A randomised trial of secondary prophylaxis using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor ('SPROG' trial) for maintaining dose intensity of standard adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer by the Anglo-Celtic Cooperative Group and NCRN.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines on the use of haematopoietic colony-stimulating factors for patients having adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer are designed to minimise the risk of neutropaenic infection (Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH et al. Update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2006; 3: 187-205; Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA et al. Effect of primary prophylactic G-CSF use on systemic therapy administration for elderly breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 47: 8-32; Carlson RW, Allred DC, Anderson BO et al. Breast cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2009; 7: 122-192). Non-randomised data suggest that the achievement of planned dose intensity (DI) may have an important effect on survival. This trial compared the effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, GCSF, against standard management following a first neutropaenic event (NE) in achieving planned DI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were randomised following a first NE, defined as hospitalisation due to neutropaenic fever, an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤1.5 × 10(9)/l requiring treatment delay or dose reduction of 15% or more of planned dose. The study was initially planned to enrol 816 patients to detect a difference of 10%. This was difficult to achieve in the timeframe and the trial size was amended. Thus, 407 patients were randomly assigned to filgrastim for 7 days or pegfilgrastim versus standard care. The amended study was designed to have 80% power to detect an absolute difference of 14% of planned DI between the two groups. RESULTS: Most regimens were anthracycline-based many of which included a sequential taxane and/or were in clinical trials. Around 82.7% had an NE in the first three cycles. A total of 401 had calculable relative dose intensity (RDI) data. A target of 85% planned RDI was achieved in only 50% of patients in the control arm compared with 75% in the GCSF arm (P < 0.0001). A secondary end point revealed a reduction in post-randomisation NEs, 65.7% controls versus 18.2% with GCSF. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary intervention with GCSF showed a statistically significant improvement in the achievement of adequate RDI in non-intensive regimens. This may have important clinical implications for outcome.

An open-label study of lapatinib in women with HER-2-negative early breast cancer: the lapatinib pre-surgical study (LPS study).

BACKGROUND: This phase II, open-label, multicentre study aimed to evaluate changes in cell proliferation and biomarkers, as well as efficacy of lapatinib in treatment-naïve patients with HER-2-negative primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received 1500 mg lapatinib for 28-42 days before surgery with repeat biopsies and measurements. The primary end point was inhibition of cell proliferation measured by Ki67; the secondary end points included clinical response, adverse events and changes in FOXO3a, FOXM1, p-AKT and HER-3. RESULTS: Overall, there was no significant reduction in Ki67 with treatment (assessment carried out in 28 of 31 subjects enrolled). However, four patients (14%) showed a reduction in Ki67 ≥50%. Four of 25 patients (16%) had a partial response to treatment judged by sequential ultrasound measurements. Response, in terms of either Ki67 or ultrasound, did not relate to changes in any biomarker assessed at baseline, including the estrogen receptor (ER) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, all four clinical responders were HER-3 positive, as were three of four Ki67 responders. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a pre-surgical course of lapatinib monotherapy had little effect on this group of patients; however, in subsets of patients, especially those with HER-3-positive tumors, we observed either reduction in proliferation (Ki67) or tumor size; EGFR/ER status had no impact.

Adjuvant epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) vs CMF in early breast cancer: results with over 7 years median follow-up from the randomised phase III NEAT/BR9601 trials.

BACKGROUND: The National Epirubicin Adjuvant Trial (NEAT) and BR9601 trials tested the benefit of epirubicin when added to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (E-CMF) compared with standard CMF in adjuvant chemotherapy for women with early breast cancer. This report details longer follow-up with interesting additional time-dependent analyses. METHODS: National Epirubicin Adjuvant Trial used epirubicin (E) 3-weekly for four cycles followed by classical (c) CMF for four cycles (E-CMF) compared with cCMF for six cycles. BR9601 used E 3-weekly for four cycles followed by CMF 3-weekly for four cycles, compared with CMF 3-weekly for eight cycles. RESULTS: In all, 2391 eligible patients were randomised and with a median 7.4-year follow-up, E-CMF confirmed a significant benefit over CMF in both relapse-free survival (RFS) (78% vs 71% 5 years RFS, respectively, hazard ratio (HR)=0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.86), P<0.0001) and overall survival (OS) (84% vs 78% 5 years OS, respectively, HR=0.76 (95% CI: 0.65-0.89), P=0.0007). Interaction of treatment effect and prognostic factors was demonstrated for duplication of chromosome 17 centromeric enumeration (Ch17CEP) as previously reported. Poor prognostic factors at diagnosis (ER and PR negative and HER2 positive) showed time-dependent annual hazard rates for RFS and OS. In univariate analysis, these factors demonstrated more favourable HRs for RFS after 5 years. Treatment effects also suggested a differential benefit for E-CMF within the first 5 years for poor prognosis tumours. CONCLUSION: Longer follow-up has confirmed E-CMF as significantly superior to CMF for all patients. Ch17CEP duplication was the only biomarker that demonstrated significant treatment interaction. Standard poor prognostic factors at diagnosis were time-dependent, and after 5 years disease-free, poor prognosis patients demonstrated favourable HRs for survival.

Association of tumor angiogenesis with bone marrow micrometastases in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The microscopic detection of tumor cells (micrometastases) in bone marrow and the extent of blood vessel formation (angiogenesis) in primary tumor specimens are recognized as independent prognostic markers in patients with breast cancer. Since micrometastases occur as a consequence of interaction between the neoplastic cells and the tumor neovasculature, we have examined the relationship between these markers to determine whether the degree of angiogenesis is related to the presence of micrometastases. METHODS: Micrometastases were identified in bone marrow aspirates collected from multiple sites in 214 breast cancer patients prior to surgery (mastectomy or lumpectomy). Tumor cells were detected through an examination of epithelial membrane antigen expression and an analysis of cell morphology. Tumor vascularity was graded semiquantitatively or quantitatively (Chalkley point count) after immunohistochemical staining of the CD31 antigen expressed by the endothelial cells. The reproducibility and accuracy of the vascular grading were validated by use of kappa statistics. Associations between micrometastases and clinicopathologic characteristics, including angiogenesis, were examined using chi-squared and logistic regression techniques. All tests of statistical significance were two-sided. RESULTS: Of the 214 patients, 42 (20%) were positive for bone marrow micrometastases and 75 (35%) had tumors of high vascular grade. There was 86% agreement between vascular grades assessed twice for 35 tumors (kappa statistic = 0.66); for 22 evaluated tumors, there was absolute concordance between vascular grade and Chalkley point count. There were significant positive associations between tumor angiogenesis and micrometastasis (P = .01), tumor grade (P = .003), and estrogen receptor expression (P = .007); however, no significant associations were observed with tumor size (P = .9), lymph node status (P = .33), vascular invasion (peritumoral blood or lymph vessels) (P = .9), menopausal status (P = .17), or age (P = .12). Adjusting for confounding factors, multivariate analysis showed that only tumor angiogenesis (odds ratio = 2.7; P = .016) and vascular invasion (odds ratio = 2.7; P = .012) were significant determinants for the presence of micrometastases. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that an assessment of tumor angiogenesis and vascular invasion gives a reliable indication of the likelihood of the presence of bone marrow micrometastases in patients with breast cancer and that both processes contribute to metastases.

Detection of estrogen receptor in bone marrow from patients with metastatic breast cancer.

We devised a method of detecting estrogen receptors (ER) in bone marrow metastases from patients with breast cancer. The method involves a sequential double-staining immunocytochemical technique, with a monoclonal antibody to ER and a polyclonal antibody recognizing epithelial membrane antigen to confirm the epithelial nature of suspected tumor cells. Twenty-seven patients were assessed: ten were found to have ER-positive tumor cells in the bone marrow; ten had ER-negative cells; and the remaining seven patients had no tumor cells in the bone marrow smears. Of the ten patients with ER-positive cells, eight (80%) either had a response to endocrine therapy, implying that they possess ER-positive breast cancers, or had ER-positive primary tumors as determined by the dextran-coated charcoal biochemical assay (DCC). Of the ten patients with ER-negative cells in the bone marrow, eight failed to respond to endocrine therapy. This technique therefore provides a means of predicting which patients will respond to endocrine therapy, and is particularly important in those patients whose ER status is unknown.

Anthrapyrazole CI941: a highly active new agent in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Thirty-one patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with CI941, an anthrapyrazole structurally related to mitoxantrone. Patients had not previously been treated with anthracyclines or mitoxantrone, and 15 patients had not received any previous cytotoxic chemotherapy. CI941 was given at a dose of 50 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus injection every 21 days. Thirty patients were assessable for response, and all were assessable for toxicity. Two patients (7%) had complete responses (CRs), and 17 (56%) achieved partial responses (PRs; overall response rate, 63%; 95% confidence interval, 46% to 81%). The response rates in patients with and without prior chemotherapy were 63% and 64%, respectively. The median response duration was 37 weeks from start of treatment, with a maximum response duration of greater than 70 weeks. Median survival has not yet been reached. Leukopenia was the most frequently encountered toxicity, with a World Health Organization (WHO) grade greater than 3 occurring in 74% of courses. Thrombocytopenia and anemia were negligible. Only 10 patients (32%) had alopecia severe enough to wear a wig. There were no cardiac symptoms or events in any patient, but a slight median fall in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 6% (from +7 to -12) during stress and 6% (from +14 to -14) at rest occurred. Other toxicities were mild, and the drug was generally well tolerated. CI941 is a very active and well-tolerated new agent in the treatment of advanced breast cancer, with neutropenia being the main toxicity.

The fate of bone marrow micrometastases in patients with primary breast cancer.

Using an immunocytochemical technique, micrometastases have been found in the bone marrow of approximately 26% of patients with primary breast cancer at the time of initial surgery. To determine the fate of these cells, both in patients receiving and not receiving adjuvant therapy, multiple bone marrow aspirates were repeated in 82 patients at a median time of 18 months after surgery but prior to overt relapse. In both treated and untreated patients micrometastases were only found in one of 45 (2%) and one of 37 (3%) patients, respectively. However, when multiple marrow aspirates were taken from patients with local recurrence the incidence of micrometastases was 19% (three of 16), and this increased to 30% (three of ten) in patients with disease at distant sites other than bone, and 100% (ten of ten) in patients with radiologically proven bony disease. Three of 11 (27%) patients in whom the primary tumor remained in situ while receiving adjuvant therapy before definitive surgery had micrometastases at the time of diagnosis and at follow-up 3 months later. These results suggest that many of the micrometastases from breast cancer patients are the result of "shedding" of cells from the primary carcinoma and that a proportion are not viable. The technique is currently insufficiently sensitive to accurately monitor adjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients.

Duration of chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized trial of three versus six courses of mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin.

PURPOSE: So far there are no published data on optimal duration of chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); six or more courses are usually recommended. We have carried out a multicenter randomized trial comparing three versus six courses of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIb or IV NSCLC were randomized at start of treatment to receive either three or six courses of mitomycin 8 mg/m(2) (courses 1, 2, 4, and 6), vinblastine 6 mg/m(2), and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (MVP) every 21 days. Treatment was stopped early in both arms for progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Key end points were overall survival, duration of symptom relief, and quality-of-life assessment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire QLQ-C30 with lung cancer-specific module QLQ-LC13. RESULTS: Three hundred eight patients were randomized. Seventy-two percent of the 155 patients randomized to three courses completed treatment. In the 153 patients randomized to six courses, 73% completed three courses and 31% six courses. Median survival was 6 versus 7 months, respectively, and 1-year survival 22% versus 25% (P =.2). Median duration of symptom relief was 4.5 months (both arms), and 8% versus 18% had continuing symptom relief (P =.4). Quality-of-life parameters were the same or improved for patients randomized to only three courses, including significantly decreased fatigue (P =.03) and a trend toward decreased nausea and vomiting (P =.06). CONCLUSION: Our findings show no evidence for additional clinical benefit by continuing MVP chemotherapy beyond three courses. This challenges current orthodoxy of six courses or more. Further trials addressing duration of chemotherapy are now warranted, particularly with newer chemotherapy schedules.

Bile duct stents: is there an increased rate of complications in patients receiving chemotherapy?

The aim of this study was to determine whether palliative chemotherapy accelerates the rate of biliary stent occlusion, in patients with a malignant biliary obstruction. Such treatment can induce neutropenia and increase the risk of bacterial sepsis. Overgrowth of bacteria within the bile of patients receiving chemotherapy could accelerate the rate of stent occlusion. Retrospective analysis of treatment records for 80 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma arising from the pancreas, bile ducts or gall bladder was conducted. Two groups were identified, those with a biliary stent in situ (primary stent group: 47/80; 59%) at the time of referral and those without (no stent group: 33/80; 41%). The majority of patients went on to receive chemotherapy, 64% and 70% in the primary stent group and no stent group, respectively. The rate of febrile neutropenia was similar in the two groups (5% versus 7% of all chemotherapy cycles in the primary stent group and no stent group, respectively). The rate of stent occlusion was not significantly different between those exposed to chemotherapy (37%; 95% CI 20-54%) and those unexposed (39%; 95% CI 19-59%). Similarly, the mean duration of patency was not shortened by chemotherapy (105 days in the chemotherapy group versus 119 days in the non-chemotherapy group; P = 0.97, Mann-Whitney U-test). We conclude that there is no evidence of increased rate of bile duct-related complications in patients receiving chemotherapy. In particular, we find no indication for the use of prophylactic antibiotics.

A randomised study to determine whether routine intravenous magnesium supplements are necessary in patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil.

Cisplatin is an effective antineoplastic agent, but can cause renal tubular damage leading to urinary magnesium wasting and hypomagnesaemia. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, when used in combination, have synergistic antitumour activity in upper gastrointestinal malignancies, but it is unclear whether they have additive effects on renal magnesium loss. To determine the optimal regimen for magnesium supplementation in these patients, we have conducted a randomised trial of routine intravenous magnesium supplements compared with magnesium given on an 'as required' basis. 32 patients were randomised to receive magnesium intravenously in prehydration and posthydration fluids with cisplatin chemotherapy, or to receive magnesium only when the serum level was low. 5-fluorouracil was given as a continuous infusion. Serum magnesium was measured on admission for each cycle of chemotherapy and an interim measurement performed between each cycle. 28 patients were evaluable. All patients randomised to receive magnesium on an 'as required' basis had at least one episode of hypomagnesaemia. On subsequent admissions for chemotherapy (cycles 2 and 3), the mean serum magnesium level was significantly lower in these patients compared with patients who received magnesium routinely (P < 0.05). After omission of magnesium from the first cycle of cisplatin, magnesium supplements were necessary in 50% of subsequent cycles, usually by the second or third cycle. Moreover, there were several instances of symptomatic hypomagnesaemia requiring further intravenous supplements in mid-cycle. Patients treated with a combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil should be given intravenous magnesium supplements with each cycle of cisplatin chemotherapy. Nevertheless, episodes of hypomagnesaemia still occur, and additional intravenous supplements may be required, highlighting the importance of measuring this electrolyte.

Bone marrow micrometastases in primary breast cancer: prognostic significance after 6 years' follow-up.

Using an antiserum to epithelial membrane antigen we have screened multiple bone marrow aspirates from 350 patients with primary breast cancer taken at the time of initial surgery. 89 (25%) patients were found to have micrometastases and their presence was related to pathological size (P less than 0.01), the presence of peritumoral vascular invasion (P less than 0.001), and positive lymph nodes (P less than 0.005) but not menopausal status. At a median follow-up of 76 months (range 34-108) 107 patients had relapsed with distant metastases. 48% (43 of 89) of these patients had micrometastases initially compared with 25% (64 of 261) who did not (P less than 0.005). The test predicts for relapse in bone (P less than 0.01) and other distant sites excluding bone (P less than 0.001) and is associated with a shorter overall survival (P less than 0.005). We conclude that the detection of micrometastases signals a high likelihood of early relapse and decreased survival in breast cancer.

Automated screening for micrometastases in bone marrow smears.

It is possible to detect micrometastases in primary breast cancer using immunocytochemical staining of bone marrow smears. However, using the light microscope the procedure is time-consuming and laborious because such cells occur rarely (less than 1 in 10,000). Using an image analysis system, the Leytas machine, and a specially prepared reproducible slide it has been possible to automate the technique. A 100% concordance was found between the machine and the light microscope in the identification of slides containing moderate to high numbers of tumour cells in bone marrow, and in those containing no tumour cells. However, in those slides containing low numbers of tumour cells (1-10 tumour cells/10(6) normal bone marrow cells) the sensitivity was decreased to 91%. In the presence of non-specific staining the false positive rate was increased from 0% to 22%. This method represents a potential improvement in the assessment of an important clinical staging procedure.

The relationship between micrometastases in the bone marrow, histopathologic features of the primary tumor in breast cancer and prognosis.

The pathologic features of the primary tumors in 285 patients with breast cancer at the time of initial presentation, and with no clinical evidence of distant metastases, have been analyzed. The results have been compared with the detection of tumor cells in the bone marrow by use of an immunocytochemical method using antisera raised against the epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). The authors found EMA-positive cells (i.e., tumor cells) in the bone marrow of 77 (27%) patients and a significant association between the presence of such EMA-positive cells in the bone marrow and tumor size (P = 0.006) and peritumoral vascular invasion (P = less than 0.001). A possible relationship with estrogen receptor negativity (P = 0.06) also was noted.

Ifosfamide with and without adriamycin in advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Uterine leiomyosarcomas are rare tumours and the results of treatment of advanced disease are poor. Ifosfamide and Adriamycin are both known to be active drugs in soft-tissue sarcomas. We present our experience using ifosfamide alone and in combination with Adriamycin in advanced or recurrent uterine leiomyosarcomas. Ifosfamide alone was given as a 24-h infusion at doses ranging from 5 to 7.5 g/m2, with mesna rescue. In the combination regimen, ifosfamide was given at a dose of 5 g/m2 and Adriamycin, at a dose of 40 or 60 mg/m2. Ten patients were treated with ifosfamide alone, with only one partial response lasting 6 months. In all, 11 patients were treated with ifosfamide and Adriamycin, which resulted in 1 complete response that lasted 11 months. Although many of the patients had extensive disease and some had undergone prior treatment with other chemotherapy, ifosfamide would appear to have only modest activity at the dose and schedule used.

The role of bisphosphonates in breast cancer management: review article.

Bone metastases are a common problem in the management of breast cancer and are associated with considerable morbidity. Bone pain, hypercalcaemia, fractures and cord compression all occur requiring interventions such as analgesia, radiotherapy and surgery. Bisphosphonates are drugs that are active in the bone microenvironment. Their effects on osteoclasts are well described: they potently inhibit osteoclast mediated bone resorption by delaying the maturation of immature osteoclasts and by directly inducing osteoclast apoptosis. It has been known for some time that bisphosphonates, in combination with intravenous rehydration, effectively treat hypercalcaemia associated with solid malignancies. It has now been demonstrated In clinical trials in breast cancer patients that regular bisphosphonate administration reduces the morbidity associated with osteolytic skeletal metastases. There is an emerging suggestion from clinical trial work that bisphosphonates may be able to reduce or delay the development of skeletal metastases although this remains controversial as the three published trials present conflicting results. The more potent third-generation bisphosphonates, such as zoledronate, are now being tested for each of these indications with promising results and may replace other bisphosphonates in the future. Laboratory studies have recently demonstrated that bisphosphonates have direct cytotoxic effects against breast cancer cells in vitro, inducing apoptosis and preventing adhesion to bone. This adds support to the hypothesis that bisphosphonates may have a genuine beneficial effect in the adjuvant setting.

Oesophageal varices: a potentially fatal complication of liver metastases.

Haemorrhage from oesophageal varices is a common and potentially life-threatening complication of portal hypertension, which is usually due to cirrhosis of the liver. Although liver metastases and hepatic dysfunction frequently occur in malignant disease, reports of oesophageal varices arising as a consequence of metastatic liver disease are sporadic, suggesting that this complication is unusual. Indeed, one review of the literature identified only 23 cases, although a few others have subsequently been reported. The management of such patients bleeding from oesophageal varices is clearly very different from bleeding due to other causes such as peptic ulceration. We report three cases and review the literature. All of our cases presented to us within a period of one year, suggesting that this complication of metastatic liver disease is more common than originally considered to be the case.

Response of metastatic anal carcinoma to single agent carboplatin.

The management of locoregional squamous cell carcinoma of the anus with a combined modality approach comprising chemotherapy and radiotherapy is well established. However, the optimum regimen for the management of metastatic disease has yet to be determined. Cisplatin has been shown to have some efficacy in this disease. We report a case of partial response of metastatic disease to single agent carboplatin, and discuss its role in this situation.

Primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the thyroid with bone marrow infiltration at presentation.

Primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the thyroid is predominantly a disorder of elderly females. Most patients present with limited disease and receive local irradiation. Presentation with advanced disease is uncommon and, consequently, bone marrow examination is not always done. We report a patient with primary thyroid lymphoma who had bone marrow infiltration at presentation and discuss the importance of this investigation in management.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in the Western world, and yet the survival after potentially curative excisional surgery has improved little over the last half century. Newer tumour prognostic markers are not superior to conventional Dukes' staging and there are currently no markers which predict response to chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy has had a chequered past, but recently a number of important prospective studies have demonstrated its proven benefit in patients with Dukes' stage C colorectal cancer. However, several issues still require clarification. (1) Do immunomodulators such as levamisole have a significant role in adjuvant chemotherapy? (2) Which patients derive most benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy? (3) Do prognostic markers have a role in predicting these patients? Approximately 30% of patients with Dukes' stage B cancers die of metastatic disease and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with these tumours seems worth exploring. Only a large randomised trial can give answers to these important questions. Such a trial would also encourage the widespread introduction of standard methods of surgical and pathological assessment.