noted from the baseline 48-hour emergency department RV rates for LEP patients (3.1%) or English proficient patients (2.6%). CONCLUSIONS: While the RV rate was not affected, this project is part of a multi-faceted approach aiming to positively impact this outcome measure. Significant improvements in AIUD were achieved without affecting balancing measures.
RESUMO
Improving the discharge process is an area of focus throughout healthcare organizations. Capacity constraints, efficiency improvement, patient safety, and quality care are driving forces for many discharge process workgroups. METHODS: Following the Pareto principle, we focused on improving the discharge process on the medical-surgical units that received the most patients admitted from the emergency department. Increased demand for medical-surgical beds, renovations, and diminished bed capacity made it imperative to improve efficiency using quality improvement techniques. A core team of frontline staff decreased the time between computer entry of discharge orders and patient's departure from the unit to less than 60 minutes, with 80% compliance. The team developed a daily dashboard that detailed the process and outcome measures to create situational awareness and daily visual management. Additional observations of staff workflow uncovered excessive walking for printer use. Printers were placed at the point of use to reduce transport times. Next, using survey results provided by patients on discharge quality, a Treasure Map that aided with teach-back and Team Discharge were implemented to level the staff's workload. Finally, physicians discharged patients earlier in the day. They standardized their discharge criteria to remove subjectivity from the discharge process and enable better team involvement. RESULTS: After implementing 4 interventions, the average time between computer entry of discharge orders and patient's departure from the unit decreased (94.26 versus 65.98 minutes; P < 0.001), simultaneously reducing our average length of stay from 5.62 to 4.81 days (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, hardwiring proven interventions and complementing them with daily visual management led to significant, sustained results.
RESUMO
Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is one of the most frequently used pharmaceuticals administered to patients in our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Initially, the total interdepartmental processing time (ordering, manufacturing, and delivery between NICU and Pharmacy) averaged 15.2 hours. Inefficiencies in this process only allowed TPN to infuse 8.8 hours on average before labs were collected the next morning. Given the short administration-to-laboratory collection time, we hypothesized that laboratory samples would not adequately reflect the effect of the current TPN infusion. Furthermore, clinicians would be making decisions based on suboptimal data and ultimately nourish this patient population inadequately. METHODS: The project team and the frontline staff created an efficient process for the manufacture and delivery of TPN. They removed waste in the process associated with manufacturing TPN and created capacity for change upstream (ordering process) and downstream (TPN infusion process) of the internal pharmacy process. The use of selection criteria and new standard operating procedures allowed for controlled PDSA testing of changes on a subset of patients. After we attained proven, sustainable results, we scaled the improvement efforts to the entire NICU patient population. RESULTS: After 4 cycles of change, patients now receive TPN on average 14.2 hours before new labs are collected. The interventions over the continuum of this project yielded statistically significant results, increased infusion times to our patients by 61.4% (P < 0.001), improved glucose homeostasis, and decreased average length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, creating process capacity from incremental changes and iterative PDSA cycles has yielded sustained results.
RESUMO
We sought to create a screening tool with improved predictive value for pediatric severe sepsis (SS) and septic shock that can be incorporated into the electronic medical record and actively screen all patients arriving at a pediatric emergency department (ED). "Gold standard" SS cases were identified using a combination of coded discharge diagnosis and physician chart review from 7,402 children who visited a pediatric ED over 2 months. The tool's identification of SS was initially based on International Consensus Conference on Pediatric Sepsis (ICCPS) parameters that were refined by an iterative, virtual process that allowed us to propose successive changes in sepsis detection parameters in order to optimize the tool's predictive value based on receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Age-specific normal and abnormal values for heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) were empirically derived from 143,603 children seen in a second pediatric ED over 3 years. Univariate analyses were performed for each measure in the tool to assess its association with SS and to characterize it as an "early" or "late" indicator of SS. A split-sample was used to validate the final, optimized tool. The final tool incorporated age-specific thresholds for abnormal HR and RR and employed a linear temperature correction for each category. The final tool's positive predictive value was 48.7%, a significant, nearly threefold improvement over the original ICCPS tool. False positive systemic inflammatory response syndrome identifications were nearly sixfold lower.